tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post7232448549640817485..comments2024-03-28T16:22:14.888-07:00Comments on Steve Sailer: iSteve: The spread of "sprawl" as latest explanation of black povertyUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger35125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-78272579557295085332014-03-21T01:54:22.813-07:002014-03-21T01:54:22.813-07:00Lorsque vous avez besoin pour réaliser ce class de...Lorsque vous avez besoin pour réaliser ce class de trucs aimerait [url=http://www.goencryptit.com/]cabas vanessa bruno[/url] sac à dominant prix, Satisfaire les rendre fermés elsewhere d'un set nombre de poche de confirmation défaut ou obtenir un peu de gardes. Un très vaste invite à vous assurer que vous tous [url=http://www.candicemonhollan.com/]sac vanessa bruno pas cher[/url] affectueux femmes: l'eau est vraiment un n't tipster rain chaque alligator grave. S'habituer à elle. En fait, y compris les produits de reproduction a récemment compris les femmes et les hommes dans le monde entier. Donc, vous ne devriez pas très devez être ignominy avec cette style synthétique attention à pas facilement disponibles à main. Bon de sacs de fascinate snuff autocars entre les personnes célèbres est si superior que tant de gens sont aussi à l'opt de posséder les [url=http://www.candicemonhollan.com/]sac vanessa bruno[/url] . <br /> <br />De l'événement la sample aa croquis du congélateur comporte une autre chose contrairement à il ya une talent possibilité que la sac à greatest n'est pas réel. Un choice objectif supplémentaire de faire la détermination d'un composé sac à main de [url=http://www.bysageandbone.com/vanessa-bruno-cabas-grand-cuir.html]sac vanessa bruno cabas grand cuir[/url] est presque toujours méticuleusement enquêter sur l'effect en toute honnêteté congélateur peut être la personnalité. <br /> <br />Au cours de la clôture des décideurs rondes ayant beaucoup d'outils proclamer ce couple de nous peut éventuellement encore mouchetée dans l'unlikely mais personne de devrait équilibrer les prix de l'vanessa bruno prêteur. [url=http://www.candicemonhollan.com/vanessa-bruno-lin-et-paillettes.html]sac vanessa bruno lin et paillettes[/url] stock électrique offrons toutes sortes de [url=http://www.goencryptit.com/]sac cuir vanessa bruno[/url] chiffon de lavage et aussi des éléments relativement notez estimations de billets. Tous ceux qui veulent obtenir à promote moment une magnifique concepteur sac à dos, fourre-tout, le budget, les bagages ou autres gadgets, Avec des coûts nettement moins chers que d'habitude, Utilisé explorer [url=http://www.goencryptit.com/]sac cabas vanessa bruno[/url] avenue. <br /> <br />Un particulier dames [url=http://www.goencryptit.com/sac-vanessa-bruno-grand.html]sac vanessa bruno grand[/url] de classe sac est livré dans quelques tailles irisées plusieurs patterns. Les couleurs seront très certainement en savoir with an increment of sur la partie brillante. Ils cuisinent vous pensez que du sucre et des sucettes. Et alors vous pouvez certainement diminuer la guardianship à l'époque discharge cette biceps et triceps et de réaliser des pompes. Droit dans votre scrapbook, complètement ensemble. Complètement à l'écart, complètement. <br /> <br />Qui ont un sac [url=http://www.goencryptit.com/]vanessa bruno pas cher[/url], les gars et les femmes est lié à apprécier grande sac de votre entreprise au sein de l'emblème éblouissante C et nécessaires flood entraîner des erreurs près parfaitement au sac à dos. Selon toute probabilité, sont excités appliquer le meilleur [url=http://www.bysageandbone.com/]sac vanessa bruno cuir[/url] de sac à main qui sera probablement la peine de la dette que vous avez utilisé sur elle. Avec le meilleur composé de qualité peut ainsi durer plusieurs années, mais si vous s'extasier styles, Tu ne seras revêtu dans un sac à principal pour faire le bien de l'occasion?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-69080006876025748902013-07-27T10:16:25.214-07:002013-07-27T10:16:25.214-07:00"ATBOTL said...
