tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post461771175356658452..comments2024-03-27T18:24:19.683-07:00Comments on Steve Sailer: iSteve: "Sex and the City"Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger69125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-65455551076204969042012-01-19T01:28:34.398-08:002012-01-19T01:28:34.398-08:00My partner and I watched the first sex in the city...My partner and I watched the first sex in the city movie, and I was quite surprised - I enjoyed it. I was expecting to be rolling my eyes, sighing, and day dreaming while a bunch of women discussed their favourite rabbit vibrators and cried at each other. We haven't seen the second movie yet. *I* want to see it but my partner isn't keen. What a role reversal, lol. Thanks for sharing!the-rabbithttp://smexy.co.uk/vibrators/rabbit-vibratorsnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-49843638895206668722010-06-30T06:44:29.571-07:002010-06-30T06:44:29.571-07:00find interesting is how high the standards are for...find interesting is how high the standards are for romance in the series.ejaz14357http://www.livetv.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-34224907064081424262010-06-16T05:01:50.930-07:002010-06-16T05:01:50.930-07:00thanks for a wonderful post :) I'm always watc...thanks for a wonderful post :) I'm always watching "Sex in the City" :)Vibratorshttp://www.getmepleasure.com/Vibrators/c50.aspnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-34079099571322376062010-06-08T11:49:11.346-07:002010-06-08T11:49:11.346-07:00"I personally think that there is some male p..."I personally think that there is some male personality type that delights in "revealing" womens' promiscuity."<br /><br />How is it revealing when often the women themselves reveal it to anyone who will listen?<br /><br />" I also notice the delight they take in 'revealing womens' dirty side'."<br /><br />Delight? Hardly. Plus, women are not uniquely "dirty", so that's irrelevant. They are simply trying to maximize personal pleasure now that certain behavioral constraints have been lifted - a wholly rational response. Whether this makes them "evil" or "slutty" is besides the point - why are you so fixated on perceptions of sluttiness?<br /><br />"I personally think it is a way for these men to justify to themselves neglecting emotional development, by "revealing" women not to be worthy of an emotionally developed man."<br /><br />Wha?? You lost me there. Are these dastardly men emotionally developed or undeveloped? <br /><br />"According to these guys, its all just a game, and we are all just lying to each other: women are whores - with this premise one sidesteps all the questions about emotional commitment, trust, and intimacy which otherwise crop up."<br /><br />...so this is all an elaborate way of whining about women being whores? Truth be told, some misogynists believe this, but I have noticed a larger number of them making the more nuanced point described above. Whether woman are being "sinful" or "whores" is irrelevant - what does matter is how this behavior will affect women and others in the future (increase or decrease in fertility rates, stable families, regional demographics, and so on).<br /><br />"Each of them was also unhappy in their relationships, I may note by the by."<br /><br />Is this intended to be feminist shaming language of some kind? i.e. "you must be gay/have no woman/have a tiny penis/live with mommy"??<br /><br />It's cool - most of us have been there before. I love the homophobic variants - fascinating how quickly pee-cee liberal wo(men) will call you a faggot, etc if you don't back down from them.Nine-of-Diamondsnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-66227307253945359312010-06-08T11:29:47.047-07:002010-06-08T11:29:47.047-07:00"you are a complete disaster, and an utter an..."you are a complete disaster, and an utter and and total blight to your family name."<br /><br />Oooh! MELTDOWN! Where my fitty cent???<br /><br />And you DO know what I'm talking about. No need to get worked up, pal. Sorry I offended you - here's hoping you do find yourself a nice "coal burner", as OJ Simpson would put it. Although in my neck of the woods they tend to be 40-50 pounds overweight, & no white man will touch 'em.