tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post5919070892164944531..comments2024-03-19T02:31:02.140-07:00Comments on Steve Sailer: iSteve: "Jim Webb, the GOP, and The Sammy Sosa Solution"Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger69125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-17349308029312981542010-07-30T14:25:34.524-07:002010-07-30T14:25:34.524-07:00"That way, it feels less like LOSING OUT TO T..."That way, it feels less like LOSING OUT TO THE BLACK MAN and more like DOING A NOBLE PROGRESSIVE FAVOR FOR THE BLACK MAN. Pathetic."<br /><br />Yes, you've hit the nail on the head. It makes you feel more powerful, instead of less so, if you can believe that you did not acquiesce or pussy out in fear of a rival, but played an active role in his success. It's weird and, as you say, pathetic.Victoriahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06823851448364528821noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-89817733078138004282010-07-30T13:41:11.027-07:002010-07-30T13:41:11.027-07:00"Webb has repeatedly failed to marry a woman ..."Webb has repeatedly failed to marry a woman of similar background. Name of wife #1: Barbara Samorajczyk. #2 named: Jo Ann Kruka. #3 is named Hong Le ..."<br /><br />Weren't the first two wives, at least, white? Doesn't his son, who served in Iraq, have a white mother? It's the third wife that makes him a disgrace -- to give his son a mixed-race sibling is repulsive.<br /><br />"Like so many postmodern whites, his ethnic identity begins and ends, with himself."<br /><br />Yes.<br /><br />"Are you really so delusional that you believe some 5'1 Guatamalan dude is more attractive than a 6' Danish guy? You have a very bad case of projection, Whiskey."<br /><br />These kinds of claims made by Whiskey are so ridiculous. One can only think he is a long-suffering guy, who exonerates his lack of desirability with these weird tales about white women. "It's not that they don't desire me, they don't want any white men!" Ha!<br /><br />By the way, the business of whites tanning has nothing to do with anything. There is no desire to permanently remain tanned after one's summer holiday. It's just something to do, and does not equate to a Sosa story.Victoriahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06823851448364528821noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-78091373539633767262010-07-27T23:14:35.185-07:002010-07-27T23:14:35.185-07:00"Let's hope he's as ashamed of playin..."Let's hope he's as ashamed of playing host to "white aggrievement" as people like you are of your total disinterest in free expression"<br /><br />Are they really any less interested in free expression then you are? I hear you constantly complaining about the NAACP, Obama, Jeremiah Wright, The Ivy league, etc.Truthhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17286755693955361308noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-1669969737972247972010-07-27T22:31:04.618-07:002010-07-27T22:31:04.618-07:00In pogroms, 1000s of Jews were killed at one time....In pogroms, 1000s of Jews were killed at one time. Under communism, 20 million Slavic Christians perished within a period of 15 yrs. If we add WWI, Civil War, and WWII, the total of Russian losses comes to at least 45million in the 20th century alone. And even those who survived often went on famine rations, and under communism, they had no rights, no freedoms. In the Taiping Rebellion in the 19th century, 20-30 million died. During the 20th century, at least 70 million--possibly 100 million--chinese died in wars, famines, genocides, etc. And stuff like this happened all across Asia and does to this day in N. Korea and Burma. In Latin America, chicken pox may have killed 50 million out of original 60 million people. If we see the American experience in the larger context of Eurpean conquest of the New World, the decimation of Indigenous people in South and Central America almost has no equal in history. And we can go on and on and on. I've known people who came from Poland(and survived WWII), from Vietnam(with memories of colonial wars and Vietnam War and communism etc), Greece and Armenia(very tragic histories, far more so than black American history in the 20th century). <br /><br />Now, Americans should not be responsbile for all the horrors that took place in the world, but I cringe when I hear stupid stuff like, 'immigrants do better than blacks because they didn't suffer like blacks did'. These people are either moronically ignorant of world history or just downright devoious and vile. If anything, it's American blacks who do NOT KNOW how lucky they've been to have lived in America. Sure, living under whites could be trying at times but any Russian, Pole, Chinese, Armenian, or whatever would have traded roles with any black American when the shit hit the fan over and over and over in the 19th and 20th centuries. The entire population of black-Americans is 40 million. Around 40 million Chinese painfully starved to death in a few yrs during the Great Leap Forward. Yet, dumb provincial