tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post5587493364533877231..comments2024-03-29T05:14:33.223-07:00Comments on Steve Sailer: iSteve: It's AIPAC Policy Conference timeUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger112125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-14011244118192327282011-05-24T12:12:33.544-07:002011-05-24T12:12:33.544-07:00White nationalists have been translating Solzhenit...White nationalists have been translating Solzhenitsyn's 200 Years Together online, but it's been taken down now. Does anyone have working links to the text?<br /><br />Here are Kevin MacDonald's commentaries on some of the chapters:<br /><br />http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2010/10/solzhenitsyn%E2%80%99s-%E2%80%9Cthe-february-revolution%E2%80%9D-chapter-13-of-200-years-together/<br /><br />http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2011/05/during-1917-chapter-14-of-solzhenitsyns-200-years-together/<br /><br /><br />http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/articles/MacDonald-Solzhenitsyn-200-Years-Together-18.html<br /><br />http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2010/08/alexandr-solzhenitsyns-%E2%80%9Cduring-the-soviet-german-war%E2%80%9D-chapter-21-of-200-years-together/<br /><br />http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2010/12/in-the-1930s-chapter-19-of-alexandr-solzhenitsyns-200-years-together/ATBOTLnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-79107323534447162502011-05-23T15:21:25.426-07:002011-05-23T15:21:25.426-07:00America would be better off in every possible way ...America would be better off in every possible way without its connection to Israel.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-65692781392307214842011-05-22T23:01:42.522-07:002011-05-22T23:01:42.522-07:00http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mk5LVFs3LlQ&fea...http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mk5LVFs3LlQ&feature=related<br /><br />We were assigned to watch MASADA back in grammar school--the teacher was an old Jewish woman-- when it first broadcast, and I'd forgotten it over the years. Seeing it again on dvd, it makes for interesting viewing in the era of the War on Terror.<br /><br />The story is about the Roman Empire vs a band of Zealots willing to fight to the last. <br /><br />What weird irony. Today, the world's neo-Roman-Empire, the US, is controlled by Jews, and the fanatical Muslism we are fighting in the Middle East are like the ancient Jewish Zealots.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-69401661179359660542011-05-22T21:47:25.531-07:002011-05-22T21:47:25.531-07:00Google is impressive? They've been stealing th...Google is impressive? They've been stealing their ideas from Bing ... for years.<br /><br />MSFT has been run aground by a mediocre CEO overall (more Jewish genius? Ha) but Bing is cutting edge.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-1152492241498459062011-05-22T21:40:05.420-07:002011-05-22T21:40:05.420-07:00Anonymous said...
There are more sports than bask...Anonymous said...<br /><br /><i>There are more sports than basketball and football.</i><br /><br />Not for most Americans.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-36533714129724183222011-05-22T19:05:50.889-07:002011-05-22T19:05:50.889-07:00Is there a bigger show of nauseating personal abas...Is there a bigger show of nauseating personal abasement than the annual AIPAC circus?Dutch Boyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02687679491743923216noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-10549136890051047612011-05-22T18:20:39.123-07:002011-05-22T18:20:39.123-07:00Israel is hostile to us? That's news to me.