<br /><br />Anyway, I was just trying to make a minor point - I should have explained that Ted Nomura is a comic book artist (Luftwaffe 1946) and Frank Cho does (or did) Sunday funnies. Both are Asians with an unhealthy fixation on strapping young Aryan lasses - in Nomura's case, complete with Nazi SS regalia. Asian males in their comics are heavily-caricatured or animalistic - Frank Cho actually represents himself as an anthropomorphic chimpanzee, kinda like one of those "furry" characters. <br /><br />Come to think of it, they're both a bit like the gay "Sex and the City" creators, in that women are pedestalized beings far superior to hetero "Beta Males" (I hate using that terminology) who flaunt their sexuality with no consequences.<br /><br />I'm not one to agree with radical Asian activists, but it does seem like some minority artists have serious complexes when it comes to white females & self image.Nine-of-Diamondsnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-56600722170904004332010-06-06T21:26:23.942-07:002010-06-06T21:26:23.942-07:00Yeah, like a certain troof seeker whining about a ...<i>Yeah, like a certain troof seeker whining about a year ago over some blonde chick who wouldn't have anything to do with him. The whole thing reminded me of Frank Nomura's & Frank Cho's sexual complexes WRT white women (google them, if you don't read comics).</i><br /><br />I do read comics (albeit less and less frequently, especially after "Civil War" and the whole "Spider-Man selling his soul, erm, I mean, <i>marriage</i> to the Devil" bit), but I don't Google. Do you have links handy?Templarnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-75375744130539484062010-06-06T17:36:42.567-07:002010-06-06T17:36:42.567-07:00I personally think that there is some male persona...I personally think that there is some male personality type that delights in "revealing" womens' promiscuity. Blandishing it as a 'cruel fact of life' to wake the listener from a supposed romantic dream he has fallen into about female purity. They do this, it seems, to paint a picture of a world where women are adventuresome whores, yet pretend not to be. It is always implied that "I have seen so much crazy shit, stuff you wouldn't believe" - and the person listening is simply naive to this deviousness of women. <br /><br />Completely aside from the actual phenomenon of women's promiscuity, for myself I like to notice the steadfastness with which this viewpoint is emphasized by those who adhere to it. I also notice the delight they take in 'revealing womens' dirty side'. Then I notice the ambiguous nature of most of the evidence, and the fact that it generalizes the behavior of the 12-20% of women who I know are genuinely promiscuous and slutty, to the totality of women (or would like to). <br /><br />I personally think it is a way for these men to justify to themselves neglecting emotional development, by "revealing" women not to be worthy of an emotionally developed man. According to these guys, its all just a game, and we are all just lying to each other: women are whores - with this premise one sidesteps all the questions about emotional commitment, trust, and intimacy which otherwise crop up. <br /><br />I write this only because I have now encountered 4+ men giving me these kind of assurances about the devious sexual lives of women, all with the same tonality and emphasis, all pointing to the same understanding. Each of them was also unhappy in their relationships, I may note by the by.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-84739622774307947332010-06-06T08:37:45.310-07:002010-06-06T08:37:45.310-07:00"Yeah, like a certain troof seeker whining ab..."Yeah, like a certain troof seeker whining about a year ago over some blonde chick who wouldn't have anything to do with him. "<br /><br />Either you, or one of these other clowns brought that up before and I have no idea what you are talking about; then I go to look up your comic book, no such thing exists, then you get the guy's name wrong, and I still can't find anything. <br /><br />Face it SPORT, you are a complete disaster, and an utter and and total blight to your family name.Truthhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17286755693955361308noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-12995168152447437542010-06-06T06:18:01.373-07:002010-06-06T06:18:01.373-07:00Frank Nomura = Ted Nomura.Frank Nomura = Ted Nomura.Nine-of-Diamondsnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-75044860088007363732010-06-05T16:23:32.397-07:002010-06-05T16:23:32.397-07:00""I'm a bit surprised at the level o...""I'm a bit surprised at the level of hate for Parker here -"<br /><br />Really? She is, after all...a woman; and this is, after all...a board for not-by-choice celibates"<br /><br />Yeah, like a certain troof seeker whining about a year ago over some blonde chick who wouldn't have anything to do with him. The whole thing reminded me of Frank Nomura's & Frank Cho's sexual complexes WRT white women (google them, if you don't read comics).