tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post8143077305800232629..comments2024-03-27T18:24:19.683-07:00Comments on Steve Sailer: iSteve: New Unz article on race and crimeUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger155125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-6063921531833763752013-07-24T09:07:05.659-07:002013-07-24T09:07:05.659-07:00However, this success would be short lived, as the...<i>However, this success would be short lived, as the program would fail to limit the number of workers entering the United States from Mexico illegally.[40] The program would also result in a more permanent, strategic border control presence along the United States - Mexico border.[41]</i><br /><br />I forgot to add this comment last night:<br /><br />Neither sentence in that last paragraph is true. Those sentences are the Wikipedia entry writer's editorial gloss on his factual paragraphs.<br /><br />Operation Wetback was a success.David Davenporthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03315090179595817174noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-59113218383822731442013-07-24T07:34:19.399-07:002013-07-24T07:34:19.399-07:00''I'm sensing that English is not your...''I'm sensing that English is not your native language. "Submissive", "spayed", "civilized" and "Christian" are not synonyms. They are four distinct and different things.''<br /><br />You is right, but actually these words became synonyms.<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-66683347379881975312013-07-23T21:52:29.283-07:002013-07-23T21:52:29.283-07:00Operation Wetback
From Wikipedia, the free encycl...<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Wetback" rel="nofollow">Operation Wetback</a><br /><br />From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia: <i>Operation Wetback (1954): Implementation and tactics[edit]<br /><br />Operation Wetback was a system of tactical control and cooperation within the U.S. Border Patrol and alongside the Mexican government.[30] Planning between the INS led by Gen. Joseph Swing and the Mexican government began in early 1954 while the program was formally announced in May 1954.[31] On May 17th, 1954 command teams of 12 Border Patrol agents, buses, planes, and temporary processing stations began locating, processing, and deporting Mexicans that had illegally entered the United States. 750 immigration and border patrol officers and investigators, 300 jeeps, cars and buses, and 7 airplanes were allocated for the operation.[32] Teams were focused on quick processing and deportation, as planes were able to coordinate ground efforts more quickly and increase mobility. [33] Those deported were handed off to Mexican officials, who in turn deported them into central Mexico where there were many labor opportunities.[34] While the operation would include the cities of Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Chicago, its main targets were border areas in Texas and California. [35] Overall, there were 1,078,168 apprehensions made in the first year of Operation Wetback, with 170,000 being captured from May to July 1954.[36] The total number of apprehensions would fall to just 242,608 in 1955, and would continuously decline by year until 1962, when there was a slight rise in apprehended workers.[37] <br /><br />During the entirety of the Operation, border recruitment of undocumented workers by American growers continued due largely to the inexpensiveness of undocumented labor and the desire of growers to avoid the bureaucratic obstacles of the Bracero program; the continuation of illegal immigration despite the efforts of Operation Wetback was largely responsible for the failure of the program.[38] Despite the decline in apprehensions, the total number of Border Patrol agents more than doubled to 1,692 by 1962, and an additional plane was also added to the force.[39] In terms of apprehensions, Operation Wetback was immediately successful. <br /><br />However, this success would be short lived, as the program would fail to limit the number of workers entering the United States from Mexico illegally.[40] The program would also result in a more permanent, strategic border control presence along the United States - Mexico border.[41]</i>David Davenporthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03315090179595817174noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-36586861082994800292013-07-23T18:58:24.623-07:002013-07-23T18:58:24.623-07:00Anonymous said...
