tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post7047744600714800001..comments2024-03-15T20:52:26.967-07:00Comments on Steve Sailer: iSteve: How the world really worksUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger167125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-5748740319219207022012-11-14T10:22:12.189-08:002012-11-14T10:22:12.189-08:00Academics "just don't get it." And ...Academics "just don't get it." And what they're not getting about the way the world works is probably rooted in the way their personalities have been shaped by the academic environment itself - cooperation and sharing. They don't have any instincts about how to respond appropriately to overtures of aggression that are not intellectual in nature. How our cultural needs to respond to encroachment by the Chinese and Asian population is completely lost on them. 98% of them probably don't even recognize that it's happening.<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-36086152634779881932012-11-13T06:32:23.168-08:002012-11-13T06:32:23.168-08:00"Anonymous said...
I am a libertarian and no..."Anonymous said...<br /><br />I am a libertarian and not a liberal. Repeat after me: L-I-B-E-R-T-A-R-I-A-N."<br /><br />Yeah, we get it, asshat. You're a petulant nitwit who believes in a fairy-land ideology.<br /><br />"As for your quote from Winston Churchill, here is a quote from someone muh smarter than him:<br /><br />"Not all conservatives are stupid, but all stupid people are conservative.""<br /><br />It would take a libertarian to think that Mill was some kind of genius.Mr. Anonnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-57331675683045151762012-11-12T21:25:41.596-08:002012-11-12T21:25:41.596-08:00I am sorry, but all those IQ tests you guys love s...<i>I am sorry, but all those IQ tests you guys love so much show that social conservatives are at the BOTTOM of the intelligence pecking order for political preferences. It is simply a fact.</i><br /><br />Blacks and browns all vote liberal. Blacks are at the bottom of the racial IQ ladder, with browns one rung above.<br /><br />Meanwhile, Jews (one rung below Episcopalians) are faux-liberals, voting "is it good for the Jews?" Which means they're not really liberal or conservative.Svigorhttp://svigor.wordpress.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-24314970325550849852012-11-12T19:37:05.530-08:002012-11-12T19:37:05.530-08:00@conservative jam
"Unless you are the ghos...@conservative jam<br /><br /> "Unless you are the ghost of Theodore Adorno, this isn't "your own theory," you sad, ignorant robot of the conventional wisdom..."<br /><br /><br /> I hadn't seen this post. I have no idea who Theodorne Arno is, and you have obviously not read my post. All you did is insult me and call me a "liberal". I stated in my post many times that I am a libertarian and not a liberal. Just because the two words sound alike does not mean that they are synonyms. And yes, libertarianism and liberalism have a lot of common gound on social matters, but there are differences too. The most obvious is that libertarianism is in favor of INDIVIDUAL freedom and equality of INDIVIDUALS before the law. Conversely, liberalism is in favor of protected GROUPS being given special protection over other groups. Libertarianism and liberalism find common gound in that they find racism wrong, but that's it. Libertarianism does not support grpoup priviledge, or the govrnment using money of individuals to support social programs that use the money of a part of the population to pay the bills of another part. Libertarianism does NOT support any of that. I get frustrated because you guys keep calling me a liberal even though I am a libertarian, and your brains do not seem being capable of understanding the difference no mattr how many times I explain it.<br /><br /> How am I a liberal? I am against Affirmative Action, against socialized medicine, against entire races being blamed for the mistakes of a few individuals - like white people today being blamed by the mistakes of a few white slave owners who did more than 100 years ago. I am a libertarian and not a liberal. Repeat after me: L-I-B-E-R-T-A-R-I-A-N.<br /><br /> As for your quote from Winston Churchill, here is a quote from someone muh smarter than him:<br /><br /> "Not all conservatives are stupid, but all stupid people are conservative."<br /><br /> I am sorry, but all those IQ tests you guys love so much show that social conservatives are at the BOTTOM of the intelligence pecking order for political preferences. It is simply a fact.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-5519202229563148522012-11-12T15:14:25.330-08:002012-11-12T15:14:25.330-08:00I believe that conservatives are authoritarian typ...<i>I believe that conservatives are authoritarian types who do not deal very well with the concept of individual self-determination when it comes to others.</i><br /><br /><i>Unless you are the ghost of Theodore Adorno, this isn't "your own theory," you sad, ignorant robot of the conventional wisdom.</i><br /><br />It's really not so much conservatism as it is Dummy Logic and Dummy Law. Dummies need authority and lots of it. They need leaders, fuhrers even, but ones who understand their needs. Liberals do not. Dummies need to live in a world where everything is illegal, immoral, and fattening - because for them it is. "Use your own judgement" is fine for smarties, i.e. liberals, and libertarians. It does not work for people who HAVE no judgement.<br /><br />Honestly, it would be nice if dummies, smarties, and averagies could all live in their own worlds with their own laws. And the interaction could be kept to a minimum, i.e. Mr. Joe Dum-Dum cleaning the smarties' chimneys. Ming Dynasty China came close to this.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-36852984453271205092012-11-12T15:10:35.335-08:002012-11-12T15:10:35.335-08:00I believe that conservatives are authoritarian typ...<i>I believe that conservatives are authoritarian types who do not deal very well with the concept of individual self-determination when it comes to others.</i><br /><br /><i>Unless you are the ghost of Theodore Adorno, this isn't "your own theory," you sad, ignorant robot of the conventional wisdom.</i><br /><br />It's really not so much conservatism as it is Dummy Logic and Dummy Law. Dummies need authority and lots of it. They need leaders, fuhrers even, but ones who understand their needs. Liberals do not. Dummies need to live in a world where everything is illegal, immoral, and fattening - because for them it is. "Use your own judgement" is fine for smarties, i.e. liberals, and libertarians. It does not work for people who HAVE no judgement.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-23751729770089508732012-11-12T08:44:41.389-08:002012-11-12T08:44:41.389-08:00Bill said...