<br /><br />$0.50 says we can get a "Sport" or two out of him before the thread's dead.<br /><br />" It's tough being so darned responsible, monogamous, emotionally attached. "<br /><br />Many women nowadays don't seem to be that way. STD rates amongst NAM females, if I remember correctly, are between 35-45 % - thus indicating many partners. Likewise, my White and Asian female friends seem to average at least 2-3 relationships a year. That's a lot of coupling between the ages of 15 - 30. Not to mention that after a breakup there's often "comfort sex" with multiple partners for a month or two. And these are generally well-educated upper middle class or wealthy types who know the risks of promiscuity. Not to say that males are paragons of virtue - just throwing it out there. I'd be interested in what other people's experiences are. <br /><br />Any links to the 4-partner-per woman stat, or similar studies?Nine-of-Diamondsnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-26646005870377916662010-06-04T12:48:30.017-07:002010-06-04T12:48:30.017-07:00Well, I liked the show but did not want it to be m...Well, I liked the show but did not want it to be made into a movie, so I have not seen either film. The show is a fantasy and a well written and acted one for what its worth. Incidentally, Cynthia Nixon is my favorite as she is the most intelligent and best actress of the four (it helps that our politics align and I have chanced to meet her at a fundraiser once). I also like her character on the show the best too.Pissed Off Chinamannoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-4290239453977692522010-06-04T10:11:39.779-07:002010-06-04T10:11:39.779-07:00this is, after all...a board for not-by-choice cel...<i>this is, after all...a board for not-by-choice celibates.</i><br /><br />Now that's the one PC term that I'm sure will be welcomed in these parts.Mouse-a-tronixnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-28168574692884751712010-06-04T08:32:37.324-07:002010-06-04T08:32:37.324-07:00Ray Sawhill's got it right.
Fantasies aren...Ray Sawhill's got it right.<br /><br />Fantasies aren't reality, guys, get a grip. You've got yours--we've got ours. Each of the SATC gals reflected at least one FANTASY of most American women.<br /><br /> Example: some women would like just one day in which they could toss aside guilt and their hard-wired tendencies and be like Samantha-- indulgent and adventurous in her sex life, self-absorbed, AND non-emotionally involved with her partners(like men in their 20s....and 30s....and?????) It's tough being so darned responsible, monogamous, emotionally attached. Samantha provides some respite from that.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-16925916919692908772010-06-04T07:41:01.192-07:002010-06-04T07:41:01.192-07:00I had a hard time watching the show because the f...I had a hard time watching the show because the four main characters were so much like the media women I spent my work days with. (Or so much like the media women liked to imagine themselves to be.) I thought the show was pretty well-done, I liked the actresses, I could see that some satire was intended. But at the end of the day I wanted a break from these people, not another half-hour in their company.Ray Sawhillhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02434181069400646328noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-64939894309945156962010-06-04T06:53:30.273-07:002010-06-04T06:53:30.273-07:00"I'm a bit surprised at the level of hate..."I'm a bit surprised at the level of hate for Parker here -"<br /><br />Really? She is, after all...a woman; and this is, after all...a board for not-by-choice celibates."<br /><br />LOL<br /><br />All the venom directed at Parker could make someone think she is man hating lesbian not a married mother. I think she is attractive for someone her age. If she is so ugly how did she marry a successful actor?<br /><br />I think her looks are on a par with Ann Coulter but the personality Coulter displays on TV is one of the most unfeminine I have ever seen unlike the girlish Parker. I am not surprised that Coulter has never married. It is a mystery to me that so many conservatives adore her.Mercerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06195537611017386332noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-69344455844052869832010-06-04T05:57:10.168-07:002010-06-04T05:57:10.168-07:00What I always find interesting: I actually read th...What I always find interesting: I actually read the original "Sex and The City" book, before it was made into a show. (I picked it up off the shelf in the bookstore becauese of the title and couldn't put it down. So sue me.)