tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post117377314511400449..comments2024-03-27T18:24:19.683-07:00Comments on Steve Sailer: iSteve: Sailer on CarterUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger86125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-1174076409984522702007-03-16T14:20:00.000-07:002007-03-16T14:20:00.000-07:00In an interview with the Dutch newspaper "Trau" (M...In an interview with the Dutch newspaper "Trau" (March 31, 1977), PLO executive committee member Zahir Muhsein said,<BR/><BR/>"The Palestinian people does not exist. The creation of a Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle against the state of Israel for our Arab unity. In reality today there is no difference between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. Only for political and tactical reasons do we speak today about the existence of a Palestinian people, since Arab national interests demand that we posit the existence of a distinct 'Palestinian people' to oppose Zionism."<BR/><BR/>FreddyAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-1174014758917454702007-03-15T21:12:00.000-07:002007-03-15T21:12:00.000-07:00The Phoenicians actually weren't Semitic. They wer...<I>The Phoenicians actually weren't Semitic. They were of Southern European origin. They migrated to the city states they founded in places like Tyre by sea. This leads to a little confusion about the Palestinians.</I><BR/><BR/>You may be confusing the Phoenicians with the Philistines. The Phoenicians were definitely Semitic speakers. Their exact origins are not entirely clear, but most presume a Middle Eastern origin. (There are other theories, many of them likely quite fanciful, placing the origins of the Phoenicians in Mediterranean Europe or even India. How they would have acquired a thoroughly Semitic language remains unexplained in such theories.)<BR/><BR/><I>Today's Palestinians are of course Arabs, who are Semites. Arabic has no consonant "P",</I><BR/><BR/>The Philistines were a different people who's origin is much debated. The most popular hypothesis currently is that they were a Mycenaean Greek tribe. Very limited evidence suggests an Indo-European language for the Philistines and some of the cultural artifacts, such as pottery, have a distinct resemblance to those in the Aegean at the time.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-1174008591087653862007-03-15T19:29:00.000-07:002007-03-15T19:29:00.000-07:00Svigor,Oh I dunno, a good liberal could make quite...Svigor,<BR/><BR/><I>Oh I dunno, a good liberal could make quite a few parallels. And what's the difference between slavery and apartheid in the liberal mind anyhow?</I><BR/><BR/>Sure, but many of those same liberals routinely fail to distinguish between George W. Bush and Adolph Hitler, so I wouldn't rely on them for too much substantial thinking.<BR/><BR/><I>I'm glad you're glad. The difference is, of course, that Jews still put halos over black heads whenever they can, but at best ignore the Pals.</I><BR/><BR/>My criticism of the Palestinians is no defense of American Jews.<BR/><BR/><I>No, I can no more prove that than you can prove otherwise.</I><BR/><BR/>The Romans were meticulous record keepers and would have noted the presence of a taxable population in the province of Judea distinct from the Jews. Even more so, when that population, the K'naani or bani kan'an (what Phoenician populations called themselves), bore the same name and spoke the same language as their ancestral enemies, the Carthaginians. The Romans failed entirely to note such a population and Jews like Josephus, speaking of the Canaanites, mention them as a population long lost. There isn't a shred of evidence to indicate the survival of a remnant Canaanite population during the time of the Roman Empire, let alone long after. The burden of proof is upon you.<BR/><BR/><I>Indeed, most of what I've read seems to suggest that Phoenicians, Caananites, Hebrews, Carthaginians, Lebanese, etc., are all the same lot.</I><BR/><BR/>The Phoenicians, Carthaginians, and Canaanites were all of the same ethnic stock (the kind we usually call "Phoenicians"). The modern Lebanese are probably significantly descended from such people. Tyre was an ancient Phoenician seaport, for instance, and Lebanon has been remained much more fertile over the millennia than its neighbor to the south, allowing for continuous sedentary habitation. The Hebrews were a distinct people speaking a related, but different, language. All Semitic people, be they Assyrians (Iraqi Christians) or Arabs or Jews, when examined genetically, have a close relationship. In fact, even non-Semitic people in the Mideast, like the Kurds and Turks, all cluster reasonably close together. There is nothing particularly mysterious about that. Northern Europeans cluster tightly too in spite of differing languages and cultures. Conquerors have came and went and sometimes imposed their language and other cultural practices in the process but, genetically speaking, peasant and nomad underbelly in the Mideast has remained fairly undisturbed.