tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post6803360159396266358..comments2024-03-27T18:24:19.683-07:00Comments on Steve Sailer: iSteve: In 2006, the Long Predicted Tidal Wave of Angry Hispanic Voters Failed to Materialize Once AgainUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger32125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-48838069760293306782007-09-26T16:10:00.000-07:002007-09-26T16:10:00.000-07:00FYI, Richard Nadler just came out with some new nu...FYI, Richard Nadler just came out with some new numbers which indicate that the tide may have turned, and that Hispanics will determine the 2008 presidential winner:<BR/><BR/><B>Border Wars: The Impact of Immigration on the Latino Vote</B><BR/><A HREF="http://www.amermaj.com/Border_Web.pdf" REL="nofollow">http://www.amermaj.com/Border_Web.pdf</A><BR/>[~1MB PDF FILE]<BR/><BR/>Some remarks by Larry Kudlow at The Corner:<BR/><BR/><B>A GOP Recipe for Electoral Disaster</B><BR/><A HREF="http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=MzExMDI0NjE5MjBhNzMwNGJkMmU5MzE1MmRkN2FlOTc=" REL="nofollow">corner.nationalreview.com</A>Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-21782344651171359022007-08-15T11:57:00.000-07:002007-08-15T11:57:00.000-07:00...Michelle Malkin. The fearless anti illegal-immi...<I>...Michelle Malkin. The fearless anti illegal-immigration stalwart...funny how her preferred 2008 candidate apparently is...Rudy Guiliani.</I><BR/><BR/>Malkin has defended Guiliani against attacks from Dems.....but I'm not sure that he is her candidate. <BR/><BR/>One thing is for sure though: she has no problem with mass LEGAL immigration. And obviously that means she has no great respect for traditional white America..... and no great desire to preserve it.<BR/><BR/>I believe Malkin is a fervent Christian and therefore amenable to open borders as long as they are well-regulated enough to weed out criminals. <BR/><BR/>In other words an orderly productive right-leaning small government Christian NON-WHITE America in 50 years time would be perfectly OK with her. <BR/><BR/>Can we all see the futility of that thinking?<BR/><BR/>This goes back to Auster's ironic observation that delegating control over the demographic future of your race culture or tradition to an outsider is fundamentally pointless and ultimately destructive. <BR/><BR/>The above observation is ironic of course because Auster has stated that he self-identifies as an Ashkenazi Jew..... and at the same postures as white gentile America's conservator.<BR/><BR/>It should be noted also that many white guys like O'Reilly and Hewitt and Limbaugh are also completely onboard the ship of fools. So a non-white ambassador of bad ideas is not a necessary component of this folly.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-21169929203613162932007-08-14T07:25:00.000-07:002007-08-14T07:25:00.000-07:00"If Washington insiders weren't so clueless about ..."If Washington insiders weren't so clueless about these numbers, they never would have tried to inflict their amnesty bill on us."<BR/><BR/>I don't think it is so much the potential vote they worried about, but about appeasing current voters and how they felt about the issue.<BR/><BR/>Further, a NY politician has said that it would be bad for NY economy if illegal residents were to get up and go. So, there were economic reasons behind this movement, not a blanket amnesty plan.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-69503114677117181132007-08-13T13:55:00.000-07:002007-08-13T13:55:00.000-07:00anon 4:29:"But isn't this really the UK version of...anon 4:29:<BR/>"But isn't this really the UK version of "boob bait for the bubbas"? The Tories hardly have a good record on controlling immigration. Nothing as insane as the record of the current government, of course."<BR/><BR/>Well if elected in 2005 I think they would have reduced UK immigration to below the insane levels created by the Labour govt, although it would have remained very high by historical standards. <BR/>- SNAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-82836274045906298692007-08-13T06:35:00.000-07:002007-08-13T06:35:00.000-07:00"We must have an immigration timeout. Then we must..."We must have an immigration timeout. Then we must erect a new cultural norm"<BR/><BR/>Good luck. The schools and the media are 100% cultural Marxist - i.e. their hidden assumption is that whites are the worst people in the world. Every child grows up believing (implicitly or explicitly) that the locus of such social evil as exists in the world is the white race as such. Whites can be decent only if they deny their nature or exercise noblesse oblige - such is the very oxygen of the culture today (and for a long time). This is the source of Competitive Moralism.