Americans think immigrants don't suffer from historical trauma cuz they never went through anything like an occasional lynching suffered by blacks. <br /><br />Btw, I wonder what Steve Sailer thinks about Hawaiians and Eskimos? Didn't they lose their lands to newcomers too? Shouldn't they be included with blacks and Indians?adsfasdfasdfnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-58313390037683485432010-07-27T22:30:45.068-07:002010-07-27T22:30:45.068-07:00Though Americans should not be responsible for and...Though Americans should not be responsible for and responsive to all the miseries and evils around the world, the emphasis on black suffering in the US has led to the ridiculous notion that blacks suffered more than anyone else and 'nobody knows the trouble he seen, noboby but a negro'. <br /><br />I'll grant the Atlantic slave trade was brutal but seen in the context of their time, was slavery in the American South really the worst thing in the world? Far from it. Materially, it wasn't so bad at all. In material terms, blacks actually lived better than most people around the world--even better than many northern white farmers and European peasants and workers. Of course, blacks didn't have political and social freedoms or rights, but how many democracies were there around the world in 1865? For 95% of mankind, concepts such as human rights was science fiction. Black experience in America can only be said to be terrible under the very high standards set by the creators of this republic. Otherwise, one would have been luckier to be a black slave than a Russian serf, Chinese slave or tenant farmer, a Hindu slave, Arab commoner, etc. <br />Even after slavery, it is true blacks did not have full rights, but they still had more rights and freedoms than most people on Earth. And blacks never had to worry about mass violence or famine or such. Now, compare the horrors that swept through the Ottoman empire, Chinese empire, Russian empire, all over Africa, etc, etc in the 19th century and 20th century. I heard from 1865 to 1965, only 2000 blacks were lynched to death. Horrible number but let's put it in perspective. And during the Civil Rights era, only a handful of blacks were killed.adfadssdfsfnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-82700466388402699812010-07-27T21:52:34.151-07:002010-07-27T21:52:34.151-07:00Reading Webb's op-ed, I was struck by the diff...Reading Webb's op-ed, I was struck by the different kinds of sympathies. <br />There is sympathy. <br />There is sympathy with guilt. <br />There is sympathy with guilt and fear. <br /><br />Whites may feel sympathy for any down-and-out or oppressed people on Earth, but without the element of guilt, it's no big deal, noting to lose sleep over. Whites feel this way about most Asians and Hispanics. I mean who really cares about Tibetans or Bolivians? <br /><br />Then, there is white sympathy WITH GUILT regarding a certain people if whites had done something bad to them in the past. American Indians fit this mold. Their lands were 'stolen' by whites. And lots of Westerns were made with Injuns being little more than target practice. So, there is sympathy and guilt but there is no fear. Most Indians live in reservations or are invisible to most of us. <br /><br />Then, there is sympathy plus guilt plus fear, and this pertains mainly to blacks. There is the slavery thing but there is also white fear of black muscle, crime, political bullying, rioting, etc. Webb focuses on guilt but I suspect his special concession to black Americans is based at least halfway on fear that many whites share.asdfasdfsdfnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-64294389155977365672010-07-27T20:17:53.892-07:002010-07-27T20:17:53.892-07:00Mr. Sailer, I wonder, do you ever feel ashamed abo...<i>Mr. Sailer, I wonder, do you ever feel ashamed about playing host to so much White aggrievement?<br /><br />For a group who enjoys every advantage in this country, you folks do an awful lot of whining.</i><br /><br />This is a bit like the fat rich kid complaining that he only gets 99% of his favorite store's inventory.<br /><br />Let's hope he's as ashamed of playing host to "white aggrievement" as people like you are of your total disinterest in free expression (which is, of course, the only reason "white aggrievement" is absent from most blogs and forums).<br /><br />Leftists: they can't tolerate even one speakeasy.Svigorhttp://majorityrights.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-27626622433677974172010-07-27T19:40:45.670-07:002010-07-27T19:40:45.670-07:00Max to the bottom and choose the "basic versi...<i>Max to the bottom and choose the "basic version"</i><br /><br />Thankyouthankyouthankyou.Svigorhttp://majorityrights.