tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post4856031958626122819..comments2024-03-27T18:24:19.683-07:00Comments on Steve Sailer: iSteve: World War T as the Next Great DistractionUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger52125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-72927025049362942572013-09-03T22:44:37.412-07:002013-09-03T22:44:37.412-07:00Why doesn't Manning declare himself as transna...Why doesn't Manning declare himself as transnational? <br /><br />Call himself Chichi Manningez or Ekaterina Manningova. <br />If he's transnational, then the US cannot charge him of betraying America since he no longer has any clear national identity or loyalty. <br />If he remakes himself as Mexican or Russian, he didn't betray America since he's no longer American, and that means his past oath is moot. <br /><br />PS. I find it funny. Globo-elites like Obama seem to have little use for citizenship laws when it comes to illegal immigration, but Manning is said to be an eeeeeeeevil guy/gal because he, as a American citizen bound by American laws, violated the laws of this country. <br /><br />So, politicians allowing 11-20 million illegals to not only enter this country but be granted amnesty/citizenship is not a violation of law and national trust. <br />But Manning spilling the dirty secrets of the US government is a terrible crime. <br /><br />But, if as globalists say, national loyalties and boundaries are moot, how can one betray one's nation when everyone should take on identities of 'global citizenship'? <br /><br />If the US government not only looks the other way when millions of illegals invade this country but argue that we shouldn't even refer to the invaders as 'illegal' but instead praise them and offer them a globalized version of US citizenship, then what did Manning do wrong?<br /><br />Why should he be loyal to any notion of American secrets/interests when the very people who run the government betray the people by supporting illegal immigration and 'bailing out' Wall Street globalist bankster pigs who won't serve a day in prison? <br /><br />If America is now a part of the global order and if its borders should be wide open to all, why shouldn't US government files be open to the entire world? What need for 'American interests' when we are told that everyone around the world is an American who hasn't yet broken into this country?<br />Reward 12 million for violating the laws of this country but punish Manning for violating the laws of the secret government. <br /><br />So, millions can invade this country, but the government is hands off to everyone but the elites... but then, what happens inside the US government isn't anything related to the good of most Americans but everything that is advantageous to transnational corporations, Zionists, and the homo cabal. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-30282059266735326882013-09-03T21:32:15.552-07:002013-09-03T21:32:15.552-07:00The case highlights the need for wider tolerance f...<i>The case highlights the need for wider tolerance for transgender individuals.</i><br /><br />Nope. If you need to draw a conclusion from this affair, it actually highlights the need for greater scrutiny over transgender individuals.<br /><br /><i>"I am Chelsea Manning"</i><br /><br />Why Chelsea? Is there a standard procedure for transgender folks to change their names? Why not be a girl named Bradley?a Newsreadernoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-2417873732545973402013-09-03T19:10:34.273-07:002013-09-03T19:10:34.273-07:00Anonymous Anonymous said...
...and when we're ...Anonymous Anonymous said...<br />...and when we're done normalizing transgenders, pedophiles are next. See the recent Atlantic article.<br /><br />What's after pedophiles?<br /><br />--------------------------------------------------------------------------<br /><br />Hopefully, the author of Revelation was right and that's when the New Sodom and Gomorrah get a long overdue comeuppance of the fire and brimstone variety.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-6569482807984404662013-09-03T18:47:05.328-07:002013-09-03T18:47:05.328-07:00"They imposed it on us, but because so many A..."They imposed it on us, but because so many Americans are idiots addicted to TV shows and celebrity culture, they came to think that they 'changed their own minds', but of course, their minds were changed through mass media and mass education brainwashing by the elites. "<br /><br />That's not the reason I became Transgender tolerant. I believe the urge is undeniable, because it fits hand-in-glove with evolution. I said, not more than a few posts ago, that if we progress by random mutations, we should expect a few mutants. Emotionally, I don't have the heart to make life hard for them - their lives are hard enough already - I've learned to accept a certain level of weirdness from people. I have mentioned previously that "the old world" had ways of dealing with them, eunuchs in Asia and celibate clergy in the West. I have even suggested that it wouldn't be unreasonable to permit them gender reassignment at a young age (end all the drama and get it over with), or as an option, assisted suicide as adolescents, because life can be torture for a guy like Manning through middle and high schools - his Wikipedia profile shows him having a tolerable youth and then having a horrible time when he fails to develope normally. Those are options but not answers. I think most of us know that things like counseling and drugs don't seem to work for people with things (like homosexuality) that seem genetically coded. We don't harbor anything close to the same repulsion for other genetic anomalies that don't express themselves sexually. As the great Joe Sobran said "Thank God for the appetites we don't have." He would have argued that they have a cross to bear and should restrain themselves. I'm more of a materialist.<br /><br />Do I think that transgenders are being used politically as a diversion and a distraction? Of course. Do I think they are used by "the enlightened" to distinguish themselves from the immoral, intolerant riff-raff? Yep. Are they being used to define deviancy down? Yep. I also believe that their lives are unbearably painful and as individuals they are just looking to alleviate the pain. I don't know how I would behave if I had such a compulsion. Is the affliction not real? It seems to have be the motivation behind his biggest life choice - joining the military. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-8363261254725146212013-09-03T18:44:51.409-07:002013-09-03T18:44:51.409-07:00"I am Chelsea manning. I am female."