<BR/><BR/>The long-term solution is homeschooling on the part of good, healthy, race-realist people. The system is rotten. Alternative, non-state institutions and practices must be grown from the ground up. "We're the government and we're here to help you" has never been more false.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-4721570267001041652007-08-13T04:29:00.000-07:002007-08-13T04:29:00.000-07:00"In 2005 the Conservative party had a Jewish leade...<I>"In 2005 the Conservative party had a Jewish leader, Michael Howard, and Jewish Shadow Chancellor, Oliver Letwin. They ran an anti-immigration campaign, with posters "It's Not Racist To Set Limits on Immigration".</I><BR/><BR/>But isn't this really the UK version of "boob bait for the bubbas"? The Tories hardly have a good record on controlling immigration. Nothing as insane as the record of the current government, of course.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-76770933178604107062007-08-13T02:10:00.000-07:002007-08-13T02:10:00.000-07:00Here's a listing of post-1974 Jewish politicians i...Here's a listing of post-1974 Jewish politicians in the UK. They're pretty evenly divided between right and left, though only the Conservatives seem to welcome Jewish leaders (the 19th century Jewish PM Disraeli was Conservative). The rise of the Muslim vote can threaten Jewish Labour MPs like Oona King, ousted by the Respect Party, a revolutionary-Marxist/Islamist alliance.<BR/><BR/>From:<BR/>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_British_Jewish_politicians<BR/><BR/>Leon Brittan, Baron Brittan of Spennithorne (born 1939) (1974) [28], Conservative cabinet minister, European Commissioner <BR/>Helene Hayman (1974), MP / Life Peer (JYB 2005 p212) <BR/>Nigel Lawson, Baron Lawson of Blaby, Conservative cabinet minister and life peer (1974) - JYB 2005 p212 <BR/>Millie Miller (1974)[18], Labour MP <BR/>Sir Malcolm Rifkind (1974) [29], Conservative cabinet minister <BR/>Alf Dubs (1979) [30], Labour MP and life peer <BR/>Edwina Currie (1983) [31], Conservative minister <BR/>Michael Howard (1983) [32], Conservative cabinet minister & party leader (2003-2005) <BR/>Barbara Roche (1992) [33], Labour minister <BR/>Margaret Hodge (1994) [34], Minister of State for Industry and the Regions <BR/>John Bercow (1997)[19], Conservative MP <BR/>Louise Ellman (1997) [35], Labour MP <BR/>Fabian Hamilton (1997) [36], Labour MP <BR/>Evan Harris (1997) [37], Liberal Democrat MP <BR/>Oona King (1997) [38], Labour MP (1997-2005), second black female MP (Jewish mother), niece of Miriam Stoppard <BR/>Oliver Letwin (1997) [39], Conservative shadow cabinet member, Chairman of the Policy Review & Chairman of the Conservative Research Department <BR/>Ivan Lewis (1997) [40], Minister of State for Health <BR/>David Miliband (2001), Labour Party policy chief & Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs (Jewish Chronicle, 12/5/2006 p7: "Jewish MP David Miliband") <BR/>Lynne Featherstone (2005), Liberal Democrat MP (Evening Standard (London); 11/04/05; ANDREW GILLIGAN; p. 16) <BR/>Ed Miliband (2005) [41], Minister for the Cabinet Office and Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster. Brother of David Miliband and son of theorist Ralph Miliband. <BR/>Lee Scott (2005)[20], Conservative MP <BR/>Susan Kramer (2005) Liberal Democrat MP for Richmond Upon ThamesAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-73510956540161470512007-08-12T19:30:00.000-07:002007-08-12T19:30:00.000-07:00Many Jews, like me, believe in restricting immigra...Many Jews, like me, believe in restricting immigration. But the elite Jews, like elites everywhere, don't. I certainly don't think more low-IQ immigrants helps us in the long run.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-66915033265160266012007-08-12T16:13:00.000-07:002007-08-12T16:13:00.000-07:00Thanks for posting a list of press releases from l...