I...<i>Israel is hostile to us? That's news to me.</i><br /><br />Is the sinking of the USS Liberty news to you?ben tillmannoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-24425602677464669662011-05-22T18:06:59.070-07:002011-05-22T18:06:59.070-07:00"Only 10% of the medals won in the Summer Oly..."Only 10% of the medals won in the Summer Olympics were by black people."<br /><br />I was talkinga bout prestige sports, not stuff like walking, synchro swimming, archery, field polo, and team handball."<br /><br />personally I am not interested in spectator sports much. Certainly sports-players were not that important prior to the 20th century. However, blacks do well basically in basketball, football and various forms of running and jumping. That's a lot of sports, but there are others like baseball, tennis, golf, horseback riding and racing, skiing, gymnasitcs, ice skating, soccer and ping pong, that are non-black dominated and appear to be reamining that way despite being entirely open to any black wishing to learn them.<br />And anyway, basketball and football are white inventions. If blacks are such sports geniuses, why haven't they invented their own games. Why don't they invent their own superheroes instead of insisting the white writers turn their white superheroes into sub-Saharan blacks?toboggan or not toboggsnnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-8909512539469950912011-05-22T17:39:06.254-07:002011-05-22T17:39:06.254-07:00Between 1200 A.D. and 1850 A.D., was there a singl...<i>Between 1200 A.D. and 1850 A.D., was there a single Jew of world-historical significance? </i><br /><br />Sure:<br /><br />Spinoza<br />Columbus (converso, but Jewish ancestry)<br />Isaac Luria<br />Menasseh ben Israel<br />Sabbatai Zevi<br />Disraeli<br />Marxben tillmannoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-46910625353028239492011-05-22T17:36:07.702-07:002011-05-22T17:36:07.702-07:00"Only 10% of the medals won in the Summer Oly..."Only 10% of the medals won in the Summer Olympics were by black people."<br /><br />I was talkinga bout prestige sports, not stuff like walking, synchro swimming, archery, field polo, and team handball.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-89540388105903347562011-05-22T14:09:31.167-07:002011-05-22T14:09:31.167-07:00"We are to be envied and admired for our lobb..."We are to be envied and admired for our lobbying efforts."<br /><br />*screws a whole bunch of Jewish girls in retaliation*Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-29855934732903559132011-05-22T13:40:33.609-07:002011-05-22T13:40:33.609-07:00I might be mistaken, but I don't think Steve i...<i>I might be mistaken, but I don't think Steve is particularly fond of Jews.</i><br /><br />Well put; in today's climate it takes a lot of fawning to come across as <i>particularly fond</i> of Ashkenazis.<br /><br /><i>What I am against is this mindless bashing of Jews for no reason other than what is probably just malice and envy.</i><br /><br />I'm into reciprocity. And there's an awful lot of Ashkenazi malice and envy to reciprocate. But really, the only thing I'm envious of is the fact that my people recognize Ashkenazis' right to rule themselves, but not their own.<br /><br /><i>As a half-Jew I will repeat which I always think of when Jews' support for immigration is discussed - GW Bush is not Jewish. Ted Kennedy was not Jewish. On and on and on. John McCain is not Jewish. While Jews mostly support more immigration (I don't), the bigger problem is white Gentiles supporting more immigration. White gentiles are split. That's the real problem.</i><br /><br />But this is like a crook using the fact that there are other crooks out there as a defense. Does anyone really buy that? Now, if we're apportioning blame, surely you can admit the possibility that ethnopatriotic Euros might be able to (or have been able to) handle the problem within, sans the problem from without?<br /><br />You can't just transform peoples' arguments whenever they don't suit you. That's called a straw man argument. I say Ashkenazis have been bad for Euros, which is an assertion that is quite distinct from "everything would be hunkey-dorey if not for Ashkenazis," or even "the problem might be manageable if not for Ashkenazis."<br /><br />Indeed, just look at your own characterization again:<br /><br />"White gentiles are split. That's the real problem."<br /><br />Yep. But what if the split was really close? And Ashkenazis are/were the deciding factor? What if team A could have defeated team B in if team Z hadn't helped team B?<br /><br /><i>The New York Times Jews are just as hostile to Jewish nationalism and Israeli territorial integrity, as they are toward expressions of those sentiments by Americans.</i><br /><br />Everyone who believes this please raise your hand.Svigorhttp://majorityrights.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-33540188438495137302011-05-22T11:52:19.774-07:002011-05-22T11:52:19.774-07:00By the number and kind of powerful people who are ...By the number and kind of powerful people who are eager to bow and scrape before them, AIPAC proves just how insignificant jewish power is in this country. Remember, they are a powerless and persecuted minority. And if you ever forget it, they will crush you.Mr. Anonnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-33218039147426078582011-05-22T11:45:20.936-07:002011-05-22T11:45:20.936-07:00Maybe that will happen in some future world in whi...<i>Maybe that will happen in some future world in which Israel's right to exist, like Ireland's and Italy's today, is no longer controversial or endangered.</i><br /><br />Italy's and Ireland's existence are endangered more than Israel's, through genocidal levels of non-white immigration (ever heard of Lampedusa?). Besides, they don't have an AIPAC to defend them, or 3 billions USD per year financial aid plus military assistance, or the whole American political class worshiping them as the best thing since sliced bread. And, talking about non-white immigration in white countries, it's a state of affairs not completely unrelated to the Jewish organizations, who push it relentlessly throughout the West, directly or via their military branch, the US. Their credo: nationalism is unacceptable, except Israeli nationalism.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-72609309137382350542011-05-22T11:29:35.987-07:002011-05-22T11:29:35.987-07:00"Anonymous said...