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-1173994688711050962007-03-15T15:38:00.000-07:002007-03-15T15:38:00.000-07:00Tim Robbins in Team America:"Let me explain to you...Tim Robbins in Team America:<BR/><BR/>"Let me explain to you how this works. You see, the corporations finance Team America. And then Team America goes out and the corporations sit there in their, ih in their corporation buildings and, and and see that's, they're all corporationy, and they make money."<BR/><BR/>David Brock on Media Matters: <BR/><BR/>"Let me explain to you how this works. You see, the racist Sailer writes for American Conservative. And Sailer used he used the word 'mulatto' and on VDare he sits there with ah white surpremacists like Borjas and er Malkin according to this Colorado newspaper, and this this article it's not completely Messiahy, and AmCon pays Sailer money."Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-1173993067128267522007-03-15T15:11:00.000-07:002007-03-15T15:11:00.000-07:00Svigor,"Damn nigras, I told everybody if we freed ...Svigor,<BR/><BR/><I>"Damn nigras, I told everybody if we freed them they'd just go on welfare, regress to African polygyny, and turn violent, but would anybody listen?"</I><BR/><BR/>First of all, please spare yourself the effort of having to find creative ways to spell well-known words and just use the "nigger" instead. I'm no fan of political correctness. Second of all, nobody has enslaved the Palestinians. However, I'm glad you did highlight a few obvious parallels between American blacks and Palestinians; namely, they both are their own worst enemies these days and they both prefer to scapegoat others rather change their self-defeating behavior.<BR/><BR/><I>"The Caananites are Jews now?"</I><BR/><BR/>I hope you're not implying that the long extinct Canaanites are the ancestors of the modern Palestinians. While Palestinian propagandists have asserted this in the past, anyone not completely ignorant of history can see that it is plainly ridiculous. (Along with the equally nutty notion that the Palestinians are descended from the ancient Philistines.) Whatever the fate of the Canaanites might have been, they were long gone as a separate people even by the time Josephus wrote his "Antiquities of the Jews."<BR/><BR/>Anonymous,<BR/><BR/><I>BTW, great line about the Cannanites too. They were there before the Jews. So the land should be theirs, as soon as someone can round up some Cannanites. </I><BR/><BR/>Well, dig them up then. They don't exist as a people anymore. In actuality, most secular archaeologists believe the Hebrews, in spite of their contrary religious claims, were merely a group of Canaanites that became politically preeminent among neighboring Canaanite tribes. Eventually the entire lot of Canaanites became absorbed into the Jewish nation. So, if you're are looking to give the land back to the Canaanites, you don't have to look far. They are already there.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-1173992903549420502007-03-15T15:08:00.000-07:002007-03-15T15:08:00.000-07:00"Canada, Britain, and Japan aren't white ethnostat..."<I>Canada, Britain, and Japan aren't white ethnostates."</I><BR/><BR/>And Israel is a "white ethnostate"? That's why it imported tens of thousands of coal-black Jews from Ethiopia? <BR/><BR/>Don't forget that Japan is an ethnostate (try getting Japanese citizenship if you don't have Japanese ancestry). <BR/><BR/>You're getting sloppy, Svigor.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-1173981230536042822007-03-15T11:53:00.000-07:002007-03-15T11:53:00.000-07:00"Seems like we're set for a re-run of Joan Peters ...<I>"Seems like we're set for a re-run of Joan Peters vs Norman Finkelstein."</I><BR/><BR/>If we are, perhaps the Kevin MacDonald acolytes will take note: On every conceivable political issue, you will find articulate Jews on all sides. Therefore, claims that all Jews band together to advocate the same policy you disagree with are false.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-1173980577003846942007-03-15T11:42:00.000-07:002007-03-15T11:42:00.000-07:00Seems like we're set for a re-run of Joan Peters v...Seems like we're set for a re-run of Joan Peters vs Norman Finkelstein.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-1173979670566611522007-03-15T11:27:00.000-07:002007-03-15T11:27:00.000-07:00"Er,yes,but wasnt it their country in the first pl...