<I>Thanks for posting a list of press releases from liberal Jewish organizations in America. That clarifies why the leading Jewish politicians in Britain campaigned on an immigration restrictionist platform.</I><BR/><BR/>I agree partly with sn and partly with anonymous 8:59 (especially possibility #1). Importing a bunch of people are who are rabidly anti-Jewish and anti-Zionist cannot be that attractive to most Jews. If neo-Nazis were America's primary immigrants, more Jews in this country would be singing the praises of immigration reduction too.<BR/><BR/>Does anyone have a list of current Jewish MPs in Britain?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-59015194551386125232007-08-12T15:43:00.000-07:002007-08-12T15:43:00.000-07:00anon 8:59:"Some of the Jews of Britain, France, Ho...anon 8:59:<BR/>"Some of the Jews of Britain, France, Holland etc are concerned about Islamic anti-semitism..."<BR/><BR/>FWIW, I think that when Michael Howard and Oliver Letwin campaigned on an anti-immigration platform in 2005, it was not because of a "what's good for the Jews?" calculation (this predated the 7/7 attacks btw), but simply a "what's good for Britain?" calculation combined with "what will get us elected?". <BR/><BR/>Perhaps strangely, British Jewry seem both more religious AND less ethnocentric than their American equivalents; my impression is that Howard, Letwin and most other prominent British Jews think of themselves as British first, Jewish second - ie they're basically patriots. <BR/><BR/>In fact I rather wonder whether the secularism of most American Jews contributes to their more ethnocentric view - if Judaism becomes less important as a religion, perhaps for them it becomes more important as an ethnicity. <BR/>- SN<BR/>- SNAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-68962326070127386892007-08-12T12:50:00.000-07:002007-08-12T12:50:00.000-07:00Tommy,Thanks for posting a list of press releases ...Tommy,<BR/><BR/>Thanks for posting a list of press releases from liberal Jewish organizations in America. That clarifies why the leading Jewish politicians in Britain campaigned on an immigration restrictionist platform.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-8530860295202665172007-08-12T09:40:00.000-07:002007-08-12T09:40:00.000-07:00I was scanning a related thread...http://michellem...<I>I was scanning a related thread...</I><BR/><BR/><I>http://michellemalkin.com/</I><BR/><BR/>Yes, Michelle Malkin. The fearless anti illegal-immigration stalwart. <BR/><BR/>Funny how her preferred 2008 candidate apparently is...Rudy Guiliani. The man who made NYC a sanctuary city for illegal aliens, and the man who can be counted on to make the USA a sanctuary nation for illegal aliens.<BR/><BR/>btw Matt Drudge can't even bring himself to post a headline saying Romney won the Iowa straw poll. <BR/><BR/>For Nuevo Conservatives, illegal alien-loving Rudy Guiliani is the only game in town.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-19029383778725520892007-08-12T08:59:00.000-07:002007-08-12T08:59:00.000-07:00Why would Jewish politicians in Britain campaign o...<I>Why would Jewish politicians in Britain campaign on an immigration restrictionist platform?</I><BR/><BR/>Here are two likely possibilities:<BR/><BR/>Possibility 1: Some of the Jews of Britain, France, Holland etc are concerned about Islamic anti-semitism. After all, they are not importing Mexicans in Europe, but instead many Arab Muslims. But, in what looks like irrationality from the non-Jewish perspective, the majority of Jews are still anti-restrictionist. But nobody said divide & conquer was going to be easy! It's a dangerous game of walking a fine line. Apparently, WHATEVER it takes to dilute political power of a white Western host society is OK with many Jews, but some Jews are indeed having second thoughts. <BR/><BR/>It is reasonable to assume that the program itself is part liberal dogma and part payback for the Holocaust. An outsider might think that Jews were more comfortable in 1960s France before the explosion of the Muslim population. But that is not true. The Jews felt threatened at every moment. A potential Nazi was/is behind every tree.<BR/><BR/>For an example of Jewish intellectual gloss applied to this subject see author Bernard Lewis and many others. For an example of the Jewish activist concerned that things are going too far see Stephen Steinlight, Melanie Phillips, Lawrence Auster. And quite a few others.