tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post5024868135077081287..comments2024-03-15T20:52:26.967-07:00Comments on Steve Sailer: iSteve: Making America more like Mexico is depressing to Mexican fertilityUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger73125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-17430253688804201002012-12-02T22:16:04.854-08:002012-12-02T22:16:04.854-08:00Anonydroid at 9:05 AM: The only thing Ron Paul di...Anonydroid at 9:05 AM: The only thing Ron Paul disagrees with the globalists on is war.<br /><br />Hunsdon: Yes, also the War on (Some) Drugs, the War on Poverty, the War on Sound Money, the War on Civil Liberties, etc., etc.Hunsdonnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-29582694203785539122012-12-02T09:05:12.542-08:002012-12-02T09:05:12.542-08:00Where's the neo con juggernaut I mean there...Where's the neo con juggernaut I mean there's commentary and that Kristol dude but that's about it. On the other hand the Chamber of Commerce pretty powerful. The only thing Ron Paul disagrees with the globalists on is war. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-51121201819532479062012-12-02T04:33:26.275-08:002012-12-02T04:33:26.275-08:00Amnesty is inevitable, the Republicans don't e...Amnesty is inevitable, the Republicans don't even know the handful of HBD blogs exist. This stuff is about as socially acceptable as atheism in Afghanistan.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-89317452276283194962012-12-01T17:35:08.489-08:002012-12-01T17:35:08.489-08:00Are 54% of births to non-Hispanic white women? I w...<i>Are 54% of births to non-Hispanic white women? I was under the impression that it recently dipped below 50%?</i><br /><br />The newsmedia has been blaring this for the last couple of years, because if the non-Hispanic white birth percentage, that had been in virtually constant decline until 2007, had continued to drop at the same rate until now, there would indeed be a minority of white births. The Census Bureau had assumed that this would be the case.<br /><br />But the popping of the Hispanic Baby Bubble caused the overall number of Hispanic births to tank, and the percentage of white births rose as a result, even though the actual number of white births also fell. The Asian birth percentage also rose for the same reason: no decline in the raw number of births.corvinusnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-70653933902580420782012-12-01T17:32:32.824-08:002012-12-01T17:32:32.824-08:00Anonydroid at 11:01 AM said: Your really enemey i...Anonydroid at 11:01 AM said: Your really enemey in the immigration fight is the libertarians and people like Ron Paul who talk national soverignty but are very reluctant to do anything about it. Something tells me that you won't like that answer though.<br /><br />Hunsdon wondered: Just where is this libertarian juggernaut we're supposed to war against? Were they the people who were advising the Romney campaign? I mean, there's that guy from Reason in the black leather jacket, I guess. Say, have you heard of the Harvard WASP mafia?Hunsdonnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-29884633087807772002012-12-01T16:45:55.426-08:002012-12-01T16:45:55.426-08:00Are 54% of births to non-Hispanic white women? I w...Are 54% of births to non-Hispanic white women? I was under the impression that it recently dipped below 50%?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-68921486540749088112012-12-01T13:54:27.974-08:002012-12-01T13:54:27.974-08:00From one anon post:
----
immirgant
skyhigh.
So, ...From one anon post:<br />----<br />immirgant <br />skyhigh. <br />So, Ca MExicans birthrates <br />TExas where the rent is lower and more job are available. <br />immirgant and legal immirgant HOuston, Dallas. <br />But Texas has recently had birthrates dropped during the recession.<br />-----<br /><br />Is there no limit to the number of spelling and grammar errors that a post can have before it get canned?<br /><br />Or are we supposed to be touchy-feely about people who can not run their ungrammatical yammerings past even a simple spelling checker?Swordnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-10972299500818147662012-12-01T12:27:24.036-08:002012-12-01T12:27:24.036-08:00As far as the neo-con point goes you alt right guy...<i>As far as the neo-con point goes you alt right guys need to outgrow this tick fast. No one cares what the neo-cons think. Whatever power and influence they entertain is solely a function of the fact that the media complex sees them as the lesser evil on the right and as such puts them on the air/ promotes their view of conservatism. The neo-cons were at one point very influential that point is over.</i><br /><br />Hardly. The neocons are the reason we were stuck with the likes of Romney, Santorum, and Gingrich as choices, and why the GOP Establishment pulled out all the stops against Ron Paul. True, McCain and Romney losing to Obama twice in a row did some damage to the neocons, but, as long as Billy Kristol's smirking mug is up there on the evening news, and as long as the GOP nominates rich globalists, we cannot consider the neocons to have lost their power.<br /><br /><i>Your really enemey in the immigration fight is the libertarians and people like Ron Paul who talk national soverignty but are very reluctant to do anything about it. Something tells me that you won't like that answer though.</i><br /><br />Rand Paul is trying to play their game, by saying, okay, we can amnesty the illegals, but they'll take up all our legal immigration slots until they're all in, and they can't do it all at once. The practical effect of this would be to drastically slow down legal immigration as people's family members are no longer called over from the Philippines, while, I'd hope, not increase illegal immigration as people see they're only being legalized at a rate of a million per year.<br /><br />The House GOP is trying something similar, by replacing the diversity lottery with STEM immigrants who are at least a lot less likely to be NAMs. Unfortunately, Sheila Jackson-Lee and Zoe Lofgren want Africans coming in. I just hope their antics start to anger the GOP congressmen so they start to not care what Jackson-Lee thinks.<br /><br />Then again, gridlock in the immigration system is always good. If the GOP wants to mitigate the damage, but the Dems don't like any of their ideas, that will prevent more harm from being done to the country by the Congresscritters, and the Hispanic birth rate can therefore continue to tank.<br /><br />The Brazilian saying "A fabrica esta fechada" has been spreading to Mexicans and Central Americans, given the Salvadoran woman using it in the article Steve put up.corvinusnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-28599469172860127462012-12-01T11:22:46.622-08:002012-12-01T11:22:46.622-08:00How do they determine illegitimacy?
