tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post977956272707400978..comments2024-03-19T02:31:02.140-07:00Comments on Steve Sailer: iSteve: Was Nixon gay?Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger167125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-76391717221099128492012-02-02T11:50:53.248-08:002012-02-02T11:50:53.248-08:00In tropical environments where females could provi...In tropical environments where females could provide food for themselves and their children males evolved to compete with each other through violence or showing off.<br /><br />Females evolved to like attention.<br /><br />Once outside those environments males needed to provide the food. So males in those environments evolved provider traits over the top of the violence and showing off traits.<br /><br />Females developed traits that looked for a good provider over the top of just liking attention - but liking attention didn't go away.<br /><br />The strong, silent and largely inattentive provider males built cool civilizations but<br /><br />- the political and business elite rigged the game in their favor, increased their wealth through the stratosphere and consequently are hogging too many females at the top end<br /><br />- welfare combined with males who never left the showing off and violence phase are taking extra females at the bottom end who like the attentiveness - even if it only lasts until they drop a kid<br /><br />So the taciturn (male definition) aka inattentive (female definition) provider males are stuffed and have three choices<br />- de-evolve to the point where they suit the 3rd world future the elites have in mind for 90% of the population<br />- become part of the elite<br />- organize collectively to change the rules back in their favorAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-88395440652572544792012-02-01T23:57:14.597-08:002012-02-01T23:57:14.597-08:00"You people will believe anything, though. I ...<i>"You people will believe anything, though. I get nervous every time the references to gay-making germs start around here."</i><br /><br />Gives you the vapors, does it?Dennis Dalehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03233729780363740881noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-50967502954964546012012-02-01T20:29:02.870-08:002012-02-01T20:29:02.870-08:00>I expect there's a casting couch element a...>I expect there's a casting couch element as well what with all those goodlooking and desperate to succeed teenagers.<<br /><br /><a href="http://preview.tinyurl.com/727kntk" rel="nofollow">Lou Pearlman</a>Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-15107756589385625452012-02-01T20:09:35.561-08:002012-02-01T20:09:35.561-08:00>Isn't it funny how gays have this almost S...<b>>Isn't it funny how gays have this almost Stalinist reflex to "out" any behavior that will make someone [be regarded as homosexual] who can no longer defend himself?<</b><br /><br />About 20 years ago, there was a line of classical music CDs called "Gay Classics," with hunks on the covers. Schumann and Chopin and Brahms and other composers of the classical music canon were identified as gay - because they wrote classical music. (Also, much play was given, if I remember correctly, to the damning fact that Chopin had an affair with GEORGE Sand.)<br /><br />Weirdly, I didn't see a Tchaikovsky CD in the "Gay Classics" line (maybe I missed it). He was very likely an actual homosexual, with testimony from contemporaries about it. Unlike Chop, Schum, Brahms et al (the first two have been speculatively conjectured, over a hundred years after their deaths, to have engaged in unprovable homosexual love affairs with other people... the wistful conjecturers are, you guessed it, poofs).<br /><br />Now Julius Caesar - HE was as queer as a 3 dollar bill, of course. As were Lincoln, Aristotle, Teddy Roosevelt, George Washington, MLK, Bobby Kennedy, Hitler, Stalin, Lenin, Newton, Darwin, Blake, Milton, Shakespeare, Plato, Churchill, and anybody else you read about in your high school history book. (joke)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-88861445121449120212012-02-01T18:55:28.986-08:002012-02-01T18:55:28.986-08:00@Maya,
"Firstly, these types of human beings...@Maya,<br /><br />"Firstly, these types of human beings are extremely immature. People are supposed to grow out of wanting to date an image shortly out of junior high."<br /><br />I'm not so sanguine about people's collective maturity. I wouldn't confuse settling for a mate with genuine satisfaction. And wanting a physically attractive mate isn't just about simple sexual desire. I know otherwise savvy, complex single people who still want a trophy wife/husband who conforms to a predetermined "type", usually, but not always an athletic world traveler/ intelligent tomboy. I have friends who have lists with more than 20 necessary traits, I kid you not. And these aren't sexless dreamers, these guys are "pleasant a$$holes" (tm).