<br /><br />THe fascinating thing: the book was a very, very dark comedy: it showed the undercurrent of desperation in the urban single girl lifestyle. I was frankly amazed when I heard the show had become such a hit, until I realized that it had taken the premise and taken out all the darkness.<br /><br />"has anyone ever done a racial/ethnic analysis of the crooks on Law and Order?"<br /><br />There was a funny bit on "30 Rock" this year where Tracy is theorizing that the election of Obama has been a catastrophe for blacks because it has made whites feel less guilty. One of his entourage agrees, saying "Last week, I saw a white judge on 'Law and Order'!"Jim Bairdhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01515091154037683897noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-79544178471885617312010-06-03T22:57:24.952-07:002010-06-03T22:57:24.952-07:00I agree with Ray Sawhill. Seems kinda strange that...I agree with Ray Sawhill. Seems kinda strange that some frivolous fantasy riles up all the commentators on here so much. I mean, I'm sure there are some impressionable teenagers who want to emulate that lifestyle, but its not like the majority of them will succeed anyway. And Sarah Jessica Parker snaring Chris Noth in the series is no different than the lovable geek in every single male-oriented action/comedy movie winning the affection of the hot girl.BamaGirlnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-82963154593919676522010-06-03T22:29:27.982-07:002010-06-03T22:29:27.982-07:00Oh, I lost track of my main point: I think some of...Oh, I lost track of my main point: I think some of the anger in men's reactions to SATC may largely be anger at what some women's fantasies are like. Some guys are very, very displeased when they find out what women really enjoy thinking and daydreaming about -- what really tickles them. <br /><br />I'm no feminist, but I think this is unfair. Women are very used to indulging guys for our dumbass enthusiasms, fantasies and passions. They routinely sit through action-adventure movies, for instance, without complaining too much about the sketchily drawn female characters, or the sicko love the guys onscreen have for their bombs and guns. They understand that this is just shit guys enjoy daydreaming about and imagining. <br /><br />Seems to me that we ought to be more indulgent where women and their fantasies go. Not that that requires us to enjoy them ourselves...<br /><br />Porn and action movies: that's how guys enjoy imagining life. Fashion magazines and romance novels (and SATC): how galz enjoy imagining life. Amazing any of us manage to mate up, isn't it?<br /><br />(My Game tip for the day: More men ought to go read a half a dozen romance novels. It's like opening up women's brains and seeing what's really going on there.)Ray Sawhillhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02434181069400646328noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-12587479088201541502010-06-03T22:14:03.837-07:002010-06-03T22:14:03.837-07:00Funny review from Steve.
Can I venture a point th...Funny review from Steve.<br /><br />Can I venture a point that I think is being under-recognized in this commentsthread? "Sex In the City" is a fantasy. You may or may not like the fantasy the show is selling (a lot of guys here obviously don't), but "SATC" isn't trying to be a documentary, or a morally instructive or uplifting show. It's a fantasy, and in that sense it resembles high-fashion magazines, which selling everyday sensible clothes for real women, they're selling giddy fluff that gives women a thrill. Anything wrong with that? Before you say Yes, consider the fact that Rambo movies and Jerry Bruckheimer movies are selling male fantasies -- blood, sweat, action, hot girls, guns ... Are these fantasies admirable? Uplifting? Morally justifiable? Or are these movies basically there to feed the male appetite for heroism, action, and excitement. OK: shouldn't girls be entitled to have their fantasies catered to similarly? <br /><br />So here's my theory: chicks love imagining a life that's all giddy romantic complications and glamor and that nonetheless winds up delivering Mr. Right to them. That's the basic structure of many romance novels, and it's there in "SATC" too. <br /><br />Here's the mystery and the moral problem: Why do so many women seem to have taken "SATC" not as silly fun but as a model to emulate? Hey, ladies: it's a fantasy, and even a bit of a satire. You aren't really supposed to go imitate these ladies. <br /><br />One of my main beefs about Americans: we take our fantasies 'way too seriously ...