<BR/><BR/>There are paranoid gentiles that believe all of the Jewish restrictionists are secretly part of the anti-restrictionist conspiracy. This is part of the fallout of being part of a monolithic political bloc. The fact is no major Jewish organization is restrictionist. Until one of them flips on this issue, it can be assumed that the community overall is pro open borders.<BR/><BR/>Possibility 2: The immigration restriction measures proposed are actually PR only, as in the USA. The measures are deliberately sabotaged behind the scenes by the same commissars that propose them.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-53918331610169036582007-08-12T07:31:00.000-07:002007-08-12T07:31:00.000-07:00Free Republic? Yes, its still there.It just got at...Free Republic? Yes, its still there.<BR/><BR/>It just got attacked by Bill O'reilly for having racist and anti-semite posters. Of course, BOR's examples of the racists/anti-semite posts were lies and exaggerations, but hey, BOR has to show he's "mainstream".<BR/><BR/>The BOR attack is funny since Jim Robinson bans people for posting Pat Buchanan articles, attacking illegal immigration, or simply writing anything not politically correct.<BR/><BR/>Its less a conservative website and than a RNC operation.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-63278493848640451322007-08-12T04:24:00.000-07:002007-08-12T04:24:00.000-07:00I don't know about 'evolutionary psychology', but ...I don't know about 'evolutionary psychology', but compared to American Jews, my impression is that British Jews are generally (a) more religious, less secularised (b) more conservative, less liberal and (c) much much less likely to hold anti-WASP prejudices.<BR/><BR/>In the USA, most Jews live in areas where there are few working-class/lower-middle-class WASPs, such WASPs as there are tend to be upper-middle-class 'peer competitors' for Jews, and seem to still be seen as a threat (though I think this view is archaic). In the UK most people of all walks of life are WASPs, at least nominally; England also has numbers of middle and upper class Catholics who are barely distinguishable from WASPs. If you look at the obvious threats to Jewish interests here, it's the rise of the EU (most European nations' elites are genuinely anti-Semitic, despite the anti-Nazi rhetoric) and the linked growth of Islam. American Jews can ignore black and Hispanic anti-Semtism, but Israel makes it impossible to ignore Muslim anti-Semitism.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-14431827049261274132007-08-12T03:18:00.000-07:002007-08-12T03:18:00.000-07:00How can this be true? Doesn't evolutionary psychol...<I>How can this be true? Doesn't evolutionary psychology determine that Jews must dilute white host societies with non-white immigrants? Why would Jewish politicians in Britain campaign on an immigration restrictionist platform?</I><BR/><BR/>There have always been Jewish immigration restrictionists, just as there have always been Jewish conservatives. That hardly means anti-immigration sentiment or conservatism is the norm for Jews.<BR/><BR/>Take a gander at some press releases from the Anti-Defamation League in the last year:<BR/><BR/><A HREF="http://www.adl.org/PresRele/CvlRt_32/5105_32.htm" REL="nofollow">ADL Applauds Overturning of Hazleton Illegal Immigration Ordinance</A><BR/><BR/><A HREF="http://www.adl.org/PresRele/CvlRt_32/5043_32.htm" REL="nofollow">Immigration Issues, Global Anti-Semitism And Israel Top Agenda of ADL National Meeting in Washington, DC</A><BR/><BR/>That should be retitled <B>"As Always, Immigration Issues, Anti-Semitism And Israel Top Agenda of ADL."</B><BR/><BR/><A HREF="http://www.adl.org/PresRele/NeoSk_82/4904_12.htm" REL="nofollow">ADL Report: Extremists Declare 'Open Season' on Immigrants; Hispanics Target of Incitement and Violence</A>:<BR/><BR/>Horrors! It's just like that case in Newark where four "undocumented Americans" (as Harry Reid calls them) were lined up and shot execution-style by a crazed nativist from the Minutemen...or something like that.