<br /><br />I wouldn't be so quick to dismiss those girls hanging out with said Biggie Smalls doppelgangers. They may very well be using them in a calculating manner, as you say it's the image not the actual person. I can't imagine physical attraction plays a role, because the guys were often so fat. Which raises another question, are these guys truly just warm props, who getting nothing more after closing time? That would be harsh. <br /><br />But as so much of culture is dictated by prestige, I can't see the girls' behavior as particularly egregious or indicative of something profoundly wrong in terms of psychology. <br /><br />On getting back at daddy, maybe dating black guys was a form of rebellion for Gen Xers, but not for most Millennials, maybe some immigrants excepted- honor killings and whatnot. I'm old enough to remember such rebellious imperatives amongst my contemporaries: "I've got a black boyfriend. BTW, did I mention he's black? Wait, I was sure to tell you he was black? He and I just went to see the new Spike Lee movie, people are so ignorant." For some of these girls it was just as callously prestige getting as their younger contemporaries. But I kind of suspect the guys involved could care less.<br /><br /><br />"Of course, usually, the asshole/bitch in question is a lot better looking than the angsty teenager contemplating the situation. But nobody wants to notice that!"<br /><br />This is true, but the insurmountable reality is just too much for people. "Game" is another form of misplaced optimism, a gnostic system of getting gals where men can change their status; achieve salvation by being privy to forms of knowledge the bodhisattvas of the frustrated, in their mercy, are willing to dispense.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-54016298336102609542012-02-01T15:00:21.631-08:002012-02-01T15:00:21.631-08:00Dale! Stop, please.
Shut up, bitch. "Game!&...<i>Dale! Stop, please.</i><br /><br />Shut up, bitch. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acting" rel="nofollow">"Game!"</a><br /><br />See kids? Her lady-parts are on fire right now!<br /><br />Just kidding. I honestly don't see how we're not in complete agreement, ma'am.Dennis Dalehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03233729780363740881noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-60976177842587169212012-02-01T14:26:30.945-08:002012-02-01T14:26:30.945-08:00"You people will believe anything, though. I ..."You people will believe anything, though. I get nervous every time the references to gay-making germs start around here."<br /><br />Ever heard of damage done by germs to some cells, bud? Who knows what will turn out to be the cause of a guy who has a penis and healthy sperm who wishes to put it where it can never make copies of his genes? He might as well put it in a hole in a rock because he doesn't need that sperm where he wants to put it.<br /><br />Something's gone wrong somewhere and much of the stuff that causes dysfunction in our systems is related to the fact that bugs can evolve to survive every bit as fast or faster than our defenses against them. <br /><br />I can't see why you seem to think the notion to be silly.<br /><br />As for the "tingle"? It's good for making babies, partial copies of ourselves, but I get the feeling you don't like "breeders."Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-33601197060401300812012-02-01T13:50:26.885-08:002012-02-01T13:50:26.885-08:00Was Nixon asperger?Was Nixon asperger?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-11463637897809798482012-02-01T13:30:07.359-08:002012-02-01T13:30:07.359-08:00The "women love assholes" is another phr...The "women love assholes" is another phrase that melts my heart because it reminds me of middle school. It's the twin brother of the "men love bitches" truism. Both invoke an image of a young teenager, lamenting the fact that his/her crush is dating that mean person and ignoring the very nice and sensitive him/her. Of course, usually, the asshole/bitch in question is a lot better looking than the angsty teenager contemplating the situation. But nobody wants to notice that! You see, this way, you can conclude that the opposite sex is ignoring you because of your virtues, not your shortcomings. Something is wrong with them, not you! <br /><br />Sure thing, there are attractive qualities beyond looks- you know the qualities that make someone an attractive friend as well as an attractive lover. Niceness is all well and good, but it's not enough to make people want to be friends with you, even people of your own gender. It's the niceness and sensitivity that kills your chances with BOTH men and women. It's being a dull, socially inept dud. Even kids in 2nd grade would rather play with someone who is funny and interesting, even if that person turns on them regularly. But, really, all things being equal, the vast majority of people don't want to be with the asshole/bitch. It's just that they don't want to sacrifice the beauty of their lover and stimulation of interesting company merely to be with someone nice.Mayanoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-7947822330734714292012-02-01T13:13:57.186-08:002012-02-01T13:13:57.186-08:00"But, I also wouldn't argue that culture ..."But, I also wouldn't argue that culture and media plays a role as one sees obese (by any medical definition) black gangsta wannabes at bars and clubs with po' white gals, many times shockingly attractive, hanging around them. With absolutely no rancor, because these guys' success or lack thereof has nothing to do with my own, I have to conclude these Biggie Smalls doppelgangers have to be benefiting from pop culture."