tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post7996197269673648884..comments2024-03-19T02:31:02.140-07:00Comments on Steve Sailer: iSteve: Eight Is EnoughUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger84125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-90055049885315284982012-07-24T14:00:51.219-07:002012-07-24T14:00:51.219-07:00Clearly, mass shooters and serial killers are anot...Clearly, mass shooters and serial killers are another example of occupations from which women are kept by discrimination, social convention, and white male privilege. Clearly, it's time for a federal program to help more women advance in the mass killing field.NOTAnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-91337480452300771562012-07-24T13:14:07.048-07:002012-07-24T13:14:07.048-07:00That just gave me an idea.
Could libs, SWPLs, I d...That just gave me an idea.<br /><br />Could libs, SWPLs, I don't care who come up with some PC program that would provide "services" to young "at risk" NAM's that would include some kind of incarceration during teens and 20's disguised and rebranded as rehabilitative. They could be given recreation "therapy" or "education" or whatever, but would be out of society and unable to reproduce.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-39419144399984470032012-07-24T13:09:17.087-07:002012-07-24T13:09:17.087-07:00In fact over 95% of such shooting "sprees&quo...<i>In fact over 95% of such shooting "sprees" are carried out by "higher IQ" whites.</i><br /><br /><br />Okay, but even accounting for the truly insane, whites have lower rates of violence than "normal" sane NAM's.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-76138784241919380262012-07-24T10:48:34.662-07:002012-07-24T10:48:34.662-07:00Genetic Advancement?Genetic Advancement?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-36018446529586204072012-07-24T10:47:06.575-07:002012-07-24T10:47:06.575-07:00If Eugenics has a negative connotation, re-label i...If Eugenics has a negative connotation, re-label it. Libs do it all the time. So, anti-white discrimination is called 'affirmative action'. <br /><br />How about we call it Generational Enhancement?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-6689758005203855852012-07-24T04:38:39.915-07:002012-07-24T04:38:39.915-07:00"Riots are nothing special in England- as its...<i>"Riots are nothing special in England- as its long history of football and other white hooliganism show"</i><br /><br />Not so, they're a modern phenomenon.<br /><br />The American anthropologist Geoffrey Gorer, in his 1955 "Exploring English Character", compared the post-war English with their early Victorian forebears of 120 years previously:<br /><br /><i>"One of the most lawless populations in the world has turned into one of the most law-abiding; ...a fiercely and ruthlessly acquisitive society has turned into a mildly distributive society; general corruption in government has been replaced by an extraordinarily high level of honesty... in public life today the English are certainly among the most peaceful, gentle, courteous and orderly populations that the civilized world has ever seen. ... you hardly ever see a fight in a bar (a not uncommon spectacle in most of the rest of Europe or in the U.S.A.)... football crowds are as orderly as church meetings.." </i><br /><br /><br />That was 1955. Not so now.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-64969498349246094562012-07-23T22:45:39.275-07:002012-07-23T22:45:39.275-07:00--------------- "In the U.S. in this century,...--------------- "In the U.S. in this century, the conventional wisdom has become that the problems posed by the poor, since they must be 0% genetic in origin, are best addressed by taking poor children away from their families for as many of their waking hours as possible and turning them over to intensely dedicated Ivy League graduates in Teach for America and similar programs. ----"<br /><br />Hyperbole allowed, this state of affairs does not exist and has rarely existed in America historically speaking. Conventional wisdom has rather insisted that "the poor" raise their own kids. This was so before the welfare statism interlude of the mid 60s and 1970s, and became that wisdom again during the Reaganaut era, and was still that under Dem Bill Clinton's welfare reform program. In fact it is a testimony to the power of "conventional thinking" that enabled or pressured Dem Clinton to sign off on welfare reform. And in THIS 21st century- the old welfare statist is not at all the conventional wisdom.<br /><br /><br />------------------ "In the wake of last summer's shameful English riots, however, the Brits are starting to talk about how, you know, just maybe it would be a good idea if people who already had more kids than they could handle wouldn't have any more. -------------------- "<br /><br />COuld be but this bit of Brit "conventional wisdom" about "too many kids" as the cause of riots is not only dubious but irrelevant. Riots are nothing special in England- as its long history of football and other white hooliganism show. <br /><br />The more relevant factor in the riots than "excess kids" were (a) sloppy policy work via the precipitating shooting, and (b) a plodding police response when widespread trouble started. Hooliganism is always waiting to happen in England, and whites are its main perpetrators. This time non-white hooligans used a window of opportunity to do their "wild" thing. Equal opportunity...