Anonymous said . . .
I have my own ...Bill said...<br /><br />Anonymous said . . .<br /><br />I have my own theory on conservatives. I believe that conservatives are authoritarian types who do not deal very well with the concept of individual self-determination when it comes to others.<br /><br />Unless you are the ghost of Theodore Adorno, this isn't "your own theory," you sad, ignorant robot of the conventional wisdom.<br /><br /><br />That's what "comedy gold" looks like.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03372032168562635546noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-65232878701773249502012-11-12T08:27:15.378-08:002012-11-12T08:27:15.378-08:00To anon,
I would not say Yan Shen is a counter-re...To anon,<br /><br />I would not say Yan Shen is a counter-revolutionary. His interest and mine are perpendicular to one another. My primary interest is in the preservation of the biological and cultural distinctiveness of my race. Yan Shen seems more interested in advancing the socio-economic agenda of his race in particular and the nebulous catch-all “Asians” as a whole in an increasingly Byzantine America. Although we both want the continued economic success of our co-ethnics, our paths diverge in that I want my descendants to remain Han. <br /><br />What I am cognizant of and what Yan Shen ignores is that America is a trap that spells the death of my race, a trap baited with wealth and prosperity but ultimately death nonetheless. The birthrates of my homeland are already among the lowest in the world considering the stage of development and declining further. While we do have a great many people, the trend lines are clear and we cannot afford to lose even more wombs, particularly those in the upper quartile, to outsiders. Unlike some of the more atavistic immigrants, my people lack a distinct racial religion to call our own, neither do we possess the degree of physiological aggression or as Mr. Sailer would describe it, a “Gold Chain” ethnoculture to provide cohesion for our ethnos when inundated by cultural Marxism and prevent external predation. What this all means is that miscegenation and cultural dispersion eliminates roughly a third of our first generation in America, another third in the second, and the remainder by the third. Without a continuous stream of new bodies, everything that makes that Han race distinct is extinct in three generations and even with more immigration it is simply buying time. <br /><br />While Yan Shen may not care, as strictly speaking the immigrants have improved their fitness by increasing their wealth and those of their progeny, I care because such people are strangers and not Chinese. Which is why I advocate against immigration from China and want the U.S. to slam the door shut.Duke of Qinhttp://dukeofqin.wordpress.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-34983432272414039132012-11-12T06:58:25.714-08:002012-11-12T06:58:25.714-08:00Anonymous said . . .
