tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post6832080419515761925..comments2024-03-15T20:52:26.967-07:00Comments on Steve Sailer: iSteve: Bad Men and the new pornographyUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger115125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-13475476039362052742012-03-26T15:08:55.161-07:002012-03-26T15:08:55.161-07:00LOL. Udo's getting his ass kicked by a woman.LOL. Udo's getting his ass kicked by a woman.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-86630984669992511942012-03-26T14:28:08.719-07:002012-03-26T14:28:08.719-07:00""... not unlike your pissy replies here...""... not unlike your pissy replies here."<br /><br />You're projecting again. No surprise there because you write like a girl."<br /><br />LMAO; hey Udo, you'd better throw more punches, Son: Sportette's ahead going into the 9th round!Truthhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17286755693955361308noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-11976728521108598882012-03-26T08:45:20.180-07:002012-03-26T08:45:20.180-07:00"For starters, why would it be intersting[sic...<i>"For starters, why would it be intersting[sic] to Steve to make a fluff post about a show he doesn't watch?"</i><br /><br />Ask him. <br /><br /><i>"It's not interesting to anybody,"</i><br /><br />And yet so far, it's got 114 comments. <br /><br /><i>"I think he just did it in a fit of pique,"</i><br /><br />Then you don't know Steve (as a blogger, I mean, not as a private individual).<br /><br /><i>"... not unlike your pissy replies here."</i><br /><br />You're projecting again. No surprise there because you write like a girl.Kylienoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-47532739898393607372012-03-26T06:54:38.621-07:002012-03-26T06:54:38.621-07:00"Matthew said...
What is there to like about..."Matthew said...<br /><br />What is there to like about gay culture? Here's just one item: go take in a few musicals and plays. Read the playbills, and note how large a fraction of the men in the cast are gay. From community theatre to Broadway, gays are everywhere in theatre."<br /><br />Yeah, Right...... Because the apotheosis of our civilization is "A Chorus Line".Mr. Anonnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-88010088349692170092012-03-26T02:51:12.193-07:002012-03-26T02:51:12.193-07:00Wow, you actually took the time to type an answer ...<i>Wow, you actually took the time to type an answer that made it clear you can't distinguish between dumb and rhetorical.</i><br /><br />No it was just a dumb thing to type, as content-free as everything you've typed in reply to this post. For starters, why would it be intersting to Steve to make a fluff post about a show he doesn't watch? It's not interesting to anybody, I think he just did it in a fit of pique, not unlike your pissy replies here.Udolpho.comhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12976984423336975944noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-3152364844648768882012-03-25T19:53:25.135-07:002012-03-25T19:53:25.135-07:00LMAO; Hey Sportette, I see you and Udolpho are fri...LMAO; Hey Sportette, I see you and Udolpho are friends; you should log into his site, now that's a REAL laugh riot...<br /><br />http://mpcdot.com/forums/index.php?/topic/4071-troof-memorial-thread/page__p__72135__fromsearch__1#entry72135Truthhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17286755693955361308noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-74271117916115119552012-03-25T19:11:30.993-07:002012-03-25T19:11:30.993-07:00"Wow, you actually took the time to type the ...<i>"Wow, you actually took the time to type the world's dumbest question."</i><br /><br />Wow, you actually took the time to type an answer that made it clear you can't distinguish between dumb and rhetorical.Kylienoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-49609435707476097892012-03-25T14:47:35.030-07:002012-03-25T14:47:35.030-07:00Also count me highly skeptical that most great art...Also count me highly skeptical that most great artists were gay. And when you get into the modern era, the increasing percentages of gays in entertainment have plainly affected quality negatively, which goes counter to the thesis. If gays are naturally more creative and artistic, this should be a golden age, but it isn't. To take one example, the big film directors who are producing quality work are still 100% heterosexual. Who cares if their assistant's assistant who prints out the call sheet and gossips about the hairdresser is gay? As a longtime film buff, I am certain that the quality of films would go up if there were many fewer gays in Hollywood.Udolpho.comhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12976984423336975944noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-89215898787967056502012-03-25T14:18:38.123-07:002012-03-25T14:18:38.123-07:00Much more interesting to whom?