<br /><br />--------------- "Minorities are typically not as smart.. So you end up with women who have lots of babies, and UNMARRIED, from DIFFERENT FATHERS, e.g. a girl that has 3 babies from 3 different fathers. Yikes! ---------------<br /><br />Nothing at all unusual for white people. The white Irish were notioious for "baby making" back in the day. And "higher IQ" white people do pretty well in violence. WHy just the other day one of them wounded over 70 people, and killed 12, including a 6-year old girl in a shooting rampage. In fact over 95% of such shooting "sprees" are carried out by "higher IQ" whites.Inquiring Jewnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-82055699223587712802012-07-23T19:53:59.285-07:002012-07-23T19:53:59.285-07:00I found it interesting that in Mexico, the average...<i>I found it interesting that in Mexico, the average woman has 2.4 children, while the average Mexican woman in America has 4.2 children. What is the difference? I guess in Mexico the Gringos are not paying the hospital bills.</i><br /><br /> In Mexico most indias and mestizas give birth at home or a "maternity hospital" of modest technology and price.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-38011255400921422252012-07-23T18:09:24.654-07:002012-07-23T18:09:24.654-07:00Cconjugal visits in prison is literally probably t...Cconjugal visits in prison is literally probably the stupidest idea ever.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-85419249531597718582012-07-23T17:34:41.950-07:002012-07-23T17:34:41.950-07:00I found it interesting that in Mexico, the average...I found it interesting that in Mexico, the average woman has 2.4 children, while the average Mexican woman in America has 4.2 children. What is the difference? I guess in Mexico the Gringos are not paying the hospital bills.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-85305009300139219242012-07-23T17:23:14.923-07:002012-07-23T17:23:14.923-07:00"You reduce the number of children impulsive ..."You reduce the number of children impulsive people have because a lot fo their life locked up."<br /><br />"the only males that still behave like men (and have spending money) are the criminals."<br /><br /><a href="http://thelefthalf.wordpress.com/2012/05/07/sure-to-be-a-hit-with-the-ladies/" rel="nofollow">Not so fast</a>Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-25501516797651515922012-07-23T16:54:19.753-07:002012-07-23T16:54:19.753-07:00To commenter # 1: If you type "per say" ...To commenter # 1: If you type "per say" in your first sentence, you lose the trust of all but those as poorly literate as you.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-89575724553729471652012-07-23T15:22:35.326-07:002012-07-23T15:22:35.326-07:00"Until we face the fact that eugenics is not ..."Until we face the fact that eugenics is not a dirty word...there is no possible rational discussion of the issues."<br /><br />You can have a disguised discussion though. The prime reason prison works - well historically it was execution but prison can work the same way - is eugenic. You reduce the number of children impulsive people have because a lot fo their life locked up.<br /><br />So you can defend prison in whatever terms work the best but privately because you understand the eugenic effect.<br /><br />Another example would be full employment. In full employment the most attractive males in bluecollar environments are the steadiest males. With mass unemployment and the creation of an underclass the steadiest males lose all pride and self-confidence (and money) and the only males that still behave like men (and have spending money) are the criminals.<br /><br />So the full employment policy decreed by the older, i wouldn't say benigh exactly but certainly less malign, elite was eugenic. Again you can believe the eugenic argument yourself but use whatever argument works best.<br /><br />.<br />"Still, it's also a pretty huge signal that something is going wrong in American black culture. (It could be genetic differences, except that a lot of what's going wrong seems to have changed faster than genetics seem like they could have changed.)"<br /><br />The genetics haven't changed too fast a *restraining* culture that *reduced* the effects of the base genetics was removed and replaced by an *enabling* culture that maximized the effects of the genetics.<br /><br />One example, segregation, black crime was as bad* but back then the police's job was to beat it back inside designated areas away from white folks. Now things like Section 8 are used to drive black violent crime into white meighborhoods.<br /><br />*I think the percentage of violent criminals has been going up both during the segregation time and now besically because the same rule of law isn't applied in black areas so the impulsively violent ****heads have more kids.<br /><br />(Although i think the removal of a cultural brake and it's replacement with an enabling culture can explain it (just) i do wonder if there is another piece of the puzzle as well, maybe related to cochran's germ theory and promiscuity. This is because the dysfunction in the white underclass - from a much lower base - seems to be happening too fast for a purely genetic explanation.)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-80515289950052130422012-07-23T12:57:18.302-07:002012-07-23T12:57:18.302-07:00"...he only operates mentally at the level of..."...he only operates mentally at the level of a junior-highschool pupil. He's a stupid a**hole, who has nothing substantive to offer."