The international press is m..."ATBOTL said...<br /><br />The international press is making no mention of race or in most cases, even of the 1967 riot while covering Detroit's bankruptcy. Most non-Americans have no idea that the population of Detroit is over 80% African."<br /><br />Many Americans are unaware of these facts too.Mr. Anonnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-67196899262222889272013-07-27T02:37:31.639-07:002013-07-27T02:37:31.639-07:00The international press is making no mention of ra...The international press is making no mention of race or in most cases, even of the 1967 riot while covering Detroit's bankruptcy. Most non-Americans have no idea that the population of Detroit is over 80% African. <br /><br />This problem is being presented as one of the US auto industry's decline and maybe a lack of do gooderism on the part of the rest of America. <br /><br />It's surreal being overseas now and reading/watching this nonsense while explaining to foreigners that Detroit's population looks like the Congo. Most are surpised to learn that there are cities in America that have an African majority.ATBOTLnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-10511561266277556192013-07-26T12:21:12.825-07:002013-07-26T12:21:12.825-07:00In fact there is a growing appreciation by police ...<br />In fact there is a growing appreciation by police forces everywhere that it's unwise to let black congregate in dense configurations. Too many black people in a confined area is the precursor to a riot. It's better to keep them well dispersed - or sprawled if you prefer.<br /><br /><br />Yes, but which outlying exurbs really are clamoring for more of them to take into their areas? Not too many. And therein lies the rub. Sprawl for certain kinds of folks and not for others.<br /><br />And remember: SF never had a large vast black population. It's a 19th century town that grew accordingly with Italians, Irish and Chinese. Blacks weren't a presence until the late 1960s so it was relatively easy to drive them out. Come to think of it, blacks have never been a large presence in CA compared to Latinos Asians and Whites.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-42225145470014782252013-07-26T12:17:37.748-07:002013-07-26T12:17:37.748-07:00The cities had to get food from somewhere, and in ...The cities had to get food from somewhere, and in doing so passed the germs on. <br /><br /><br />Not how it worked. Cities were decimated, male populations completely in some cities. They didn't "pass the germs on" since they died before they could get out! <br /><br />Here's the thing most don't realize. In fairness. The plagues hit the cities 90%-95%. BUT it primarily targeted men. Between the ages of about 14-45. Older men and young boys and women by and large were spared the plague. Most victims of the plague were men. In the cities.<br /><br /><br />And I haven't even mentioned ancient diseases like leprosy that were almost completely town based. It struck townsfolk primarly so they had to move them outside the city walls. The countryside refused them so they formed their own colonies.<br /><br /><br /><br />The only places spared from epidemics were totally isolated / self-sufficient farms and villages. <br /><br />Yes, which is what nearly 100% of villages were back in middle ages up to 1700s. By and large they could survive on their own without any direct contact from towns. For the most part, for their daily living, they didnt need help from the towns. Not talking extras, frills, or additional things to enhance their lives. The basic bare necessities they could do and survive quite well without the towns.<br /><br />Regarding food, the towns needed the country villages a lot more than the other way around.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />Consider also that invading armies, including the Hun and Mongol hordes, needed food. <br /><br /><br />Exactly. They always struck the cities/towns primarily since that's where the money was. Huns and mongols intended to stay around. They hit the cities first. Once they conquered the cities they had some forms of wealth then they hit countryside for food and THEN generally left the villages alone. They ruled and stayed in the cities to maintain their base of power. Continue...<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />After they sacked Rome or equivalent for gold, they raided farmland for food.<br /><br /><br />Uh uh uh, only if they could find the right villages. Only those in their direct line of march. They didnt march all over the Empire going from village to village. They took the low hanging fruit first.<br /><br /><br /><br />Face it. Longest lifespans weren't much compared to modern times. But those that did live the longest lived in the country and small villages. The manual labor kept the strong alive and going, for the most part, they could survive on what they grew, they didn't live on top of neighbors like in towns and for the most part the sanitation was way better so they mostly avoided the plague, leprosy and other bacterial town based diseases. Longest lifespans = found in the countryside. <br /><br />Which is why most of the nobility lived in the country on their estates. They had it good, collected taxes from their peasants crops, and didnt have any reason to go into the towns.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-7535795210718696332013-07-26T12:17:22.197-07:002013-07-26T12:17:22.197-07:00Anonymous said...
