tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post2530774589358039481..comments2024-03-19T02:31:02.140-07:00Comments on Steve Sailer: iSteve: The Game take on what the GOP is doing wrongUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger80125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-30508168498522428582012-11-15T20:35:20.721-08:002012-11-15T20:35:20.721-08:00If you guys spent half as much time productively c...If you guys spent half as much time productively combating liberals as you spend kicking around poor Whiskey, you could have the economy back in shape, the borders closed, illegals deported, and the national debt cut in half in 3 weeks.Alicia T.noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-41426993195939017372012-11-15T19:55:03.612-08:002012-11-15T19:55:03.612-08:00The difference between GOP strategists Democratic ...The difference between GOP strategists Democratic strategists? Science versus alchemy. The Dems are using science to win elections and to shift the long-term demographics of the country in their favor.<br /><br />The GOP, instead, has these alchemists who are just certain they alone are clever enough to turn lead into gold.<br /><br />They can't, they won't, and they never will.Matthewnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-26724898094433867872012-11-15T15:32:15.268-08:002012-11-15T15:32:15.268-08:00"If you made, magically, most White guys say,..."If you made, magically, most White guys say, 20% more powerful, richer, higher status, looked up to, and dominant than their female peers? "<br /><br />end feminism you mean?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-45043860564826606242012-11-15T14:51:50.272-08:002012-11-15T14:51:50.272-08:00Whiskey:
If you want things to change, you have t...Whiskey:<br /><br /><i>If you want things to change, you have to push technology to the point where power and dominance flow to average White guys, who are the natural users and creators of it.</i><br /><br />Do you mean the Singularity?<br /><br /><i>And you have to make technology so HARD and complex, not easy and stripped down, that ONLY they can use it.</i><br /><br />Making technology harder will only make it more accessible to geeky Asians, Jews, and Whites. It will leave most normal whites in the same place as blacks. Look at the state of personal computers in the 1970s. Do you want to return to that? Will it be the answer you were hoping for?Shurdlunoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-40935321852907059032012-11-15T14:37:06.122-08:002012-11-15T14:37:06.122-08:00Whiskey:
"If you made, magically, most White ...Whiskey:<br />"If you made, magically, most White guys say, 20% more powerful, richer, higher status, looked up to, and dominant than their female peers? Romney would be President with 80% of the White Vote."<br /><br />Eventually a societal collapse will create evolutionary conditions favouring White Guys again, as it did after the fall of the Western Empire. The question is whether there will be any White Guys left - possibly not, in the pure-descent sense, but there will be people with more White Guy ancestry than others, who will be selected for. Until they re-estabish civilisation and then screw it up again... Simon in Londonnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-40834827287826747472012-11-15T14:24:06.437-08:002012-11-15T14:24:06.437-08:00I think the Left are brilliant at 'framing the...I think the Left are brilliant at 'framing the debate' - http://www.amazon.com/Dont-Think-Elephant-Debate-Progressives/dp/1931498717 - creating a frame that makes their enemies look bad. Neocons do it too, but lack the same mastery of the technique.<br /><br />IME Right-Liberals are particularly vulnerable to this tactic, because they persist in believing that the other side are operating in good faith and that politics is about good-faith debate and the search for objective truth. So they accept their enemies' frame, and get massacred.Simon in Londonnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-73496869256335941562012-11-15T14:11:31.063-08:002012-11-15T14:11:31.063-08:00"Thus a conservative approach must bring the ..."Thus a conservative approach must bring the future (and destroy its enemies power to kill the future) as quickly as possible."<br /><br />The Taliban's paradigm for maintaining the viability of conservatism seems more practical and realistic.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-27800887802541473152012-11-15T13:40:14.052-08:002012-11-15T13:40:14.052-08:00California is far from the richest state. Average ...California is far from the richest state. Average income is barely 60,000 and many places even including the city of La its 46,000 you dems need to study average income on the us census. GNp is a bad way of determining a state's wealth since overpopulated States like California and Texas are going to have high GNP.