<br /><br />I know you are but what am eyyyyye?Truthhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17286755693955361308noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-70817553866612751652012-07-23T12:55:43.115-07:002012-07-23T12:55:43.115-07:00"And the purpose of your statement to Anon is..."And the purpose of your statement to Anon is what, Truth? As a quip, a joke, it's the stuff of junior high school boys so since you're not a junior high school boy, I figure you mean much more than this."<br /><br />No. no deeper meaning, just effective junior high ridicule.Truthhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17286755693955361308noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-82500400259928465242012-07-23T12:26:06.127-07:002012-07-23T12:26:06.127-07:00Until we face the fact that eugenics is not a dirt...Until we face the fact that eugenics is not a dirty word, that it was invented by Americans (at least in its classsical form) and that Hitler had nothing to do with its founding and was a poor eugenist, at best, anyway, there is no possible rational discussion of the issues.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-82028817260365595792012-07-23T11:13:30.381-07:002012-07-23T11:13:30.381-07:00"are best addressed by taking poor children a...<i>"are best addressed by taking poor children away from their families for as many of their waking hours as possible and turning them over to intensely dedicated Ivy League graduates..."</i><br /><br /><br />http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-18952579<br /><br />"Some 2,000 new summer schools running across England will attempt to put 65,000 poorer children on an "equal footing" with their wealthier peers, Nick Clegg said today.<br /><br />The deputy prime minister said the "brain training" camps would help struggling primary pupils make a good start at secondary this September.<br /><br />The schools are being funded by £50m targeted at disadvantaged pupils.<br /><br />They will focus on literacy and numeracy, and art, music and sport.<br /><br />There will also be sessions to help youngsters get to know their new teachers.<br /><br />About £50m has been made available to schools through the "pupil premium" - extra funding for disadvantaged children - to run the camps this year."Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-85378776832570019532012-07-23T10:34:57.981-07:002012-07-23T10:34:57.981-07:00the poor are self destructive and have a nostalgie...<i>the poor are self destructive and have a nostalgie de la boue(love of the gutter) because they know the state will ultimately take care of their every need</i><br /><br />"Nostalgie de la boue" is a middle- and upper-class phenomenon, a kind of vicarious thrill-seeking by the pampered and cocooned. A few well brought-up people end up in the gutter, but most low-class scum are just doing what comes naturally to them.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-12390424142484972202012-07-23T10:29:29.377-07:002012-07-23T10:29:29.377-07:00I'm probably the only regular reader of this b...I'm probably the only regular reader of this blog who is a former AFDC Social Worker. I have seen close up all of the things that most readers just imagine. I've been in their houses. I've talked to them.<br /><br />Much to my surprise I found that black people were really quite terrible people. For example, they beat their kids in public. I never saw a white parent do that (and I never saw an Asian on AFDC at all). Black parents routinely beat the hell out of their kids. Somehow the Sunday talk shows never take up the problem of child abuse by blacks.<br /><br />Black people fall easily into deep dependence. White parents on welfare often prosper. They get free money, free food and free housing. I remember a young white couple who had decorated their apartment with hand crafts, discarded items and a bit of paint. All welfare recipients had TVs and most had cars. These two white kids with the unexpected baby lived a life of hope and dignity. They were probably off welfare within a year.<br /><br />Black families in contrast wallowed in squalor. Their homes were chaotic. When you went inside your feet stuck to the floor. Everything was dirty and/or broken.<br /><br />It was impossible to ignore the racial differences and that drove most of the young white liberal Social Workers mad. I remember a guy in my unit two desks down from me, who just cracked. He went to the stairwell and collapsed in a crying jag. He kept repeating over and over that everything was unfair. <br /><br />I was, it seems, made of sterner stuff. I began to see things differently. I came to the opinion that we should abolish AFDC and similar programs altogether. When Gingrich forced Clinton to enact welfare reform there were all these terrible predictions as to what would happen. The press predicted starving babies. In fact the whole thing was pretty uneventful. The welfare mothers just got jobs.<br /><br />I worked for most of my time at the welfare department in the jobs oriented programs. I knew hundreds of unemployed men and women whose employment status was the basis of their welfare eligibility. I never met anyone who I thought couldn't get and hold a job. Never.<br /><br />The welfare department had declared all of these people "unemployable". That's a class bias. For a college educated office worker like a public social worker there are certain expectations. First the workplace will be clean, well lit and orderly. The boss will be polite and just. The pay will be generous and you as a worker will get respect. For the class of people who end up on welfare none of these things is true. When such a person gets a job the boss is likely a fool or a monster. The work will be arduous and dirty. The worker will be treated with contempt and they will try to cheat him or her out of their wages.