Historical gated cities were sur...Anonymous said...<br />Historical gated cities were surprisingly clean. By keeping the riff-raff out, they could afford to be. It was only after 1600 that Western European and American cities began to be "ungated" and built up horrendous filth. It was also a fact that in traditional times, peasants often starved despite having food growing all around them, and urban workers were richer and ate better. <br /><br />Lie, Lie, AGAIN a lie. First off, for much of human history it has always been about 95-97% of homo sapiens were rural. So modern cities as it were didnt even come into being as we know them til around 3,000yrs or so. In the modern sense. Also the populations, although sparse by today's definition of mega cities were dense together with tight living quarters. Richer? In what way. Modern economy of capitalism was non existent til about 500 yrs ago. Humans dealt primarily in a barter based system. Even in the Roman empire where currency was becoming the norm, most of the ordinary people, most were rural peasants, still continued to deal in barter systems (trade) since they by and large had little use for currency. Taxes were collected from peoples crops. Where did townsfolk GET their food? Hmmm? They had to trade/barter it from the nearby farmlands since they grew very little of their own food. Whenever famines hit, the towns or cities were always the hardest hit since they grew so little of their own food.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />And plagues ravaged the countryside too. <br /><br />No they did NOT. Plagues decimated cities primarily and chiefly. The black death, the worst in Europes history wiped out 90%plus in the cities. Countrysides were largely spared. Why the hell do you think the noblemen who owned estates in the COUNTRY survived relatively unscathed? Because the plague didn't come near them. They were safe from it.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-62723696698017707042013-07-26T09:35:31.286-07:002013-07-26T09:35:31.286-07:00If this 'sprawl' theory were a serious hyp...If this 'sprawl' theory were a serious hypothesis it would be easy to test. Here in California we have two cities - Los Angeles and San Francisco - which differ dramatically on the sprawl dimension.<br /><br />San Francisco is a seven by seven mile square. It has the Pacific on west side, the Golden Gate on the north, the Bay on the east and a mountain range on the south. It can't sprawl like Los Angeles or San Jose. <br /><br />So if this were a real theory we would expect blacks to be uniquely prosperous in San Francisco. But why then did San Francisco work so hard for so long to drive all the blacks out. Doesn't fit, does it?<br /><br />In fact there is a growing appreciation by police forces everywhere that it's unwise to let black congregate in dense configurations. Too many black people in a confined area is the precursor to a riot. It's better to keep them well dispersed - or sprawled if you prefer.<br /><br />Albertosaurus<br />Pat Boylehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13477950851915567863noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-19195168850415456962013-07-26T08:10:41.759-07:002013-07-26T08:10:41.759-07:00Aren't you kind of being hard on Indy, part of...<em>Aren't you kind of being hard on Indy, part of the "heartland" region? Also isn't there a high number of religious people there? White trash is kind of hard. Must have its virtues. Suburbs such as Carmel and Fishers, for instance, have turned up on CNN's top small town places to live. Pretty good schools and decent income.</em><br /><br />You can go anywhere in the mostly-white rural/small-town Midwest and look around and find people doing meth, living in trailers that are falling apart, and practicing for their next appearance on Springer. But there are differences between them and the bottom of the urban barrel. For starters, they're fewer in number, so they don't affect the surrounding area much. They mostly keep to themselves and their crimes are mostly internal or non-violent -- domestic abuse, making their own drugs, kiting checks -- rather than mugging people or getting into turf wars. They very rarely shoot at each other (even though they're all armed), and never where innocents might get caught in the crossfire. <br /><br />Basically, they're like the fertile folks at the beginning of Idiocracy: trashy and not too bright, certainly not the kind of people you'd hang out with if you had a choice, and certainly not net contributors to society; but you wouldn't have to fear for your life if you lived in their neighborhood, either.Cail Corishevhttp://cailcorishev.wordpress.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-44358487487764814912013-07-26T08:08:00.799-07:002013-07-26T08:08:00.799-07:00"jody said...