<BR/><BR/><A HREF="http://www.hadassah.org/pageframe.asp?section=advocacy&page=DPP_statements.html&header=DPP_statements&size=65" REL="nofollow">Hadassah</A>:<BR/><BR/><I>U.S. immigration has long been an important issue for the Jewish people. Throughout history, limits on the number of immigrants allowed to enter the United States have cost many Jewish lives and cost many others their chance to freely practice their religion. As such, we have also been sensitive to non-discriminatory immigration policies for other groups fleeing repressive governments. In fact, the very first American Affairs/Domestic policy statement, adopted by the National Board in 1946, called on the United States government to "... take the initiative in opening the doors to new immigrants."</I><BR/><BR/>How many lives have been lost because of lax immigration enforcement is a question that doesn't concern Hadassah.<BR/><BR/><A HREF="http://www.ajcongress.org/site/News2?page=NewsArticle&id=6080" REL="nofollow">American Jewish Congress Praises Senate Immigration Proposal</A><BR/><BR/><I>The American Jewish Congress today announced that it supports immigration reform legislation being proposed in the Senate. "We are pleased that, rather than attempting to criminalize the conduct of nearly 12 million people who came to our shores seeking opportunity, and rather than ignoring the need to protect the sanctity of America's borders and safety of our homeland, the Senate is pursuing a balanced approach in reforming our immigration and border security systems," said Neil B. Goldstein, American Jewish Congress Executive Director.</I><BR/><BR/><A HREF="http://www.ajc.org/site/c.ijITI2PHKoG/b.838517/k.37FD/Immigration.htm" REL="nofollow">American Jewish Committee</A>:<BR/><BR/><I>Understanding the significance of these events, AJC recently reaffirmed its commitment to fair and generous immigration policies, as fundamentally good for the United States and consistent with Jewish values</I><BR/><BR/><A HREF="http://tools.isovera.com/organizations.php3?action=printContentItem&orgid=54&typeID=82&itemID=20682&User_Session=7bba4a567d7a0c066a4d12a91ea75698" REL="nofollow">The Jewish Council for Public Affairs</A>:<BR/><BR/><I><B>Action</B>: Call your Senators and ask them to support amendments to the Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act of 2007 (S.1348) that will reaffirm the United States’ longstanding commitment to family values and fairness.<BR/><BR/>While JCPA applauds the Senate’s commitment to finding a workable compromise on Comprehensive Immigration Reform <B>we hold serious reservations about other aspects of the bill, particularly those that address family-based immigration and the guest worker program.</B></I><BR/><BR/><A HREF="http://www.jewishlaborcommittee.org/2006/01/recent_activities_arizona_1.html" REL="nofollow">The Jewish Labor Committee</A><BR/><BR/><I>The Arizona JLC has been involved in defense of the rights of immigrant workers and their families. Earlier, we helped form an Immigration Committee of the Jewish Community Relations Council of the Jewish Federation of Greater Phoenix; later, we were able to help the JCRC pass a resolution on immigrant rights. Brother Brown was at the first meeting of, and the Arizona JLC subsequently joined, the newly-formed Arizona Coalition for Migrant Rights. JLC is represented on the Coalition’s Leadership Training and Capacity Building Committee.</I><BR/><BR/><A HREF="http://www.pjalliance.org/article.aspx?ID=286&CID=9" REL="nofollow">Progressive Jewish Alliance</A><BR/><BR/>Need I even tell you where an organization with a name like that stands?<BR/><BR/>Jewish organizations show about as much diversity of opinion on immigration as the YearlyKos convention does on race.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-89141433353186585682007-08-12T02:11:00.000-07:002007-08-12T02:11:00.000-07:00Who ya gonna believe? Evolutionary psychology or y...Who ya gonna believe? Evolutionary psychology or your lying eyes?Steve Sailerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11920109042402850214noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-72547781137976717842007-08-12T01:27:00.000-07:002007-08-12T01:27:00.000-07:00"In 2005 the Conservative party had a Jewish leade...<I>"In 2005 the Conservative party had a Jewish leader, Michael Howard, and Jewish Shadow Chancellor, Oliver Letwin. They ran an anti-immigration campaign, with posters "It's Not Racist To Set Limits on Immigration".