tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post4918538719114600931..comments2024-03-28T16:22:14.888-07:00Comments on Steve Sailer: iSteve: Crazy conspiracy theoryUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger89125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-49046421974557583392013-02-01T05:31:02.037-08:002013-02-01T05:31:02.037-08:00The great who/whom question of modern America invo...The great who/whom question of modern America involves whose neighborhoods and schools and such will be saddled with the long-term dependent underclass. If young professional couples start gentrifying the places where the underclass lives in the city, then they get relocated somewhere--presumably to the nearby suburbs, where their kids pull down the test scores and engage in petty crime while the neighbors curse the bastard who decided to rent his house to someone with a section 8 voucher. <br /><br />There is really no good answer to this question. Concentrations of the underclass tend to become ungovernable bleak horrible places where schoolkids get shot for walking down the wrong street and the police prefer to show up only in numbers. (Increasing the fun, when they do show up they tend to find someone who's resisting arrest and needs all his teeth knocked out.). Spreading the underclass around tends to ruin nice neighborhoods--it doesn't take very many times of having the GPS stolen out of your car or your door kicked in and the TV stolen before you just want to leave the damned neighborhood.<br /><br />Charles Murray talked about the custodial state as a likely outcome. But that assumes concentration. A widely diffused underclass spread through the whole society encourages a move toward something of a police state across the board. Gun control, no-knock SWAT raids, surveillance cameras everywhere, visible police presence at schools and stores, support for bloodthirsty tough-on-crime policies (lock the bastards up or string them up, and if they happen to be guilty, so much the better)--those all fall naturally out of the siege mentality of people who are afraid of the constant crime in their neighborhood. Similarly, a desire to have educated and civilized social workers and teachers and bureaucrats heavily involved in the lives of many families falls naturally from widespread underclass dysfunction, and keeping the rules neutral means that healthy functional families get caught up in them sometimes, too. To let you take your kid out of school for a two-week trip to Rome is to let your shiftless neighbor just not bother taking his kids to school for a couple weeks, so maybe they had both better be banned. <br /><br />This is one of many forces pushing the US in the direction we seem determined to go--in another decade or two, this country is going to be unrecognizable to people who were used to substantial personal freedom and privacy. NOTAnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-1181854423679230152013-01-31T19:39:27.834-08:002013-01-31T19:39:27.834-08:00The HIV conspiracy theories don't make any sen...The HIV conspiracy theories don't make any sense, just given the timeline of when HIV must have started spreading, and the available technology for developing an engineered virus. (Or rather, modifying SIV, which has been around in some monkeys for a long time, into a human pathogen.) I'm pretty sure you'd have to have started the work modifying it before the discovery of how retroviruses even worked, and perhaps before anyone knew much about how DNA worked at all. The first known American death from HIV was in 1969 (verified by testing stored tissues and blood in the 80s). He was a black teenager, and likely a gay prostitute, so the disease was circulating in the US by then. The theory of how retroviruses worked was only beginning to be discussed then (around 1968)--that later led to a couple of Nobel Prizes. The structure of DNA was only understood about a decade earlier. I think immunologists were just figuring out what a T cell was and what it did in that decade. <br /><br />In order for the timeline of HIV being an engineered disease to work, somebody would have had to be a decade or two ahead of the whole world in a bunch of stuff. It took years from when the virus was isolated and identified until anyone worked out much of how it worked. In order to have engineered HIV, someone would have had to do all that in secret, a decade or two earlier. This is like claiming that the Nazis established a secret permanent moonbase before they lose WW2. <br /><br />NOTAnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-84599116309713934042013-01-30T14:47:39.806-08:002013-01-30T14:47:39.806-08:00"No white people would never do anything snea..."No white people would never do anything sneaky to a minority group like give them small pox blankets. That would never happen. Oh snap."