Wow, you actually ...<i>Much more interesting to whom?</i><br /><br />Wow, you actually took the time to type the world's dumbest question.Udolpho.comhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12976984423336975944noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-77295901660803491052012-03-25T09:37:43.627-07:002012-03-25T09:37:43.627-07:00"Now, what about gays? I think it's like ...<i>"Now, what about gays? I think it's like this. Women like to keep things neat. Men like to mess things up to be expressive. But gays have the male expressiveness but female sense of form and order. So, their expression tends to have more of a point and vision than simple male expression of 'LOOK AT MY COCK AND I WANT PUSSY'. So, a gay guy might feel the urge to paint something on the wall but more in the nature of interior decorating than writing lewd stuff. This may explain why so many great artists were gay."</i><br /><br />Clearly you haven't spent any time perusing the photos from any of the Folsom Street Fairs. (Helpful hint: I won't provide any links because they aren't SFW.)<br /><br /><i>"So, their [gays'] expression tends to have more of a point and vision than simple male expression of 'LOOK AT MY COCK AND I WANT PUSSY'."</i><br /><br />Sure, if you consider 'LOOK AT MY COCK AND I WANT YOU TO SUCK IT' as having more of a "point and a vision".Kylienoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-19212555473129404452012-03-25T02:31:04.587-07:002012-03-25T02:31:04.587-07:00This may explain why so many great artists were ga...<i>This may explain why so many great artists were gay.</i><br /><br />Exactly how many great artists were genuinely homosexual? Is their percentage among great artists any greater than it is among the general population? Offhand I can think of only a few great artists who were known beyond doubt to have been homosexual. Most artists of the very highest rank were definitely heterosexual.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-67484325197656049982012-03-25T01:28:18.969-07:002012-03-25T01:28:18.969-07:00Athol Kay is very good. But the best quick entry i...Athol Kay is very good. But the best quick entry into the Manosphere I have found is here:<br /><br />http://hawaiianlibertarian.blogspot.com.au/<br /><br />An Aladdin's Cave of stuff for men. I am a married man - 26 years, same woman. And the Manosphere insights, especially on Game, have helped me hugely. Men have to stop taking what women profess so seriously. Especially feminists who secretly read porn about dominating men. I believe that Andrea Dworkin actually wrote some.David Collardhttp://davidcollard.wordpress.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-15849637248317452982012-03-24T23:19:55.569-07:002012-03-24T23:19:55.569-07:00" Of course, anyone who thinks that Mad Men h..." Of course, anyone who thinks that Mad Men has "unusually well-written characters" is either huffing glue or doesn't get out much. Well, whatever, Udolpho. It's probably all a problem of scale, anyway"<br /><br />LMAO; he's talking to you, Pleasureman. (Inside joke, Udolpho will explain it.)Truthhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17286755693955361308noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-25889624947103801142012-03-24T21:58:59.914-07:002012-03-24T21:58:59.914-07:00Along those lines, John Updike said that the best ...Along those lines, John Updike said that the best time in your life to read the super long 19th Century novelists is during summer vacation when you are a teenager, and he never got around to it then, and he was too old now.<br /><br />I slogged unfazedly through Of Human Bondage during my 14th summer. It was most educational.<br /> Jane Eyre at 12; but I couldn't get through Bronte's Villette till much later and then it became obsessional reading.dear readernoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-46547092185758085642012-03-24T18:13:01.564-07:002012-03-24T18:13:01.564-07:00Any opinions about period serial dramas like "...<i>Any opinions about period serial dramas like "The Tudors" and "The Borgias"? I haven't watched either, but I really enjoyed "Rome."</i><br /><br />If you liked <i>Rome</i> you'll like <i>The Tudors</i>. I haven't seen <i>The Borgias</i> yet.Svigorhttp://svigor.wordpress.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-59062881087175499902012-03-24T18:00:59.744-07:002012-03-24T18:00:59.744-07:00Escapism is my solution for coping with nihilism. ...Escapism is my solution for coping with nihilism. Therefore I prefer shows that don’t get significantly worse over time like the Sopranos and The Wire to go on forever. <br /><br />The creator of the Wire said if he would have done a sixth season it would have been about Hispanics, re Sailer’s complain that Hollywood doesn’t notices them. <br /><br />“Simon [creator] indicated that no theme seemed substantial enough to warrant a sixth season, except possibly the large influx of Latinos into Baltimore. Simon said that since no writer on the show spoke Spanish or had any intimate knowledge of the city's Latino population, the field work would be too cumbersome.”