tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post4231239168420814847..comments2024-03-27T18:24:19.683-07:00Comments on Steve Sailer: iSteve: More Oliver StoneUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger63125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-86452163690857412542010-08-01T00:11:38.705-07:002010-08-01T00:11:38.705-07:00"(don't worry-- in real life she's wi..."(don't worry-- in real life she's with a tall, tatttoed bad boy out of Whiskey's worst nightmare)."<br /><br />Actually, she's with some 40-year-old Vegan dork from Beverly Hills 90210.Truthhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17286755693955361308noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-51418316023854013492010-07-31T09:47:39.524-07:002010-07-31T09:47:39.524-07:00There isn't enough diversity at the top. Jews ...There isn't enough diversity at the top. Jews dominate the marketplace of ideas and information.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-75358693058564383892010-07-30T21:27:34.923-07:002010-07-30T21:27:34.923-07:00Patrick Goldstein has responded with another blog ...<i>Patrick Goldstein has responded with another blog entry that contains the following: </i><br /><br />If you or I wrote that and signed it "Goldstein", we'd be painted as anti-Semites for portraying Jews as pathological liars. But if a real "Goldstein" writes it, we're anti-Semites for questioning its ludicrous assertions.ben tillmannoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-83118722690639262652010-07-30T20:01:11.333-07:002010-07-30T20:01:11.333-07:00Both Udolpho for the prosecution and Fred for the ...Both Udolpho for the prosecution and Fred for the defense seem unaware that LeBoeuf actually began his career as a child actor in a Disney Channel show. I don't know whether Jews were involved in the casting thereof.<br /><br />I personally associate LeBeouf much more with the Transformers series than with his role in Spielberg's Indiana Jones IV. (According to Wikipedia Michael Bay is Jewish; I never knew that before, but make of it what you will.)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-92049309824356242972010-07-30T17:52:48.249-07:002010-07-30T17:52:48.249-07:00Fanboys just hate Shia because he's a funny lo...Fanboys just hate Shia because he's a funny looking weirdo who got to kiss Megan Fox onscreen in two movies (don't worry-- in real life she's with a tall, tatttoed bad boy out of Whiskey's worst nightmare). In reality, he actually does have a following among kids and young adults-- his star power made the otherwise forgettable Rear Window knockoff Disturbia into a decent-sized hit. Yes, former wimpy kid Spielberg probably sees a bit of his younger self in the kid, but when is that new among directors? Apparently Scorcese's avatar is the tall, blonde DiCaprio (also used by Spielberg in the excellent Catch Me If You Can.)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-76210697836562963062010-07-30T16:38:53.132-07:002010-07-30T16:38:53.132-07:00Victoria meet irony; irony: Victoria.Victoria meet irony; irony: Victoria.Frednoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-75582145748326700752010-07-30T15:26:10.767-07:002010-07-30T15:26:10.767-07:00"Those dastardly Jews! Things were so much be..."Those dastardly Jews! Things were so much better in the olden time, when the WASPs controlled Hollywood."<br /><br />If, as Gabler says, the Jews INVENTED Hollywood, when could the WASPs have controlled it? If you're talking about pre-Hollywood movie-making, there wasn't much of that before those Russian Jews invented their California la-la-land of Hollywood.Victoriahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06823851448364528821noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-10504842865315014072010-07-30T12:53:27.772-07:002010-07-30T12:53:27.772-07:00"Only a fellow Jew (like Shia's protector...<i>"Only a fellow Jew (like Shia's protector, Spielberg) could see any appeal."</i><br /><br />I'm not a fan of Mr. The Beef, but clearly some non-Jews (e.g., Affleck and Damon, among others) have seen an appeal. <br /><br />As for Jonah Hill, you're on crack. That kid is funny. Go watch Forgetting Sarah Marshall or Superbad.Frednoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-23537122016702509742010-07-30T11:33:34.620-07:002010-07-30T11:33:34.620-07:00"Not even remotely ready for primetime, but i..."Not even remotely ready for primetime, but in a town run by Jews no one can see that."