<I>"Er,yes,but wasnt it their country in the first place?? :)"</I><BR/><BR/>In <I>the first place</I>, it was the Jews' land. That's why the Jews, not the Palestinians, are blamed for killing Jesus. <BR/><BR/>That's ancient history, of course. In modern times, the land was controlled by the British from 1917 until 1947 under a League of Nations Mandate; prior to 1917, the land was controlled by the Ottoman Turks for four hundred years.<BR/><BR/>One salient point to remember is that, as recently as the 19th Century, few people gave a shit about the Holy Land. It was sparsely populated because it was so uninhabitable -- swamps and deserts. Don't take my word for it: do a Google search for photos of the Holy Land from the 19th Century -- you'll see weeds sprouting from the stones in front of The Dome of the Rock.<BR/><BR/>Or look up Mark Twain's first hand account from "Innocents Abroad" (e.g., "Palestine lies in sackcloth and ashes...").Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-1173977573328092962007-03-15T10:52:00.000-07:002007-03-15T10:52:00.000-07:00Er,yes,but wasnt it their country in the first pla...Er,yes,but wasnt it their country in the first place?? :)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-1173974882137401022007-03-15T10:08:00.000-07:002007-03-15T10:08:00.000-07:00To the extent that relocating the ethnic Germans b...To the extent that relocating the ethnic Germans back to Germany eliminated a pretext for a third German-initiated World War in less than a century, it <I>was</I> the moral and logical thing to do. <BR/><BR/>Nevertheless, that has nothing to do with what happened to the Palestinians. The vast majority of Palestinians left what became Israel because they were encouraged to do so by Arab leaders, and led to believe that they would be able to go back as soon as the Arabs had pushed the Jews into the sea. <BR/><BR/>For example, this is what the Iraqi Prime Minister had to say in '48:<BR/><BR/><I>"We will smash the country with our guns and obliterate every place the Jews seek shelter in. The Arabs should conduct their wives and children to safe areas until the fighting has died down."</I><BR/><BR/>-- Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri Said<BR/><BR/>And this is from the memoir of his Syrian counterpart:<BR/><BR/><I>“Since 1948 we have been demanding the return of the refugees to their homes. But we ourselves are the ones who encouraged them to leave. Only a few months separated our call to them to leave and our appeal to the United Nations to resolve on their return.”</I><BR/><BR/>-- Syrian Prime Minister Haled al Azm<BR/><BR/>The bottom line: The Arabs rejected the partition of Palestine in '47 because they thought they could get the whole thing by force; they couldn't, and they've been whining about it ever since.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-1173972037872955532007-03-15T09:20:00.000-07:002007-03-15T09:20:00.000-07:00Oh, yes, a few others who at the time considered t...Oh, yes, a few others who at the time considered the expulsions of the Germans from Eastern Europe to be immoral: George Orwell, Sen. William Langer (R-N.D.), George Kennan (see www.hungarianhistory.com/lib/vardy/vardy.doc (pp. 247-48, 259-60))<BR/><BR/>Also, a correction to my earlier post: Robert Murphy wasn't a diplomat, but rather political adviser to General Eisenhower.Seamushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10065227784774273923noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-1173970227457702682007-03-15T08:50:00.000-07:002007-03-15T08:50:00.000-07:00It's worth remembering that, after World War II, m...<I>It's worth remembering that, after World War II, millions of people were forcibly relocated -- including German-speaking minorities in Europe. These German-speakers were relocated back to Germany to eliminate a pretext for another war. This wasn't considered illegal or immoral at the time . . . .</I><BR/><BR/>Actually, a lot of people did -- and still do -- think it immoral. British publisher Victor Gollancz, for example, said, "If the conscience of men ever again becomes sensitive, these expulsions will be remembered to the undying shame of all who committed or connived at them . . . . The Germans were expelled, not just with an absence of over-nice consideration, but with the very maximum of brutality." Robert Murphy, an American diplomat, said in a cable to the State Department, "Here is retribution on a large scale, but practiced not on the <I>Parteibonzen</I>, but on women and children, the poor, the infirm. . . . Knowledge that they are the victims of a harsh political decision carried out with the utmost ruthlessness and disregard for humanity does not cushion the effect. The mind reverts to other mass deportations which horrified the world and brought upon the Nazis the odium which they so deserved. Those mass deportations engineered by the Nazis provided part of the moral basis oil which we waged war and which gave strength to our cause. Now the situation is reversed. We find ourselves in the invidious position of being partners in this German enterprise and as partners inevitably sharing the responsibility."