tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post5062472167117710515..comments2024-03-28T16:22:14.888-07:00Comments on Steve Sailer: iSteve: Yosemite Sam McCain blows his stack at HispanicsUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger68125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-65204213598744112772009-04-11T13:06:00.000-07:002009-04-11T13:06:00.000-07:00I'm not sure what you're getting at here [maybe I'...I'm not sure what you're getting at here [maybe I'm misunderstanding], but the modern-day evangelicals are just about the ONLY people in our society that the 17th-century Puritans would recognize.<BR/><BR/>No. 17th Puritans would never recognize evangelicals. Evangelicals, unlike the anabaptists, have been shaped by and are a response to the materialist views of 19th century idols Darwin, Marx and Freud.Stannoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-81014498411331258582009-04-09T22:32:00.000-07:002009-04-09T22:32:00.000-07:00Victoria: Yeah, "back in the day." And those peopl...<B>Victoria:</B> <I>Yeah, "back in the day." And those people would not recognize the fools who now parade around in their name, but are nothing more than Republican party flunkies.</I><BR/><BR/>I'm not sure what you're getting at here [maybe I'm misunderstanding], but the modern-day evangelicals are just about the ONLY people in our society that the 17th-century Puritans would recognize.<BR/><BR/>[Maybe also the various Anabaptists - Moravian and Mennonite - but that's about it.]Lucius Vorenusnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-49536619498066159842009-04-09T12:04:00.000-07:002009-04-09T12:04:00.000-07:00Lucius Vorenus said...Not that anyone cares about ...Lucius Vorenus said...<BR/><BR/><I>Not that anyone cares about that</I><BR/><BR/>Why should they care? America is about to enter a new era where the Catholic church is the largest faith. Soon we won't have to think about those evil heretics who left the Holy Mother Church and divided the pious masses from their chaste leaders. <BR/><BR/>/sarcasmAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-15759296797411482822009-04-09T10:53:00.000-07:002009-04-09T10:53:00.000-07:00Without them there would be no conservative moveme...<I>Without them there would be no conservative movement in America. </I><BR/><BR/>What conservative movement? Do you call those embarrassing, immature jerks who follow the Limbaugh-Hannity bandwagon the "conservative movement?" <BR/><BR/><BR/><I>Those evangelical nutcases were also the people who created this nation, back in the day.</I><BR/><BR/>Yeah, "back in the day." And those people would not recognize the fools who now parade around in their name, but are nothing more than Republican party flunkies.Victoriahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06823851448364528821noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-75018055464868324802009-04-09T09:34:00.000-07:002009-04-09T09:34:00.000-07:00"---In McCain's type of neighborhood Mexicans are ..."---In McCain's type of neighborhood Mexicans are an army of little men riding around in service vehicles and riding mowers. The Mexican army tank is a Toro.---"<BR/><BR/>Ha ha ha ha ha!<BR/><BR/>The illustrious Senator's new name:<BR/><BR/>Juan 'Sweat Stain' Insane 'Son of Cain'Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-64266043155812575642009-04-08T22:41:00.000-07:002009-04-08T22:41:00.000-07:00Those evangelical nutcases were also the people wh...Those evangelical nutcases were also <A HREF="http://i157.photobucket.com/albums/t45/maggie6138/marywinslow.jpg" REL="nofollow">the people who created this nation</A>, back in the day.<BR/><BR/>Not that anyone cares about that.Lucius Vorenusnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-36765731089956876002009-04-08T10:40:00.000-07:002009-04-08T10:40:00.000-07:00McCain's neighborhood may influence his views on i...<I>McCain's neighborhood may influence his views on immigration, since he doesn't live in south Mesa, Phoenix or the west valley.</I><BR/><BR/>In McCain's type of neighborhood Mexicans are an army of little men riding around in service vehicles and riding mowers. The Mexican army tank is a Toro.<BR/><BR/>Mormon elite are not particularly divided on illegal immigration. They are emphatically in favor of it. The last 3 governors of Utah, at least, support amnesty (Hunstman, Walker and Leavitt). The current AG supports it. Senator Bennett supports it. The LDS Church-owned newspaper and radio station have staunchly pro-amnesty editorial positions.<BR/><BR/>The LDS Church has always been on good terms with its richest members. While most moneyed men favor mass migration, the richest Mormons skew disproportionately towards businesses that benefit from it the most: real estate (Peery, Ivory, Fulton) and hotels (Holding, Marriott).