Possibiliti...How do they determine illegitimacy? <br /><br />Possibilities:<br />1) Woman is unmarried, which sounds good but many women are common law wives especially among the poor.<br /><br />2) No father on birth certificate. I can think of many reasons for this, especially for illegal aliens.<br /><br />3) Mother and fathers names don't match. This could be cultural especially for African Americans who often do not change their names. <br /><br />4) I did a quick once over on the study at the cdc site. They used census data. So that might be an influence for example in the case of women that receive government benefits like Section 8 and food stamps and do not want the government to know there is a man in their life. <br /><br /> <br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-19976942855637217362012-12-01T11:01:38.840-08:002012-12-01T11:01:38.840-08:00I am going to try one more time. I am OPPOSED to i...I am going to try one more time. I am OPPOSED to immigration. The MEDIA, which is far more than the two networks you mentioned, supports immigration and thanks to the election of Obama basically feels vindicated in their all out administration salesmen mode. There is no psy ops at work only the raw pursuit of leftist power by media organizations which are instrumental in forming the thoughts of about 30 to 40 percent of the American public. As far as the neo-con point goes you alt right guys need to outgrow this tick fast. No one cares what the neo-cons think. Whatever power and influence they entertain is solely a function of the fact that the media complex sees them as the lesser evil on the right and as such puts them on the air/ promotes their view of conservatism. The neo-cons were at one point very influential that point is over. Your really enemey in the immigration fight is the libertarians and people like Ron Paul who talk national soverignty but are very reluctant to do anything about it. Something tells me that you won't like that answer though. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-82756037918987839172012-12-01T08:34:17.855-08:002012-12-01T08:34:17.855-08:00Another 23 percent in another 4 years from 85 to 6...Another 23 percent in another 4 years from 85 to 65 per women. The great hispanic voting pushed will be no longer heard if that happens.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-45586740413888137112012-11-30T21:56:35.401-08:002012-11-30T21:56:35.401-08:00The leftwing zeitgeist is a joke.