<BR/><BR/>When this sort of stuff is done in the Balkans today, it's called "ethnic cleansing" and generally regarded as an atrocity.<BR/><BR/>See http://www.crimesofwar.org/thebook/deportations.htmlSeamushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10065227784774273923noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-1173968428021958362007-03-15T07:20:00.000-07:002007-03-15T07:20:00.000-07:00Israel right now is in the position of the "300 Sp...Israel right now is in the position of the "300 Spartans." Not an easy place to be in. Some rabbis believe that every problem the Jews encounter is a lesson from God, so we'll see what can be learned here. <BR/><BR/>For all we know, the world will look a lot like Israel in the future. iSteve readers against Mexican immigration to the USA might find themselves brothers to the Israelis in not much time.<BR/><BR/>So the Palestinians complain of being exploited as cheap labor, and then when the jobs get cut off, they are complaining of "their economic aspirations" being thwarted. What a laugh. It's the same old song we've heard before. Big difference between keeping someone down and upstaging them. <BR/><BR/>Nobody likes a whiner, and Israelis are not whiners. To their credit, the Arabs are not really whiners either. Ultimately, war isn't about who is right. It's about who is most organized, capable, and competent. It's a moral test.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-1173964289785954962007-03-15T07:11:00.000-07:002007-03-15T07:11:00.000-07:00aceflyer,Of course, the problem is that Israel co-...aceflyer,<BR/><BR/><I>Of course, the problem is that Israel co-opted the Palestinian economy, giving them only one economic outlet - to serve as cheap labor. This was explicitly stated as the goal of the 1993 Oslo agreement. Taking away that one economic outlet is like taking away moldy bread crumbs from a starving man. And you're laughing at the starving man for being deprived of his food.</I><BR/><BR/>I'm laughing at the apologists who will say anything regardless of its truth content, not at the Palestinians generally. However, the Palestinians could have had a state by now if they had acted in good faith over the last few years.<BR/><BR/>With the withdrawal from Gaza, we heard all this nonsense about how the Palestinians intended to continue growing the crops in the greenhouses and how they wanted to set up an amusement park in one of the settlements. Of course, anyone with a realistic view of the Palestinians knew the likelihood of them doing anything productive with the abandoned settlements was nil. Sure enough, they just ransacked the place and used it as a base to launch further missile attacks into pre-1948 Israeli territory. If they had any sense, they would at least declare a moratorium on attacks originating from Gaza and started to work on opening up the Strip and making the it economically productive. In fact, the Palestinians had a campaign a few years ago to promote tourism in Gaza. They've got a strip of land there on the Mediterranean that could be a rather nice tourist destination, but it doesn't help when even Palestinian sympathizers are regularly kidnapped amidst ceaseless inter-tribal feuding.<BR/><BR/><BR/>rob,<BR/><BR/><I>Apart from the Barbary pirates 200 years ago, Arabs or Muslims never bothered America until America started supporting Israel and fighting its wars.</I><BR/><BR/>Well gee, how many opportunities were they given to do that since the decline of the Barbary states?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-1173937412629443712007-03-14T23:43:00.000-07:002007-03-14T23:43:00.000-07:00Svigor said: Okay, not much of an analogy, but sti...Svigor said: <I>Okay, not much of an analogy, but still you gotta admire how fast the liberal crib sheet gets pocketed, and out comes der Sturmer...</I><BR/><BR/>LOL, best line of a wonderful post.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-1173936905410533882007-03-14T23:35:00.000-07:002007-03-14T23:35:00.000-07:00This actually brings up a funny point. A few years...<I>This actually brings up a funny point. A few years ago, Palestinian apologists were complaining that Jews just wanted the Palestinians around as a source of cheap exploitable labor. As the second intifada rolled along, Israel cut off the flow of Palestinians workers inside Israel almost entirely and has basically phased the Palestinians out entirely. You might think that the Palestinian proletariat would be overjoyed (or, at least, a little less alienated). Hardly. Instead it has led to complaints that Jews are making life hard on the Palestinians by denying them work in Israel.