tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post2164702115188019841..comments2024-03-28T16:22:14.888-07:00Comments on Steve Sailer: iSteve: NYT: Having female loved ones makes men into sexist RepublicansUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger70125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-88268961268478137872014-02-02T18:38:03.427-08:002014-02-02T18:38:03.427-08:00I think the causality runs the other way: A man wh...I think the causality runs the other way: A man who votes Republican is more likely to marry and have children.ScarletNumbersnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-31776279153248675522014-02-02T10:19:15.398-08:002014-02-02T10:19:15.398-08:00The term "female loved ones" raises the ...<i>The term "female loved ones" raises the issue of sex partners. If there is anything to this theory would that mean that male Republicans have more lifetime sex partners than comparable Democrats?<br /><br />Interesting if true.</i><br /><br />But probably not true, since it's a virtual certainty that Reps marry younger and are less likely to stray. It may be that single Rep males are more successful at getting women into bed than comparable Democrats.<br /><br />Anyway, how does "loved ones" translate into sexual partners? I wouldn't apply that phrase to more than maybe 20% of my lifetime sex partners, though I liked almost of all of them, some quite a bit.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-38945250611914995872014-02-02T08:19:07.045-08:002014-02-02T08:19:07.045-08:00http://live.huffingtonpost.com/r/segment/woody-all...http://live.huffingtonpost.com/r/segment/woody-allen-is-a-perv/52d595a02b8c2a42eb00093fAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-86442368325791951742014-02-01T21:26:47.258-08:002014-02-01T21:26:47.258-08:00The Deep South gave similar results for the limous...<i>The Deep South gave similar results for the limousine Leninist FDR.</i><br /><br />Unreal. It looks like in 1932 MS voted 95% for FDR and GA voted 91%. SC actually went 98% for FDR! <br /><br />Do you suppose if the South still voted like that today, they'd be treated with much more respect? Do you suppose there would be studies like this trying to determine if men with daughters voted democrat?<br /><br />BTW, here is a great <a href="http://uselectionatlas.org/RESULTS/" rel="nofollow">site </a>that allows you to easily toggle through all presidential elections at the national and state level. This is real fun stuff.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-70571951267809225892014-02-01T19:39:58.892-08:002014-02-01T19:39:58.892-08:00Actually, I don't know how well this correspon...Actually, I don't know how well this corresponds to what is observed in day to day life. <br /><br />Men who have had daughters that I known have tended to become more liberal. Its apparently hard for people to refuse special privileges and even more difficult if its for one's kids. Poueronnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-45030236309504271952014-02-01T18:58:18.280-08:002014-02-01T18:58:18.280-08:00Feminism is mind cancer.Feminism is mind cancer.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-24669226520892267512014-02-01T16:23:51.836-08:002014-02-01T16:23:51.836-08:00Why are there no Secret Service Women protecting t...Why are there no Secret Service Women protecting the President?<br /><br />To be representative, shouldn't it be 51% women?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-88292704979774516802014-02-01T15:17:53.158-08:002014-02-01T15:17:53.158-08:00The only places where 90% of such a large populace...<i>The only places where 90% of such a large populace votes one way is in places that are not democracies.</i> --anon.<br /><br />The Deep South gave similar results for the limousine Leninist FDR. Their electors represented 12-20 mil people, but only a small fraction ever voted. Wheels did 10-20 %pts better there than in NYC, and 10-20 %pts better than previous Dem candidates in those states. <br /><br />I'll let the rest of you wrangle over whether that was a "democracy". I can't begin to care. Reg Cæsarnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-45258978700033642002014-02-01T15:13:33.997-08:002014-02-01T15:13:33.997-08:00Speaking of sexist Republicans, don't you thin...Speaking of sexist Republicans, don't you think that the members of uber-exclusive golf clubs like Cypress Point and SFGC should help fund Mark Steyn's defense of the Mann suit? Figure, what, 300 members at each place? So for a $5 million worldwide exposure of perhaps history's greatest fraud, that would be about $8k each for blokes worth an average of 50 mil. Doesn't seem too much to ask.not a hackernoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-39358183067542059702014-02-01T15:00:19.251-08:002014-02-01T15:00:19.251-08:00Stereotype Treat is better than Stereotype Thrill....Stereotype Treat is better than Stereotype Thrill. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-66667925864562969102014-02-01T14:51:50.158-08:002014-02-01T14:51:50.158-08:00"A person with a sense of honor and shame wou..."A person with a sense of honor and shame would've picked up on that and gracefully bowed out, maybe flipped the bird at his bosses for being so patronizing and misleading."<br /><br />He's probably happy to have a job, just like the rest of us.SFGnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-74581872833180641512014-02-01T14:08:52.622-08:002014-02-01T14:08:52.622-08:00Here is statistician Andrew Gelman trying to work ...<i>Here is statistician Andrew Gelman trying to work through the puzzles of how to test for these effects without measuring something else, such as propensity to have larger families.</i><br /><br />Find non-family-oriented (WASP, SWPL) people who marry into large (ethnoid) families. There are many real life example of MY BIG FAT GREEK WEDDING.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-84193118053234977532014-02-01T14:05:27.048-08:002014-02-01T14:05:27.048-08:00Only one Democrat has won the male vote in preside...<i>Only one Democrat has won the male vote in presidential races since 1992 — and that was Barack Obama, who won it in 2008 by one percentage point.</i><br /><br />It appears the Left is concerned that (white, gentile) men vote GOP in larger numbers, so they are grasping at straws to find the reasons behind this. Hence this ridiculous study.<br /><br />In the list Blow provided of (white, gentile) male voting since 1992, the greatest percentage of said vote was 55% in 2004. Fifty-five percent, and we are supposed to see this as a problem? In other words the (white, gentile) male vote is pretty much up for grabs AS IT SHOULD BE in a democracy. This is healthy because it shows that both parties can actively compete for those votes.<br /><br />As opposed to say, the black vote which routinely goes 90% or higher for one side. Tell me what other democracy on Earth, with 40 million people, votes 90% for one party. This would be like Poland voting 90% for one party. The only places where 90% of such a large populace votes one way is in places that are not democracies, such as <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elections_in_Iraq" rel="nofollow">Saddam winning </a> in a unanimous vote in 2002.<br /><br />To a lesser extent the same can be said about Jews and Hispanics. In 2012, we were supposed to be happy because Jews only voted 70% for the democrat. <br /><br />If whites voted in the same bloc-like fashion as minorities and Jews, the democrats would not have a prayer. Yet they bitch because (white, gentile) males have the audacity to give SLIGHTLY over half their votes to the GOP.<br /><br /><i>The Republican Party is in danger of becoming a man cave of cavemen and the women who can abide them.</i><br /><br />Similar things could be said about the democratsAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-60351194375517226052014-02-01T13:59:23.892-08:002014-02-01T13:59:23.892-08:00Jupiter wrote:
Either marriage makes you sane, or...Jupiter wrote:<br /><br /><i>Either marriage makes you sane, or sanity makes you marry.</i><br /><br />I respond:<br /><br />I think it's a little of both.countenancehttp://countenance.wordpress.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-28062925141614368242014-02-01T13:57:03.085-08:002014-02-01T13:57:03.085-08:00"pat said...
The term "female loved one..."pat said...<br /><br />The term "female loved ones" raises the issue of sex partners."<br /><br />I think Steve was referring to sisters, daughters, aunts, etc.<br /><br />You know,...........the kind of women whom you don't tie up in your basement, Pat. You've been in San Francisco too long.Mr. Anonnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-29676317303906729972014-02-01T13:54:58.825-08:002014-02-01T13:54:58.825-08:00"David said...