I..."I am Chelsea manning. I am female."<br /><br /><br />I'll believe that when he gets his junk chopped off.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-32221678990804168442013-09-03T18:31:04.285-07:002013-09-03T18:31:04.285-07:00Paul Mendez said..
"...there's not a dim...Paul Mendez said..<br /><br />"...there's not a dime's worth of difference between them".<br /><br />That's because they are bought, owned and paid for by the same people.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-6850401171788852372013-09-03T18:00:14.222-07:002013-09-03T18:00:14.222-07:00Mr. Sailer, it seems that you don't believe th...Mr. Sailer, it seems that you don't believe that official government recognition of hardcore man-on-man penis-in-rectum action is important. You liken it to a mere circus. How dare you! Everyone knows that official government recognition of penis-in-rectum is the Most Important Thing Ever.<br /><br />How dare you.<br />dufus maximusnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-38455924813661191242013-09-03T17:22:37.843-07:002013-09-03T17:22:37.843-07:00This is why the Washington Post sold for nothing. ...This is why the Washington Post sold for nothing. They may truly believe this is somehow an important issue to someone, but it is not important to a paying readership. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-32611074118471965032013-09-03T15:19:34.710-07:002013-09-03T15:19:34.710-07:00most popular student club at Berkeley is the Campu...<i>most popular student club at Berkeley is the Campus Republicans</i><br /><br />I don't know about that, but today on the campus I saw a white kid who by all appearances, and speech pattern, was gay, sweep up his Asian girlfriend and plant a big romantic kiss on her. Maybe that'll be the new thing, playing both sides of the street at once. <br />(No, that's not "bi," bi-types don't lisp). eckywalnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-71671085376901822792013-09-03T14:34:43.149-07:002013-09-03T14:34:43.149-07:00When guys win a sports game that they are emotiona...When guys win a sports game that they are emotionally invested in, their testosterone spikes. When guys lose, their testosterone drops.<br /><br />White trangendered men are a demoralized, feminized epiphenomenon of the conquest of the common white man and the death of the West. I doubt that there were many transgendered white men before 1914.Iannoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-45926311450765561092013-09-03T14:30:19.343-07:002013-09-03T14:30:19.343-07:00Agnostic has put it quite well.
CennbeorcAgnostic has put it quite well.<br /><br />CennbeorcAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-82499716209694174582013-09-03T14:12:02.036-07:002013-09-03T14:12:02.036-07:00This "transgender" thing is creepy. Take...This "transgender" thing is creepy. Take "Bob". He is a forty year old, 6'3" 270 lb construction worker. One day he decides he is a "woman" and "identifies as female". Now he apparently has the right to help himself to female washrooms and change rooms. Just like the ones your daughters and wives use. Like i said, creepy stuff.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-76758640046196741162013-09-03T13:30:12.229-07:002013-09-03T13:30:12.229-07:00"What's after pedophiles?"
