tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post2111059055552397433..comments2024-03-28T16:22:14.888-07:00Comments on Steve Sailer: iSteve: Israel's covert commentersUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger49125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-54708167715418645812013-08-20T19:18:38.407-07:002013-08-20T19:18:38.407-07:00"Jews acting clandestinely to further their o..."Jews acting clandestinely to further their own interests"<br /><br />How clandestine is it, if it is even on this website?<br /><br />Since it is Israeli, not US Jewish, then you can really expect a spirited defense of (a) border fences, (b) desert concentration camps for the indefinite detainment of "refugees" (infiltrators), and c) paying desert banditos to intercept "refugees" before they even get into one's country.<br /><br />So all good.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-66196675298693348962013-08-19T03:06:55.910-07:002013-08-19T03:06:55.910-07:00Norman Podhoretz did not spend 27 years of his lif...<i> Norman Podhoretz did not spend 27 years of his life and Irving Kristol did not spend 36 years of his life critiquing liberal social policy because they were Jedi mind tricked by Richard Nixon and Daniel Patrick Moynihan (who got off the bus in 1981, btw).</i><br /><br />They did it because they and their friends were getting mugged in NYC-and sometimes DC.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-5451762002335136672013-08-18T16:30:44.950-07:002013-08-18T16:30:44.950-07:00Rarely do you fail to live up to the reverse-Wiese...Rarely do you fail to live up to the reverse-Wiesenthal self-parody you perfected during the Iraq war, when you'd explain at length why the great majority of anti-Bush anti-war American Jews were actually colluding with Cheney, that notorious Hebrew. How many articles have been published in the past 3 years, in international-affairs weeklies as well as Conde Nast clifestyle mags, about the Water Army and the 50c Party? I'm gonna guess in the low hundreds; journalists love taking on any cultural phenomenon that seems to undercut their own bloviation franchise, however slightly. And yet when an Israeli biz reports on local interest in the same strategy previously mined by Media Matters and Justin Bieber fans, the guy can't contain his own fevered reflex response and rushes to breathlessly detail the scheming race's latest "innovation" and its various defects that his steel-trap Congressman-debating cranium has immediately discerned. You're the last great goy hope--how would we know about the nefarious plots that they publish in English at their online ad-supported newspaper sites? The deliberations of the monolithic Zionist C2 are just so arcane, like an SAT-squashing bank/college/music/alcoholic beverage-dominating version of Raymond Shaw but with millions of 'em. No one else notices these things, they're just not said! I'm out of order? The whole freaking system is out of order!Sailer's curious curiositiesnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-24739249001521899212013-08-18T09:24:29.746-07:002013-08-18T09:24:29.746-07:00http://blogs.the-american-interest.com/wrm/2013/08...http://blogs.the-american-interest.com/wrm/2013/08/18/scientists-unlock-self-fertilizing-crops/Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-19813903862379343322013-08-17T12:47:05.241-07:002013-08-17T12:47:05.241-07:00No, did not I break this assumption.
Many people d...<i>No, did not I break this assumption.<br />Many people define themselves as belonging to superior races, ethnic groups, nations or peoples, but they do so based on the logic of facts.</i><br /><br />Yes, you can distinguish and rank different groups according to different facts such as intelligence, aesthetics, physical strength, etc. <br /><br />But that's not what morality is about. As Hume pointed out a long time ago. <br /><br />Morality is fundamentally about the "pragmatic rationalization" of group behavior, modulating intra-group relations, defining and exalting the in-group vs out-groups, etc. This is what evolutionary psychology tells us. Read Jonathan Haidt's "The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion" and Robert Kurzban's "Why Everyone (Else) Is a Hypocrite: Evolution and the Modular Mind."Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-23339180179808232762013-08-17T07:04:00.125-07:002013-08-17T07:04:00.125-07:00Anon@'' Of course this itself is a common ...Anon@'' Of course this itself is a common example of the "pragmatic rationalization" endemic to moral reasoning in which one defines one's in-group the "true humans", "the elect", "chosen", etc..<br />There's no escape because it's fundamental to moral behavior. In fact, claims to not engage in "pragmatic rationalization" should be huge warning signs to others que one is engaging in self-interested hypocrisy and deception.''<br /><br />No, did not I break this assumption.<br />Many people define themselves as belonging to superior races, ethnic groups, nations or peoples, but they do so based on the logic of facts.<br />I myself am latina-amurrican, in other words, despite being full of European blood and I'm mixed race, but I have no problem admitting the superiority of Europeans as a group (not as individuals, or as I made it clear I think I made it clear).<br />Individually speaking, there are also special people as an important part of european people in other continents. The only real difference between Europeans and non-Europeans is that this group is more concentrated in the first.<br />I keep wondering why we teach Asians who kill dogs and cats to eat is inhumane, unethical and anti aesthetic. I think they should already have in mind from birth what is beautiful and pleasant to be maintained and not eaten.<br />This is the pragmatic rationalization I speak.<br />Just as the excess of high-mindedness of Europeans is leading to extinction. Multiculturalism is too beautiful (for many) in the abstract-aesthetic concept to be destroyed.<br />The Europeans have a sense of aesthetics higher than in any other group and this can be proved eg by selection of hair and eyes.<br />A sense of aesthetics is more upright and have a creative capacity with higher quality.Gottliebnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-72109974706677943202013-08-17T05:58:14.894-07:002013-08-17T05:58:14.894-07:00""That sounds like some kind of ugly con...<i>""That sounds like some kind of ugly conspiracy theory."<br /><br />Noxious, too. Never forget noxious."<br /><br />Dreamed up by vicious anti-semites.<br /><br />How could you all forget canard? AFAICT "canard" is Abraham Foxman's favorite word.</i><br /><br />"Bizarre rant" is another popular phrase. Anyone saying something they don't like is engaging in a "bizarre rant".<br /><br /> Another stock word for them is "vile". Funny thing is that "vile" has also been used to death in France, as <i>"immonde"</i>. Here's Marine Le Pen laughing at the worn-out phrase, "le retour de la bête immonde": "the return of the vile beast" [of Nazism, Vichy etc]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UGi8o5k8ADkAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04017589590769465615noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-62619388577050849972013-08-17T00:12:17.621-07:002013-08-17T00:12:17.621-07:00I think all of your ugly conspiracy theories are n...I think all of your ugly conspiracy theories are noxious, odious AND ... reprehensible.<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-949402619891703362013-08-16T23:34:43.260-07:002013-08-16T23:34:43.260-07:00"An opponent who knows his facts and can expl..."An opponent who knows his facts and can explain his views without personal invective -- boy does that flummox hasbarist(?) Jews (and, to a lesser extent, their goyisch toadies)."<br /><br />It flummoxes them, but in all honesty I would have to rate them as having held up pretty well in debates I've witnessed at places like Foreign Policy. Of course, when I say "held up well" I'm not referring to the debate regarding facts, in which they're regularly clobbered. I'm referring to having created and maintained the impression that their opponents are morally suspect - not necessarily that they're "antisemites," but that they're edging perilously close, which is all the social warning necessary.Silvernoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-92191870003070405282013-08-16T23:27:56.659-07:002013-08-16T23:27:56.659-07:00"How could you all forget canard? AFAICT &quo..."How could you all forget canard? AFAICT "canard" is Abraham Foxman's favorite word."<br /><br />Definitely. Foxman can't resist the "canard" canard.Silvernoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-43061934040310862182013-08-16T20:57:14.539-07:002013-08-16T20:57:14.539-07:00Still, I suspect that tossing out accusations of a...