True but say most of your viole...<i>Anonymous said...<br /><br />True but say most of your violent crime rate comes from 20% of your population and you can replace them over 20 years with 5% asian and 15% hispanic - simply because that's the ratio they're arriving in - or only replace 5% with asians and wait another 40 years for the other 15%.</i><br /><br />Except that "the ratio they're arriving in" has been completely policy-dependent and not fixed at all. Hispanic immigration has been largely illegal in recent years while Asian ones have been mostly legal (indeed, as illegal immigration declined in recent years, the immigrants' ethnic pattern has shifted from majority Hispanic to plurality Asian starting about 2010).<br /><br />If urban elites wanted that 20% "thug population" to be replaced entirely by Asians, rather than by Hispanics, they could have achieved it. Yet they have done the opposite (prefer Hispanics) by enacting policies like "sanctuary cities" and such.<br /><br />Again, Unz's thesis does not make sense because if replacement of higher criminality minority by lower criminality minority were the main criterion, these elites would have preferred Asians, not Hispanics. So I suspect other motives/fears.<br /><br /><i>Matt said...<br /><br />People create their own environments. <br /><br />Within country comparisons don't make sense because of the cherry picked nature of immigration (i.e. East Asian migrants come out roughly the same on average, but have a higher % of people at the low and high end of ability) and because of the general advantage of foreign born people in crime, from being older and so on.</i><br /><br />"People create their own environments" is simplistic and does not reflect actual historical pattern. The causality between people and environment go BOTH ways, not one way. In other words, Swedes made Sweden as much as the Swedish environment made Swedes.<br /><br />If you want to compare apples to apples, you have to put people in the same environment.<br /><br />Your point about the advantages, in terms of lower criminality, of selecting immigrant population is well-taken. It is absolutely true -- with all ethnic groups, including whites, immigrants display lower criminality than American-born of the same ethnicities.<br /><br />That methodological problem can be bypassed largely by looking at crime-related numbers for the American-born of various ethnicities.<br /><br />Here are the incarceration rates from a 2010 study:<br /><br />Non-Hispanic whites (native-born): 1.7%<br />Mexicans (foreign-born): 0.7%<br />Mexicans (native-born): 5.9%<br />Chinese/Taiwanese (foreign-born): 0.2%<br />Chinese/Taiwanese (native-born): 0.7%<br /><br />Note that the American-born Chinese still show lower criminality than native-born whites (0.7% vs. 1.7% respectively).<br /><br />Another point to note is that the negative criminal effect of assimilation varies by ethnicity. With Mexicans it jumps more than 8 times while for Chinese it only jumps 2 1/2 times. Apparently Chinese kids born here are more resistant to the lure of our degenerate popular youth culture (which, again, is consistent with other proxies like marriage rates, divorce rates, etc.).<br /><br />By the way, the assimilative effect is NOT uniform across all Asian groups. Laotians and Cambodians, for example, show worse-than Mexican numbers (0.9%/7.3%), but with the same 8x effect. So clearly NE Asians and SE Asians diverge in this regard. <br /><br />Jared Taylor's study confirms this overall relationship pretty well as it shows that Asians (NE, SE & subcontinental) in the U.S. (mixture of foreign-born and U.S.-born) are 1/4 less likely to be violent criminals than whites.<br /><br />Finally, regarding PG County near DC, the one thing that captures the area perfectly is that it is the most affluent "black" county in the country, yet it is the county with the highest criminality and the lowest test scores among DC suburbs, many of which have only 55-60% whites. Meaning, even in a highly "diverse" region, PG County's "achievement" is quite unique.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-86252207257938808442013-07-23T14:34:48.939-07:002013-07-23T14:34:48.939-07:00Camden is a component of greater Philadelphia, so ...<i>Camden is a component of greater Philadelphia, so it would not be a locus of 'cleansed' blacks from Brooklyn.</i> <br /><br /><br />Your proclaiming it does not make it so. There is nothing whatsoever to prevent blacks displaced from NY from moving to, among other places, Camden NJ. They do not say to themselves "Uh oh, Camden is a component of greater Philadelphia - let's not more THERE!"<br /><br />As your yourself point out, the violent crime rate of the blacks who remain in NY, though still high, is lower than that of blacks elsewhere in the US. It is also true that the percentage of the NY populations which is black has dropped. The only logical conclusion is that the blacks who have left the city are the most violent ones.