tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post1041216430380108538..comments2024-03-28T16:22:14.888-07:00Comments on Steve Sailer: iSteve: Twin studies debunked: Twins are "Similar but not identical"Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger32125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-87414562985769079292013-12-21T15:34:38.285-08:002013-12-21T15:34:38.285-08:00"The heritability of general intelligence, fo..."The heritability of general intelligence, for instance, rises with age. In infancy, about 20 per cent of a child’s intelligence is attributed to genes, whereas in adults it can be as high as 70 or even 80 per cent"<br /><br />I'd be <b>incredibly!!!!</b> interested in a comparison of IQ test scores at the same ages between parents and children.<br /><br />Would the parents of a child whose infant IQ results are much lower or much higher than their adult IQ results also have scored much lower or much higher (respectively) as an infant than they do as adults?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-66096858702713993182013-12-16T10:57:15.123-08:002013-12-16T10:57:15.123-08:00jody said...
would be interested to know how ...<br /> jody said...<br /><i><br /> would be interested to know how twinning affects sexuality. could give important insight into the hormone hypothesis for homosexuality.</i><br /><br />You might like <a href="http://borngay.procon.org/view.answers.php?questionID=000019" rel="nofollow">this</a> and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biology_and_sexual_orientation#Twin_studies" rel="nofollow">this.</a> When one identical twin is gay, then about half the time the other twin is gay, though some studies find higher or lower values.<br /><br />Billnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-86271193376734998252013-12-14T15:54:48.948-08:002013-12-14T15:54:48.948-08:00Steve, this is exactly the defense that Bryan Capl...Steve, this is exactly the defense that Bryan Caplan has put up of twin studies. If identical twins aren't perfectly identical, then the estimator using fraternal twins as a control underestimates the effect of genes. Justin Irvinghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16509797066142837881noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-2354995194996616682013-12-14T13:06:09.984-08:002013-12-14T13:06:09.984-08:00"indicating an unequal environment in the wom..."indicating an unequal environment in the womb" - 8 months and 29 days alert.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-63808897331949202972013-12-14T12:39:20.927-08:002013-12-14T12:39:20.927-08:00For all that technical yeahyeah, with all the epig...For all that technical yeahyeah, with all the epigenetics said and done, when have you met identical twins (kids) that you can actually tell apart? I couldn't, with kids I knew as family friends.<br /><br />I had an adult friend who was MZ but I never met her twin. <br /><br />I think there were some in my HS, but if so I had no idea which was which, not being friends of theirs.RSnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-39021726709643716942013-12-14T09:50:39.857-08:002013-12-14T09:50:39.857-08:00Having taken GCSEs, I can confirm they're very...Having taken GCSEs, I can confirm they're very easy exams. The top 2/3rds of the bellcurve can easily get the required grades, and gaming the system by teaching/studying to the test, resitting exams, and so on, is trivial.<br /><br />I would be very interested in seeing the A-Level results of this twin cohort - those exams are much meatier.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-86935294842378202502013-12-14T07:36:51.008-08:002013-12-14T07:36:51.008-08:00This might shed some light on this:
http://www.ps...This might shed some light on this:<br /><br />http://www.psychologytoday.com/articles/201109/the-incredible-expanding-adventures-the-x-chromosomeDartangnan19https://www.blogger.com/profile/01631855189862486486noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-22716220064185880302013-12-14T06:52:30.861-08:002013-12-14T06:52:30.861-08:00Insofar as GSCEs measure achievement and not simpl...Insofar as GSCEs measure achievement and not simply 'g', the scores are more malleable than 'g' is. Nevertheless, they are reasonably g-loaded. Their malleability is reflected in the shared-environment contribution to the scores.<br /><br />Measures of 'g' in adulthood show higher heritability than this study found.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-40938314625630849382013-12-14T06:44:26.775-08:002013-12-14T06:44:26.775-08:00"Don't twin studies work by positing that..."Don't twin studies work by positing that the difference in degree of phenotypical variation between identical twins and fraternal twins is due to genetics..."<br /><br />I think that's the opposite of it. The differences are assumed to be environment; the similarities are assumed to be genetics.Prodawnnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-81963734953147425552013-12-14T06:17:20.514-08:002013-12-14T06:17:20.514-08:00From Connor's piece,