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-7292843219509069292010-07-27T17:32:37.156-07:002010-07-27T17:32:37.156-07:00Affirmative action is a bad thing but there's ...Affirmative action is a bad thing but there's another problem. <br />Call it the guilt/privilege paradox. <br /><br />We generally associate 'white guilt' with whites losing privilege and power. Since 'white guilt' argues whites did alot of evil, criminal, shameful things in the past, the implication is whites need to make amends and concessions to repair the damage. And indeed many whites lose out as a result of this. But many whites, especially well-educated liberal elites, gain huge advantages from this. Since SO MUCH NEEDS TO BE DONE, there are many organizations, institutions, committees, foundations, and etc that look into social problems and seek solutions to fix them. Guess who runs most of these bastions of new power? White elitists. And what if their proposals fail to bring blacks and browns up to par with other whites? Then, the privileged sons and daughters of these white liberal elitists inherit and run these organizations. When a rich white liberal yammers about 'white guilt', he or she means something must be done and HE or SHE--and her friends and family members--should control and devise the means of doing it. So, 'white guilt' is also a huge industry of white power/privilege, at least for white liberal elitists. <br /><br />But there is also a psychological element to the guilt/privilege paradox. Some whites who really do lose out feel better about their social-historical defeat by embracing 'white guilt'. They can fool themselves that they lost out because (1) they morally deserved to lose out (2) they are noble because they accepted the loss with grace (3) they CHOSE lose out for good of progress. <br />If you're a wasp who loses out to Jews in business and loses out to blacks in sports, 'white guilt' might be therapeutic. Instead of being overcome with bitterness and envy, you can say something like, "we whites ran everything for so long, and we kicked butt so many times, it's time we lost too once in awhile and got our butts kicked too." It works like ointment on an aching butt. Even without political or economic power, a white guy can psychologically feel empowered through 'white guilt'. He can pretend that his loss and defeat was something he himself engineered and/or accepted gracefully out of own goodness of heart and raised consciousness. <br /><br />For example, take Lawrence O'Donnell, a passionate proponent of interracial relations. We all know white women go with black men cuz black men in greater numbers because black men are winning the TOP STUD CONTEST, whereby white males are becoming irrelevant as icons of male sexuality and prowess. O'Donnell, by making lots of noises about interracial relations, is pretending that the new sexual order has been made possible by a good-hearted and 'progressive anti-racist' fighter such as he. No longer sexually relevant, a wussy white boy is trying to remain politically and morally relevant, as if to suggest, "white women and black men can finally do one another cuz a good, conscientious, and noble white liberal like myself has allowed it to happen." <br />That way, it feels less like LOSING OUT TO THE BLACK MAN and more like DOING A NOBLE PROGRESSIVE FAVOR FOR THE BLACK MAN.<br />Pathetic.asdfasdfasdfnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-37509759776882978442010-07-27T09:54:23.003-07:002010-07-27T09:54:23.003-07:00In the full (Vdare) article, Steven makes the inte...<i>In the full (Vdare) article, Steven makes the interesting point that we don't even know how much religious underrepresentation there is, because no one asks about it. </i><br /><br />And the fact that the EEOC ignores religion is due to the efforts of tribester Alfred Blumrosen.<br /><br /><i>In violation of the Civil Rights Act, Blumrosen’s EEOC sent out official forms to major American corporations demanding a “race count” to determine the proportionality of various races working at the firms. This annual race count should be deemed as notorious as Germany’s Jew count, but it is generally ignored—or applauded—by scholars. Soon thereafter the EEOC also required corporations to submit sex and ethnicity counts, all aimed to force employers to hire a racially, sexually, and ethnically proportional workforce. But Blumrosen ensured that the EEOC never inquired about religion. He was determined to prevent a proportional workforce based on religion—though religion was one of the categories mentioned in the Civil Rights Act of 1964.</i><br /><br />Appareently, this is discussed here:<br /><br />Hugh Davis Graham, The Civil Rights Era: Origins and Development of National Policy, 1960-1972 (New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990), pp. 118-52, 177-221.<br /><br />Moreover,<br /><br /><i>[t]he authors of Title VII (the employment section) of the 1964 Civil Rights Act consistently and clearly opposed the use of quotas to remedy discriminatory hiring practices, but Alfred Blumrosen, a ranking civil servant at the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) and a classic bureaucratic zealot, deliberately subverted those intentions. <br /><br />Through “creative interpretation” of Title VII, he reoriented the EEOC toward an acceptance of the need for quotas or analogous forms of compliance assessment.