<BR/><BR/>One factor in selecting the nominee is that the GOP prefers a familiar face. People who finished 2nd in the last open primary have a good shot at finishing first in the next. McCain (2000 & 2008), Dole (88 & 96), Bush (80 & 88) and Reagan (76 & 80). Romney still has a shot. He does seem a little too slick, a little too willing to adjust his positions to what the majority wants. I would argue that's a <I>good</I> thing.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-10212079977333660762009-04-08T07:23:00.000-07:002009-04-08T07:23:00.000-07:00Bill saidAre these washed up old Republicans reall...Bill said<BR/><BR/><I>Are these washed up old Republicans really so clueless that they thought that Chicano farm laborers would instantly morph into third generation Old World immigrants?</I><BR/><BR/>Yes. They watch television, which is now 100% propaganda for the multicult. Any real experience they have is in their neighborhoods (lily white) or their districts (Republicans largely are not from "vibrant" areas). They see the slappy-happy stuff on TV now and then, and so they think human differences are trivial.<BR/><BR/>They, like many of us, are living and dying in a propagandistic electronic cocoon.<BR/><BR/>Now I have to go watch "American Idol."Davidnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-2076775330595962632009-04-08T06:59:00.000-07:002009-04-08T06:59:00.000-07:00It may be time to get Irish on their butts.It may be time to get Irish on their butts.Davidnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-86950674322007626482009-04-08T06:53:00.000-07:002009-04-08T06:53:00.000-07:00Victoria said...Had it not been for those evangeli...Victoria said...<BR/><BR/><I>Had it not been for those evangelical nutcases, for whom Romney was not "Christian" enough and failed to exhibit the right attitude towards Jesus, he might very well be President today.</I><BR/><BR/>Those Evangelical "nutcases" are the only group that consistently votes Republican. Without them there would be no conservative movement in America. It makes sense that the GOP would at least take the considerations of the Evangelicals into account when campaigning, even if their promises to them are all lies.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-31531697714564077582009-04-07T23:51:00.000-07:002009-04-07T23:51:00.000-07:00togo said..."It's pretty pathetic having to place ...togo said...<BR/><BR/>"It's pretty pathetic having to place your hopes in the GOP given their track record. In fact, the whole concept of a "two party" system is pathetic. It always moves the debate toward the "center." The center may have been OK in Ike's day, but today the center is PC, Multiculturalism and Cultural Marxism. Plus big bailouts for private sector pirates and incompetents.<BR/><BR/>What is to be done? Armed revolt is suicidal, hiding out in the hills is both impractical and cowardly and "tea parties" are laughable. Instead start a campaign to institute proportional representation in as many venues as possible. That way candidates who speak the truth (instead of the usual assemblage of cynical careerists-liars-whores-thieves)have a chance to get elected to public office."<BR/><BR/>I agree. Placing our hopes on the GOP as it is now is a sucker's bet. They still stink. They really are the stupid party - the one's who aren't just bagmen for the wealthy, that is.<BR/><BR/>I used to think that PR was a bad idea. If it is, then it's a bad idea whose time has come. It's the only way for us to get some real representation. It will cause fractiousness, and may finally lead to the country breaking apart. But that's going to happen anyway, and when it does, I'd at least like to have someone representing my interests when the goods and real-estate are divied up.Mr. Anonnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-3589170748626910522009-04-07T22:52:00.000-07:002009-04-07T22:52:00.000-07:00Anonymous said: You people who keep blaming Romne...<I>Anonymous said: You people who keep blaming Romney's defeat on his Mormonism are batshit crazy. The guy has ZERO charisma.</I><BR/><BR/>Maybe what we need around here is a president with a little (lot?) less charisma.Junnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-50403529594480245482009-04-07T22:30:00.000-07:002009-04-07T22:30:00.000-07:00You people who keep blaming Romney's defeat on his...You people who keep blaming Romney's defeat on his Mormonism are batshit crazy. The guy has ZERO charisma. The more people saw him, the less they liked him. End of story.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-20421845247171224842009-04-07T20:32:00.000-07:002009-04-07T20:32:00.000-07:00"Remind me again how the Republican Party came to ..."Remind me again how the Republican Party came to nominate this guy for President?"<BR/><BR/>Winner take all primaries. <BR/><BR/>Steve, have you petitioned the California Republican Party to award delegates proportionally? <BR/><BR/>Wouldn't it be better if the number of delegates were related to the number of Republican Reps and Senators, rather than just total Reps and Senators? <BR/><BR/>Why should a blue state like CA have so much weight in the GOP primaries? <BR/><BR/>---<BR/><BR/>We need closed primaries. Also, the deadline for registering for voting in the primaries should be set well in advance of the primary date. <BR/><BR/>---<BR/><BR/>Basically, only the hardcore party faithful should vote in the primaries.