"The heritability o...<br />From Connor's piece,<br /><br />"The heritability of general intelligence, for instance, rises with age. In infancy, about 20 per cent of a child’s intelligence is attributed to genes, whereas in adults it can be as high as 70 or even 80 per cent, according to Robert Plomin, professor of behavioural genetics at King’s College, who led the twins study into educational achievement."<br /><br />This of course means that those extra efforts to enhance a child's IQ might look promising for a while but then as young adults they fall back to the level of their relatives. Money well spent?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-63489915460186935502013-12-14T01:56:06.114-08:002013-12-14T01:56:06.114-08:00GCSEs include significant amounts of coursework, t...GCSEs include significant amounts of coursework, though maths was discontinued a few years earlier. It'd also be interesting to see how g loaded these GCSEs are considering that they have often been criticised as getting easier over time and the questions are derided as being far too easy.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-15476588673855955302013-12-13T22:50:50.765-08:002013-12-13T22:50:50.765-08:00I see the Indy isnt allowing comments on that arti...I see the Indy isnt allowing comments on that article. If only, if only...it would be carnage! Lol!<br /><br />The Guardian did allow comments but of course comment moderation there is almost air-tight. Only the barest whisper of dissent is tolerated. The liberal livestock must remain unworried at all costs.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-11345126441697722382013-12-13T21:19:23.241-08:002013-12-13T21:19:23.241-08:00So they're saying "Aha! These studies are...So they're saying "Aha! These studies are useless because identical twins are NOT even identical in the first place!" But they don't then wonder why the identical twins raised apart score so similarly?<br /><br />So, if identical twins are not exactly equal but when raised apart they still score so similarly, the heritability estimates are actually underestimating the effect of genes? Do I have this right?Janninoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-69563369152779579552013-12-13T20:55:57.780-08:002013-12-13T20:55:57.780-08:00as Shakespeare said if you have to ask what rhythy...as Shakespeare said if you have to ask what rhythym is you ought to stick to painting. I am sorry that my disagreement with you on the value of twin studies to the non-neurologically-diverse was muggily opaque.long live reggie wnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-68467084455487164272013-12-13T20:18:27.333-08:002013-12-13T20:18:27.333-08:00long live reggie w said...
Your analogy made abou...<i>long live reggie w said...</i><br /><br />Your analogy made about as much sense as the fact that coconuts cause more deaths than shark attacks implies red squirrels are very annoying.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-66542250704709806522013-12-13T19:10:32.817-08:002013-12-13T19:10:32.817-08:00"One twin can be larger than the other from b..."One twin can be larger than the other from birth, indicating <i>an unequal environment in the womb,</i> and it is now firmly established that identical twins can be born with very different health prospects"<br /><br />Could it be? Have we reached the <i>ne plus ultra</i> of behaviorist denial? Surely there's no point beyond the belief even the womb is an un-level playing field where resources are hogged and the weak exploited. Dennis Dalehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03233729780363740881noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-73119838935358175392013-12-13T19:05:55.658-08:002013-12-13T19:05:55.658-08:00Steve, twin studies are the province of losers. He...Steve, twin studies are the province of losers. Here is an analogy - some old former pro golfer (I forget his name) is spending quality time with old friends who are unimpressed, as old friends should be, by minor details of a life well lived such as whether somebody had been a pro golfer or not. Anyway, at a random point in the weekend, two or three of these friends find themselves at a driving range where, by some kind of dream logic, only broken down old five six and seven irons are available. They all whack a few for the pure joy of it and are all more or less as successful as would be expected but off the iron of the old pro the ball flies as if it had been hit on a sunny morning in Denver with the wind at his back instead of near the Jersey shore on a dull muggy evening. Twin studies are not the province of old pros, they are the dull muggy evening of people who do not understand other people very well and who need lists of numbers to convince themselves of what they ought to have known since childhood about the various gifts the Lord has given.long live reggie wnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-88404020004593027882013-12-13T18:19:36.480-08:002013-12-13T18:19:36.480-08:00By comparing identical twins, who share identical ...