<br /><br /><br /><br /><i>You would have to show that the thus diffused black population was damaging public order in their new residences.</i> <br /><br /><br />Since there is no way to know for certain where their new residences are, you are setting a condition which is (by design, I suspect) impossible to meet.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-880496403559122702013-07-23T14:12:38.955-07:002013-07-23T14:12:38.955-07:00The term coined submissive is well here. In the en...<i>The term coined submissive is well here. In the end, all the people from medium to high IQ tend to be'' submissive'' are civilized, spayed, Christianized.</i> <br /><br /><br />I'm sensing that English is not your native language. "Submissive", "spayed", "civilized" and "Christian" are not synonyms. They are four distinct and different things.<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-63250210183642160132013-07-23T12:32:36.122-07:002013-07-23T12:32:36.122-07:00Re: Prince George's County:
The place is nota...Re: Prince George's County:<br /><br />The place is notable for low police density. If the ratio of local police to the population in tract developments was around the national mean for metropolitan settlements, the number of sworn officers would be about 2.5x what it is at this time. They need to hire more cops. The homicide rate is currently 16 per 100,000. For a suburban zone, that is exceedingly unusual (and not replicated in any other DC suburb, august or scruffy).Art Decohttp://wwrtc.blogspot.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-5771530860520418862013-07-23T09:09:13.192-07:002013-07-23T09:09:13.192-07:00"True but say most of your violent crime rate..."True but say most of your violent crime rate comes from 20% of your population and you can replace them over 20 years with 5% asian and 15% hispanic - simply because that's the ratio they're arriving in - or only replace 5% with asians and wait another 40 years for the other 15%." - they aren't being replaced, they are being moved into other communities.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-75597406615489171732013-07-23T08:48:27.581-07:002013-07-23T08:48:27.581-07:00All this talk about Prince Georges County, Marylan...All this talk about Prince Georges County, Maryland -- I live right next to PG County, and have worked and gone socially there often. As it has gotten more black (and hispanic) it has transformed into a crime-ridden place. The kind of place where people say, don't wait for the bus to get to the metro station because a girl got kidnapped and raped, etc., etc. I don't really understand how anyone can use someplace like PG County (or any other place where blacks form more than about 15%) is not affected profoundly by serious crime, the kind of crime that makes you feel like a prisoner in the your very own town, paid for by your very own taxes.<br />Makes you fell like you need a watchful protector, a silent (or noisy) guardian -- a Zimmer Man.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-72187972034102160912013-07-23T06:04:56.931-07:002013-07-23T06:04:56.931-07:00The Alexandria Rt 1 corridor is not a part of the ...The Alexandria Rt 1 corridor is not a part of the actual city of Alexandria but a part of Fairfax County. The black population of Alexandria has been diminished due to gentrification. The historic black section of Alexandria was located in Old Town which is very expensive now 800 sq ft row homes going for 500k+ for example. <br /><br />Alexandria has also broken up problematic housing developments and have adopted a scattered public housing model. New developments tend to have some units reserved for public housing residents. <br /><br />Finally on the West End of the city the Black population is increasingly of West African immigrants.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-72880917129092750142013-07-23T02:46:59.316-07:002013-07-23T02:46:59.316-07:00Art Deco, I genuinely don't know what point yo...<i>Art Deco, I genuinely don't know what point you're trying to make here. Is it that "blacks" are not a homogeneous mass and that some are more likely to be criminals than others? Fine. I don't see where that gets us but yes, that much is obvious. </i><br /><br />[sighs and drums fingers]. The contention incorporated in the original post was that crime rates in New York City and other loci had fallen because recent immigrants had displaced the domestic black population. You would have to show that the thus diffused black population was damaging public order in their new residences. In the three metropolitan regions named, that is not the case.