1) CNN is wher...The leftwing zeitgeist is a joke. <br /><br />1) CNN is where ratings go to die. The public has tuned them out. MSNBC is a fever swamp with only a slightly larger audience. Lefty print media is shriveling. <br /><br />2) Obama limped back into the white house by buying the votes of low information rabble. He has no plan and no mandate.<br /><br />3) U.S. Presidents hit career peak upon their reelection. Then it's all downhill in the second term.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-35967662761966481562012-11-30T21:43:13.225-08:002012-11-30T21:43:13.225-08:00No anon. You are promoting an astroturf zeitgeist....No anon. You are promoting an astroturf zeitgeist. It's a damn PSY-OP. Wake up.<br /><br />Obama hemorrhaged support his turnout was way down. Obama's mandate is as weak as W in 2004. <br /><br />The neocon coffee klatch unleashed the immigration push asap after the election - they had it in the can all prepared and ready for rollout. Fact-based non-propagandist pundits have refuted the entire meme. Illegals don't generate our zeitgeist.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-64372212187942147262012-11-30T21:41:28.907-08:002012-11-30T21:41:28.907-08:00Here is what the CIA World Factbook has to say abo...<i>Here is what the CIA World Factbook has to say about US demographics:<br /><br />white 79.96%, black 12.85%, Asian 4.43%, Amerindian and Alaska native 0.97%, native Hawaiian and other Pacific islander 0.18%, two or more races 1.61% (July 2007 estimate)<br />note: a separate listing for Hispanic is not included because the US Census Bureau considers Hispanic to mean persons of Spanish/Hispanic/Latino origin including those of Mexican, Cuban, Puerto Rican, Dominican Republic, Spanish, and Central or South American origin living in the US who may be of any race or ethnic group (white, black, Asian, etc.); about 15.1% of the total US population is Hispanic</i><br /><br />The CIA Factbook is utter crap. I see it cited all the time, and I'm constantly shaking my head.corvinusnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-68370559934534059772012-11-30T21:37:21.987-08:002012-11-30T21:37:21.987-08:00In the U.S census, the reason people from countrie...<i>In the U.S census, the reason people from countries like Burma, Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos, Indonesia, and The Philippines are lumped into the same racial category as the Japanese and the Chinese, is because they all have slanted eyes.<br /><br />To most White people, they all look like alike. To your average White person, a person from Cambodia for example, is just another Chink.</i><br /><br />The average White person wouldn't mistake people from India for "Chinks", but they WOULD mistake people from Kyrgyzstan or Kazakhstan (who are counted as "White") or Eskimos and Inuit ("American Indian") as Chinks. There's a somewhat different rationale for labeling people "Asian".corvinusnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-8481691034223417262012-11-30T20:29:05.585-08:002012-11-30T20:29:05.585-08:00I would reserve some skepticism regarding these st...<i>I would reserve some skepticism regarding these statisitcs and assertions. They seem to be conveniently timed for softening up opposition to the current amnesty effort, on the grounds we are going to run into a Mexican shortage in the near future, possibly leading to rationing of landscapers and waitresses.</i><br /><br />I agree with this. I've heard people blabber lately that the illegals are no longer coming. But of course that doesn't mean that the 10 million illegals already here are going home. The last thing I want to do is to make them citizens, and start a new round of chain migration and democrat voter registration. And note, I don't buy that ten year old estimate of 10 million illegals. It is probably much closer to 30 million, and when you factor in family unifications, could easily become 50 million.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-87661929692320782772012-11-30T20:21:33.622-08:002012-11-30T20:21:33.622-08:00Mestizos fall under the Hispanic category.
But, ...<b>Mestizos fall under the Hispanic category. </b><br /><br />But, at the top level they are classified as white and then broken out into a category called <i>hispanic white </i>while European Americans are called <i>non-hispanic whites.</i> <br /><br />Here is what the <a href="https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/us.html" rel="nofollow">CIA World Factbook </a>has to say about US demographics:<br /><br /><i>white 79.96%, black 12.85%, Asian 4.43%, Amerindian and Alaska native 0.97%, native Hawaiian and other Pacific islander 0.18%, two or more races 1.61% (July 2007 estimate)<br />note: a separate listing for Hispanic is not included because the US Census Bureau considers Hispanic to mean persons of Spanish/Hispanic/Latino origin including those of Mexican, Cuban, Puerto Rican, Dominican Republic, Spanish, and Central or South American origin living in the US who may be of any race or ethnic group (white, black, Asian, etc.); about 15.1% of the total US population is Hispanic </i>Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-80752169074687800092012-11-30T19:47:06.965-08:002012-11-30T19:47:06.965-08:00I would reserve some skepticism regarding these st...I would reserve some skepticism regarding these statisitcs and assertions. They seem to be conveniently timed for softening up opposition to the current amnesty effort, on the grounds we are going to run into a Mexican shortage in the near future, possibly leading to rationing of landscapers and waitresses.Rev. Righthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10165887113835960014noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-85469539250621184922012-11-30T18:52:10.584-08:002012-11-30T18:52:10.584-08:00"So the Census takes into account slanted eye..."So the Census takes into account slanted eyes? lol. South Asians have slanted eyes? While you're at it, why does the government lump mestizos and middle easterners into the White category?"