Anything having to do with he..."David said...<br /><br />Anything having to do with healthy productive family life among the generality is anathema to the continued rule of the families in power.<br /><br />Thus the loud top-down campaigns against hetereosexuality, traditional marriage, sexual continence, inheritance, landowning, low taxes, etc.<br /><br />It's easy to predict what will enrage the power families and their lackeys. Just say you don't want your daughter to marry black, or take drugs. That's enough. Or simply defend inheritance. Dynasty-building is only for the powerful families - your family should avoid it like poison (it's harmful that your influence should extend beyond your own lifetime in any way). Or state that your boy will not wear a dress. They will come after him hammer and tongs."<br /><br />@David: Well said. The only real lasting power is the power to influence the world beyond one's own life. The wealthy want it all for themselves. They want their progeny to inherit the future, and ours to inherit only the dust.Mr. Anonnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-84887971410531743642014-02-01T13:51:22.695-08:002014-02-01T13:51:22.695-08:00Further proof Charles Blow was a token hire -- he ...Further proof Charles Blow was a token hire -- he previously had jobs as a graphics and art director at the NYT and Nat Geo.<br /><br />What are the odds that in today's hyper-competitive job market, he could specialize in verbal and visual jobs at the most elite media institutions?<br /><br />They just shoved his token ass in wherever they had a vacancy at the time.<br /><br />A person with a sense of honor and shame would've picked up on that and gracefully bowed out, maybe flipped the bird at his bosses for being so patronizing and misleading.<br /><br />But, welcome to the 21st century.agnostichttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12967177967469961883noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-48451107431878899462014-02-01T13:38:42.889-08:002014-02-01T13:38:42.889-08:00Obviously Bill Clinton hates his wife.Obviously Bill Clinton hates his wife.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-64498945797896307242014-02-01T13:32:01.338-08:002014-02-01T13:32:01.338-08:00"Explain the voting pattern of black men then..."Explain the voting pattern of black men then?" - is their behavior with respect to politics liberal or conservative? Given how they act the instant they seize power I'd say its fairly conservative.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-47732195946895439792014-02-01T12:18:15.676-08:002014-02-01T12:18:15.676-08:00"i'm starting to get sick of the west.&qu..."i'm starting to get sick of the west."<br /><br />It's not the West it's the anti-west.<br /><br />It's taking every aspect of the original Western culture and inverting it piece by piece.<br /><br />Whatever its flaws the old Western culture was probably the most (net) adaptive devised so far so inverting it creates the most poisonous culture devised so far.<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-40443177482991354042014-02-01T11:56:31.464-08:002014-02-01T11:56:31.464-08:00Only the racists at the NYT would hire a mediocre ...Only the racists at the NYT would hire a mediocre Token like Charles Blow.<br /><br />I mean, think all the black Democrat writers - and they picked Charles Blow! Or is it that he was willing to work for the minimum wage?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-43070456028165489962014-02-01T11:25:55.257-08:002014-02-01T11:25:55.257-08:00Love is the enemy of liberalism. Liberalism is at ...Love is the enemy of liberalism. Liberalism is at war with basic human nature. <br /><br />Only question now, is how long can this nonsense last!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-10852107239252269272014-02-01T11:12:10.418-08:002014-02-01T11:12:10.418-08:0065.0% of white men with wives voted Republican com...65.0% of white men with wives voted Republican compared to only 50.6% of white men without wives.<br /><br />Same for women. If it were up to married white women, Romney would be President. Either marriage makes you sane, or sanity makes you marry.Jupiterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13008508862847561845noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-80269485284080073982014-02-01T11:09:25.446-08:002014-02-01T11:09:25.446-08:00The term "female loved ones" raises the ...The term "female loved ones" raises the issue of sex partners. If there is anything to this theory would that mean that male Republicans have more lifetime sex partners than comparable Democrats?<br /><br />Interesting if true. <br /><br />AlbertosaurusPat Boylehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13477950851915567863noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-74862096429721441112014-02-01T11:00:14.851-08:002014-02-01T11:00:14.851-08:00Anything having to do with healthy productive fami...Anything having to do with healthy productive family life among the generality is anathema to the continued rule of the families in power.<br /><br />Thus the loud top-down campaigns against hetereosexuality, traditional marriage, sexual continence, inheritance, landowning, low taxes, etc.<br /><br />It's easy to predict what will enrage the power families and their lackeys. Just say you don't want your daughter to marry black, or take drugs. That's enough. Or simply defend inheritance. Dynasty-building is only for the powerful families - your family should avoid it like poison (it's harmful that your influence should extend beyond your own lifetime in any way). Or state that your boy will not wear a dress. They will come after him hammer and tongs.<br /><br />Al Gore's family can marry into the Schiffs. Your family should be kept at or dragged down to the level of workers in the Tasty Freeze. Preferably with scarred tubes from sleeping around or a black baby with no visible father. That's "cool" and "liberated." It shows that you're "fighting the power." Meanwhile, the power laughs all the way to the hedge fund.Davidhttp://david-passingparade3.blogspot.comnoreply@blogger.com