</I><BR/><BR/>How can this be true? Doesn't evolutionary psychology determine that Jews must dilute white host societies with non-white immigrants? Why would Jewish politicians in Britain campaign on an immigration restrictionist platform?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-62593217328413151682007-08-11T09:18:00.000-07:002007-08-11T09:18:00.000-07:00Does he address the recent history of Jews in Aust...<I>Does he address the recent history of Jews in Australia, Britain, Brazil, France, and other countries?</I><BR/><BR/>Not that I recall. If he does, it's only in passing (unless it's in something he's written fairly recently ('06-'07)).<BR/><BR/><I>Have Jews in those countries promoted similar immigration policies to undermine those countries?</I><BR/><BR/>Have a look at majorityrights.com (search). There have been some discussions of Europe.Svigorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09397917915404344439noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-59526013024991792102007-08-11T09:06:00.000-07:002007-08-11T09:06:00.000-07:00...yes but what's the reaction of the "Born fighti...<I>...yes but what's the reaction of the "Born fightin" guys...?</I><BR/><BR/><I><B>We're sunk. We cant' go anywhere.</B> The ...elite is simply going to provoke another Jacksonian revolt.</I><BR/><BR/>Many agree that if current trends are not adjusted very quickly then, yes, "we're sunk". <BR/><BR/>But Steve's superb reality check as laid out in the subject of this thread demonstrates that the sinking process is happening much slower than the media would like you to believe. <BR/><BR/>In other words, the Browning of America (and the West) can indeed be stopped and reversed. And it is entirely within our natural rights as a people to do so. It is also a morally righteous project for humanity, contrary to what any Leftist will tell you, or what any neocon koolade drinker will tell you such as, for example, Hugh Hewitt.<BR/><BR/>The latinization of the USA will be a catastrophe for the globe. Domestically, it will mean a chronically weak currency and a dramatic decline in civic transparency. A gigantic population of folks "spiritually disconnected" from math and science cannot support a middle class. <BR/><BR/>Internationally, (aside from economic vacuum) latinization will snuff out the lamp of liberty that has been the light of the world for 200+ years. Without the USA as we know it, a chain reaction of decline will ripple around the world for <I>ages</I>. <BR/><BR/>The EU is not a replacement. Asia is not either. Asia is dependent on the West as the incubator of ideas. The West itself is hugely dependent on the USA.<BR/><BR/>Reality: The white West is a dramatically special and important slice of humanity. It is undeniably the lynchpin of the modern world. And a Latin nation is not Western. A Latin nation can never be a bastion of representative government, a vanguard of tech development, and defender of the free world. It's asking an apple to be an orange.<BR/><BR/>That having been said "Jacksonian revolt" is a horrible last-ditch solution. In between the extremes of La Raza brown beret nationalism and a Neo-Confederacy is a simple non-violent political reassertion of white American consciousness. <BR/><BR/>We must have an immigration timeout. Then we must erect a new cultural norm that recognizes the ills caused by mass immigration and demonizes transgressors. That is happening. This process must be developed fully and at a certain point it will cause self-deportation of the millions of illegal aliens. That is completely doable.<BR/><BR/>Calling bullsh*t on Competitive Moralists is just one small step to getting us back on stable footing as a continuum of traditional America with a confident white majority and various assimiliated minorities.<BR/><BR/>Do it right now in your personal life. Discuss the situation with friends and family. Refuse to seed the moral high ground to Competitive Moralists. Ever.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-20660026170856478602007-08-11T07:10:00.000-07:002007-08-11T07:10:00.000-07:00Kevin MacDonald has documented pro-immigration pol...Kevin MacDonald has documented pro-immigration political action similar to those in the US by Jewish organizations in many other countries, including Australia, Canada and, if I remember correctly, England.