<br /><br />Look, here's my take on that... Culture and media do indeed influence the metrics of attraction, but only those who are seriously defective, in some way, are ultra susceptible. For example, men did begin to prefer much skinnier women in the 90s, but only very few supremely insecure ones began to seek out truly underweight women. An average man's tastes merely shifted towards thinner girls WITHIN the healthy range. We are susceptible to find certain styles of hair and dress more sexy, depending on when and where we came of age. However, only the very flawed among us would choose a naturally repugnant emo (emos were sexy in my middle class suburb :)) over a naturally attractive person without the sex signalling style. Those attractive girls hanging out with the obese, rapper wannabe black guys? I guarantee you that something is wrong with the vast majority of them- not because they are showing attention to a black guy (black men can be attractive, good catches too), but because they treat those guys as props. Do you think they'd be as nice to the obese black guy if he wore a suit and talked like a suburban white guy? No, they probably wouldn't. These women are trying to be the type of women who could date a gangster or a rapper, so they need a look alike for an accessory. Firstly, these types of human beings are extremely immature. People are supposed to grow out of wanting to date an image shortly out of junior high. Perhaps they want to make their fathers angry? Again, they need this prop. And he can't be just some attractive black guy. He needs to be a gang banger. Since the purpose here is to show off an image rather than fulfill a more natural desire, it doesn't matter how attractive he is. Remember the guys in middle school who wanted to date a cheerleader, any cheerleader, just so they could be the type of guys who date cheerleaders? It's like that. Protip- these are the girls (and guys) who are good marks for "game" practitioners. They are likely to be emotionally unstable and mentally dim, but they will be impressed if you present the right persona to them. Most adults are not like that, thank God. But, I guess, they are over represented in bars and clubs.Mayanoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-59829250230987041312012-02-01T08:25:45.842-08:002012-02-01T08:25:45.842-08:00Dennis, I can't argue with your conclusions. I...Dennis, I can't argue with your conclusions. I think game is largely a fictional lifeline for evolutionary dead-ends. Maya is right, and my own example bears it up, physical appearance is as important, if not more, than behavior. Get rid of that gut will do more for a guy than any number of axe(tm) products<br /><br />For most men, behavior can be that little bit of extra help that can seal the deal. Here is where the a$$hole comes in. Women don't like a total jerk, but based on years of observation, candid discussions with women, and self-evaluation about times when I've "bantered" (as they would have it; personally I'd say mildly insulted them and their opinions) with women to their amusement, I've concluded most women like charming brats. The important thing, and this is what game doesn't get, women aren't unaware of the dynamics. With the exception of naive, often younger, but not always, women are pretty savy. But they figure, at least he's interesting. In this regard women aren't too different from men. Can you blame them? Who would want to hang out with a dud, even a noble dud. People (particularly Americans) are very forgiving of insults, provided they are given with a smile. Many men will fawn on a guy who treats 'em in a condescending manner, provided humor is involved.<br /><br /><br />But without a basic physical level of attraction, wit will do the most gabby player no good. I wouldn't even argue that there are some perfectly normal looking men who have been emasculated for various biographical, not biological reasons. I've had friends, often not very witty or sexually aggressive, who girls told me aroused them without a word and I was continually shocked at the number of times these guys would pass on one night stands that I'd treasure for months.<br /><br /><br />But, I also wouldn't argue that culture and media plays a role as one sees obese (by any medical definition) black gangsta wannabes at bars and clubs with po' white gals, many times shockingly attractive, hanging around them. With absolutely no rancor, because these guys' success or lack thereof has nothing to do with my own, I have to conclude these Biggie Smalls doppelgangers have to be benefiting from pop culture.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-11853585531883608902012-02-01T06:09:11.425-08:002012-02-01T06:09:11.425-08:00Dude said...