<br /><br />The Left's love of dis-proven stereotypes never ceases to amaze. They think it's such a zinger to stay things like this. It's a "gotcha" in their mind. So clever.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-1238346167015344242013-01-30T08:44:55.667-08:002013-01-30T08:44:55.667-08:00When the French say "disadvantaged students,&...When the French say "disadvantaged students," do they mean what Americans mean by that, or do they mean "disadvantaged"?Cail Corishevhttp://cailcorishev.wordpress.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-38861866491128663852013-01-29T20:49:02.226-08:002013-01-29T20:49:02.226-08:00I thought that it only happened on TV but i had a ...<i>I thought that it only happened on TV but i had a brief chat with a chilean guy and as we were talking about brazilian black metal band made up of black guys, he refered to them as "african americans"! I found that kind of silly but he said that since I'm black he wanted to use a polite term or something like that lol.</i><br /><br />Chile is part of the Americas. And so is Brasil.ben tillmannoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-92071881721457282602013-01-29T20:11:18.454-08:002013-01-29T20:11:18.454-08:00In the 1970s and 1980s, the French conducted an ex...<i>In the 1970s and 1980s, the French conducted an experiment with 2,000 students to determine whether sending children to preschool at age two was worth the public expense. The results were remarkable. After seven years of elementary school, disadvantaged students who had started preschool at age two had fully caught up with their more advantaged peers....</i><br /><br />That makes no sense. <br /><br />Here's what I get from that article:<br /><br /><i>From 1945 to 1967, 12th-graders’ verbal scores on the SAT and other tests had risen. But then those scores plummeted. Cornell economist John Bishop wrote in the 1980s of “the historically unprecedented nature of the test score decline that began around 1967. Prior to that year test scores had been rising steadily for 50 years.”</i><br /><br />Thank you, Lyndon B. Satan!<br /><br />And:<br /><br /><i>For 30 years after 1945, Stiglitz observes, economic equality advanced in the United States; after about 1975, it declined.</i><br /><br />Thank you, Celler & Co.!ben tillmannoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-67324947245607279982013-01-29T19:53:09.743-08:002013-01-29T19:53:09.743-08:00>the British once thought about trying it, but ...>the British once thought about trying it, but there is no solid evidence that they ever actually carried it out.<<br /><br />Not so fast. William Trent reports that it was carried out at Fort Pitt in June 1763, a week or so before Amherst thought of doing the same thing. The dispute is over whether it worked. <a href="http://www.history.org/Foundation/journal/Spring04/warfare.cfm" rel="nofollow">Cite</a>.<br /><br />As for NINA, Richard Jensen's <a href="http://tigger.uic.edu/~rjensen/no-irish.htm" rel="nofollow">paper</a> is astonishing. For example, there were thousands of newspapers (<a href="https://www.nyu.edu/classes/stephens/Collier%27s%20page.htm" rel="nofollow">7,000 in 1880</a>), pamphlets, handbills, ephemera in 19th-century America, only a small fraction of which is on microfilm or was otherwise preserved (or available to the parties who might have wanted to preserve it). What could some future Jensen say about our assertion that whites in general are systematically discriminated against today? "Despite vague talk, in a handful of ambiguous court rulings, about correcting 'racial disparity,' and the purported existence of anti-white academic theses that can't be found and likely never existed, as well as 31 documented instances of the term 'whitebread' appearing in arguably racial contexts, searches of thousands of pages of the NYT, The Nation, and the Richmond Gazette tell us that there is no solid evidence that anti-white discrimination ever existed anywhere except as a folk myth among resentful whites."Davidhttp://david-passingparade2.blogspot.fi/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-9854355359072176002013-01-29T19:27:26.535-08:002013-01-29T19:27:26.535-08:00If Latino immigration is a way to ethnically clean...<i>If Latino immigration is a way to ethnically cleanse blacks, and Sailer readers aren't too fond of blacks, why are Sailer readers against Latino immigration?