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-62708446506354950472012-11-15T11:37:42.591-08:002012-11-15T11:37:42.591-08:00James Burke in his "Connections" series ...James Burke in his "Connections" series makes the point that the humans are "caught" in the technology trap. There is no possibility -- though women, gays, non-Whites in particular want this desperately, see NBC's Revolution and the Hunger Games -- that we will abandon technology.<br /><br />Staten Island, the Far Rockaways, Long Island, show what no technology means to the West: horror.<br /><br />The solution is to press even HARDER with technology that flips the balance towards White guys, who do nerdy balanced with independence and aggression better than anyone else (culturally Asians tend to need a Big Emperor or something to corral them, likely a function of selection in high-density populations over the past 3,000 years or so whereas Europeans were mostly low-density and thus selected for independent thought/action.)<br /><br />This means pressing ever greater technology that REQUIRES intelligence and adaptation by the user, a "smart user" and the complete opposite of the Apple approach.<br /><br />Apple (and Jobs) was famous for the tagline "Easy is hard." And the idea that huge amounts of effort needed to be done to simplify and strip down the device and interface so even ... well Blacks in the Ghetto can use an Iphone to Twitter their meet-up for a flash-mob looting party. Or your average teen girl can post endless attention whoring photos of herself to feed her ego.<br /><br />Thus a conservative approach must bring the future (and destroy its enemies power to kill the future) as quickly as possible. <br /><br />A hypothetical -- think of a smart-phone, that can do things like predict the future in some ways (not just weather but traffic patterns, stock market moves, and other pseudo random events). But one that requires large (but not unobtainable) amounts of math and science understanding to use, properly. And gives the successful user a massive advantage in everyday life.<br /><br />That right there lifts most average White guys much higher than their female peers, making them desirable and "Alpha" (dare I say it) and thus worthy of protection and ... VOTES.<br /><br />If you made, magically, most White guys say, 20% more powerful, richer, higher status, looked up to, and dominant than their female peers? Romney would be President with 80% of the White Vote. It would not have been close enough to cheat. Black guys with a thug advantage in times of plenty, would be viewed culturally as dead-weight, guys who were "guidos" and chumps like the Situation by most outside his social group.<br /><br />If you want things to change, you have to push technology to the point where power and dominance flow to average White guys, who are the natural users and creators of it. And you have to make technology so HARD and complex, not easy and stripped down, that ONLY they can use it.Whiskeyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01854764809682029464noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-20646915698051631372012-11-15T11:25:52.651-08:002012-11-15T11:25:52.651-08:00What Game can and cannot do is win on the margins,...What Game can and cannot do is win on the margins, and tranform the environment fundamentally, respectively.<br /><br />Heartiste, those of us who admire him and other PUA doing what amounts to field research in human gender/sexual relations (i.e. empirical testing, science without the degrees and pc junk), would argue that Game has power but limits, and certainly a healthy society creating wealth and stability and having a design margin would not have Game be so essential. Learned Charisma would not be everything in such a place.<br /><br />If Obama stole the election (and its entirely consistent with his background, JFK doing it, and the insistence on no voter ID, motor voter laws, and ACORN) then the response is to steal it right back.<br /><br />NOT with the GOP who are spineless Beta Male White guys clinging to a system of high-trust, low friction, high racial/cultural unity (the Sailer Characteristics I'd argue) that went away by 1975. No. With outside groups pushing their own conservative agenda and using the same methods as Obama. Just don't get caught. Which means suborning the same FBI, Judicial, and other officials Obama did. Since he's cheap, that's likely doable.