</I><BR/><BR/>Of course, the problem is that Israel co-opted the Palestinian economy, giving them only one economic outlet - to serve as cheap labor. This was explicitly stated as the goal of the 1993 Oslo agreement. Taking away that one economic outlet is like taking away moldy bread crumbs from a starving man. And you're laughing at the starving man for being deprived of his food.<BR/><BR/>Remember earlier on this thread when we were instructed that Jews "invented humanism"? LOL!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-1173933892659514212007-03-14T22:44:00.000-07:002007-03-14T22:44:00.000-07:00^that's cute, a white nationalist - maybe people w...^that's cute, a white nationalist - maybe people will take your kind seriously when you denounce Hitler...<BR/><BR/>Do you guys support the troops or just the white ones?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-1173923425710248102007-03-14T19:50:00.000-07:002007-03-14T19:50:00.000-07:00Found drunk, naked, with sex toys. Steve, this is...Found drunk, naked, with sex toys. Steve, this isn't Third World behavior. This is run-of-the-mill British Tory politician behavior.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-1173921047465197032007-03-14T19:10:00.000-07:002007-03-14T19:10:00.000-07:00Northern and Western European-origin Americans, an...<I>Northern and Western European-origin Americans, and I assume most commentators here are, lack a sense of historical development. The regions that many commentators scorn as being decadent and backwards - the Middle East, was the more economically developed part of the world for all but the past 500 to 800 years or so.</I><BR/><BR/>Before 1750, the entire world was basically agrarian, so it's absurd to characterise any country or civilisation as being far more economically developed than the others. <BR/><BR/><I>If you go back further, to say pre-Roman Europe then the disparity is even greater. Written language became commonplace in Britain, for example, with the entry of the Romans in the 1st Century BCE.</I><BR/><BR/>Huh? The vast majority of the world's population were illiterate before the 18th century, so again, everyone was essentially in the same boat. Knowledge was passed on through oral conditions.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-1173919051078350392007-03-14T18:37:00.000-07:002007-03-14T18:37:00.000-07:00Lysander Spooner,Ladies and gentlemen, without fur...Lysander Spooner,<BR/><BR/><I>Ladies and gentlemen, without further ado, I present to you "Steve Sailer: Evil 'Far-Right' Columnist".</I><BR/><BR/>David Brock is the definition of a moronic, hysterical twit.<BR/><BR/>Funny piece though:<BR/><BR/><I>New York Post columnist John Podhoretz, writing on National Review Online's The Corner weblog, condemned Sailer's "shockingly racist"</I><BR/><BR/>Roll out JPod. Which is funny because Media Matters has, itself, <A HREF="http://mediamatters.org/items/200604070008" REL="nofollow">accused </A> Podhoretz of misrepresenting facts in the past. Of course, Media Matters has also condemned Podhortez <A HREF="http://mediamatters.org/items/200605100008" REL="nofollow">for characterizing Hillary Clinton as a "bitch."</A> But his judgment is pure gold when come to Sailer, apparently.<BR/><BR/><I>VDARE.com was described by the Rocky Mountain News on July 15, 2006, as a "white nationalist Web site."</I><BR/><BR/>Featuring such notable white nationalists as Michelle Malkin, George Borjas, and David Yeagley.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-1173909831338675112007-03-14T16:03:00.000-07:002007-03-14T16:03:00.000-07:00previous AnonThe whole IQ tests/gentic reductionis...previous Anon<BR/><BR/>The whole IQ tests/gentic reductionism stuff disgusts me also.<BR/><BR/>I really hoping that the true believers make a full frontal assault and push this garbage out into a wider debating venue.<BR/><BR/>I am fully confident that the Bell curve genetic reductionists will be obliterated in debate.<BR/><BR/>warmest regards<BR/>JupiterAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-1173909409454171292007-03-14T15:56:00.000-07:002007-03-14T15:56:00.000-07:0017766At the present point in time, there is a moun...17766<BR/><BR/>At the present point in time, there is a mountain of documentation that removes any doubt about the collaboration between Jewish neocons in the Bush administration and the Israeli goverment.<BR/><BR/>The Israeli agents were tracking the legal muslim immigrants who were hell bent on killing thousands of Americans.