<i>By comparing identical twins, who share identical genes, with non-identical twins, who share half their DNA....</i><br /><br />Um, more like 99+%. They share all the DNA that their parents share plus, on average, 50% of the rest of their DNA. <br /><br />Connor's (and his editor's?) intellectually sloppiness is absolutely unacceptable. ben tillmannoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-24730176964114474702013-12-13T17:59:05.103-08:002013-12-13T17:59:05.103-08:00At least, this was the main conclusion of a “repre...<i>At least, this was the main conclusion of a “representative” sample of 11,117 identical and non-identical 16-year-old twins....</i><br /><br />An odd number? And it doesn't occur to Mr. Connor that this figure has to be wrong? Wow.<br /><br />ben tillmannoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-55861023550169044102013-12-13T17:53:26.613-08:002013-12-13T17:53:26.613-08:00It is really amusing how these people at the Guard...It is really amusing how these people at the Guardian were so discombulated by the results of the study, and so determined to refute it, that they couldn't even see that they were working against their own goal.<br /><br />Maybe their sports idol is Roy "Wrong Way" Riegels.candid_observernoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-18241696751646852062013-12-13T17:52:51.291-08:002013-12-13T17:52:51.291-08:00So...because identical twins aren't really ide...So...because identical twins aren't really identical, only 99% or so, any similarity between them is more likely to stem from whether their community has a Head Start program?Assistant Village Idiothttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01978011985085795099noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-866589559947531632013-12-13T17:20:52.485-08:002013-12-13T17:20:52.485-08:00From the article:
A serious problem with heritabi...From the article:<br /><br /><i>A serious problem with heritability as a metric for measuring anything, however, is that it varies depending on what you are measuring, on which population it is based, and on the time of assessment.</i><br /><br />It's funny how the critics seem to think that this criticism only concerns behavior genetics, when it of course applies with equal force to all social and behavioral science. The very same people who think that a study of 11,000 twins carefully selected to be nationally representative cannot be used to draw any general conclusions also think that small <a href="http://users.nber.org/~sewp/events/2005.01.14/Bios+Links/Good-rec2-Steele_&_Aronson_95.pdf" rel="nofollow">experiments</a> involving a few dozen elite university students convincingly explains all racial differences in test scores across society.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-51091935537207552982013-12-13T17:12:50.916-08:002013-12-13T17:12:50.916-08:00I find the following very useful comment on the Gu...I find the following very useful comment on the Guardian site, which places the estimate of the effect of shared environment in proper perspective:<br /><br /><i>...there is another reason to believe that the GCSE study referred to in the article exaggerates environmental influences. Namely, the study assumes that the parents of the children studied mated randomly, with no regard to the educational level, intelligence, etc. of each other. This is, of course, a highly unrealistic assumption — assortative mating is the rule in all societies — but twin researchers rely on it because they typically don’t have the data needed to model assortative mating. The consequence of this for the twin method is that to the extent that assortative mating causes twins to be phenotypically more similar, it is treated as a purely environmental effect, even though parental similarity in traits like intelligence is strongly influenced by genetics. Thus, the importance of genetic influences in underestimated.<br /><br />The GCSE study found that about 58 percent of exam results were explained by genetic differences, while about 36 percent were due to those environmental influences that are shared between siblings (e.g., family and school effects). For the reasons discussed above, the former figure is probably an underestimate, while the latter figure is probably an overestimate.</i>candid_observernoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-88702576679726208782013-12-13T17:09:39.133-08:002013-12-13T17:09:39.133-08:00Interesting points, but, correct me if I'm wro...<i>Interesting points, but, correct me if I'm wrong...</i><br /><br />Steve, you're always so nice. :) What this article deserves is a good Cochrane fisking. Then again, why waste a good fisking.Allan Folzhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06762674627739423845noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-77355233911596057202013-12-13T16:45:02.105-08:002013-12-13T16:45:02.105-08:00would be interested to know how twinning affects s...would be interested to know how twinning affects sexuality. could give important insight into the hormone hypothesis for homosexuality.jodynoreply@blogger.com