When provided with a read..."Anonymous said...<br /><br />When provided with a ready-made corpus of Western science, secular Jews proved extremely able at extending it and advancing it, and indeed, became most of the leading figures in the second great scientific revolution."<br /><br />This is not true. Jews have certainly contributed greatly to science, and many of the greatest scientists of the last century have been jews - but not most.Mr. Anonnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-57529798905374677932011-05-22T11:27:25.472-07:002011-05-22T11:27:25.472-07:00"Whiskey said...
AIPAC also is small pot..."Whiskey said...<br /><br /> AIPAC also is small potatoes compared to the Saudi lobbying effort (the Saudis paid Bill Clinton about $300 billion in speaking fees over the years and paid about half the GWB library fundraising amount)."<br /><br />$300 billion? $300 billion?! So Bill Clinton is now the richest man in the world - being some five or six times richer than Carlos Slim or Bill Gates? The Saudis have paid Clinton an amount comparable to the annual budget of the defence department?<br /><br />Whiskey, you are an idiot and a fool.Mr. Anonnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-5883575954267131502011-05-22T11:13:03.423-07:002011-05-22T11:13:03.423-07:00Y'all should know, by the way, that Jews who s...<i>Y'all should know, by the way, that Jews who support AIPAC, and the New York Times Jews whose dominance over the conversation in the US media you bemoan, are two quite distinct groups. The New York Times Jews are just as hostile to Jewish nationalism and Israeli territorial integrity, as they are toward expressions of those sentiments by Americans.</i> <br /><br /><br />I can't help but notice that Strauss-Kahn and his wife, Ann Sinclair, are two "international Jews" who are not at all hostile to Jewish nationalism but who are quite hostile to American nationalism. Their attitude to French nationalism falls somewhere between those two extremes.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-50247155094996794972011-05-22T11:08:43.517-07:002011-05-22T11:08:43.517-07:00I think immigration is a more sensitive issue in U...<i>I think immigration is a more sensitive issue in UK cuz it never habored the notion of 'UK is a nation of immigrants' whereas many whites in America have immigrant origins from the late 19th and early 20th century.</i> <br /><br />This nonsense about America being "a nation of immigrants" is of quite recent origin. Nobody in the late 19th and early 20th century was talking like this.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-73087054924065322442011-05-22T10:30:36.130-07:002011-05-22T10:30:36.130-07:00" suppose it's like blacks and sports. Be..." suppose it's like blacks and sports. Beore blacks gained equal access in sports, most of the great names in sports were white. But once blacks got an equal chance at sports, they totally blew away whites in many fields: track and field, boxing, basketball, football, etc. Since the 90s, even in tennis and golf. "<br /><br />Only 10% of the medals won in the Summer Olympics were by black people. Golf and tennis? Tiger is only part black and where are all the other blacks. There were more blacks in pro golf in the 70's-Calvin Peete, Jim Dent, Jim Thorpe.<br />There are more sports than basketball and football.<br /><br />Even in Jews were held back in the past, all the accomplishments were still done by whites. So we didn't need you.<br /><br />Did Jews invent money lending? Didn't the Medicis lend money?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-90947331217074494092011-05-22T09:37:12.073-07:002011-05-22T09:37:12.073-07:00RKU:
in 1789 France was the most centralized, most...RKU:<br /><i>in 1789 France was the most centralized, most absolute monarchy and had held that stable position for centuries. Yet soon thereafter, the king and all his aristocrats had their heads shortened. Similarly, in 1917 Russia filled a similar role in European states, and followed a similar trajectory.</i><br /><br />Nothing of this sort. By 1917, Russia's politics was in turmoil for at least 40 years. Tsar was killed by a bunch of terror-minded revolutionists in 1881, remember? <br />1905 Revolution, widespread terror, end of absolute monarchy, etc, etc. 1917 was a very logical consequence of the preceding half a century.Nanonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-53203827719351624302011-05-22T09:30:57.248-07:002011-05-22T09:30:57.248-07:00"As a half-Jew I will repeat which I always t..."As a half-Jew I will repeat which I always think of when Jews' support for immigration is discussed - GW Bush is not Jewish. Ted Kennedy was not Jewish. On and on and on. John McCain is not Jewish."