On female sexuality and desire, I'...<i>Dude said...<br />On female sexuality and desire, I'm not convinced that women can really be attracted to anyone or have real orgasms either...</i><br /><br />Ma'am, I tip my trollin' hat to ya.<br /><br />Truth, that's how you do it.robnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-12895875219258024152012-02-01T03:37:28.275-08:002012-02-01T03:37:28.275-08:00Dale! Stop, please.
Here's a little informat...Dale! Stop, please.<br /><br />Here's a little information that might help resolve this issue for you. Many women on the pill have a reduced sex drive which probably also reduces the likelihood they'll have an orgasm when they get talked into having sex they didn't want to have in the first place.<br /><br />The sad truth may also be that the optimum hormone balance for getting pregnant and attracting men somewhat inhibits sexual responsiveness. Bummer.<br /><br />We all might be better off if insecure, asshole types only pursue women 30 and older whose sex drive has finally kicked in and who don't want to procreate or necessarily need a husband. This will keep the losers from annoying chicks who need love, since sex isn't so great for them, while also lowering the number of jerks born each year.elviranoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-23398891262300075462012-02-01T03:26:02.934-08:002012-02-01T03:26:02.934-08:00"... if I am struck by a cold virus that gets..."... if I am struck by a cold virus that gets me down for a week, isn't that related to my immune system's resistance or lack of resistance to it and isn't that the result of my genes?"<br /><br />No. This is related to your genes for remembering to eat nutritious meals or those for the motivation to find some ColdEase at Walgreens which will boost your worn down immune system that has succumbed to stress and/or poor nutrition. <br /><br />You people will believe anything, though. I get nervous every time the references to gay-making germs start around here. I guess this virus gives a guy purple, estrogen-averse sperm or makes him believe he has a phantom vagina. This topic always draws comments about absorbed opposite sex twins making gay chimeras and opposite gender patches of flesh. Serves you right for hogging the umbilical cord. The ultra-self aware might even know which part of the body has a separate gender since that part will tingle in response to same sex attraction.ate my fellow quintupletsnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-41153684360350358732012-01-31T23:11:55.471-08:002012-01-31T23:11:55.471-08:00"I've never understood why some guys clai..."I've never understood why some guys claim to be aroused by lesbians"<br /><br />Not real ones - they mean in porn.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-75514362529598115092012-01-31T20:57:34.917-08:002012-01-31T20:57:34.917-08:00gcochran said,
"It's possible that I ha...gcochran said, <br /><br />"It's possible that I have a better insight into Mike Bailey's views than most, since A. I've actually read many of his papers, B. we've corresponded for years, and C, he called me last night, and we talked for an hour and a half.<br /><br />"It is fair to say that he thinks that my hypothesis (homosexuality is caused by some pathogen), although unproven, is the strongest and most plausible<br />one extant. Mike actually knows that selection is important, more than you can say abut most biologists, medical geneticists, and behavioral geneticists.<br /><br />"There's news: it looks as if we're going to see a GWAS study of homosexuality. Results are not in yet, but I'm definitely looking forward to it."<br />---------------------------------<br /><br />Thought I remembered seeing a video of the lead researcher doing the GWAS to which poster gcochran refers, but can't find it right off. Instead this article will do:<br /> <br />http://abcnews.go.com/2020/story?id=4529843&page=1#.TyjDyMgsHao<br /><br />From the article, <br /><br />"Dr. Alan Sanders, a psychiatric geneticist at Evanston Northwestern Healthcare Research Institute, is currently heading the biggest study ever undertaken on sexual orientation. He's looking at the genetic makeup of more than 700 sets of gay brothers.<br /><br />'I think the evidence is pretty convincing already that a substantial contribution to sexual orientation comes from genetics,' he said. 'It's probably the single biggest factor that we know about.'" <br /><br />So I guess Dr. Sanders is one of those behavioral geneticists that insist he's going to find some genes contributing to male homosexuality, something I gather poster Cochran doesn't think will happen. <br /><br />I think Bailey works with Sanders so I am guessing maybe he already knows not much there? <br /><br />I don't know. I always chuckle, though, when I hear a geneticist say that genetics in a big factor in something but that it's just one of the factors. <br /><br /> Well, duh, I would think so. Our genome is really a factor in everything, isn't it? Even if I am struck by a cold virus that gets me down for a week, isn't that related to my immune system's resistance or lack of resistance to it and isn't that the result of my genes?