<br /><br />Obviously you want to tie up the show at some point. The biggest mistake is not having an arch early on. The lack of reward ruined Lost and Battlestar-Galactica.<br /><br />The best one right now is Game of Thrones, where the events are supposed to lead up to a conclusion. Even the fifth book was excellent, so if the author lives to finish the series I predict it will become the first high quality nerd classic on TV.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-14736478950212256542012-03-24T16:36:32.175-07:002012-03-24T16:36:32.175-07:00One thing I kind of like about the GOP primary is ...<i>One thing I kind of like about the GOP primary is the revealing of the gender gap that strongly favors the guy we are NOT supposed to like. </i> <br /><br /><br />Women just think Santorum is cute!<br /><br />Actually Romney also does slightly better among women than among men. This all evens out because Gingrich does a lot worse among women than among men. (or a lot better among men than among women, if you want to look at it that way)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-39166788284574271952012-03-24T13:48:32.995-07:002012-03-24T13:48:32.995-07:00Any opinions about period serial dramas like "...Any opinions about period serial dramas like "The Tudors" and "The Borgias"? I haven't watched either, but I really enjoyed "Rome."Matthewnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-78500280531553805422012-03-24T13:43:20.494-07:002012-03-24T13:43:20.494-07:00"From the start, racism was the carbon monoxi...<b>"From the start, racism was the carbon monoxide of the show: a poison that couldn’t always be detected"</b><br /><br />No, it's always been there, quite detectable. That's the biggest lie of the review.<br /><br /><b>"women these days are aroused by men masterful enough to violate today's thought crime taboos"</b><br /><br />Women are aroused by men who aren't pussies. Always have been. Whining about blacks, Jews, gays, Asians, illegal aliens, etc. is another matter entirely. If you feel disapproval about the behaviors re: some of these groups you can express it. Just don't obsess about it, or let her see you obsessing about it. That may or may not imply that you're a "racist," but it definitely implies that you're firghtened by them.<br /><br />I've known a few losers who were "racist," but I've also known some very smart, successful men who were, too. There was a huge difference in the ways the two types expressed their feelings on the matter, however.<br /><br /><b>"after one has seen a gay pride parade, what is there to like about gay culture?"</b><br /><br />Right, because a group's entire culture is summed up by parade behavior.<br /><br />What is there to like about gay culture? Here's just one item: go take in a few musicals and plays. Read the playbills, and note how large a fraction of the men in the cast are gay. From community theatre to Broadway, gays are everywhere in theatre. They typically don't have kids to feed, so they're willing to do it for love, and not just pay.Matthewnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-91917557900691801452012-03-24T12:59:20.412-07:002012-03-24T12:59:20.412-07:00I must admit I might have heard of the WASHROOM RU...I must admit I might have heard of the WASHROOM RULE before but I recall where.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-36867100241869659402012-03-24T12:58:28.202-07:002012-03-24T12:58:28.202-07:00OT. I think I found the proof that men are more cr...OT. I think I found the proof that men are more creative than women. This creativity is actually rooted in male vileness and craziness. I call it the WASHROOM RULE as there is where I found the evidence. <br />Today, I was hiking in the forest and came upon two nature-washrooms side by side. One is for guys and other is for gals. As there weren't no one around I checked both. Women's washroom, though something like an outhouse, was neat with smooth clean walls. In contrast the guys' washroom was dirty, and its walls were scribbled with all sorts of stuff like 'suck my thick cock', 'for free blow job call ___-____', and the like. All over the place too. <br />Some were done with markers, some with pen, and some even carved onto the stall door with a knife. <br />There were even illustrations of all kinds of penises, breasts, butts, and animals and humans doing weird things. It reminded me of cave paintings; it might be be called the Cave of Forgotten Creams. I must say it was vile and disgusting.. but creative(though not of an high order). High or low, what was plentifully evident was the male need to express himself, be nutty, be hostile, be outrageous, be different, to shock, to transgress, etc. <br /><br />Based on evidence on women's washroom walls, there's