</i>ben tillmannoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-86430495511838443432010-07-27T09:01:08.575-07:002010-07-27T09:01:08.575-07:00"1. We should emphasize that amnesty for ille..."1. We should emphasize that amnesty for illegal immigrants will mean millions more people entitled to preferential treatment. (This observation is rarely discussed, but it will sour most people on both amnesty and on preference programs.)"<br /><br />Over and over and over<br />and over and over and over and over.<br /><br />sorry for shouting, but THIS IS THE KEY FACT TO GET ACROSS TO PEOPLEAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-33205866837635871222010-07-27T05:26:39.690-07:002010-07-27T05:26:39.690-07:00"Getting rid of the annoying White guy two cu...<i>"Getting rid of the annoying White guy two cubicles over who checks them out with a dominant darker skinned man is a plus for White women."</i><br /><br /><br />That's more than I wanted to know about your personal life, Whiskey. The fact that women consider you a creepy stalker does not mean that they dislike white men.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-20918491302493668012010-07-27T05:21:01.652-07:002010-07-27T05:21:01.652-07:00It's okay to be a little fuzzy on the details....<i>It's okay to be a little fuzzy on the details. If the need be, you can just make them up, like your natural leaders Kevin MacDonald and Pat Buchanan.</i> <br /><br /><br /><br />Have you ever actually <i>read</i> MacDonald and Buchanan, or are they just scary figures which haunt your dreams and which you in your turn will scare your children with?<br /><br />For a supposedly intelligent people, Jews sure do <i>emote</i> a lot.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-70266937404631190102010-07-27T00:36:55.916-07:002010-07-27T00:36:55.916-07:00Before WW2 in the UK, dark skin was unfashionable ...Before WW2 in the UK, dark skin was unfashionable - a hangover from the not very distant days when it meant you worked in the fields. Women in Victorian England took great care to cover their arms in the sun.<br /><br />Tanning really seems to have come in during the post-war years, when the rich were holidaying in the South of France and Barbados. Before, it denoted 'labouring class', after 'leisured class'.Labanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12031578024191117985noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-15574510374528893872010-07-26T22:48:23.209-07:002010-07-26T22:48:23.209-07:00Are white college women happy that they have a har...<i>Are white college women happy that they have a harder time getting a boyfriend at many colleges because they outnumber men on campus? I have read a few articles about it and they did not think it was catnip. What evidence do you have that they like it when they outnumber white men?</i><br />I talked to a girl at a music conservatory a year ago... which, as may be surmised, is heavily female and many of the men there don't fancy women. She says many of the girls there are borderline crazy from the lack of straight male attention. Many go lesbian to pass the time even though they prefer men.<br /><br /><i>White women hate white men? That must be new. White people didn't hatch out of eggs. To create white people, you'll need white women to love white men. (lols if you didn't know this)</i><br />He apparently hasn't thought much about the married/single voting divide among white women, how they vote for the Dumbos when single but switch to the GOP when they get that ring -- which is one of their secret life goals. Yes, even now. I guess one worthy idea would be to convince single white women to vote GOP rather than Dem.corvinusnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-24057588261339806062010-07-26T22:21:29.022-07:002010-07-26T22:21:29.022-07:00Mercer,
Does anyone know when it became fashionab...Mercer,<br /><br /><i>Does anyone know when it became fashionable for American whites to tan?</i><br /><br />Obviously, whenever THE Jews consolidated their power. Probably about six millennia ago. It's okay to be a little fuzzy on the details. If the need be, you can just make them up, like your natural leaders Kevin MacDonald and Pat Buchanan.<br /><br /><i>Do whites in other countries tan?</i><br /><br />It depends; do you feel that THE Jews have Vast World Reach, or do you believe in the Pristine White Haven? If the former, then they do; if the latter, then they don't. And you can definitely have it both ways (like Average Joe, for example), in which case, it's sometimes.Immigrant Group Quintilingualnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-47911379960063453842010-07-26T21:15:44.505-07:002010-07-26T21:15:44.505-07:00"Moreover, Women mostly prefer darker skinned..."Moreover, Women mostly prefer darker skinned guys, who are viewed as more masculine, more dominant, more well endowed. Getting rid of the annoying White guy two cubicles over who checks them out with a dominant darker skinned man is a plus for White women."