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-77078244453092367602009-04-07T19:54:00.000-07:002009-04-07T19:54:00.000-07:00It was obvious even back in the 1990s that the med...It was obvious even back in the 1990s that the media was grooming and promoting McCain to be President. That "maverick" label really just meant Liberal Republican.<BR/><BR/>I believe it is too late for our nation anyway, no matter if the GOP sees the light. Changing demographics have assured our destruction as a cohesive, advanced nation. White babies are already nearing minority status, and that 2042 prediction of when Whites fall below 50% is off by a couple decades.Cat Patrolnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-48856514742586829082009-04-07T18:49:00.000-07:002009-04-07T18:49:00.000-07:00McCain is nuts and a jerk. Romney would be a far b...<I>McCain is nuts and a jerk. Romney would be a far better president than either McCain or Obama. </I><BR/><BR/>Had it not been for those evangelical nutcases, for whom Romney was not "Christian" enough and failed to exhibit the right attitude towards Jesus, he might very well be President today.<BR/><BR/><I>mccain wants obama to give jack johnson a presidential pardon for violating the mann act in 1913.</I><BR/><BR/>I've never read much about this Johnson and have never seen any of the dramatizations, since his life always sounded so repulsive. But are you sure the Mann act wasn't invoked because he was carrying on affairs with white women and just happened to travel with them, or did he actually traffic in prostitution, i.e., providing women for other men?<BR/><BR/><I>For example, why was Colin Powell against the war in Iraq? Probably because he knew that blacks had nothing to gain from it and something to lose from it - some of the soldiers killed in the neocon wars were going to be black.</I><BR/><BR/>Wow, you really have a naive understanding of things, if you think that black elites at the top give half a damn about what happens to the blacks on the bottom. Powell is about as "ethnocentric" as my cat!<BR/><BR/><I>In the end, we did not elect McCain, but how did he and Palin even managed to be in the running?</I><BR/><BR/>They were in the running for the same reason that the next Republican presidential candidates will be in the running -- they knew how to appeal to those evangelical lunatics, that is, profess love for The Fetus. That's all that's required to insure the nomination. The Single Issue zealots rule. <BR/><BR/><I>As an aside, that would be the white/Spanish Cubans (and, probably, Chinese Cubans) I think -- not so much Afro-Cubans.</I><BR/><BR/>Forget it. People on this side of the Atlantic don't seem to understand the difference between a real Spaniard, who is as white as any German or Anglo, and a "Hispanic" person, who is the result of Spanish men's sperm left in the wombs of the Indians and African slaves in North America during colonial times. To the typical American, Spanish means "Hispanic."Victoriahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06823851448364528821noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-87898597035511072172009-04-07T17:29:00.000-07:002009-04-07T17:29:00.000-07:00The Business Elites are no where near re-evaluatin...The Business Elites are no where near re-evaluating their race-replacement program. That's just wishful thinking.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-34975250550727267022009-04-07T17:13:00.000-07:002009-04-07T17:13:00.000-07:00"What Would King Solomon Do?"Cut the author of you..."What Would King Solomon Do?"<BR/><BR/>Cut the author of your response in half.Truthhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17286755693955361308noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-91954546036826104392009-04-07T16:19:00.000-07:002009-04-07T16:19:00.000-07:00The good news is that with McCain's defeat so goes...The good news is that with McCain's defeat so goes the rest of the pro-illegal Republicans. It will be much harder to run in the next election cycle as a Republican if they are not solidly anti-illegal. I suspect the Repubs will lose some industry support but good riddence anyway.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-74938550158373523562009-04-07T16:05:00.000-07:002009-04-07T16:05:00.000-07:00Steve Sailer wrote...By the way, I've been explain...Steve Sailer wrote...<BR/><BR/><I>By the way, I've been explaining for nine years that amnesty is not the royal road to Hispanic voters' hearts. With the exception of the Cubans and the <B>born-agains</B>, they tend to be natural Democrats for both tax-and-spend and racial reasons.</I><BR/><BR/>Actually, the Hispanic born-agains voted for Obama 50-34 (<A HREF="http://blog.faithinpubliclife.org/upload/2008/10/LATINO%20PROTESTANT%20POLL%20REPORT%20--%20Embargoed%20until%2010%2016%2008%20at%201%2000%20pm%20EDT.pdf" REL="nofollow">PDF</A>).Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-81372822342073501482009-04-07T15:06:00.000-07:002009-04-07T15:06:00.000-07:00Realty check: the whole world is going nuclear, pa...Realty check: the whole world is going nuclear, particularly our enemies Iran, Syria, North Korea, helped by Russia which shares with Iran the need for Oil at $200 a barrel to keep their patronage regimes going. Which btw kills the US. <BR/><BR/>What do you mean by "our"? Iran and syria are not in America's neighborhood.Jacknoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-14493982679453406842009-04-07T15:03:00.000-07:002009-04-07T15:03:00.000-07:00Indeed. That's one reason you'd think the elite wo...<I>Indeed. That's one reason you'd think the elite would be a bit more patriotic - there is no there there anymore, in terms of places to flee to. China? India? France? This time they've shat in all their nests.</I><BR/><BR/>I think they're <A HREF="http://www.opinionjournal.com/columnists/pnoonan/?id=110007460" REL="nofollow">just hoping they die</A> before the wheels come off completely.PRCalDudehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04536108855155262530noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-1375898423219176592009-04-07T14:33:00.000-07:002009-04-07T14:33:00.000-07:00"Remind me again how the Republican Party came to ..."Remind me again how the Republican Party came to nominate this guy for President?"<BR/><BR/>Sure Steve, I'd be glad to. First of all, the political insiders that run BOTH political parties AND the mainstream media allowed Mitt Romney, with the Mormon glass jaw, to lead the polls in Iowa and New Hampshire right up until the weeks before the Iowa caucuses. Suddenly the media "discovered" a new darling in the guise of that evangelical "Romney-Killer" Mike Huckabee. Miraculously, the Iowan evangelicals, energized by the specter of a dreaded Latter Day Saint in the White House came out in droves to defeat Romney in the Iowa straw poll and the nomination was all but secured for McCain.<BR/><BR/>Why? Because despite the fact that he was largely despised by a huge segment of the Republican grassroots (primarily for his back-stabbing, pro-amnesty votes in Congress) they were not allowed to believe that anyone else had a snowballs chance in Hell of defeating the Democratic candidate in November. The Des Moines Register in Iowa and the Manchester Union Leader in New Hampshire coincidentally were both inspired to endorse John McCain despite the fact that he had been languishing in the low single digits in the polls for years.<BR/><BR/>Huckabee was a one-trick pony who could only win against a Mormon. But with the Iowa win under his belt, and just enough positive publicity to shut out any other potential candidates, it was all over but the shouting. Ron Paul, the only REAL choice left in the race, was relentlessly and blatantly ignored or marginalized by the press throughout the rest of the primaries.<BR/><BR/>I'm not saying the GOP didn't get what they deserved, the media played them like a Stradivarius. <BR/>But they WERE played.<BR/><BR/>There, did that help?spacehabitatshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01540280499274649411noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-19130159354952141452009-04-07T13:48:00.000-07:002009-04-07T13:48:00.000-07:00Captain Jack Aubrey said...But for some inexplicab...Captain Jack Aubrey said...<BR/><BR/><I>But for some inexplicable reason, McCain hated Romney. The fact that McCain couldn't overlook his hatred for his own benefit demonstrated what a small man he was.</I><BR/><BR/>In McCain's defense, there is a large Mormon community here in the Phoenix metro area that is centered here in my suburb of Mesa. I wouldn't be surprised if McCain secretly despises them even if he has to get their votes to get reelected, since the Mormons have not always been easy to get along with. McCain may have confused Romney with the local LDS crowd.<BR/><BR/><BR/>Incidentally, these mormons are didivded on immigration. State legislator Russel Peirce is against illegal immigration, Jeff Flake is for it, both are Mormon. <BR/><BR/>Finally, I bet McCain lives in either Fountain Hills or north Scottsdale, both of which are rich, clean areas with low crime. McCain's neighborhood may influence his views on immigration, since he doesn't live in south Mesa, Phoenix or the west valley.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-18488055751006133702009-04-07T10:08:00.000-07:002009-04-07T10:08:00.000-07:00Members of the elite? Thinking about their kids an...<I>Members of the elite? Thinking about their kids and grandkids? Why, they can just emigrate to, to, ..... nevermind.</I><BR/><BR/>Indeed. That's one reason you'd think the elite would be a bit more patriotic - there is no <I>there</I> there anymore, in terms of places to flee to. China? India? France? This time they've shat in <I>all</I> their nests.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com