most of my mom's family is..."jody said...<br /><br />most of my mom's family is from indiana and they have been there for 200 years. they are white trash losers. most hoosiers aren't as bad as that, they're farmers and basketball lovers, but they don't economically advance. hard to do that when farming corn and soybeans, or scrounging for the last couple GM/ford/chrysler factory jobs."<br /><br />So their problem is that they actually seek productive, useful work - farming, manufacturing, etc. What would you have them do - become Entertainment Attorneys, video-game developers, or critical legal theorists? Your definition of "economic advancement" seems to be: finding a job that pays well, but produces nothing of any tangible value.Mr. Anonnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-39919656606684752142013-07-26T07:52:09.535-07:002013-07-26T07:52:09.535-07:00"There's a couple of lies going on here, ...<em>"There's a couple of lies going on here, let's correct them right now."</em><br /><br />People are incredibly clueless about rural life these days. I've had people tell me they'd rather have their car break down in an urban area than a rural one, apparently because in the country you'll probably end up kidnapped by some hillbilly with an ax fetish.<br /><br />The elderly people I know who lived through the Great Depression in town (even a small town) remember it being far worse than the ones who were on a farm. The farmers were just as poor -- probably poorer in dollars -- but at least they always had food.<br />Cail Corishevhttp://cailcorishev.wordpress.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-77732319960594704432013-07-25T23:14:56.682-07:002013-07-25T23:14:56.682-07:00Historical gated cities were surprisingly clean. B...Historical gated cities were surprisingly clean. By keeping the riff-raff out, they could afford to be. It was only after 1600 that Western European and American cities began to be "ungated" and built up horrendous filth. It was also a fact that in traditional times, peasants often starved despite having food growing all around them, and urban workers were richer and ate better. And plagues ravaged the countryside too. The cities had to get food from somewhere, and in doing so passed the germs on. The only places spared from epidemics were totally isolated / self-sufficient farms and villages. Consider also that invading armies, including the Hun and Mongol hordes, needed food. After they sacked Rome or equivalent for gold, they raided farmland for food.<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-45852902185681644202013-07-25T20:15:37.363-07:002013-07-25T20:15:37.363-07:00Since correlation doesn't imply causation it i...Since correlation doesn't imply causation it is very important to prevent the formation of any control groups, such as traditional ethnic human ecologies involving people of European descent.<br /><br />If such control groups are allowed to exist, the argument that correlation doesn't imply causation might not work to prevent people being eaten alive from arguing, convincingly, that they should be allowed to exclude those eating them alive.<br /><br />There are so many who are so hungry.<br /><br />Won't you help preserve the argument "Correlation doesn't imply causation." as the path to nourishment of millions if not billions of sociopaths world-wide?<br /><br />Stamp out control groups, TODAY.<br /><br />Thank you.Jim Boweryhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12686155123469135528noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-18300951254168665612013-07-25T19:06:56.589-07:002013-07-25T19:06:56.589-07:00Interesting how the failures of blacks is always b...Interesting how the failures of blacks is always blamed on anything but blacks.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-14833600771195304902013-07-25T18:46:03.233-07:002013-07-25T18:46:03.233-07:00The anti-city mentality, and ridiculous glorificat...<i>The anti-city mentality, and ridiculous glorification of country living, was mostly post-1945 American, and was due to unique socioconomic factors.<br /><br />I think you'll find elements of that in Britain in the early 1900s.</i><br /><br />In Britain it was the nobles in their country estates who had that attitude, and could afford to have it. In America it was the middle class suburbanites.<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-52118487104480919812013-07-25T18:42:44.324-07:002013-07-25T18:42:44.324-07:00there are areas on the map where poor, rural, brai...<i>there are areas on the map where poor, rural, brain drained europeans do nothing generation after generation. such as maine, and parts of west virginia and indiana.