less of such need or urge among womenfolk. <br />No doubt all prehistoric cave paintings were by men. <br /><br />Now, washroom paintings and messages are not art, but they exhibit the creative urge in its most animal/crude/elemental form, and it seems there's plenty more of this among men. <br /><br />Now, what about gays? I think it's like this. Women like to keep things neat. Men like to mess things up to be expressive. But gays have the male expressiveness but female sense of form and order. So, their expression tends to have more of a point and vision than simple male expression of 'LOOK AT MY COCK AND I WANT PUSSY'. So, a gay guy might feel the urge to paint something on the wall but more in the nature of interior decorating than writing lewd stuff. This may explain why so many great artists were gay.gumnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-54556145692136113362012-03-24T11:09:17.971-07:002012-03-24T11:09:17.971-07:00A show like "The X Files" doesn't co...<i>A show like "The X Files" doesn't count right? If I remember correctly each episode tended to be self-contained and resolve itself. I could watch a show like that regularly.</i><br /><br />The X-Files famously had a story arc about alien invasion that lasted the entire series. Have you forgotten "oiliens" and Krycek and Cancer Man? Most of the series ran during the heyday of Usenet, and there were fanatical newsgroups devoted to discussing and speculating about the tiniest details of the so-called mytharc. <br /><br />But you're right in that many episodes were what are known as "monster-of-the-week" stories, where Mulder and Scully solved - or sometimes didn't solve - strange cases that involved - or sometimes didn't involve - the supernatural. <br /><br />You're also right that, today, the MOTW episodes are much more watchable. Some of them are television classics. I've been watching them off-and-on lately, which is what you can do with this type of show. The "mytharc" episodes are largely unwatchable in isolation and are not interesting enough to watch in sequence. <br /><br />The early episodes of Law & Order (the original one that premiered in 1990 with Chris Noth and a succession of partners, ending with Jerry Ohrbach) were about as close to self-contained, non-relationship-driven shows as fictional TV gets. As I recall, many of those episodes were great television, but I haven't watched them in a long time.<br /><br />Star Trek: The Next Generation was also most an episodic show, although there were some two-parters. It was much more driven by relationships and emotion, though. I didn't mind that because the show embodied such perfect, traditional gender archetypes, more than any TV show I can think of at the moment.Get Off My Lawn!noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-27932269892469172162012-03-24T08:04:01.512-07:002012-03-24T08:04:01.512-07:00"My point was, why is Steve writing a fluff p...<i>"My point was, why is Steve writing a fluff post like this"</i> <br /><br />My point is, why are you asking why Steve chooses to write a fluff post when he's repeatedly said here that he became basically self-employed so he could write about whatever interests him?<br /><br /><i>"...when current events suggest much more interesting subject matter? "</i><br /><br />Much more interesting to whom?Kylienoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-84876870805717066782012-03-24T07:58:21.821-07:002012-03-24T07:58:21.821-07:00"Gee, "Kylie", it's like you...<i>"Gee, "Kylie", it's like you've never watched horror films before."</i><br /><br />Is it? Why don't you brief me on the moral attached to a Western horror movie like "The Texas Chainsaw Massacre" or something more recent like "Wolf Creek" or "Hostel"? All I ever managed to get out of those is "Creepy madmen (not to be confused with Mad Men) do creepy things to as many non-creepy people as they can".<br /><br /><br /><i>"Not that I'm going to watch Mad Men, or any of the other tripe passing for entertainment these days, but you'll often find that there's some moral attached to these shows."</i> <br /><br />If you're so sure there is without even having to watch them, then spare me the experience and tell me just what that moral might be beyond, "The hot guy gets the chicks and gets to treat them badly if he wants to".Kylienoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-54295530043706803472012-03-24T07:02:16.187-07:002012-03-24T07:02:16.187-07:00"It is a good show, way above average."
..."It is a good show, way above average."<br /><br />Nice negging, Steve. Roissy will be proud.<br /><br />It's hard to watch shows with your undivided attention, and harder still if PC keeps irritating every 5 minutes. <br /><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iI19xxmuTic&t=35s" rel="nofollow"> On the other hand,</a> reality sounds much funnier than if it were given a free reign.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com