<i>Still, I suspect that tossing out accusations of anti-Semitism is an effective method with Americans of implanting the idea: Better not go there.</i><br /><br />Certainly it works with a lot of people. I've pushed back often. I have found that when I have written lucid, fact-citing, non-vulgar, not personally insulting refutations of name-calling hasbara, my (usually self-ID'd Jewish) interlocutors either give up and ignore me, shriek some more names and run away, or get me banned from that blog (e.g., I got booted from Jeffrey Goldberg's old blog at the Atlantic after I was flagged as "offensive", and Walter Russell Mead blocked most of the Israel-related comments that I submitted on his neocon blog).<br /><br />Zionists/neocons (overlapping but not identical), Jewish and goyisch, use accusations of anti-Semitism like a magic incantation, or like kryptonite against Superman or garlic against a vampire. They are so accustomed to this tactic succeeding that they don't know how to respond to someone who fights back, but -- this is key -- who fights back intelligently. <br /><br />Jewish hasbara debaters much prefer some dumb skinhead stereotype who just cusses and tosses out ethnic slurs, someone who can be easily dismissed and held up for mockery to the crowd. An opponent who knows his facts and can explain his views without personal invective -- boy does that flummox hasbarist(?) Jews (and, to a lesser extent, their goyisch toadies).Noah172noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-16807718964779487652013-08-16T20:37:21.721-07:002013-08-16T20:37:21.721-07:00""That sounds like some kind of ugly con...<i>""That sounds like some kind of ugly conspiracy theory."<br /><br />Noxious, too. Never forget noxious."<br /><br />Dreamed up by vicious anti-semites.</i><br /><br />How could you all forget <b>canard</b>? AFAICT "canard" is Abraham Foxman's favorite word.Noah172noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-63796077424998739442013-08-16T17:31:31.600-07:002013-08-16T17:31:31.600-07:00You do have to admire them for their perspicacity ...<i>You do have to admire them for their perspicacity and diligence in getting the Jewish message out.</i><br /><br />There's really no way to (1) be honest, (2) pay attention to Jewry, and (3) admire them, without being (4) a racist.Svigornoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-64130925960848791212013-08-16T17:23:29.529-07:002013-08-16T17:23:29.529-07:00"You are not buying the best writers, you are..."You are not buying the best writers, you are buying those which can be bought."<br /><br />From Netanyahu's point of view, is that a bug or a feature?<br /><br />Seriously, a domestic goal would be to train people who like to write to stay on task, to repeat the approved talking points, and to expect to be rewarded for this. <br /><br />Sure, it's terrible for the quality of intellectual discourse, but it's just the formalization of various trends in the contemporary world.Steve Sailerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11920109042402850214noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-34933334232826352442013-08-16T16:54:51.637-07:002013-08-16T16:54:51.637-07:00What really kills me is the overkill part of this....<i>What really kills me is the overkill part of this. I mean Jews and Zionists pretty much control all of US media and government. That isn't enough? Israel has to hire young people to spread Zionist stuff on twitter? </i><br /><br />The US in general is pro-Israel, and key points of power and influence in the US and in Europe to some extent are pro-Israel, but Europe and most of the world is not that pro-Israel.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-79627222745067373322013-08-16T15:36:28.514-07:002013-08-16T15:36:28.514-07:00Steve makes a good point about writers being a che...Steve makes a good point about writers being a cheap asset to purchase, being a low-pay/high-status job. Likely they are only going to get cheaper in the future, as the supply of semi-competent writers vastly outgrows the demand. The "bad old days" where debate was conducted by mean old sexist, racist, transophobes will be viewed as a pinnacle of intellectual honesty. The future belongs to helot scribblers rented by governments and corporations. The hasbara century begins!Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09492878487564373318noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-33851552866239923242013-08-16T14:33:19.835-07:002013-08-16T14:33:19.835-07:00This explains Whiskey's source of livelihood.This explains Whiskey's source of livelihood. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-81373297025132088652013-08-16T14:25:34.213-07:002013-08-16T14:25:34.213-07:00Does anyone on our side offer back pay??Does anyone on our side offer back pay??Davidhttp://david-passingparade2.blogspot.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-14993099451277790142013-08-16T14:16:04.492-07:002013-08-16T14:16:04.492-07:00Pee Wee Bush?<a href="https://www.google.com/search?safe=off&q=elian%20gonzalez&psj=1&bav=on.2,or.r_cp.r_qf.&biw=1024&bih=610&bvm=pv.xjs.s.en_US.77Xy4hViwko.O&um=1&ie=UTF-8&hl=en&tbm=isch&source=og&sa=N&tab=wi&ei=iY4OUr_2O_TC2gXH54GIDQ" rel="nofollow"> Pee Wee Bush?</a>Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-78033995923354910552013-08-16T13:44:42.876-07:002013-08-16T13:44:42.876-07:00White Europeans and especially northern Europeans ...<i>White Europeans and especially northern Europeans overcame their condition as rational animals (hybrid between the pragmatic rationalization ((aka, archaic)) and high-mindedness) and are the true humans.</i><br /><br />Of course this itself is a common example of the "pragmatic rationalization" endemic to moral reasoning in which one defines one's in-group as "true humans", "the elect", "chosen", etc. <br /><br />There's no escape because it's fundamental to moral behavior. In fact, claims to not engage in "pragmatic rationalization" should be huge warning signs to others that one is engaging in self-interested hypocrisy and deception.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-37437031250306181692013-08-16T13:11:09.414-07:002013-08-16T13:11:09.414-07:00""That sounds like some kind of ugly con...""That sounds like some kind of ugly conspiracy theory."<br /><br />"Noxious, too. Never forget noxious."<br /><br />And 'odious'. How about make it simple and call it odoxious or nodious? Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-76888685605331662422013-08-16T13:08:33.074-07:002013-08-16T13:08:33.074-07:00These sorts of shills are commonly referred to as ...These sorts of shills are commonly referred to as JIDF (Jewish Internet Defense Force) on some of the seedier parts of the internet.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-53276207588113096082013-08-16T12:50:06.676-07:002013-08-16T12:50:06.676-07:00What really kills me is the overkill part of this....What really kills me is the overkill part of this. I mean Jews and Zionists pretty much control all of US media and government. That isn't enough? Israel has to hire young people to spread Zionist stuff on twitter? bloggerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06607033974434672862noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-25256584982238515912013-08-16T12:37:00.183-07:002013-08-16T12:37:00.183-07:00"But we can spread the word nonetheless: Bord..."But we can spread the word nonetheless: Border enforcement works. Fences work. Follow the Jewish example. "Illegal infiltrators" can be stopped!"<br /><br />Quite.<br /><br />.<br /><br />"how does Wikipedia get all those nerds to work for free"<br /><br />nerds are inherently good peoplesedjukated by wikinoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-74754119771990275242013-08-16T12:34:45.940-07:002013-08-16T12:34:45.940-07:00Your wretched excess of self-confidence makes you ...Your wretched excess of self-confidence makes you say stupid things. Norman Podhoretz did not spend 27 years of his life and Irving Kristol did not spend 36 years of his life critiquing liberal social policy because they were Jedi mind tricked by Richard Nixon and Daniel Patrick Moynihan (who got off the bus in 1981, btw). Neither did Seymour Martin Lipset, a far more consequential figure in social research than Moynihan. James Q. Wilson, Nathan Glazer, Hilton Kramer, Joseph Epstein, Edward Shils, Ronald Radosh.<br /><br />Which of these characters was ever subsidized by the MacArthur Foundation or received (as did Irving Howe and as did Michael Walzer) a regular academic appointment? Do you really think that's worth less to people than some s*** as slot on an advisory committee that meets three times a year?<br /><br />Art Decohttp://wwrtc.blogspot.comnoreply@blogger.com