<br /><br />I think the descriptive statistics from New York City's police precincts and community districts discredit the Unz thesis as well, at least as regards New York City. Art Decohttp://wwrtc.blogspot.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-38101070884033263602013-07-23T00:46:12.595-07:002013-07-23T00:46:12.595-07:00That would be comparing apples to oranges since th...<i>That would be comparing apples to oranges since the conditions in these countries are vastly different.</i><br /><br />People create their own environments. <br /><br />Within country comparisons don't make sense because of the cherry picked nature of immigration (i.e. East Asian migrants come out roughly the same on average, but have a higher % of people at the low and high end of ability) and because of the general advantage of foreign born people in crime, from being older and so on.Mattnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-60651969564459601042013-07-22T23:23:23.467-07:002013-07-22T23:23:23.467-07:00"Without the 1924 Immigration Act, the countr..."Without the 1924 Immigration Act, the country would indeed be whiter, but more Catholic and Jewish, and more ethnically fragmented. The Little Italys and Poletowns would be bigger and longer lasting, New York would be very Jewish. Southerners would be a smaller share of the population. The black percentage of the population would have dropped to maybe 6-7% (It was 9% in the 1930 census) The space and resources filled by those Europeans would not have been later available to Latin American and Asian immigration. The Great Migration would have been minimal. However, the country would probably have lost its Anglo-Protestant character and chosen the path of multiculturalism, like Canada."<br /><br />Sounds almost utopian. If only that America had existed. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-34185563376773797792013-07-22T23:11:37.979-07:002013-07-22T23:11:37.979-07:00"Yes, yet 1 beats 4 any day in terms of crime..."Yes, yet 1 beats 4 any day in terms of crime, no? Going from 8 to 1 seems a lot better than from 8 to 4 if this were the main criterion."<br /><br />True but say most of your violent crime rate comes from 20% of your population and you can replace them over 20 years with 5% asian and 15% hispanic - simply because that's the ratio they're arriving in - or only replace 5% with asians and wait another 40 years for the other 15%.<br /><br />.<br /><br />"Sugar was bad news."<br /><br />In pretty much every way. Bees ftw.<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-54243058044841365662013-07-22T22:06:04.962-07:002013-07-22T22:06:04.962-07:00Sugar was bad news. Jim in "Huckleberry Finn&...Sugar was bad news. Jim in "Huckleberry Finn" is always terrified he'll get sold down the river to the sugar plantations. Tobacco was the nicest crop for slaves, with cotton in the middle.<br /><br />Cigar rolling was even compatible with a well-informed work force. Cuban cigar-rollers often paid somebody to read them newspapers and books while they worked. Steve Sailerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11920109042402850214noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-36145014384215774392013-07-22T21:53:09.678-07:002013-07-22T21:53:09.678-07:00"This put the total number of visas available...<i>"This put the total number of visas available each year to new immigrants at 350,000. It did not, however, establish quotas of any kind for residents of the Western Hemisphere. (emphasis added)"</i><br /><br />When I took Civics back in High School in the late 60s (in South Texas) we studied what it took to immigrate to the US. One of the things that was required was being able to demonstrate speaking in English.<br /><br />The requirement to be able to speak English alone would have kept many of the current illegal immigrants from the Western hemisphere from being legal immigrants in the US. It also reduced the number of Mexican ag-labor types who would have even considered legally immigrating, as opposed to remaining annual migrant farm labor (coming from Mexican and returning each year).<br /><br />At the time these laws were actually respected and enforced. That didn't last. Now we have the government that buries us in laws but only enforces what it pleases. Pretty much devolves to an arbitrary exercise in power.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-20067401801525055292013-07-22T21:34:57.741-07:002013-07-22T21:34:57.741-07:00"Yes, the "elites want to replace blacks..."Yes, the "elites want to replace blacks with Hispanics" is a novel argument, but its pretty bonkers."<br /><br />The elites in New York, LA and DC *are* replacing blacks with hispanics. <br /><br />Unz is simply providing a possible explanation for why.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-5918399971083183572013-07-22T21:34:09.059-07:002013-07-22T21:34:09.059-07:00Art Deco said...