<br /><br />I think Jonah Hill is a decent comic actor. Did you see 'Cyrus'?<br /><br />Anyway, are there not a few successful gentile actors around who are "not ready for prime time"?<br /><br />Sorry to see the Jew bug has bitten Udolpho so hard.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-43514008159020233952010-07-29T14:22:12.116-07:002010-07-29T14:22:12.116-07:00I don't get this at all. Why is saying the Jew...<i>I don't get this at all. Why is saying the Jews control Hollywood controversial. If Mel Gibson or Oliver Stone while in their cups blurted out - "The Jews control the diamond trade" - would this be news?</i><br /><br />Because if people get the impression that Jews control the media, they will begin to question why the media is so biased in its coverage of various issues in the middle east, and then public opinion will be harder to manipulate.catpersonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00648652809818262153noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-15775506707770270712010-07-29T14:21:48.256-07:002010-07-29T14:21:48.256-07:00Who others did raise against Hitler than the Germa...Who others did raise against Hitler than the German christian conservatives? It was not the former social democrats or the communist, who would party with SA after a good street fight. I have an impression that many former hardcore nazis became social democrats after the war. The anticapitalist tendencies of the Nazi movement (e.g socialist Goebbels) were there even after the Night of the Long Knives, which (the stripping of the far left nazis from power) was demanded by the conservatives in exchange for their support.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-5109462675103950102010-07-29T14:16:30.708-07:002010-07-29T14:16:30.708-07:00The majority of Jews in the media opposed war with...<i>The majority of Jews in the media opposed war with Iraq.</i><br /><br />I don't know where you get that idea. The media was extremely pro-Iraq war during the early years of the Bush administration. The normally liberal New York Times has been criticized for being especially active in promoting the war ( http://www.wsws.org/articles/2005/oct2005/mill-o18.shtml ) and the rest of the media looks to the NY Times to set the agenda. A subset of media figures who are normally liberal were surprising hawkish when it came to war with Iraq such as Peter Beinart (former editor of The New Republic) or NY Times columnist Thomas Friedman or New Yorker editor David Remnick, or Clinton administration CIA analyst and writer Kenneth Pollack (who wrote the Threatening Storm; a book credited with convincing liberals to support the war), film maker Steven Spielberg and even shock jocks like Howard Stern. Indeed the media was so pro-Iraq war that even liberal Hollywood booed film maker Michael Moore when he denounced the war during his Oscar speech. <br /><br /><br /><i>At least, they seemed to - perhaps with their "high verbal IQ's" they were able to appear to oppose was while actually encouraging it?</i><br /><br />Certainly high verbal IQ is helpful when speaking out of both sides of your mouth at the same time. High verbal IQ is also useful in convincing other liberals that the war was motivated by corporate oil greed while concealing the real motive. Also, a lot of the media who supported the war quickly turned against it once Sadam was toppled and no longer a threat. <br /><br /><i>Jews don't dominate the media because of their "high verbal IQ". They do it because they are aggressive about advancing their own interests.</i><br /><br />All ethnic groups are aggressive in promoting their own interests. It seems unfair to single out Jews in this regard, just because they are way better at it than others. <br /><br />High verbal IQ certainly plays a huge role in virtually all media positions from writing columns to stand up comedy to being a pundit or talk show host to being a popular blogger. Media is extremely competitive and only the fittest tend to survive.catpersonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00648652809818262153noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-88433744460641323542010-07-29T12:29:32.281-07:002010-07-29T12:29:32.281-07:00Oliver Stone's Jewish problem...