Depends ..."What's after pedophiles?"<br /><br />Depends on who has the money and cash and who is favored by Jewish media. <br /><br />This business with the gay agenda didn't just happen out of the blue. Homo won through the game of power. Many homos made fancy stuff that rich people like, and if you win the hearts of the rich who control the elite institutions, you are advantaged. Also, many homos became rich themselves. <br />Also, as they had to remain in the closet, they became masters of conspiratorial path to power, just like Vietnamese became masters at guerilla warfare since they'd done it for so long against Chinese, French, and Americans. <br />Homos also attached themselves to powerful men and served them mostly loyally, indeed so loyally in fact that some of these powerful men, even if anti-gay, came to appreciate, value, and protect homo talent--a lot of this happened in the GOP and Vatican as well in liberal circles. <br /><br />Homos didn't make all this stride because Americans suddenly got so interested in 'equality'. They won it by gaining unequal amounts of power in the elite institutions. They imposed it on us, but because so many Americans are idiots addicted to TV shows and celebrity culture, they came to think that they 'changed their own minds', but of course, their minds were changed through mass media and mass education brainwashing by the elites. <br /><br />This trans business has become hot because homos see trans as part of the political and cultural family. <br />But as Jews, homos, and lib elites don't much care about polygamists and incest sexuals, those won't be hot button issues... unless incest sexuals and polygamists became a powerful bloc in elite centers of power. <br /><br />Pedos are trickier. Some are allied very closely with the homo community, and NAMBLA has been allowed to march in some homo pride parades. Also, there have been lots of talented and powerful pedos throughout history. <br /><br />But all-out pedophilia(involving little children) will never be accepted since it is just too gross. But I wouldn't be surprised if age of consent is lowered to 14 in the future, especially as young people are slut-ized by even Disney and as Obama is talking of sex education--more like sex indoctrination--starting in the kindergarten. <br /><br />Anyway, it makes little sense to wonder 'what will happen next?'<br />It's more instructive to ask "which group is on the up-and-up?" <br /><br />Paradoxically, if a deviant group is to demand 'equality' or 'equal recognition' for its behavior, it must gain and control unequal amount of power. <br />This is how homos forced 'equality' on the issue of sexuality. Anyone with sense and honesty knows that fecal penetration among men and dismembering bodily organs to become a member of the other sex cannot be of equal biological or moral value as real sexuality, but we've been forced to recognize such as 'equal' or even better! After all, it is fecal penetration among men and sex-change operations that are associated with the miracle of the rainbow. Real sex of real marriage that produces real life and real commitment between the life-givers is just treated as humdrum. <br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-30122480427724284972013-09-03T13:03:50.268-07:002013-09-03T13:03:50.268-07:00"Gee, when you put it that way -- I guess I&#...<br />"Gee, when you put it that way -- I guess I'll vote against gay marriage and trannie rights." Bingo!<br /><br />Like in the what? 35 States that VOTED against SSM? <br /><br />"The Will of the People"<br /><br />It is to laugh.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-521744712740998822013-09-03T10:48:41.839-07:002013-09-03T10:48:41.839-07:00You want hysteria? Wait 'till the guys who &qu...<i>You want hysteria? Wait 'till the guys who "identify as women"<br />(with a full set of wedding tackle, as the British say) start insisting on barging into the ladies' bathrooms. Per Chelsea Manning, all it takes is a blonde wig and a wish.<br /></i><br /><br />This just shows what mouth-breathin', literalist morons most iSteve readers are, right Aaron Gross?<br /><br />The whole point of liberalism is to free us from sex AND gender. If women are allowed to have sex with women and still use private women's facilities, and ditto for women who dress as manly men who have sex with women; and if it is a sacred human right to allow a man to declare himself a woman regardless of how much hormone therapy or surgery he's undergone (from full to none at all- I mean, c'mon, insisting transgendered "women" remove their male genitalia first is like saying in the 21st Century it's not a plane if it ain't got a propeller), then by the laws of perverse closure, biologically-born males who still exclusively have sex with women, still have male genitals, have never undergone reassignment therapy, and dress and act "butch" (i.e. like normal heterosexual males) must be given full access to the women's gym showers as soon as they tell us they are really women. It's all very simple.<br /><br />NB: It would not be "jocks" who'd pull this stunt, but omega Brony losers. Luckily, with severely draconian anti-bullying penalties, the football player boyfriends of the offended girls would not dare correct this through "extra-judicial" means as in days of yore.Modern Abrahamhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05601548083390383293noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-38130104755250524622013-09-03T10:48:40.108-07:002013-09-03T10:48:40.108-07:00The US is run by one political party. That party ...The US is run by one political party. That party has two competing wings. The two wings use social issues like gay marriage, guns and abortion to distract their followers from noticing that when it comes to the important issues, there's not a dime's worth of difference between them. Paul Mendeznoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-19853682788418343212013-09-03T10:16:14.610-07:002013-09-03T10:16:14.610-07:00Michelangelo was probably gay (he never sculpted w...