<br /><br />(Incidentally, I haven't seen the movies, and I've only watched a couple of episodes of the show. So I may be way off here.)Ray Sawhillhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02434181069400646328noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-60133571302038214022010-06-03T21:30:19.329-07:002010-06-03T21:30:19.329-07:00"I'm a bit surprised at the level of hate..."I'm a bit surprised at the level of hate for Parker here -"<br /><br />Really? She is, after all...a woman; and this is, after all...a board for not-by-choice celibates.Truthhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17286755693955361308noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-89102375299025233222010-06-03T20:52:18.240-07:002010-06-03T20:52:18.240-07:00Cynthia Nixon...two biological children...
Huh, t...<i>Cynthia Nixon...two biological children...</i><br /><br />Huh, the homosexual outbred the straight ones. So many women declare themselves lesbians in late middle age, do they really take 30+ years to figure out that they're interested in chicks?<br /><br />Some researchers think women don't have fixed orientations. If that's true, maybe only masculinized bull dykes hit on middle aged women, so they decide that they're gay?robnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-50599649883224333762010-06-03T20:13:32.424-07:002010-06-03T20:13:32.424-07:00What's with all the "Why is she so famous...What's with all the "Why is she so famous despite the fact that I don't want to bang her?!!" confusion in these comments? <br /><br />Her fanbase is mostly female. She doesn't have to be sexy to men. She was the star of a show hugely popular with women, she's a style icon who is all over fashion magazines constantly (not Maxim-style mags, but magazines aimed at women), she has a pleasant, approachable personality that goes over well with fans, and she's the not so cute, not so rich girl who made it big anyway and enjoyed a glamorous career and love life.<br /><br />Enough women like her that casting her makes sense. Whoever said that for a long career, actresses must be liked by their own sex could have been talking about Parker. <br /><br />Although I think the rage here at Parker is less about her personally than about the series and lifestyle she was the face of. If she were a star of Lost or Grey's Anatomy or something, I imagine people would be less enraged that a none-hot woman was cast as a romantic lead.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-47390716314859684712010-06-03T19:22:42.282-07:002010-06-03T19:22:42.282-07:00I'm a bit surprised at the level of hate for P...I'm a bit surprised at the level of hate for Parker here - her show is certainly morally toxic, but so is most Hollywood product these days, and she seems affable enough in interviews, more so than her three co-stars.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-80111153348585150382010-06-03T18:44:06.322-07:002010-06-03T18:44:06.322-07:00As bad as Sarah Jessica Parker looks today, image ...As bad as Sarah Jessica Parker looks today, image what she would look like without all the makeup, hair dye, photo edits and retouches as well as plastic surgery (shudder). She used to look like <a href="javascript:void(0);" rel="nofollow">Tony Danza's fugly cousin</a> or <a href="http://www.stars-plastic-surgery.com/images/stories/septimo/sarahjessicaparker/sarah-jessica-parker.jpg" rel="nofollow">scrawny hippy little brother</a><br /><br />I realized the MSM in general and elites in particular hated me well before the 2008 misinformation campaign. When I repeatedly saw SJP sold as a sex symbol on the cover of Vogue, Elle, and fronting various beauty/fashion industry products, I knew they hated our innate aesthetic sensibilities.<br /><br />Will SJP become the Chuck Norris-like meme to plumb the depths of ugliness?Daddy Warbucksnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-76224308442005345032010-06-03T16:23:50.854-07:002010-06-03T16:23:50.854-07:00>she lives a fairly quiet life and doesn't ...>she lives a fairly quiet life and doesn't make a spectacle of herself<<br /><br />Do as I propagandize, not as I do.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com