I think beca...Oliver Stone's Jewish problem...<br /><br />I think because Oliver Stone was born half-Jewish/half gentile, began on the Right and then moved to the Left, craves fame & fortune but believes in 'social justice', and blabbity and blibbity, there's a one-man civil war raging inside his soul. Even his leftist movies tend to be politically incorrect. Born on 4th has a typical lefty ending, but there is much that defiles PC notions. Blacks at the VA hospital were hideous. And some blacks in Platoon were also pretty brutal and nasty. ANY GIVEN SUNDAY is both sympathetic to black athletes and angrily frustrated with their bulljive. <br /><br />Anyway, Stone is like John Milius crossed with Gillo Pontecorvo. He grew up a Goldwater all-American conservative, went to Vietnam, got disillusioned and got caught up in 60s upheaval, and he's one messed up guy. But he probably likes being messed up because that's where the action is(as with Woods character in Salvador), creatively speaking. In a way, he probably identified with Nixon and even Dubya cuz they too were conflicted characters. Nixon didn't rise as an establishment conservative and Dubya wanted to reject the whole thing before being dragged back into it. <br /><br />As a sports and war-and-guns maniac, Stone loves the man of power, the man's man. But he's also an intellectual and avid reader, so he loves ideas too. But the world of ideas is often at odds with world of action. Action often follows ideas, but action also often follows instincts, which are often non- or anti-idealistic. Stone wrote the script for the Scarface remake and it's clear that Stone admires Tony. He's a man of instinct than ideas but he's a man of action. He has big balls. He topples the half-Jewish/half-Cuban car dealer druglord. The Jew may be smarter but Tony has more guts. And though Wall Street is anti-greed, it's obvious Stone admires Gekko as a man of instict and will to power. And Jim Morrison was portrayed the same way in The DOORS. He may have been crazy but he compromised nothing for his art and brand of crazy living. Stone may feel that Jews are too cunning, calculating, shrewd, and manipulative to be REAL MEN. Those are good qualities to gain power and keep it, but they lack the excitement of raw honest power that arises from the gut level. A Jew is more like Hyman Roth. A real man is like Tony Montana. Stone has both Roth and Montana inside of him, and so he struggles but he has fun with it.adsfasdsdfnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-65708762266311088722010-07-29T12:11:36.085-07:002010-07-29T12:11:36.085-07:00asfasdfasdf said..."Will Stone have the guts ...<i>asfasdfasdf said..."Will Stone have the guts to say something like WE KNOW ALMOST NOTHING ABOUT JEWISH COMMUNIST VILLAINS WHO KILLED MILLIONS IN THE 20TH CENTURY BECAUSE OF LIBERAL-LEFTIST JEWISH CONTROL OF THE MEDIA?"<br /><br />Ynet news had a decent editorial on this called Stalin's Jews</i><br /><br />It's interesting. Before we could speak of Stalin's Jews, it was Jews' Stalin. Jews who controlled the early yrs of the USSR felt they were too conspicuous and sought to hide behind unimaginative, dimwitted, bureaucratic, paper shuffling, and machine politician Stalin. They thought he'd be a pushover. But Stalin had risen up the ranks as a cutthroat fighter and ruthless operator and knew well how to outmanuever the Jews who sought to use him. So, it went from Jews' Stalin to Stalin's Jews. And then Stalin killed a whole bunch of Jews. <br /><br />There is a parallel to this in the rise of Hitler. German bankers, industrialists, and remants of the noble class thought he was just a rabble rousing clown who could be appropriated and bought, repackaged to serve their interests. But, Hitler also rose up as a fighter and radical and had the wits, muscle, and will to outmanuever the conservative forces that had sought to use him. <br />(It's ironic that Jews, who suffered much under Hitler, have pulled the same stunt with Obama. Obama surely knows this and is trying to outmanuever the Jews who bought and sold him, but he's too much of a slick phony to pull off anything spectacular.) <br /><br />But there's one difference. Stalin later liquidated the very people who helped him to power whereas Hitler, though having