<br /><br />But where Game fails is the fundamental revolution in Western Society post WWII. Mass consumerism, the pill, the condom, the Welfare State, rising female incomes, status, jobs, and a whole DOMINANT ecosystem of power, prestige, and control going to a few coastal urban centers over-run with Sex and the City women and occupations (infotainment, NGOs, "corrupt idealism" of crony philanthropy aimed at raising status and raking in bucks in corrupt deals at the same time?)<br /><br />THAT is the function of technology, demographic shifts (fewer and fewer Whites due to birth control and improved conditions for women) and innate sexual preference: women demand men HIGHER than themselves in status, power, dominance, control, etc. <br /><br />Raise women up to be the equal of their male counterparts, and they will automatically despise them. Its hard-wired. Primate DNA. Can't be modified.<br /><br />The solution?Whiskeyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01854764809682029464noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-28877462214213312642012-11-15T11:17:23.935-08:002012-11-15T11:17:23.935-08:00To be fair, that's not me. That's Roissy/H...To be fair, that's not me. That's Roissy/Heartiste. He said it first, best, better.<br /><br />Game is defined by Heartiste as "learned charisma" nothing more or less, so yes that makes a difference because most White women vote on charisma, dominance, etc. not anything else. Obama's record in the economy was miserable, will get worse not better, and still most White women voted for him. Because most White women are not married, and Obama took enough of White married women (think Paula Broadwell, who is common enough among Married White Women) and most of single White women.<br /><br />That being said, Game has limitations.<br /><br />Obama won not because of Game but because he stole the election, and because sexual and market dynamics "Game Plus" means the media tilts ultra-female or hard, hard, hard left. Towards a few Alpha dominant oligarchs, their defacto harems, and White guy being an insult.<br /><br />Obama clearly stole the election -- Rich Lowry (I know but clock, broken, right twice a day) noted Obama won Ohio by 100K votes. Which depended on ... 200K MORE Black votes than 2008 (when he got overall 10 million FEWER than 2008) ... and 200K LESS White votes (which given the size of Romney rallies, etc. and polling of the base is ludicrous). Obama stuffed ballots and tossed White votes. Clearly.<br /><br />So don't think like a nice, upstanding, law abiding Middle Class White guy. Think like a thug.Whiskeyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01854764809682029464noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-64987258475684007192012-11-15T10:53:04.787-08:002012-11-15T10:53:04.787-08:00>No wonder so many Texas Anglos value Mexicans....>No wonder so many Texas Anglos value Mexicans. Mexicans [...] don't cry foul on white abuses and greed. They just say 'gimme jobez'.<<br /><br />Don't tell Karl Rove.Davidnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-10611635743449560042012-11-15T10:48:46.419-08:002012-11-15T10:48:46.419-08:00Or GOP losses might mean relatively high-density-a...Or GOP losses might mean relatively high-density-area voters prefer a secular and social-democratic outlook to Bible-beating and unrestrained private tyranny. Good luck getting Democrats to understand that, though.Davidnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-41344997408191575482012-11-15T10:17:32.516-08:002012-11-15T10:17:32.516-08:00So goes California, so go the Democrats(to the gra...So goes California, so go the Democrats(to the grave). When the biggest richest state goes under thanks to Democratic policies, it's gonna send shockwaves throughout the nation. Since there is no hope of winning CA, we should hasten its demise by encouraging its big government and 'diversity' politics. <br /><br />Maybe California bluer and bluer(and bluer in the face until it drops dead). Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-26081654047366322032012-11-15T09:59:31.306-08:002012-11-15T09:59:31.306-08:00The problems of Mexicans is not only that they are...<i>The problems of Mexicans is not only that they are more corrupt in government and business but that they are more tolerant of corruption among non-Mexicans in government and business.</i><br /><br />The downside of tolerance?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-47579244581880081182012-11-15T09:17:45.131-08:002012-11-15T09:17:45.131-08:00Paradoxically, Mexicans are natural democrats beca...Paradoxically, Mexicans are natural democrats because they are natural republicans. <br /><br />If conservatism or republicanism means petty, small-minded, tribal self-interest, then Mexicans are certain that, i.e. 