<br /><br />So, as a half-Jew, you speak half-truths. <br /><br />While I agree that Jews were/are not the only people who are pro-immigration, just look at poll numbers and it's obvious no group is as pro-immigration as Jews are. Also, no group is as powerful as the Jews in pushing and getting what they want. <br />I'll concede on Ted Kennedy, but George W. Bush and McCain were pro-immigration for reasons different than those of Jews--and indeed they were given a pass by the Jewish media establishment becaue they were so pro-immigration(and pro-Jewish). <br /><br />Three reasons why Bush/McCain supported immigration. <br />1. They come from heavily Mexicanized states and wanted support from the Mexican-American community. <br />2. They hoped to use Mexicans as future counter-balance against blacks. <br />3. Big business lobbying. <br /><br />Anyway, Bush and McCain's pro-immigration stance wasn't as dangerous because there was no compelling MORAL reason behind it. It was mostly political or economic. If those clowns were the ONLY ones pushing immigration, we could counter them effectively. <br /><br />It was the Jews who MORALIZED the immigration issue so that most Americans, even those opposing it, dare not speak out or do so only mutedly because they don't want to be labeled as 'racist' or 'xenophobic. It's the Jews who turned the immigration issue into 'are you a Nazi or a KKK?' Thus morally defined, opposition to out-of-control immigration--even illegal immmigration--is regarded as EVIL. <br /><br />And Jewish control of mass media and education fooled a lot of kids that 'diversity' is not only wonderful and essential to our economic and cultural well-being but absolutely MORAL. This idiocy has spread so far and wide around the Western world that even Swedes are eager to import more Muslism to ruin their cities and more Africans to do their womenfolk. <br /><br />But then, no non-Jewish immigration to Israel! Oy, Jews deserve and need a state of their own. <br />And the so-called 'antisemitic' call for return to 67 borders by Obama is nothing of the kind. It is merely smoke-and-mirrors ruse for a landswap which hands over Arab-Israeli areas to the Palestinian authority, thereby making Israel even more homogeneously Jewish.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-90623137856201694562011-05-22T09:15:34.226-07:002011-05-22T09:15:34.226-07:00"In response, Jews took up fencing and soon b..."In response, Jews took up fencing and soon became some of the best fencers in Europe -- and the gentiles refused to fight them. So much for honor."<br /><br />Yeah, I think I saw something like this in Szabo's SUNSHINE. It could be Jews made better fencers because there is an element of bluffing and trickery. It's like using the 'tell' in Mamet's HOUSE OF GAMES. You make to strike 'this way' but feint and strike another way. Also, you have to read the opponent's movement--look for the 'tell' or bluff--before he makes it. It's a competition where wit can overcome strength. So, a Jew who fences like a haggler or comedian is bound to throw the more straight-laced gentile fencer off off the fence. <br /><br />It's like verbal dueling between William F. Buckley and Alan Dershowitz. Dersho usually won because, as agile as Buckley was, WFB's attacks were straight and narrow whereas Dershowitz's wit moved in arcs and curves. Left hook, uppercut, and fancy footwork are more effective than straight jabs and rooted-footed-ness.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-18113931942020321282011-05-22T09:05:40.212-07:002011-05-22T09:05:40.212-07:00"Wouldn't it be simpler if American Jews ..."Wouldn't it be simpler if American Jews just had a college football team to root for, the way American Catholics had the Notre Dame Fighting Irish?"<br /><br />Why would they need a college football team when they own much of the NFL? No matter which teams wins, Jews are proudly cheering the fact that they own the teams and the media that carry the games(and rakes in all the dough). <br />Jews own both political parties like they own sports teams. No matter which side wins, Jews win. <br />Jews own the left but also the hearts/minds of the Christian Right.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-30412694372490718412011-05-22T07:46:22.013-07:002011-05-22T07:46:22.013-07:00Wouldn't it be simpler if American Jews just h...<i>Wouldn't it be simpler if American Jews just had a college football team to root for, the way American Catholics had the Notre Dame Fighting Irish?</i><br /><br />Maybe that will happen in some future world in which Israel's right to exist, like Ireland's and Italy's today, is no longer controversial or endangered.<br /><br />Y'all should know, by the way, that Jews who support AIPAC, and the New York Times Jews whose dominance over the conversation in the US media you bemoan, are two quite distinct groups. The New York Times Jews are just as hostile to Jewish nationalism and Israeli territorial integrity, as they are toward expressions of those sentiments by Americans.International Jewnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-13999400476499577342011-05-22T07:15:26.573-07:002011-05-22T07:15:26.573-07:00Saw this bumpersticker: DIVERSE ENOUGHSaw this bumpersticker: DIVERSE ENOUGHAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com