outmanuevered his supporters, did not go after their wealth or positions. <br />This could be due to the nature of the different ideologies. Communism was supposed to be purely revolutionary and rebellious, thus every firebrand or thinking communist could be a potential threat to Stalin. So, Stalin feared other 'Stalins' plotting to overthrow him and take power. So, he had to kill all the little would-be stalins, lenins, and trotskys so that he alone could be the One and Only Big Stalin. <br /><br />Nazism, on the other hand, developed as an ideology of unity and obedience. It was understood that the people--rich, middle, and poor--should all pledge loyalty to the great fuhrer and that was that. Though Nazism had a revolutionary element, its core emphasis was on national/racial consensus. So, Hitler had less to fear. But when it came to OUTSIDERS like Jews, he got really ruthless.adsfasfasdfasfnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-63325888774802684142010-07-29T10:45:22.523-07:002010-07-29T10:45:22.523-07:00If Stone were a comedian, he'd be able to push...<i>If Stone were a comedian, he'd be able to push the envelope oh, so much further, since comics can get away with all sorts of outlandish, politically incorrect remarks without provoking a hailstorm of criticism.</i><br /><br />Please give an example of a famous comedian making "outlandish" comments about Jews (i.e. saying anything even remotely critical of Jews) without suffering consequences.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-38352159765188199462010-07-29T09:16:42.425-07:002010-07-29T09:16:42.425-07:00I don't get this at all. Why is saying the Jew...I don't get this at all. Why is saying the Jews control Hollywood controversial. If Mel Gibson or Oliver Stone while in their cups blurted out - "The Jews control the diamond trade" - would this be news?<br /><br />It was about a decade ago that Tom Hanks was on Saturday Night Live and did a quiz show skit called "Jew or Not Jew?". The contestants had to guess which famous Hollywood stars were Jewish. I seem to remember that all of them were Jewish. I was surprised at the time but from then on I assumed most stars who weren't black were Jews.<br /><br />The public revelation that Hollywood is Jewish is like when Charlton Heston screams "Soylent Green is people". Yeah, well we knew that - so what? It was not much of a secret for anyone with half a brain.<br /><br />After watching Bill O'Reilly, Sean Hannity, Conan O'Brian, and Megyn Kelly on TV I sometimes feel the need to get drunk and reveal that the Irish control the media. At least that would be a refreshing change from all the endless hubbub about the Jews.<br /><br />Maybe there are some iSteve readers who don't know that the Jews are very influential in Hollywood - but I doubt it. I guess some non-Jews don't like that. But if they are so concerned why don't they just make their own movies? <br /><br />I took a film class in college. I don't remember any anti-gentile discrimination. I'm now bombarded with junk mail ads about digital film making. I'm not being excluded from making movies. I'm being harangued and pursued.<br /><br />The new wave of movie making may very well be on Roku not in Hollywood studios. Jews and Hollywood are yesterday's news. When I was in film class the cost of film stock to shoot a feature was said to be two million dollars. Today the latest Harry Potter feature cost $29.1M for the initial release prints.<br /><br />These kind of entrance costs tend to entrench the existing players, which means, I guess, the Jews. But the rules are changing quickly. Box office receipts and physical movie theaters are becoming much less important. Distribution of films by Roku is dirt cheap - no film, no theaters, no Jews.<br /><br />Personally I like Jews but if it bothers you, then stop complaining and just run them out of the movie business. The Jews are being run out of the diamond business by the Russians and the Indians, you know. <br /><br />The worst thing about antisemitism for me is the self pity. <br /><br />AlbertosaurusAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-89744404843935762592010-07-29T07:02:35.648-07:002010-07-29T07:02:35.648-07:00Anonymous sez: "The sentence, "The Jews ...Anonymous sez: "The sentence, "The Jews control the media" is misleading. Jewish persons are obviously very prominent in upper-level media jobs, but they don't all work in tandem or think alike, nor are such jobs the exclusive province of Jews."