I have my own theory on cons...<br />Anonymous said . . .<br /><br /><i>I have my own theory on conservatives. I believe that conservatives are authoritarian types who do not deal very well with the concept of individual self-determination when it comes to others.</i><br /><br />Unless you are the ghost of Theodore Adorno, this isn't "your own theory," you sad, ignorant robot of the conventional wisdom.Billnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-27324294361771123182012-11-12T00:20:42.680-08:002012-11-12T00:20:42.680-08:00I'm surprised than nobody compared Tibet to Ca...I'm surprised than nobody compared Tibet to Canaan.<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-66358418251549665252012-11-12T00:19:00.606-08:002012-11-12T00:19:00.606-08:00If white people think like tibetans, then whites d...<i>If white people think like tibetans, then whites doomed</i><br /><br />How, and in what way?<br /><br />Tibetans have little of the notorious white self-hatred and self-guilt. Tibetans breed above replacement level. Tibetans are pro-family. Tibetans are some of the most religious people on the face of the planet. No way are they deluded materialist atheist bully-boys who goose-step for Generalissimo Jehovah and Drill Sergeant Jesus, and call it religion.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-81486411350956617612012-11-12T00:00:35.951-08:002012-11-12T00:00:35.951-08:00If they have the right to invite, I have the right...<i>If they have the right to invite, I have the right to evict. Libertardians, pack up your #&!# and leave, now.</i><br /><br />I thought that Libertarianism includes the right to own property, and the right to use force to defend such property. And no moral guilt for not inviting the world.<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-35031900948949141222012-11-11T22:07:37.380-08:002012-11-11T22:07:37.380-08:00They've come up with that they call "the ...<i>They've come up with that they call "the right to invite". Which means that if Yan Shen wants to invite 1.3 billion Chinese to America, he has the right to do so, and it's a violation of his "rights" if somebody else prevents it.</i><br /><br />If they have the right to invite, I have the right to evict. Libertardians, pack up your #&!# and leave, now.Svigornoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-36105786673707041252012-11-11T21:36:59.397-08:002012-11-11T21:36:59.397-08:00The Han is dealing with the Tibetans in a far more...<i>The Han is dealing with the Tibetans in a far more humane way than the way the Americans dealt with the Native Americans.</i><br /><br />I love it when moral cretins retcon modern sensibilities onto the past.<br /><br />Back in reality, the Tibetans aren't Amerinds (not by a long shot) and the Chinese aren't the Pioneers (not by a long shot), and neither are the Israelis (not by a long shot).Svigornoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-29684394214202365812012-11-11T21:22:28.879-08:002012-11-11T21:22:28.879-08:00"Some of you think that Jews need to be enlig..."Some of you think that Jews need to be enlightened about HBD. The fact is they KNOW about HBD but just don't want to admit it. Jewish liberalism is just a tactic in places where Jews are the minority, and it's smart!"<br /><br /><br />Gummstein,<br /><br />You might add it's smart but extremely disingenuous. <br /><br />Your entire post was excellent and echoes my own experience with the Scotch-Irish.<br /><br />Naive no ...disingenous when it suits them hell yes.<br /><br />Your post should be reread by everybody who visits this blog so that they can get a clue.<br /><br />Thanks.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-75961813292984882852012-11-11T21:16:19.804-08:002012-11-11T21:16:19.804-08:00Sure beats suicide bombing by Muslims.
No, it doe...<i>Sure beats suicide bombing by Muslims.</i><br /><br />No, it doesn't.Svigornoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-71427749920075748362012-11-11T21:14:25.627-08:002012-11-11T21:14:25.627-08:00FFS already:
Israelis Favour Discrimination Again...FFS already:<br /><br /><a href="http://www.amren.com/news/2012/11/israelis-favour-discrimination-against-arabs-poll/" rel="nofollow">Israelis Favour Discrimination Against Arabs—Poll</a><br /><br /><i>More than two-thirds of those questioned by Dialog, an opinion pollster, said they would oppose suffrage for the 2.5 million Palestinians living in the West Bank were it to be annexed to Israel.<br /><br />Nearly three-quarters—74 per cent—say they also support a system of segregated roads for Palestinians and Israelis in the West Bank, although the majority say they would view such a policy as “necessary” rather than “good”.<br /><br />[...]<br /><br />The survey found that a majority of the Jewish public—59 per cent—say they want a system that gives preference to Jews applying for civil service jobs. Arabs, who constitute 20 per cent of the Israeli population, complain such a policy unofficially exists already.<br /><br />Just under half of respondents, 49 per cent, said they want the state to treat Jewish citizens better than Arab ones, while 42 per cent said they did not want to live in the same building as Arabs and did not want their children to go to schools that also admit Arabs.<br /><br />Tellingly, 58 per cent of those surveyed said Israel already practices a system of apartheid against Palestinians, an opinion normally only voiced by the Jewish state’s staunchest critics.</i><br /><br />If acting like Jews is "exterminationist," so be it.Svigornoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-43329524189416402962012-11-11T20:04:36.762-08:002012-11-11T20:04:36.762-08:00"Anonymous said...