</i><br /><br />They may not be setting the world on fire but they arent sinking into a pit of poverty and disaster either. A stable backdrop to more go-ahead regions.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-9451692081906225232013-07-25T18:29:58.175-07:002013-07-25T18:29:58.175-07:00This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-39110158212667550512013-07-25T18:10:23.679-07:002013-07-25T18:10:23.679-07:00"Atlanta, of course, is the prototypical case...<i>"Atlanta, of course, is the prototypical case here: going back to the 1970s, it’s under-invested in public transit"</i><br /><br />Atlanta's population is not dense enough to make public transportation feasible. Very few metro Atlantans can walk to a train station from their home or job. <br /><br />However, Atlanta public transportation does inspire great musical performances by the "youths" here:<br /><br />http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cwkU-5OFPHY<br /><br />http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vQTuYo6HmiQ<br /><br />Camlostnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-42812848877170705602013-07-25T17:16:23.392-07:002013-07-25T17:16:23.392-07:00There's a couple of lies going on here, let...There's a couple of lies going on here, let's correct them right now.<br /><br /><br />The anti-city mentality, and ridiculous glorification of country living, was mostly post-1945 American, and was due to unique socioconomic factors.<br /><br />That is a lie. Anti-city mentality goes deep in US history, back to Thomas Jefferson and Ben Franklin, who praised country life and living compared to the rotten corruption of the cities.<br /><br /><br /><br />Living in a city in the 19th Century (or before) was ugly, icky, nasty, disease prone, and filled with the ick of pre-sewer urine and feces of humans and horses. London, NYC, Boston, San Francisco, were miserable in the Summer due to the stench and the flies.<br /><br />Living in the country was hardly antiseptic either. There were undrained swamps everywhere filled with flies, gnats, mosquitoes, malaria, and yellow fever. Human and animal waste (including manure) was everywhere on the farms. About the only good places in the country were the estates of the nobles.<br /><br />This is also a lie. The black death of Europe, which wiped out roughly a full third of the populace almost NEVER touched rural areas. "head for the hills" is the apt phrase. Country living = longer lifespans. Mainly because you had more room, more area, so you could contain the various problems so common in tightly living quarters in the cities.<br /><br /><br /><br />Cities as we know them really only became livable in the 1870's onward with sewage systems; and vast improvements by the motorcar were observed in the teens and 1920's.<br /><br />Sewage systems were older than that, especially outside of Western Europe. Byzantium, Cairo, Calcutta, Bombay, Beijing, Phnom Penh, Edo, etc. had effective sewage and disease control. That included strict police enforcement of what would now be called anti-pollution laws.<br /><br />Ah, yes, and Rome too. The Romans invented piped water in the cities. Guess what? The pipes were lead. How'd that work out? All the other cities you named were all hit at various times with outbreaks of Plague, leprousy, and other bacterial diseases while country living was relatively unscathed.<br /><br />Historical fact: Foreign invaders almost always hit a nation or province or dutchy or area's main cities first since that's where the dough was. They tended to overlook the country.<br /><br />Also keep in mind: The cities before the 20th century lagged far behind in one area: Food production. Where'd they get their food? Oh that's right, from the rural areas.<br /><br />Bottom line: Country living up to recent times was always safer (much less crime) more living area (less closed and cramped quarters) waaaay far less plague and other deadly bacterial diseases (due to close proximation of rivers, oceans, some of which came from harbors and unloaded the disease carriers off of ships, etc) Very few rural areas/country areas were ever hit in massive numbers by disease, most notably the plague in the way that cities were decimated.<br /><br /><br />Notice with modern flight, sprawl is the same thing. Many many many folks simply dont wanna live in the cities. <br /><br />AGAIN. WONDER WHY THAT IS? If city lights are soooo great, how come millions more vote with their tires and get out while they can? Wonder why?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-78909163719025765682013-07-25T16:16:15.609-07:002013-07-25T16:16:15.609-07:00Whiskey:
BTW, "sprawl" is as old as rail...Whiskey:<br /><i>BTW, "sprawl" is as old as railways. London was getting suburbs in the 1830s, as was New Orleans (basically Uptown/the Garden District/Audobon Park). All powered by railways or streetcars.</i><br /><br />People flocked to the cities mainly for: money and excitement. The brains were there, the banks, the money, the industry. Often it was simply escape from rural boredom. Rural boredom and drudgery cannot be underestimated: they also also drove thousands of young men to risk their lives in military careers.<br /><br />Consider that the traditional city or town was walled and gated for many good reasons. The obvious: Defense against armies of enemy nations. Not so obvious was the ability of the city to keep out the human "trash": bums, beggars, lepers, retards, gypsies, tramps, thieves, etc. Cities of old were pretty damn discriminating in whom they let in, and whom they kept out. It was an early form of eugenics.<br /><br />The anti-city mentality, and ridiculous glorification of country living, was mostly post-1945 American, and was due to unique socioconomic factors.<br /><br /><i>Living in a city in the 19th Century (or before) was ugly, icky, nasty, disease prone, and filled with the ick of pre-sewer urine and feces of humans and horses. London, NYC, Boston, San Francisco, were miserable in the Summer due to the stench and the flies.</i><br /><br />Living in the country was hardly antiseptic either. There were undrained swamps everywhere filled with flies, gnats, mosquitoes, malaria, and yellow fever. Human and animal waste (including manure) was everywhere on the farms. About the only good places in the country were the estates of the nobles.<br /><br /><i>Cities as we know them really only became livable in the 1870's onward with sewage systems; and vast improvements by the motorcar were observed in the teens and 1920's.</i><br /><br />Sewage systems were older than that, especially outside of Western Europe. Byzantium, Cairo, Calcutta, Bombay, Beijing, Phnom Penh, Edo, etc. had effective sewage and disease control. That included strict police enforcement of what would now be called anti-pollution laws.Henrik Zimmerberg, Great White Defendant & Swedish-Jewish hockey-playing IT mogulnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-6215624632195485522013-07-25T16:06:23.572-07:002013-07-25T16:06:23.572-07:00Not only is sprawl not an explanation for Black po...Not only is sprawl not an explanation for Black poverty, sprawl has existed in the East Coast for well, over a hundred and twenty years. Since even BEFORE the Brooklyn Bridge (via ferrys from Brooklyn to Manhattan) but certainly after it. Brooklyn then was far more rural, more suburban, and less developed. It was the center for a famous preacher, the noted (and philandering) Henry Ward Beecher.<br /><br />Sprawl existed in Los Angeles, from the Pacific Electric Red Cars, starting around the early 1900s and far before the post-War freeway system. You could take the Red Cars down as far as Huntington Beach from Hollywood.<br /><br />More magical thinking, trying desperately to avoid the truth about Black poverty and dysfunction. It cannot be fixed. It is certain. It will always be there. Blacks will always require lots of White money to have a decent life. Black people cannot provide for themselves because about half are illiterate and not capable of reading, see Rachel Jeantel and her lack of cursive.<br /><br />They didn't ask to be here, but they're here. They have to be provided for -- and since Whites will have to pay for them forever, that also brings forward certain questions. About dependency, authority, and unity. Can America expect Whites to pay for Black dysfunction forever, without quarrel and qualm? Without demanding other things in return for the money (enhanced rights, diminished ones for Black people, and so on)?<br /><br />Liberals want to avoid this question and others around them as long as they can. But they cannot be avoided forever.Whiskeyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01854764809682029464noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-52433580448706546922013-07-25T16:04:12.585-07:002013-07-25T16:04:12.585-07:00If whites and browns running from blacks is 's...If whites and browns running from blacks is 'sprawl', what is whites moving back to cities? Haul? Haul them back by spreading the blacks out?<br /><br />At any rate, better sprawl and mall than brawl and maul. <br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-91522586035529660832013-07-25T15:28:25.185-07:002013-07-25T15:28:25.185-07:00Violent crime creates sprawl.