'naturally republican'. And to serve their small-minded tribal interests, they will go with the party that offers more to their tribe. And that is the Democratic Party. <br /><br />Leon McNicholnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-86278850389517804372012-11-15T08:13:55.088-08:002012-11-15T08:13:55.088-08:00People who say 'Mexers are naturally conservat...People who say 'Mexers are naturally conservative' mean 'conservatives are naturally mediocre, clueless, sheep-like, herd-like, gullible, tribal, etc.' Mexicans are indeed all those things... and so are many conservatives, many of whom work with their hands than with their heads. <br /><br />So, smart groups are naturally democrats while mediocre groups are naturally republicans. It's kind of an veiled insult. <br /><br />There is some truth in Mexicans being naturally 'conservative'. Just like white conservatives are for white interests, Mexers are for Mexican interests. Conservatism is less about universal moral values than tribal unity. So if Mexers are indeed 'conservative', they would be looking out for their own interests and that means getting more favors from the Dems. Midgardianhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13696107904800668193noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-41908578509277619152012-11-15T07:02:01.235-08:002012-11-15T07:02:01.235-08:00Personality, another amnesty will not work since F...Personality, another amnesty will not work since Fair and numbers usa will get thousands of people to flood both dems and republicians. Also, Obama will take his time and the earliest date will be feb for a legalization process. Not only Reagan but Clinton did about 4 mini-amensty like hurricane Mitt but since illegal immirgants were mainly in the larger states prior to 2000 hardy anyone paid attention. Most that don't have kids will leave the us in 5 years since the job market goes up and down for them not like the 90's or 2000's.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-39215345916161473562012-11-15T06:38:26.888-08:002012-11-15T06:38:26.888-08:00Excerpts from an article about the F-35 program ve...Excerpts from an article about the F-35 program versus unmanned combat air vehicles:<br /><br /><i> ... As it stands, unmanned aircraft have flown only in uncontested airspace. As U.S. military focus shifts to the Pacific, the Air Force could be confronted by enemy fighters in unfriendly skies, a mission UAVs aren’t yet designed to handle.<br /><br />...<br /><br />“You don’t let go of the plane you’re holding onto (JSF) until you’ve got something else to hold onto,” he said. “JSF is a necessary program. I wish it were under cost and ahead of schedule, but it’s not. It may still be a necessary stepping-stone. Rarely, even with a disruptive technology, do you totally let go of the old one even though you’ve got the new one.” <br /><br />...<br /><br /><br />The progression toward a robust unmanned-vehicle fleet reached an inflection point this year. For the first time in its history, the Air Force trained more UAV pilots than fighter and bomber pilots combined.<br /><br />...</i><br /><br /><a href="http://www.nationaldefensemagazine.org/archive/2012/February/Pages/AirForceF-35s,DronesMaySquareOffinBudgetBattle.aspx" rel="nofollow">Air Force F-35s, Drones May Square Off in Budget Battle <br />February 2012</a>David Davenporthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03315090179595817174noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-91799233681221737322012-11-15T04:15:01.983-08:002012-11-15T04:15:01.983-08:00David Davenport said:
"Boondoggle weapon sys...David Davenport said:<br /><br />"Boondoggle weapon systems like the F-22 and F-35 that are obsolete in the modern era but can't be killed because some people make a lot of money off of them.<br /><br />Please explain why the F-22 and F-35 are obsolete in the modern era. Note that the Air Force stopped F-22 production at 187 of the item, far short of the 400+ F-22's for which the USAF orginally requested."<br /><br />I take it that you as well as iSteve approve of the Air Force's request for funds to develop a UCAV capable of air to air combat."<br /><br />This explains it all. I can't think of a single thing to add to it.<br /><br />http://www.nsfwcorp.com/dispatch/cheap-drones<br /><br />As far as the F-22 goes, there are many criticisms, but the biggest is that manned planes are obsolete now.<br /><br />You can also do a google search for "War Nerd This is how the carrier die" for an essay that describes exactly what I think about carriers as well.sunbeamhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16540822135478202229noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-65150590989920280112012-11-15T03:17:01.167-08:002012-11-15T03:17:01.167-08:00Why would the GOP listen to the MSM, they want the...Why would the GOP listen to the MSM, they want them to lose anyway...