<br /><br />Huh? So its just dark skin that white women like? Are you really so delusional that you believe some 5'1 Guatamalan dude is more attractive than a 6' Danish guy? You have a very bad case of projection, Whiskey.BamaGirlnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-4187537728037504512010-07-26T21:10:35.067-07:002010-07-26T21:10:35.067-07:00"Does anyone know when it became fashionable ..."Does anyone know when it became fashionable for American whites to tan? Do whites in other countries tan?"<br /><br />Eastern Europeans tan. Alot of British women have fake tans from what I've seen. Scandinavians seem to go tanning as well. Not so sure about the rest of Europe though.<br />I'd assume it started in the 30s, maybe earlier. My grandmother who was born in the mid twenties described going tanning when she was a teenager.BamaGirlnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-37793004917084266132010-07-26T20:38:21.819-07:002010-07-26T20:38:21.819-07:00Why'd you go and call Obama names? Be nice, Tw...Why'd you go and call Obama names? Be nice, Twoof. The poor guy's got enough trouble already without your making everybody think he's on the downlow.<br /><br />Now have a King Cobra with that Newport and <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tsc4GWgZ-e4&NR=1" rel="nofollow">get your crunk on!</a>kudzu bobhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00865247508134005274noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-51779148618681899512010-07-26T19:49:31.102-07:002010-07-26T19:49:31.102-07:00I only smoke Newports, Kools are for fags.I only smoke Newports, Kools are for fags.Truthhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17286755693955361308noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-28528711003978321842010-07-26T19:33:03.434-07:002010-07-26T19:33:03.434-07:00... Getting rid of the annoying White guy two cubi...<i>... Getting rid of the annoying White guy two cubicles over who checks them out with a dominant darker skinned man is a plus for White women. ... </i><br /><br />So change your life, Whiskey.<br /><br />Quit that nerdy cubicle job.<br /><br />Take up a manly occupation that your mother won't like.David Davenportnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-63623010731367588312010-07-26T19:12:05.212-07:002010-07-26T19:12:05.212-07:00Fred said...
Witness the unsympathetic reaction t...Fred said...<br /><br /><i>Witness the unsympathetic reaction to that Indian lacrosse team that missed the tournament in Britain because the Brits wouldn't take their homemade Indian nation passports and the Indians didn't want to travel on U.S. passports.</i><br /><br />Yes I noticed that. It got a lot of play up here in Canada (a lot of the Iroquois players live on the Canadian side of the border in cross-border reserves notorious for smuggling and crime). As far as I can tell nobody else gives a rat turd.<br /><br />Encouraging.CJnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-78443725190823856712010-07-26T19:02:18.650-07:002010-07-26T19:02:18.650-07:00I'll pass on your kind of offer of skin-whiten...I'll pass on your kind of offer of skin-whitening cream, Twoof, but I wouldn't mind a Kool.kudzu bobhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00865247508134005274noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-26897148378408900752010-07-26T18:22:39.226-07:002010-07-26T18:22:39.226-07:00As cosmetic procedures become safer, cheaper, and ...<i>As cosmetic procedures become safer, cheaper, and more effective, it is likely that more and more people will choose to look more and more European...... Perhaps this sort of thing will be the solution to our racial problems.</i><br /><br />EVOLUTION DOES NOT WORK THAT WAY!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-87418270981634959612010-07-26T16:56:36.940-07:002010-07-26T16:56:36.940-07:00Whiskey said...
"White women form the backbo...<i>Whiskey said...<br /><br />"White women form the backbone, politically, as the swing force behind AA."</i><br /><br />Thats BS! Sounds like you need to brush up on your history. Jewish ethnic activist have always been (and still are) the backbone behind affirmative action. Support for AA is slowly diminishing within in the Jewish community, because they now form an elite group and have nothing to gain from AA anymore. Hence, they now want to protect the status quo.<br /><br /><br /><br /><i>"...Getting rid of the annoying White guy two cubicles over who checks them out with a dominant darker skinned man is a plus for White women."</i><br /><br />White women hate white men? That must be new. White people didn't hatch out of eggs. To create white people, you'll need white women to love white men. (lols if you didn't know this)<br /><br />The deepest hatred for White men has always come (and still does) from the most extreme element of the Jewish community. Watch a few Hollywood movies and you’ll see. White women, like all women, are social creatures. They are heavily influenced by what they see on TV.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com