<BR/><BR/>Of course many (but a smaller than average percentage) of individual Jews oppose mass immigration, see "Inductivist" for statistics.RobertHumehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03913525250329418444noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-57124559698422613282007-08-11T02:23:00.000-07:002007-08-11T02:23:00.000-07:00"Does he address the recent history of Jews in Aus..."Does he address the recent history of Jews in Australia, Britain, Brazil, France, and other countries? Have Jews in those countries promoted similar immigration policies to undermine those countries?"<BR/><BR/>Speaking only for Britain, I don't get the impression that Jewish politicians & commentators here promote uncontrolled immigration to anything like the same extent as in the USA.<BR/><BR/>In 2005 the Conservative party had a Jewish leader, Michael Howard, and Jewish Shadow Chancellor, Oliver Letwin. They ran an anti-immigration campaign, with posters "It's Not Racist To Set Limits on Immigration". The Labour govt responded with posters where Howard's and Letwin's heads were put on the bodies of pigs, which apparently was aimed at the Muslim vote.<BR/>SNAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-1006759010454463702007-08-10T22:04:00.000-07:002007-08-10T22:04:00.000-07:00Anon 2:21 -- yes but what's the reaction of the "B...Anon 2:21 -- yes but what's the reaction of the "Born fightin" guys, the Scots-Irish in the South, and probably the Poles, Germans, Irish, etc. in the Atlantic and Midwest?<BR/><BR/>We're sunk. We cant' go anywhere. The feminist-black-etc. elite is simply going to provoke another Jacksonian revolt.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-70804602977120678122007-08-10T16:33:00.000-07:002007-08-10T16:33:00.000-07:00Hey, Steve, here is a link to another group of pow...Hey, Steve, here is a link to another group of power hungry interlopers, the Chinese.<BR/><BR/>But instead of taking back the southwest, they're taking our moon!<BR/><BR/><A HREF="http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=070810101658.qtxtup2l&show_article=1" REL="nofollow">China plans to survey 'every inch' of moon</A><BR/><BR/>How long until a Chinaman kicks over the US flag that we planted up there in 1969?<BR/><BR/>Hey, that's a good screenplay pitch for you out there in la la land. A lunar combat epic between the USA and China in the year 2030. The fight can start after a Chinese astronaut kicks moon sand into the face of one of our macho Mexican-heritage astronauts.<BR/><BR/>Implausible that we would have a space program in 2030? I agree...but this is a movie. I'd say make the battle between the Japan/India alliance and China but you're in Hollywood. <BR/><BR/>But you could think ahead into our chaotic mestizo future to when the Jews evacuate Hollywood and relocate to India where they quickly turn Bollywood into the cultural and media center of the world!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-2483477719209066312007-08-10T15:36:00.000-07:002007-08-10T15:36:00.000-07:00If Washington insiders weren't so clueless about t...<I>If Washington insiders weren't so clueless about these numbers, they never would have tried to inflict their amnesty bill on us.</I><BR/><BR/>Hey, Steve, there is a new MSM charm offensive afoot judging by the fresh <I>Crackdown on Immigration</I> headlines. Naturally this must mean they are once again trying to "inflict their amnesty bill on us". I mean, there's no way in hell that Commissars Chertoff & Guiterrez are actually going to control the border. <BR/><BR/>So, what's the scoop? What are they up to? Where are they shoving the knife in, exactly? It is just coverage for a general continuation of Operation Sandbag?<BR/><BR/>I was scanning a related thread...<BR/><BR/>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/08/10/the-new-bush-immigration-enforcement-plan-color-me-underwhelmed/<BR/><BR/>...and didn't see any compelling reason for action right now. Perhaps Rove did some internal polling that said the entire Senate leadership was looking at the guillotine? Or the GOP fundraising has gotten only worse?<BR/><BR/>But then poster named Laree I think nailed it:<BR/><BR/><I>August 20-21 President Bush, President Calderon of Mexico and Prime Minister Harper of Canada, will meet for the Second SPP summit. Security Prosperity Partnership Summit. On the Agenda: The North American Union.</I>Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com