""Like Victoria..."Anonymous said...<br /><br />""Like Victorian Britain for example ;-)""<br /><br />But the progress came with the weakening of religious power."<br /><br />No, the progress came about because a religious Britain had no objections to it. In what sense did the theory of evolution represent progress, in a material sense? Not at all - not in the 19th century. Whether Darwin was right or wrong had no effect on the speed that a ship could achieve, the development of the wireless, the invention of the airplane, the curing of disease, or the discovery of a new chemical.<br /><br />This is something that knee-jerk anti-anti-evolutionists fail to understand. The implications for a technological society of belief - or disbelief - in evolution are just about nil. Isaac Newton probably believed in young Earth creationism - that didn't stop him from creating physics as a modern science.<br /><br />Imagine that every scientist in the world became a believer in intelligent design overnight. What would be the effect of that on their scientific work? Just about nothing. Whether you believe that the Universe just happened as the result of some inexorable physical law, devoid of any spirit, or that the Universe was created by a wise and loving God - all that has no real implications for your views concerning global warming, the mass of the Higgs Boson, the existence of exo-solar planets. It doesn't even have many ramifications for most life scientists.Mr. Anonnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-57031196763451125512012-11-11T18:28:37.007-08:002012-11-11T18:28:37.007-08:00"Not all conservatives are stupid, but all st...<i>"Not all conservatives are stupid, but all stupid people are conservative."</i><br /><br />Stupid people NEED to be conservative, or reactionary, or fascist. They have no self-regulation, no inner moral compass. They will only destroy themselves and other dummies like them if given a little personal freedom. They are like domesticated animals, lacking the wisdom of wild animals, and will eat themselves to death if given enough food - not to mention smoke, drink, drug, sex, rock-and-roll, and video-game themselves to death.<br /><br />Tragedy happens when stupid people, out of a twisted but noble sense of fairness, force smart people to follow the same totalitarian rules.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-19067434191579789042012-11-11T17:50:57.971-08:002012-11-11T17:50:57.971-08:00Robert Barnett, director of the Program for Tibeta...Robert Barnett, director of the Program for Tibetan Studies at Columbia University, disagrees with the "cultural genocide" accusations:<br /><br />http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2008/03/25/seven_questions_what_tibetans_want<br /><br />"I think we have to get over any suggestion that the Chinese are ill-intentioned or trying to wipe out Tibet. Its obviously horrible that people are being savagely beaten up and killed. But crucially, this is a historic change in the profile of Tibetan politics. Were looking at something much larger than any immediate anxiety about Olympics, or whether somebody planned one of these things, or whether people are upset about economic disadvantage. Historians are going to tell us that we missed the big picture if we didnt notice that this is the big story here. All the party cadres are going to be sent to the countryside areas to listen to the Tibetans complaints and find out what has gone so wrong with the policy machine in China."<br /><br />http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2008/may/29/thunder-from-tibet/?pagination=false<br /><br />"In the political discussions too there are enigmas, such as why, if Tibetan culture within Tibet is being “fast erased from existence,” so many Tibetans within Tibet still appear to have a more vigorous cultural life, with over a hundred literary magazines in Tibetan, than their exile counterparts."Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-75920734139617683132012-11-11T17:39:21.956-08:002012-11-11T17:39:21.956-08:00'What a bigoted ignoramus you are. No wonder y...<em>'What a bigoted ignoramus you are. No wonder you don't use a name. There is no "banning of the teachings of evolution at schools in many American states".'</em><br /><br />Anonymous was clearly visiting us via time machine from Tennessee, circa 1949. <br /><br />No wonder people are worried about "creationists" in politics, if they think this kind of thing is going on or is even on anyone's radar.Cail Corishevnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-42365104291787363722012-11-11T17:29:20.043-08:002012-11-11T17:29:20.043-08:00@Anonymous 3:11 PM
"It must be true becaus... @Anonymous 3:11 PM<br /><br /> "It must be true because anonymous says so!"<br /><br /> So having the clergy scutinizing and censoring scientists aids in scientific/technologial progress? Because this is what you are implying by disagreeing with my statement.<br /><br /> It is not my "opinion" that England underwent the scientific revolution despite the interference of religious conservatives; it is a fact that one concludes after a simple logial deduction. Obviously, scientists can do science better when there is complete freedom of thought and when they don't have to catter to religious doctrine. The alternative, that scientists can do science better if they are limited on what they can discover depending on whether what they discover agrees with the Bible or not, is absurd. This is a very simple logical deduction, but it eludes you because you are not very good at logic. So you make spiteful little remarks, such as that it is true because I "say so".Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-79247021473801233352012-11-11T17:10:16.857-08:002012-11-11T17:10:16.857-08:00"have a solution for you conservatives: I thi..."have a solution for you conservatives: I think you should just join your economies, buy a lot of land and found your own country. Then you can have shools only for white children where Biblical teaching will be mandatory, you will have giant public shooting ranges for you to fire your guns and smoking in public spaces will be allowed, and you can name Chuck Norris to be your president. "<br /><br />Sounds pretty sweet. If there was such a place I´d move there. Probably be easy to make a living, and good people to live with. Maybe the Rocky Mountain WEst could be like that... too bad its so damn cold there tho...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-788587159557283112012-11-11T16:40:41.413-08:002012-11-11T16:40:41.413-08:00They've come up with that they call "the ...They've come up with that they call "the right to invite". Which means that if Yan Shen wants to invite 1.3 billion Chinese to America, he has the right to do so, and it's a violation of his "rights" if somebody else prevents it.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-50739015594574087342012-11-11T16:22:54.860-08:002012-11-11T16:22:54.860-08:00"Steve, as your only counter-revolutionary Ch..."Steve, as your only counter-revolutionary Chinese reader..."<br /><br />What about yanny?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com