The Washington Post catches on to  something I've been writing about for  three years: AIDS is so bad in Africa in part because it has a different  sexual structure than much of the rest of the world. One of Africa's big AIDS  causes is not Castro Street-style promiscuity, but multiple concurrent partners. 
  Speeding HIV's Deadly Spread
Multiple, Concurrent Partners Drive Disease in Southern Africa
By Craig Timberg 
FRANCISTOWN, Botswana --  … A growing number of studies single out such behavior  -- in which men and women maintain two or more ongoing relationships -- as the  most powerful force propelling a killer disease through a vulnerable continent.  
This new understanding of how the AIDS virus attacks individuals and their  societies helps explain why the disease has devastated southern Africa while  sparing other places. It also suggests how the region's AIDS programs, which  have struggled to prevent new infections even as treatment for the disease has  become more widely available, might save far more lives: by discouraging sexual  networks. 
"The problem of multiple partners who do not practice safe sex is obviously the  biggest driver of HIV in the world," said Ndwapi Ndwapi, a top government AIDS  official in Botswana, speaking in Gaborone, the capital. "What I need to know  from the scientific community is, what do you do? . . . How do you change that  for a society that happens to have higher rates of multiple sexual partners?"    …
But the number of sexual partners is not the only factor that increases the risk  of AIDS. The most potentially dangerous relationships, researchers say, involve  men and women who maintain more than one regular partner for months or years. In  these relationships, more intimate, trusting and long-lasting than casual sex,  most couples eventually stop using condoms, studies show, allowing easy  infiltration by HIV. 
Researchers increasingly agree that curbing such behavior is key to slowing the  spread of AIDS in Africa. In a July report, southern African AIDS experts and  officials listed "reducing multiple and concurrent partnerships" as their first  priority for preventing the spread of HIV in a region where nearly 15 million  people are estimated to carry the virus -- 38 percent of the world's total. 
But for many Batswana, as citizens of this landlocked desert country of 1.6  million call themselves, it is a strategy that has rarely been taught. 
… International experts long regarded Botswana as a case study in how to combat  AIDS. It had few of the intractable social problems thought to predispose a  country to the disease, such as conflict, abject poverty and poor medical care.  And for the past decade, the country has rigorously followed strategies that  Western experts said would slow AIDS. 
With its diamond wealth and the largess of international donors, Botswana  aggressively promoted condom use while building Africa's best network of HIV  testing centers and its most extensive system for distributing the  antiretroviral drugs that dramatically prolong and improve the lives of those  with AIDS. 
But even though the relentless pace of funerals began to ease in recent years,  the disease was far from under control. The national death rate fell from the  highest in the world, but only to second-highest, behind AIDS-ravaged Swaziland.  Men and women in Botswana continued to contract HIV faster than almost anywhere  else on Earth.   Twenty-five percent of Batswana adults carry the virus,  according to a 2004 national study, and among women in their early 30s living in  Francistown, the rate is 69 percent. 
Researchers increasingly attribute the resilience of HIV in Botswana -- and in  southern Africa generally -- to the high incidence of multiple sexual  relationships. Europeans and Americans often have more partners over their  lives, studies show, but sub-Saharan Africans average more at the same time. 
Nearly one in three sexually active men in Botswana reported having multiple,  concurrent sex partners, as did 14 percent of women, in a 2003 survey paid for  by the U.S. government. Among men younger than 25, the rate was 44 percent. 
The distinction between having several partners in a year and several in a month  is crucial because those newly infected with HIV experience an initial surge in  viral loads that makes them far more contagious than they will be for years.  During the three-week spike -- which ends before standard tests can even detect  HIV -- the virus explodes through networks of unprotected sex. 
This insight explained what studies were documenting: Africans with multiple,  concurrent sex partners were more likely to contract HIV, and countries where  such partnerships were common had wider and more lethal epidemics. 
A model of multiple sexual relationships presented at a Princeton University  conference in May showed that a small increase in the average number of  concurrent sexual partners -- from 1.68 to 1.86 -- had profound effects,  connecting sexual networks into a single, massive tangle that, when plotted out,  resembles the transportation system of a major city. 
… These factors, researchers say, explain how North Africa, where Muslim  societies require circumcision and strongly discourage sex outside monogamous  and polygamous marriages, has largely avoided AIDS. They also explain why the  epidemic is far more severe south of the Sahara, where webs of multiple sex  partners are more common, researchers say. 
West Africa has been partially protected by its high rates of circumcision, but  in southern and eastern Africa -- which have both low rates of circumcision and  high rates of multiple sex partners -- the AIDS epidemic became the most deadly  in the world.   "That's the lethal cocktail," said Harvard University  epidemiologist Daniel Halperin, a former AIDS prevention adviser in Africa for  the U.S. government, speaking from suburban Boston. "There's no place in the  world where you have very high HIV and you don't have those two factors." 
… "It explains why Africa is hardest hit" by AIDS, Mosojane said. "The way we  contract for sex is different from how others do it." 
Polygamy once was common in the region, and in some parts still is; Swaziland's  king has 13 wives. In generations past, even Batswana with just one spouse  rarely expected monogamy. Husbands spent months herding cattle while their  wives, staying elsewhere, tended crops, Mosojane said. On his return, a husband  was not to be quizzed about his activities while he was away. He also was  supposed to spend his first night back in an uncle's house, giving his wife time  to send off boyfriends.
  
An anthropologist friend who spent years in Botswana talks about how once he and some of the tribesmen went off on a trip. On the way home to the village, they were making better than expected time, so he proposed driving through the evening and arriving about midnight, rather than the next day as they had announced upon leaving. The tribesmen were aghast at his proposing such a social faux pas. No gentleman would arrive home early, likely surprising his wife in flagrante delicto with her lover. It would be most embarrassing for all concerned. No, a polite husband never comes home early.
In Setswana, the  national language, "the word 'fidelity' does not even exist," Mosojane said. 
The few checks that traditional villages had on sexual behavior dwindled during  the development frenzy after 1967, when diamonds were discovered. Batswana  increasingly moved to cities for school or work. Plentiful television sets  delivered a flood of Western images, including racy soap operas and music videos  featuring lightly clad women vying for the attention of wealthy, bejeweled men.    
The key is that African  husbands tend to be more tolerant of their wives having a long term lover or two  than is the norm elsewhere. The thought of one's wife becoming pregnant by  another man is intolerable to most husbands around the world, but tends to be  less infuriating in Africa. 
That probably stems from women doing most of the farm work in rural Africa.  (That's why you are always hearing about men in Africa working away from home in  mines or wherever for months -- the men aren't often needed around the farm  because most of the work is just hoeing weeds, which women can do at least as  well as men.) 
So, the husbands don't have as much leverage over their wives' behavior as in  places where husbands are work-a-daddies bringing home the bacon. And African  husbands don't have as much motivation to enforce fidelity on their wives since  they won't be investing as much money in their wives' children's upbringing as  they would elsewhere. 
Another contributor to the high rates of AIDS in Southern/Eastern Africa besides multiple concurrent partners and lack of circumcision is the bizarre fetish for "dry sex," which I would guess doesn't exist among West Africans because (thankfully) you never hear about it among their African-American cousins.
My published articles are archived at iSteve.com -- Steve Sailer