<br /><br />Something tells me that a behavioral geneticist will find SOMETHING "genetic" to pin on this trait, even if there is only a weak correlation of sorts. <br /><br />Not that I think guys choose to be non-heterosexual. That's absurd.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-68417165576225790482012-01-31T17:06:36.899-08:002012-01-31T17:06:36.899-08:00All that said, game has sort of come onto one trui...<i>All that said, game has sort of come onto one truism; women like a pleasant a$$hole. It's no more complicated than that.</i><br /><br />Here's my take on Game: Women like assholes you say. I'll buy that. Now, why would they prefer unattractive, sexually inept assholes?<br />In case you haven't noticed, there's never a shortage of assholes (Game says we need more).<br />But the "female orgasm is a myth" assertion makes sense in this light; it's the gamer's "IQ is a myth" myth. It <i>has</i> to end here. <br />"Anyone can give women orgasms", is the gamer's pre-coital boast; once he's done he dryly declares, with equal insistence:<br />"Women are incapable of orgasms".<br /><br />Which is not to confuse Game with the Men's Rights resistance. But then, Game is like Men's Rights' entertaining but unreliable cousin.Dennis Dalehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03233729780363740881noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-45201803436634179602012-01-31T14:29:04.509-08:002012-01-31T14:29:04.509-08:00Just to throw out something to reaffirm Maya's...Just to throw out something to reaffirm Maya's commentary. I'm no ladies man, far from it. But I went through a particularly dry spell; tried everything, clothes, was aggressively flirtatious, no luck.<br /><br />Gave up, started running for whatever reason, dropped 30 pounds, had 4 partners within a month, and it didn't stop there. Nothing different in terms of dress or behavior. One girl, had been friends with for 2 years, had flirted a lot, only after the running. I didn't even initiate things.<br /><br /><br />All that said, game has sort of come onto one truism; women like a pleasant a$$hole. It's no more complicated than that.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-54015140615376877532012-01-31T00:42:24.885-08:002012-01-31T00:42:24.885-08:00This is a gentlemanly thread and the restraint is ...This is a gentlemanly thread and the restraint is admirable, but I wouldn't be saying something like "I think this female orgasm business is all a fraud" out loud, like at work or something. You're just asking to become a running joke. <br />And you agnostics who've yet to see evidence of it should view the female orgasm as Pascal's Wager would have you treat the Almighty. Take the safe bet. Proceed as if it's there.<br /><br />Cue <i>Waterworld:</i> "dry land exists, I've seen it..."<br /><br />Now if you want to argue the female orgasm is a troublesome little biological artifact, I'm listening...Dennis Dalehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03233729780363740881noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-15571467540299954262012-01-31T00:26:41.337-08:002012-01-31T00:26:41.337-08:00It proves that the whole shtick about women prefer...<i>It proves that the whole shtick about women preferring guys who work out, have no beer gut and clear skin is total bullshit.</i><br /><br />Wait a minute. This-- "guys who work out, have no beer gut and clear skin..." has to be a description of gay men. So yeah, I guess you're right.Dennis Dalehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03233729780363740881noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-84612048626302688352012-01-30T20:18:32.199-08:002012-01-30T20:18:32.199-08:00"Sailer's Law of Female Journalism as app..."Sailer's Law of Female Journalism as applies to "Gamers" has been ably demonstrated."<br /><br />I stumbled upon "game" last year, and it's creepy just how much their blogs resemble the female Fat Acceptance blogs I came across 10 years ago, and the femenazi self esteem teachings that were supposed to indoctrinate me in school. <br /><br />Every other female guest speaker or an article in a teen magazine would assure us girls that the boys like girls of all shapes and sizes, as long as she's confident and enjoys life. Don't even attempt to change anything about yourself physically. There's no need! Only defective boys care about that. Boys only THINK that they care about your looks because they've been brainwashed by the media. In reality, all you need to work on is your confidence, and the boys will respond despite what the think they would respond to.