<br /><br />I think the words you are looking for are <a href="http://www.hr-guide.com/data/G702.htm" rel="nofollow">"disparate impact"</a> and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hegemony" rel="nofollow">"hegemony"</a> and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Institutional_racism" rel="nofollow">"institutional racism"</a>. <br /><br />Intent really doesn't matter. No secret meetings or Protocols of the Elders of Hollywood are needed. Dominance and control can be determined by mere statistics.<br /><br />As my people move from the majority to the minority, we will inevitably have to use the very tools and logic that our replacements use against us. Pity, that, in our own country.<br /><br />There is an irony to all this, however. <br /><br />As Dersh, Gould and Nozick pointed out in their "Thinking about Thinking" course, Affirmative Action, as ratified by Justice Powell in his _Bakke_ decision (aka "the Harvard plan"), was an effort to reach out to other gentiles in order to prevent Harvard from being turned into a predominately Jewish school. <br /><br />Hence diversity and all the doctrines it has spawned are returning to their origins.Big Billnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-14796922364981898222010-07-29T06:47:41.805-07:002010-07-29T06:47:41.805-07:00For all the sturm & drang about Patrick Goldst...For all the sturm & drang about Patrick Goldstein's protestations about Jews controlling the media, let's note two points about his posts on this issue:<br /><br />1) He thinks it's wrong for Haim Saban to pressure the network to drop Stone's miniseries. <br /><br />2) He thinks it would be similarly wrong to censure Mel Gibson. <br /><br /><i>"Meanwhile someone explain to me the career of Shia LaBeouf, because unless Jews promote their own it makes no sense."</i><br /><br />Shia LaBeouf got his breakout role in The Battle of Shaker Heights, which was entered in a contest run by two Jews named Matt Damon and Ben Affleck.<br /><br /><i>"This is funny as hell. But if Oliver Stone really had guts, he would have said (1) German bankers supported the Nazis ONLY BECAUSE of the communist threat. German conservatives didn't like nor want the Nazis. They only hoped to use Nazis against the commies, among whom Jews were prominent."</i><br /><br />Jews were also prominent among German capitalists, who were just as threatened by the Communists. And the Nazis were such a great bullwark against the Communists that Hitler invited them to takeover half of Poland. <br /><br /><i>"It was fear of communism that persuaded German conservatives to RELUCTANTLY support Nazism as the lesser evil."</i><br /><br />False dichotomy. They could have supported the Social Democrats as an alternative to both the Nazis and the Communists. No one forced them to choose between two evils. <br /><br /><i>"They're anti-Chavez as well as anti-Islamist because they see such varieties of anti-American populism as being quasi-fascistic."</i><br /><br />Calling Chavez a fascist is an insult to fascism. Post WWII fascists, for all their faults, at least generally left their countries in better shape economically than when they found them. Someone like Pinochet implemented Milton Friedman-inspired reforms that have given Chile the stablest economy in Latin America since then.Frednoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-77772363558129538682010-07-29T06:34:38.519-07:002010-07-29T06:34:38.519-07:00Andrew Wiles is married to Nada Canaan Wiles. Is s...Andrew Wiles is married to Nada Canaan Wiles. Is she, by chance, the grand-daughter of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tawfiq_Canaan" rel="nofollow">Dr. Tawfik Canaan</a>, one of the Christian intelligentsia in the Holy Land before the recent unpleasantness?