Alexandria, Va. is a case in po...<i>Art Deco said... <br /><br />Alexandria, Va. is a case in point. That municipality is 20% black and has a homicide rate of 2.0 per 100,000. I do not think you can demonstrate that diffused black populations have been a source of social problems.</i><br /><br />Anyone who is familiar with crime in Northern Virginia knows that the ghetto of the area is the Route 1 corridor along Alexandria-Mount Vernon where there exists an unusually high concentration of black population for the region. It's just that this concentration happens to be sitting immediately next to a highly educated and affluent SWPL population in nearby touristy part of Alexandria and beyond. Your numbers are, therefore, highly misleading.<br /><br /><i>Anonymous said<br /><br />If the asian/white/hispanic/black crime rates were 1/2/4/8 then replacing 8 for 4 is a big enough difference to make sense on its own and as mentioned the drop in crime in New York has been higher than anywhere else as a result of this cleansing.</i><br /><br />Yes, yet 1 beats 4 any day in terms of crime, no? Going from 8 to 1 seems a lot better than from 8 to 4 if this were the main criterion. There must be other factors at work since "Hispanics and Asians" seem equally preferred allegedly. <br /><br /><i>Matt said...<br /><br />If you want the true index of criminality for Asians vs Whites, we should be comparing a mixed basket of Taiwan, Hong Kong, South Korea and Japan to a mixed basket of Germans, French, Italians, British and Spanish (preferably while adjusting for migration, but this isn't hugely necessary).</i><br /><br />That would be comparing apples to oranges since the conditions in these countries are vastly different. A more useful comparison would be how their rates vary in the SAME country. As Jared Taylor's "The Color of Crime" shows Asians in the U.S. display lower criminality than whites in the U.S. though not by as big a margin as the differences between blacks/Hispanics and whites.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-35064159809300903412013-07-22T21:29:01.003-07:002013-07-22T21:29:01.003-07:00"Unfortunately, the founders were lazy and di..."Unfortunately, the founders were lazy and didn't want to do the field work"<br /><br />Nope, not possible. Throughout history sugar plantations have always been associated with slavery because they were so labor intensive - starting from Yemen thousands of years ago then east to west to Ethiopia, to Ancient Egypt, Cyprus, Crete, Sicily, North Africa, Moorish Spain, West African Islands and finally the Caribbean and parts of the Americas.<br /><br />For 3000 years sugar plantations = slavery.<br /><br />.<br /><br />"unemployed men often feel emasculated, and emasculated men are often violent."<br /><br />Not really true. Emasculated men tend to get depressed. However *environments* of long-term unemployment *breed* violent and criminal men because they are relatively more successful in those environments. It's generational imo.<br /><br />.<br /><br />"A quite large fraction of New York City blacks are now West Indians and Africans."<br /><br />A function of the racial churn?<br /><br />1) Which black neighborhoods have disappeared?<br />2)Were they "historic" black neighborhoods in areas of what would be prime real estate in places like Manhattan?<br />3) Did the new black immigrants congregate in different neighborhoods?<br /><br />I'm going to assume based on experiences elsewhere the answer to all three questions is yes.<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-16337343090888220882013-07-22T21:01:29.691-07:002013-07-22T21:01:29.691-07:00After reading a good number of unz articles, I'...After reading a good number of unz articles, I've come to the conclusion that unz would rather be original than correct.<br /><br />Yes, the "elites want to replace his blacks with Hispanics" is a novel argument, but its pretty bonkers.<br /><br />His "Jews are overrepresented at elite colleges" made a little more sense, but even that one didnt really hold up to any real scrutiny.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-47680112391638593382013-07-22T20:22:52.800-07:002013-07-22T20:22:52.800-07:00sunbeam said:
"That is an interesting idea. ...sunbeam said:<br /><br />"That is an interesting idea. How might we analyze it though? It sounds like a chicken and egg thing honestly."<br /><br />Here's a link to a Swedish study that examines the relationship between long-term unemployment and violent crime: <br /><br />http://ideas.repec.org/p/hhs/lunewp/2011_034.html<br /><br />More evidence: according to politifact, Nevada is No. 1 in unemployment and No. 2 in violent crime.<br /><br />http://www.politifact.com/florida/statements/2012/jan/26/no-casinos/nevada-no-1-unemployment-violent-crime-car-theft-d/<br /><br />As you know, these are merely correlations. Yet, the findings are in line with some obvious truths: unemployed men often feel emasculated, and emasculated men are often violent. This, of course, doesn't mean that all violence is a result of unemployment.<br /><br />"I mean are there any other populations around that have such long histories of chronic unemployment that don't have high crime?"<br /><br />If I were conducting my own research, I'd focus on white collar individuals subjected to long-term unemployment for the first time; men with no prior history of violent crime, mental illness, alcoholism or drug abuse. <br /><br />If you can show that these men are prone to violence, you can conclude that there's a causal relationship between high levels of long-term unemployment and high levels of violence in a community.<br /><br /><br /><br />"I'll defer to our resident experts on everything, but how many Russian crime lords are actually Russian, as opposed to Chechens, Azerbaijanis, Georgians, and the like?"<br /><br />Based on this video, I would say that most Russian prisoners are white: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qJ0duvcxVf0<br /><br />Here's a video about Russian street children involved with murder (clearly white): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R7gpeKDdGgY<br /><br />Russian Criminals and their tattoos: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bZjfOJIeOLE<br /><br />Some of them look to be from the Caucasus but the majority of them are clearly white.<br /><br />By the way, HBDers, I'm not going to argue about why blacks are more likely to be unemployed. I'm simply making a point. Not everything is about race. Marlonoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-89091393526537203122013-07-22T19:55:03.167-07:002013-07-22T19:55:03.167-07:00jody said:
"since the 2013 super bowl, over ...jody said:<br /><br />"since the 2013 super bowl, over 30 NFL players have been arrested. only 2 or 3 of them were white, all of them arrested for DUI. the rest were vibrant, the highest profile arrest being aaron hernandez, who is suspected in at least 4 murders. during the same time period, not 1 NHL player has been arrested, as far as i can tell. NHL in total averages maybe 3 arrests per year."<br /><br />I guess HGH is the main thing that is used, but I've thought for a long time that athletes in a lot of sports are aberrations if they don't juice.<br /><br />Just wondering if steroids have something to do with these arrests.<br /><br />You hear all kinds of things about different sports getting cleaned up, but the reports of suspensions for use of these substances keeps coming.sunbeamhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16540822135478202229noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-26007587222788286402013-07-22T19:51:28.770-07:002013-07-22T19:51:28.770-07:00"Despite this they claim that had the Founder..."Despite this they claim that had the Founders wanted a European nation, they would have enshrined it into the Constitution. However, even the Founders had no idea back then what would happen in the late 20th century"<br /><br />Imagine what this country could have been had the Founders not allowed the slaves to be brought over.<br /><br />Unfortunately, the founders were lazy and didn't want to do the field work and so the seeds of the destruction of the country were planted at the very beginning.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-19253588793760169292013-07-22T19:45:27.957-07:002013-07-22T19:45:27.957-07:00>is it possible that blacks are jailed more oft...>is it possible that blacks are jailed more often not because they commit more crimes, but [...] of racist police and courts? I don't hold this view myself. I merely raise it as a point which race hustlers could make. Ideally, any study which purports to demonstrate black criminality should incorporate other statistics which couldn't be countered this way<<br /><br />No. That countering is invalid on its face. It has an impossible burden of proving that all or most of the verdicts (for instance) were incorrect; or else the illogical burden of demanding that the prosecutors prove that they <i>didn't</i> throw or blow the cases (i.e. prove a negative).<br /><br />Imagine if these burdens were accepted. What would count as "proof" of "non-racism"? Obviously, some form of disparate impact would be called on as the standard. Which means goodbye justice.Davidhttp://david-passingparade2.blogspot.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-48902004938305389322013-07-22T19:44:55.084-07:002013-07-22T19:44:55.084-07:00The Hispanics have IQs slightly higher than blacks...<i>The Hispanics have IQs slightly higher than blacks and more submissive behavior.</i><br /><br />Let me get this straight - you consider Hispanics who obey the law instead of going on criminal rampages to be submissive? You must be Whiskey's Stormfront cousin.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com