<br /><br />Mestizos fall under the Hispanic category. <br />"Middle Easterners" are almost as diverse as "Asians." Armenians or Lebanese Maronites arguably have more in common with Southern Europeans than with Yemenis.patricknoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-45894395353535870352012-11-30T17:57:13.188-08:002012-11-30T17:57:13.188-08:00The Asian category includes Pacific Islanders, who...The Asian category includes Pacific Islanders, who are very different from Northeast Asians or Subcontinent Asians. Their out of wedlock birth rate is likely to be closer to blacks or Hispanics than to Northeast Asians or middle/upper-middle-class whites.patricknoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-60404934442993680362012-11-30T17:52:36.602-08:002012-11-30T17:52:36.602-08:00[QUOTE]Everyone knows that Asians are a very broad...[QUOTE]Everyone knows that Asians are a very broad and diverse grouping. I see East Asians, SE Asians, and South Asians as very distinct groups in culture and behavior. In fact, it's just as misleading to group SE Asians with East Asians as it is to group mestizos or Arabs as White for statistical purposes.<br /><br />East Asians account for more than 1.6 billion people. Does it really make sense to group them with another 2.5 billion people and claim that over 4 billion people represent one group, just because their combined population is small in the United States?[/QUOTE]<br /><br />In the U.S census, the reason people from countries like Burma, Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos, Indonesia, and The Philippines are lumped into the same racial category as the Japanese and the Chinese, is because they all have slanted eyes.<br /><br />To most White people, they all look like alike. To your average White person, a person from Cambodia for example, is just another Chink.Jeffersonnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-10867135451124475432012-11-30T17:50:50.632-08:002012-11-30T17:50:50.632-08:00Personality, I don't like anything Obama does ...Personality, I don't like anything Obama does but the way it is the parties are divided, Fair and numbers usa can get a lot of people telling the congressmen off, granted we got three legalization Dems from Ca for Congress and lost some good people like Bilaray. A good blue dod dem in NC won over a bad legalization Republican. Those that are Dems needed to help get the BLue Dogs back on their feet.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-43164326244247241832012-11-30T17:31:06.363-08:002012-11-30T17:31:06.363-08:00What people want dies not=zeitgeist What people want dies not=zeitgeist Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-4801157242585959812012-11-30T17:30:09.201-08:002012-11-30T17:30:09.201-08:00Umm you are confused what people want=zeitgeist as...Umm you are confused what people want=zeitgeist as I made clear by emphasizing the media's power over politics. Maybe before calling me a liar you understand what I was saying. We are close approaching Gramscian hegemony for the left that's the zeitgeist retard.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-5660430836649679242012-11-30T17:29:23.611-08:002012-11-30T17:29:23.611-08:00Peterike asked a bunch of questions.
Hunsdon repl...Peterike asked a bunch of questions.<br /><br />Hunsdon replies: Why yes. Have you considered that an unending stream of questions, absent any positive assertion, invites ridicule in return?<br /><br />I shall, however, attempt to address the general thrust of your comments. If I have properly parsed them, you seem to think, "Whiskey is right!" (And, conversely, "Hunsdon is wrong.") That is, President Obama intends to rule as a kind of grey Caesar, by diktat and fiat, and to prevail against him will require an assumption of Fabian tactics.<br /><br />Fabian tactics? Does one refer here to the actual Roman general Fabius Maximus, or to Sidney Webb's Fabian Society? While Whiskey does use "scorched earth" in his screed, one assumes that he refers more to rhetorical than actual warfare. (Webb himself was, of course, a mere figurehead for the Harvard WASP mafia of his day.) Shall we agree to limit ourselves to the rhetorical option? I shall do so, presuming that you are in agreement. If you wish (and Steve allows) to discuss more literally martial alternatives, we may do that at a later point.<br /><br />Fabian, or if one prefers, Gramscian, tactics are appropriate for certain situations. Bear in mind where (and when) the Fabian Society arose, to wit, in late 19th century England. The delaying game, of slowly building a consensus amongst the elite, was successful in a society dedicated to the rule of law, and with broad provisions for the freedom of speech. The winning, as it were, of hearts and minds---particularly among the elite.<br /><br />We face a number of problems with adopting this strategy. We all bear in mind Adam Smith's dictum that there is a lot of ruin in a nation, but we also think that we have been on that path for quite some time now, and that, further, we near the end of that road. The Gramscian long march through the institutions took how many generations, again? Two, three? I for one doubt that we have two or three generations left to avert the euphemistic "zombie apocalypse."<br /><br />Another issue which seems to confound Whiskey's prognosis is that whole "rule by fiat" thing that he, and indeed you, in echo, mention. The Fabian Society enjoyed some goodly success in Victorian England. Oddly enough, that success had no mirror in Alexandrian Russia. I should point out that Alexandrian Russia was an autocratic state, with a vigorous and widespread secret police, and a top down mentality. "Reform" in Russia took a rather different path.<br /><br />So Whiskey, and by extension you, sir, seem to be advocating a long march through institutions which are receptive, if not friendly, to our ideas, while at the same time waving your hands in the air about the autocratic nature of Obama (and presumably, any successor). Do you not, sir, see the contradiction there?<br /><br />To the extent that Whiskey advocates "dropping out" of society, however, I find myself somewhat in agreement, yet this runs counter to his "engage and destroy the MSM" strategy.Hunsdonnoreply@blogger.com