<br /><br />The name seemed odd so I looked it up and ran into Tawfik. The guy's history is interesting, particularly his research into the folk culture of Palestine and Palestinians (which at the time included Christians, Muslims and Jews). <br /><br />Reading the Wikipedia article, I felt a certain emotional resonance with his growing concerns about open borders, mass immigration, and the blessings the new immigrants supposedly brought to everyone in Palestine, when in fact they were experiencing a Reconquista.Big Billnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-46593567384241867122010-07-28T22:51:57.119-07:002010-07-28T22:51:57.119-07:00"Nolte's last sentence is silly. Marlon B..."Nolte's last sentence is silly. Marlon Brando, whose leftist politics were of the purest Sacheen Littlefeather varietal, had to publicly grovel for most of a week after telling Larry King that Jewish studio bosses had helped the Civil Rights movement by casting black actors, so Jewish executives should similarly cast Latino actors now. Greg Easterbrook got fired by Michael Eisner's ESPN for blogging on The New Republic that Jewish studio executives shouldn't make gratuitously violent films."<br /><br />It depends on the context and situation. Stone is half-Jewish but Brando was not. Also, Brando was all washed-up by then and may have groveled because he needed special help from Hollywood bosses. (I think he was especially broke after spending a fortune to defend his son in court.) <br />Easterbrook, like Brando, is not Jewish. <br /><br />But it's okay for a Jew to say things about Jews. Joel Stein wrote a column about Jews totally owning Hollywood but no problemo. Jews in the media figure when a Jew says it, he's either showing off or making CONSTRUCTIVE CRITICISM. After all, why would a Jew or half-Jew say stuff for 'neo-nazi' reasons, that is unless one happens to be totally cuckoo like Bobby Fisher? <br /><br />Same is true with blacks and white liberals. Harry Reid got away with the "Obama talks white than Negro-like" remark because he's a liberal. Since he's a liberal, he couldn't have possibly meant racial malice, right? And when Bill Cosby said harsh words about black urban culture, he didn't get in too much trouble and was even lauded in some liberal circles. The idea was 'since he's a black guy, it must have been concerned and constructive criticism, not a putdown of blacks.' <br /><br />Brando and Easterbrook didn't happen to have any Jewish genes or credentials. Sure, Brando was a leftist but he was always an eccentric kind of trouble-making leftist who wasn't much liked in Hollywood. Coppola had to struggle and sweat to cast Brando as Vito Corleone. <br /><br />Besides, Stone said nothing that was really anti-Jewish. He made criticism about Jewish power, and to an extent, Stone may have been breaking the ice. Indeed, what he said might even be good for Jews, as many goyim will now think, "how nice that not all Jews think tribally and some even speak the truth. I'm beginning to like Jews."<br />There is a perception that all Jews stick together, and Stone, by being the odd-Jew-out, gives the impression that it is not so.<br /><br />Also, he blamed Hitler's rise on GERMAN bankers and said NOTHING of Jewish bankers' role in the rise of communism. He said nothing about Armand Hammer that pile of ____. And he praised Stalin for defeating Hitler but didn't say anything about Stalin-Jewish collaboration in murdering tens of millions of Slavic Christians.asdfasasdfnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-65977067090120197602010-07-28T22:35:35.965-07:002010-07-28T22:35:35.965-07:00"Articles like this are why I love you, Mr. S..."Articles like this are why I love you, Mr. Sailer. Am I correctly inferring a certain, if tempered, reverence for Chavez? How beautifully unexpected."<br /><br />Chavez is a stupid clown, an egomaniac, an economic retard, and a thug. But he's a genuine nationalist, which is good. <br />And given that US is run by the likes of NY TIMES, WAll STREET, and Obama(puppet of Jewish power), I don't feel must hostility toward Venezuela. <br />Though a 'leftist', Chavez is actually closer to Mussolini in terms of personality and style. He's very latin, and maybe a little bit of negro blood made him kinda funkyass too. But he's one ugly mofo. He looks like a cross between Mussolini, a mule, and Curly. He's no Che Guevara, a scumbag but a beautiful scumbag. If Chavez had the looks of Che or even the young Castro, he'd be a lot popular.. which goes to show the so-called 'rationalist' left is really into worship of 'great men'. <br /><br />But the best leader of Latin America was Pinochet.asfasdfasdfnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-41887283319506354912010-07-28T22:30:53.960-07:002010-07-28T22:30:53.960-07:00<>