<br /><br />Just stop fellating businessmen who send jobs overseas and people from other countries here. Is that so hard to understand? Oh yeah, you need the money. Right.SFGnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-76103341778987541882012-11-15T02:34:05.010-08:002012-11-15T02:34:05.010-08:00http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/universityedu...http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/universityeducation/9459747/Foreign-students-countries-sending-the-most-students-to-the-UK.html?frame=2302827<br /><br />uh ohAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-51579037873064385802012-11-15T02:31:53.757-08:002012-11-15T02:31:53.757-08:00The problems of Mexicans is not only that they are...The problems of Mexicans is not only that they are more corrupt in government and business but that they are more tolerant of corruption among non-Mexicans in government and business. If German-Americans might blow the whistle on local government corruption, Mexican-Americans will just tolerate corruption--even among gringos--as business as usual. No wonder some whites like Mexicans. Mexicans are very tolerant about greed and corruption. So, greedy whites can get away with more bs with Mexicans than with nosy German-Americans or such. <br />No wonder so many Texas Anglos value Mexicans. Mexicans may vote democratic but they don't cry foul on white abuses and greed. They just say 'gimme jobez'.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-52921693596484966122012-11-15T02:24:10.657-08:002012-11-15T02:24:10.657-08:00http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/11/13/us-berna...http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/11/13/us-bernardino-bankrupt-idUSBRE8AC0HP20121113Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-29429113199703391052012-11-15T00:22:10.960-08:002012-11-15T00:22:10.960-08:00"Idiotic. The people running the GOP aren'..."Idiotic. The people running the GOP aren't like that at all."<br /><br />Probably not. But the simpering path of the GOP to bow again and again to amnesty for absolutely no gain whatsoever and without learning from its mistakes - it deserves ridicule.<br /><br />The Democrats have morphed into the anti-white party. This is shown by the racial bloc voting, the policies, and the racial animus expressed after the win. The Republicans are stuck in the 1970s, pretending that the dividing line between the two parties comes down to anything but race. Romney's recent post-loss meltdown about "gifts" amply demonstrates this ignorance.<br /><br />The effect on their policies is like so:<br /><b>Democrats</b> <br />Non-whites: Racial spoils coming up!<br />Whites: Nothing for you unless you want to marry Uncle Sugar. For white married couples, we're going to shaft you good but it doesn't matter because you're not voting for us.<br /><br /><b>Republicans</b><br />Non-whites: We're Democrat-lite, so you will still have most of your racial spoils.<br />Whites: We're not going to roll back AA. We're not going to stop immigration. We won't stop outsourcing. If you're rich, we'll push for tax cuts. That's about it. We're Democrat lite though, the marginally lesser evil.<br /><br />The end result is that non-whites (and the sort of white people contributing to white demographic ruin and further Democratic voting) have a huge incentive to vote for Democrats, amplifying their turnout. In their case it is not a "lesser evil" they are voting for, they are getting a "greater good" served up on a silver platter.<br /><br />The end result for white people is that the reasons given for voting for the Republican lesser evil, are at best anemic. The Republican motto may as well be: "We'll shaft you less!"<br /><br />Looking at this situation objectively, the Republicans are not doing the right thing strategically. They need to realize that their base is married white people, and to a lesser extent single white people. They need to motivate the turn out of this base by showing up to fight for them, and tenaciously fighting the demographic shift. If they can motivate their base to the extent that the Democrat base is motivated, they will not only win but win in a landslide.<br /><br />The media are going to call them racist no matter what they do, simply by being the de facto white party. And yes, I do realize that politicians in the running for president have been selected from the very beginning of their political career to be pro-Israel, and probably PC as well. They probably realize that this move has the potential to cost them their career, which is why they have fought it for so long. But fight it they must, otherwise they will have to wait for the Democrats to vote in a disaster president, a GWB of their own.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com