<br /><br />Work for a Social Worker is a source of self esteem. This is not the case for welfare recipients. Their self esteem is assaulted every time they go to work. The result is that the Social Workers judge that no one should have to work under those conditions and they decide that the welfare recipient is unemployable.<br /><br />The job market is competitive and welfare recipients don't get the good jobs. That doesn't mean they can't work, only that some bureaucrat wants to save them from working.<br /><br />As is well known welfare dependency is a trap. My contribution to this discussion is to dare to mention that black people are particularly easy to trap. In my experience, whites generally get in and get out, Asians don't even get in when they have real hardships, but blacks once they are in stay for generations.<br /><br />There is a frieze on an Egyptian temple showing men force feeding a hyena. They are trying to domesticate it. Hyenas didn't take to it, dogs did. Similarly we have given food to people and encouraged them to quit being independent (wild). Most races have resisted, not blacks.<br /><br />AlbertosaurusPat Boylehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13477950851915567863noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-24048897119891533322012-07-23T07:52:59.915-07:002012-07-23T07:52:59.915-07:00it seems clear to me that the country would be bet...<i>it seems clear to me that the country would be better off if smarter, more functional people were having relatively more kids, and dumber, less functional people were having relatively fewer kids. It's hard for me to see how anyone could really doubt this.</i><br /><br />Nazi! You want to killsixmillionjews!!!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-44933744849096600222012-07-23T07:42:26.024-07:002012-07-23T07:42:26.024-07:00"Anonymous said...
And the purpose of your s..."Anonymous said...<br /><br />And the purpose of your statement to Anon is what, Truth? As a quip, a joke, it's the stuff of junior high school boys so since you're not a junior high school boy, I figure you mean much more than this."<br /><br />No, there is no more to what he says than adolescent snark. Perhaps he only operates mentally at the level of a junior-highschool pupil. He's a stupid a**hole, who has nothing substantive to offer.Mr. Anonnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-54646871094172608682012-07-23T06:58:59.966-07:002012-07-23T06:58:59.966-07:00anony-mouse said...
SNIP
The only practical way o...anony-mouse said... <br />SNIP<br />The only practical way of reducing the size of dumb families would be to pay them to accept passive forms of sterilisation (norplant implants). Unfortunately such implants can also be removed.<br />-----<br />Norplants an be taken out. However, if the state offers big bribe money for hysterectomies, then there is no going back. Heck, fork up 1 million bucks, tax-exempt, to any woman that is less than 40 years old and has accepted handouts during the last year. The more functional women would probably not take the bait, and those that are down and out but have functional relatives might use the option as a way to start a bidding war with relatives that want them to remain fertile. Non-functional women without a safety net in the form of relatives would be the most likely to take the bait/stipend, and that is just fine.<br /><br />One could also match that with a money offer for men who get the tubes tied. That would not be as effective in controlling population, but it might be a good thing to CYA with regard to gender equality.<br /><br />One side effect of this might be that lesbians who are sure that they do not want kinds might go for the easy money. I see no downside with that.Swordnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-38381550278814347092012-07-23T06:50:25.895-07:002012-07-23T06:50:25.895-07:00Anyhow, isn't this the way all lower sea life ...<i>Anyhow, isn't this the way all lower sea life propagates, clouds and clouds and clouds of eggs, sperm, zygote, plankton?, aren't the chavs just rediscovering ancient and primal truths?</i><br /><br />r-selection vs. K-selection.<br /><br />Reward r-selection, drive up the cost for k-selection and yes, we KNOW how this ends up as surely as gravity.<br /><br />Like Peter Brimelow said in another context, it will all end in tears.The Anti-Gnostichttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04386593803225823789noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-69270583124586086942012-07-23T05:58:19.379-07:002012-07-23T05:58:19.379-07:00Thanks for the link, Lugash. Too bad it looks lik...Thanks for the link, Lugash. Too bad it looks like Mr. Smith has signed off. But they will be interesting archives to read.jeannenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-63007771051903013892012-07-23T04:58:05.606-07:002012-07-23T04:58:05.606-07:00I loved the use of the word "scheme" rat...I loved the use of the word "scheme" rather than plan or program- very apropos.<br /><br />So let's recap: The more children you have the more dysfunctional they are, the higher the income, however they should not notice this relationship (between dysfunction and reward) and rather "be responsible" because it had somehow escaped their notice that irresponsibility has its rewards.<br /><br />Did I miss anything?<br /><br />No wonder these people are always in charge, they are brilliant.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com