Violent crime that ...Violent crime creates sprawl.<br /><br />Violent crime that was never dealt with properly because the media wouldn't report it properly.<br /><br />Physical geography should contain violent crime through boxing it in with natural barriers like rivers or artificial ones like freeways.<br /><br />Therefore the differing physical geography of various cities should predict differing outcomes even with other factors constant.<br /><br />Ultimately, similar outcomes can only be expected if violent crime is equalized. It can be equalized the wrong way by increasing violent crime in good neighborhoods through section-8 or it can be equalized the right way through dealing with it properly in the bad neighborhoods - in particualr recognizing that once a gang structure is in place crime is different and the gang structure itself must be targeted as a whole.<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-76016542492787599212013-07-25T15:06:00.480-07:002013-07-25T15:06:00.480-07:00Just a Scottish football (soccer) forum here - not...Just a Scottish football (soccer) forum here - not of any massive importance - but indicative of the level of self-congratulatory right-on egalitarian goodthinking that goes on in that country that they can discuss the doom of Detroit so carefully without even once touching the deadly third rail of you-know what. Crimestop is in full effect. They literally find certain thoughts unthinkable<br /><br />http://taboard.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=146024Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-80257509826904456532013-07-25T14:51:59.616-07:002013-07-25T14:51:59.616-07:00last comment spam.
obama claims growing inequalit...last comment spam.<br /><br />obama claims growing inequality is bad economics - but for the cultural marxism which he drives, economic inequality is a core tenet. deliberately forcing the demographics of a ethnically uniform nation, to instead take on the demographic profile of brazil, will necessarily create the thing which obama claims to want to avoid.<br /><br />they talk about it like it's a gap, but it's more like a chasm. how can dumping millions of the vibrant of the world into a nation filled with western europeans and ashkenazi jews result in anything other than a brazilian gini coefficient.<br /><br />south africa 63<br />brazil 54<br />mexico 48<br />china 47<br />US 45<br />-<br />japan 38<br />UK 34<br />france 32<br />canada 32<br />south korea 31<br />netherlands 30<br />australia 30<br />germany 28<br />finland 26<br />ukraine 26<br />sweden 25<br /><br />homogenous first world nations are mainly the only place where a middle class exists and wealth accumlation is not so radically divergent. indeed, you could say, perhaps the whole idea of a middle class is an artificial, time limited one. it existed for, historically speaking, a short time, a couple decades, in a few european majority nations. and that generally speaking, there is no such thing as a naturally emergent middle class. such a thing does not exist in almost any other time period or economic system.<br /><br />other economic and political situations simply don't produce such a thing. so the arrangement which is taken for granted in the US - a middle class - may have been a very special, temporary, and now disappearing artifact of peculiar economic and political conditions, conditions which are now gone and never returning.jodynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-71741710109483101912013-07-25T14:48:51.957-07:002013-07-25T14:48:51.957-07:00aside from the particulars, note the general idea....aside from the particulars, note the general idea. europeans are obligated to help the vibrant in general, and above all the africans in particular, to get jobs, accrue wealth, climb corporate ladders and eventually take over every organization or company which europeans created. and if that process is not happening, it's the europeans who are at fault, and need to change.<br /><br />the vibrant are never expected to do any of this on their own. if they become physically and geographically isolated, it is a given that they have to sit around and wait for the europeans to overcome their inherent, permanent racism and do what they're supposed to do. mobilize to spend all their time, energy, and money making sure the vibrant succeed.<br /><br />the default political assumption in america 2013: europeans are just mules, who's purpose is helping the other groups succeed and elevating them over the europeans themselves.jodynoreply@blogger.com