<BR/><BR/>The Israelis witheld this information. The Israeli goverment is guilty murdering of hundreds of Americans. <BR/><BR/>The scale off death and destruction would have been much greater if the Indian point nuclear power plant had been a target.<BR/><BR/>If you have evidence that a majority of American Jews opposed the Iraq invasion, present it here.<BR/><BR/>It is well known that the jewish neo-cons and the Israelis were loooking for a way to get the US to take out at least three muslim goverments.<BR/><BR/>I blame the majority of American Jews for the current war in the middle east that could easily escalate into a world wide nuclear war. <BR/><BR/>If the Bush administration nukes Iran, it is very likely that the Russians will place their nuclear weapons on a automatic launch and alert system. We will then only be a flock of geese away from the annihilation of the human species.<BR/><BR/>American Jews have never tolerated honest criticism of Isarel. As a consequence, every Euro-American Christian family may be doomed.<BR/><BR/><BR/>warmest regards <BR/>JupiterAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-1173909315470280072007-03-14T15:55:00.000-07:002007-03-14T15:55:00.000-07:00Northern and Western European-origin Americans, an...Northern and Western European-origin Americans, and I assume most commentators here are, lack a sense of historical development. The regions that many commentators scorn as being decadent and backwards - the Middle East, was the more economically developed part of the world for all but the past 500 to 800 years or so. If I take the hidden assumption contained in many of the postings here - namely, that economic development is an indicator of IQ, then the Middle East was far smarter then compared to Europe. If you go back further, to say pre-Roman Europe then the disparity is even greater. Written language became commonplace in Britain, for example, with the entry of the Romans in the 1st Century BCE.<BR/><BR/>I've traveled all over the world and your average American is just as stupid, if not more stupid, than your average street Arab. <BR/><BR/>As for the other annoying premise presented by someone - namely, that the number of patents indicates high IQ. Three hundred years ago, there were no patents being created anywhere. Now there are. China recently entered the modern world with its focus on intellectual property and its number of patents is growing at a much higher rate than most Western nations. A precondition for patents is a certain amount of general economic development and a certain notion of property rights.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-1173908415932179512007-03-14T15:40:00.000-07:002007-03-14T15:40:00.000-07:00Ladies and gentlemen, without further ado, I prese...Ladies and gentlemen, without further ado, I present to you "Steve Sailer: Evil 'Far-Right' Columnist".<BR/><BR/><A HREF="http://mediamatters.org/items/200703140004" REL="nofollow">Media Matters Link</A><BR/><BR/>You've hit the big time, Mr. Sailer!<BR/><BR/>Steve, has an MSM outlet ever mentioned you without referencing the Pioneer Fund, etc.? You might want to consider adding it to your CV.<BR/><BR/>At any rate, I'm sure we can expect a deluge of indignant mindless lefties, in between Keith Olbermann broadcasts and feeling a need to satisfy their daily quota of moral outrage, to stop by within the next few hours/days.<BR/><BR/>(And please note that I said "mindless lefties"; I'm not attempting to disparage all people whose views fall left of center, though I may disagree with their politics.)<BR/><BR/>We're talking about the crowd that spends their days figuratively hunkered down at the homepage of Media Matters, a particularly retarded and shrill organization--like the SPLC if the SPLC were run by 18-year-old Marxists (instead of 50-year-old charlatans)and couldn't decide what its opinions were.<BR/><BR/>("Do we like Hillary? I mean, sure, she's ostensibly a neocon, but she's also a woman. We can't be against a woman--can we?")<BR/><BR/>Here's some intriguing reading for anyone interested, liberal or conservative, about David Brock, the founder of Media Matters.<BR/><BR/><A HREF="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Brock" REL="nofollow">David Brock Bio</A><BR/><BR/><A HREF="http://slate.msn.com/id/2063759/" REL="nofollow">David Brock, LiarA lifelong habit proves hard to break.</A><BR/><BR/><A HREF="http://www.thenation.com/doc/20020527/hitchens" REL="nofollow">The Real David Brock</A><BR/><BR/><A HREF="http://www.eastbayexpress.com/2002-05-15/news/the-unreal-david-brock/1" REL="nofollow">The Unreal David Brock</A>Lysander Spoonerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02443829123499778403noreply@blogger.com