Of course, you're right. After all, ...<><br /><br />Of course, you're right. After all, there are Jewish cabbies and plumbers. But when we say 'Jews control the media', we are talking of prominent Jews and pointing out the fact that lots of top journalists and pundits are Jewish--and also the fact that most Jews agree with powerful Jews on most issues. <br /><br />When we say Germans killed 5-6 million Jews, we don't every German was involved. Heck, some Germans risked their own lives to save Jews. Others resisted the Nazis in their own personal ways. And not everyone in the Wehrmacht took part in killing of Jews. However, the fact remains that the German leadership carried out the genocide with the help of many Germans. Also, majority of Germans supported the Nazis. <br /><br />So, to the extent that the Jewish elite does control the media and most Jews in America more or less agree and support the positions and policies of the Jewish-dominated media, we can speak of Jewish control of the media. After all, suppose the top media guys were to die suddenly and be replaced randomly by other Jews. Given that Jews are 85% liberal, the chances are the media will go on being what it is: Jewish-oriented, Jewish-biased, and Zionist. <br />The Jewish elite members are liberal and leftist because they arose from the Jewish community which is mostly liberal and leftist.asdfasdfasdfnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-2190537977412290622010-07-28T22:24:47.848-07:002010-07-28T22:24:47.848-07:00Was Stone's father like Gordon Gekko? I recal...Was Stone's father like Gordon Gekko? I recall Stone saying his father was old school, the very opposite of Gekko. Gekko was supposed to represent 80s Reaganite GREED. <br /><br />I recall Stone saying in an interview that his father was like the Hal Holbrook character in the movie. A honorable man. Of course, he could be shitting us.asdfasdfasdfnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-56007671918907409452010-07-28T22:22:39.650-07:002010-07-28T22:22:39.650-07:00This is funny as hell. But if Oliver Stone really ...This is funny as hell. But if Oliver Stone really had guts, he would have said (1) German bankers supported the Nazis ONLY BECAUSE of the communist threat. German conservatives didn't like nor want the Nazis. They only hoped to use Nazis against the commies, among whom Jews were prominent. (2) While it's true that the Liberal Jewish media don't much talk about 20 million Soviet people killed in WWII, it says NEXT to the nothing about the fact that Stalin killed around 20 million people WITH CRUCIAL HELP FROM JEWISH COMMUNISTS. <br /><br />Will Stone have the guts to say something like WE KNOW ALMOST NOTHING ABOUT JEWISH COMMUNIST VILLAINS WHO KILLED MILLIONS IN THE 20TH CENTURY BECAUSE OF LIBERAL-LEFTIST JEWISH CONTROL OF THE MEDIA? <br /><br />That would be really courageous. As vile as Nazism was, it never would have risen to such heights in Germany if not for the rise of communism led by Jews. It was fear of communism that persuaded German conservatives to RELUCTANTLY support Nazism as the lesser evil. As it turned out, Nazism proved to be an even greater evil, but who was to know back in 1933?asdfasdfasdfsnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-31239269142022351602010-07-28T21:34:19.120-07:002010-07-28T21:34:19.120-07:00There's a lefty blog called Three Way Fight wh...There's a lefty blog called Three Way Fight which, to its credit, notes that fascism is another radical alternative to the status quo rather than some distilled essence of it. They're <a href="http://threewayfight.blogspot.com/search?q=%22hugo+chavez%22" rel="nofollow">anti-Chavez</a> as well as anti-Islamist because they see such varieties of anti-American populism as being quasi-fascistic. <a href="http://crookedtimber.org/2009/08/05/steady-work/#comment-285350" rel="nofollow">James Petras</a> takes the opposite view, finding such non-American radical movements to be the only alternative to capitalism since the proletariat has been fully co-opted (the Black Panthers/Maoists used the term "labor aristocracy" to refer to the first-world working class). He also writes a lot about Jews.TGGPhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11017651009634767649noreply@blogger.com