<br /><br />The 20-something, 30-something Fat Acceptance feminist bloggers like to talk about confidence too. AND they love to brag and give examples of how well their confidence works in bars. All you have to do is have or fake high self esteem and go get drunk in a bar. Success with the opposite sex guaranteed. Don't even try to work on your short comings other than that low self esteem! That would be WEAK of you. In fact, you have no short comings. If you think you do, that's just the evil patriarchy brainwashing you. All you need is confidence to attract male attention, and it will be proven to you if you go get drunk with some random men! Any man who might have a different hypothesis as to why you might be able to get laid or why you might not have attracted men at all before you went into the territory of mandatory beer goggles is either a liar or completely brainwashed by the media which is controlled by the patriarchy. Pay no attention to him. The jerk!<br /><br />Are "game" bloggers and feminazis actually working together? Or is the pathetic, whiny side of human nature so similar in everyone?Mayanoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-62026590438142523292012-01-30T19:47:59.978-08:002012-01-30T19:47:59.978-08:00"Men and women differ in amygdala response to..."Men and women differ in amygdala response to visual sexual stimuli.<br />As for your question, how much of the difference in their successes comes from the self-deprecation of men(not long enough!) than women's preferences(as roissy points out about women's long lists). "<br /><br />This, kind of makes me smile. It's how adults lie to kids all the while expecting them to grow out of it when the time comes. But some of those kids can't deal with harsh reality once they grow up, so they continue the lie for themselves. Of course, how you carry yourself, your character and your confidence matter! But, unlike what the grown ups in your life told you to shelter you, your looks matter too. They matter a whole lot. Sure, all your other traits can make your life better, but you will never fully compensate for being butt ugly. And good looks can't compensate for everything, but they can compensate for a whole lot. That's why handsome men don't concern themselves with "game". Yes, I've heard many men say that they have problems with girls, even though they are fairly good looking. Guess what? Usually, neither I nor any of the other women who mentioned it later ever thought that the guy was good looking. That's why roissy has to overcompensate so drastically and still ends up with poor quality pickings. He's average looking, at best. You can't be seriously comparing some woman's silly long list of man specks with a natural biological response! Men and women react differently to visual sexual stimuli because women need the correct setting as well as the correct partner- you know, we got limited resources so things have to be right. That's why erotic literature is popular- it provides an elaborate setting. However, the guy within that setting is of supreme importance. You might have noticed that male romantic leads in movies geared towards women tend to be very handsome. Nature is nature. You or Roissy or whoever else can throw tantrums against it, but you can't change it. No, there is no Santa Clause either. It's okay. Just do the best with what you got.Mayanoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-58478689320801245042012-01-30T18:06:22.028-08:002012-01-30T18:06:22.028-08:00"Now some don't realize their capacity un..."Now some don't realize their capacity until they try a vibrating massager, but it's there. In fact a guy showed me that.<br />You're weird. I don't think you know any women, and have the penis focus of a 10 year old."<br /><br />I'd ignore the Dude. Giving him further information might lead him to approach a female overconfident that he now knows how to tickle her fancy. The outcome would only be overwhelming annoyance. Don't encourage him to breathe let alone think about sex. ;0)edgy gurlnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-12782128005533357012012-01-30T18:03:04.924-08:002012-01-30T18:03:04.924-08:00"You are getting Eugene Robinson, the straigh..."You are getting Eugene Robinson, the straight Washington Post columnist, confused with Gene Robinson, some kind of gay Protestant bishop."<br /><br />Back at you. He was an Episcopal which is what they deem reformation yet still more Catholic than Protestant. Hence, those who protest the ordination of gay clergy being welcome back into the Catholic fold.articlesnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-87042311172912745302012-01-30T17:57:51.714-08:002012-01-30T17:57:51.714-08:00You are getting Eugene Robinson, the straight Wash...You are getting Eugene Robinson, the straight Washington Post columnist, confused with Gene Robinson, some kind of gay Protestant bishop.Steve Sailerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11920109042402850214noreply@blogger.com