<i>Michelangelo was probably gay (he never sculpted women's bodies?)</i><br /><br />He did sculpt (and paint) women's bodies, but made them almost grotesquely musclebound. For example, the Sibyl figure on the Sistine Chapel, his <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Night_(Michelangelo)" rel="nofollow">sculpture of Night</a>. Camille Paglia I think quite insightfuly called him (or maybe Leonardo) a "homosexual idealist".<br /><br />Socrates was not gay, though. In Plato's dialogues it clearly says he was married and had several sons. In other dialogues, of course, he does talk about being so puppy-dog love struck with a boy as to camp out on his parents' front porch. Still not gay in the modern sense, though. As the Hon. Steven Alder says, "Anybody can make you come".Modern Abrahamhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05601548083390383293noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-86848130827989157702013-09-03T10:05:01.012-07:002013-09-03T10:05:01.012-07:00Origin of World War T: "T" rhymes with &...Origin of World War T: "T" rhymes with "3" ("World War 3" means "the end of the world" or "the ultimate battle" to people of a certain age); and there is a popular teen novel about zombies titled "World War Z".Davidhttp://david-passingparade2.blogspot.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-16521761335176861352013-09-03T07:35:51.760-07:002013-09-03T07:35:51.760-07:00"But when the chance comes along to say "..."But when the chance comes along to say "her male genitalia," suddenly they discover singular possessive pronouns again."<br /><br />The end result sounds like some female student is carrying around a dick and balls in her purse, and is flashing it to the other gals in the locker room.David M.noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-79058275829843912042013-09-03T07:25:48.935-07:002013-09-03T07:25:48.935-07:00"But according to parents, the fact that the ...<em>"But according to parents, the fact that the student has exposed her male genitalia, in one instance in the sauna, is cause for concern."</em><br /><br />What's funny about that is that the same writer would insist on butchering the grammar by using "their" in the singular in any other context, because feminism. They do it now even when the person under discussion can only be male: "Each player for the Mets owns their own glove." But when the chance comes along to say "her male genitalia," suddenly they discover singular possessive pronouns again.Cail Corishevhttp://cailcorishev.wordpress.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-29137690690756211772013-09-03T05:44:39.108-07:002013-09-03T05:44:39.108-07:00What (or who) is the origin of the "World War...What (or who) is the origin of the "World War T" meme? It is Steve's creation, or from elsewhere? Just curious.flambeauxhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07504462005555329573noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-84899250724722823732013-09-03T04:59:11.268-07:002013-09-03T04:59:11.268-07:00I thought this nonjudgemental stuff jumped the sha...I thought this nonjudgemental stuff jumped the shark in the 00s when spain granted chimps human rights.<br /><br />But i coild be wrong.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-38767532377133788992013-09-03T04:48:19.818-07:002013-09-03T04:48:19.818-07:00To Candid Observer:
You won't see any more me...To Candid Observer:<br /><br />You won't see any more mention of transvestitism because it is being subsumed into "transgender" by the media. Manning is a woman, not because he has had the operation or hormone shots, but because he says so. <br />Agnostic has best expressed why this is being done.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-23967910416331840842013-09-03T04:28:03.234-07:002013-09-03T04:28:03.234-07:00Apropos the recent discussion on iSteve about the ...Apropos the recent discussion on iSteve about the verbal gymnastics journalists must put themselves through when writing about the "transgendered", here's this quote about a transgender (wo)man using the female locker room:<br /><br />"But according to parents, the fact that the student has exposed her male genitalia, in one instance in the sauna, is cause for concern."<br /><br />http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/headlines/2012/11/transgender-student-in-womens-locker-room-raises-uproar/David M.noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-51002776555601689512013-09-03T03:48:43.760-07:002013-09-03T03:48:43.760-07:00"What's after pedophiles?"
Sex in p..."What's after pedophiles?"<br /><br />Sex in public, cannibalism (not murder, the deceased gives permission to be eaten after his death), selling aborted fetus for food, defecating in public, total nudity everywhere allowed.<br /><br />All these can be defended using the principles utilised in the homosexual arguments, they are all consensual and any objection can be made out to be hatred from conservative reactionaries.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com