</i><br /><br />Because those "Latinos" use resources that belong to White Americans, and they team up with Blacks to use the political process to maximize the amount of White resources transferred to them.<br /><br />Ultimately, those "Latinos" take the place of tens of millions of White Americans. How many Jack Kilbys and Henry Fords and Charles Lindberghs and David Sloan Wilsons will never draw a breath?ben tillmannoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-3747212295191320542013-01-29T17:02:55.208-08:002013-01-29T17:02:55.208-08:00anonymous:"No white people would never do any...anonymous:"No white people would never do anything sneaky to a minority group like give them small pox blankets. That would never happen. Oh snap."<br /><br />Ah, the old small pox infected blankets number. That is almost as historically false as the NINA (no Irish need apply sign).Check THE STRAIGHT DOPE on this one; the British once thought about trying it, but there is no solid evidence that they ever actually carried it out.Don't bother trying to cite Ward Churchill;his account of the Mandan in 1837 is a tissue of lies.<br /><br /><br />Anglos did plenty of bad stuff to Amerinds, but spreading smallpox via infected blankets was not one of them.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-40335518164200135462013-01-29T16:54:27.024-08:002013-01-29T16:54:27.024-08:00>Not only that, but it's been proven that t...>Not only that, but it's been proven that there's an inverse relationship between malaria (African disease) immunity and AIDS susceptibility.<<br /><br />Surely you made a mistake here and meant to say that there is a direct relationship between being immune to malaria and being susceptible to AIDS. Malaria immunity would tend to be higher in a population more exposed to it. Nor does Malaria's being an "African disease" (but non-Africans get malaria, too; see <i>Panama Canal, construction of</i>) mean Europeans and other non-Africans are less or more immune; for instance, not having a disease doesn't equate to being immune to it.<br /><br />So assuming you meant biological reasons cause Africans to get AIDS more (i.e., they are more "susceptible"), here are questions. 1. What's the cite? 2. What do you mean by susceptible? That there is a relationship between malaria and HIV-risky behaviors? 3. I still see in all this no tad of evidence that Whitey cooked up AIDS in Frankenstein's castle, old top.<br /><br />On "crazy conspiracy theories": one could with equal cogency theorize that an evil black lesbian cooked up AIDS. Whitey presumably had at least means and motive, while Evil Black Lesbian had at least opportunity and motive. There is no ground floor on this elevator trip, old bean.Davidhttp://david-passingparade2.blogspot.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-38285485615307320722013-01-29T15:48:49.516-08:002013-01-29T15:48:49.516-08:00"You ever hear about the bubonic plague buddy..."You ever hear about the bubonic plague buddy?...As I recall I believe that was introduced from China or elsewhere in Asia."<br /><br />You don't know the half, Buddy; I heard it was introduced on purpose at trading posts through B.P infected blankets!Truthhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17286755693955361308noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-36173232621680231142013-01-29T14:01:50.822-08:002013-01-29T14:01:50.822-08:00Anonymous said..
"No white people would neve...Anonymous said..<br /><br />"No white people would never do anything sneaky to a minority group like give them smallpox blankets. That would never happen. Oh snap."<br /><br />You ever hear about the bubonic plague buddy? The notorious black death that wiped out at least a third or even half of all Europe's population in just a few years? As I recall I believe that was introduced from China or elsewhere in Asia. But i guess when it happens to a white population it doesn't matter, huh?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-66350308505654824112013-01-29T10:44:40.376-08:002013-01-29T10:44:40.376-08:00Black liberal writer Jamelle Bouie just figured ou...Black liberal writer Jamelle Bouie just figured out that working class blacks don't like immigration and that running against immigration could actually split the Democratic coalition and pick up Republicans enough black votes to tip the balance in Rust Belt swing states. <br /><br />http://prospect.org/article/how-african-americans-view-immigration-reformAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-62912747801404273292013-01-29T07:59:10.500-08:002013-01-29T07:59:10.500-08:00You want to talk about conquistadores, what about ...<i>You want to talk about conquistadores, what about Anglo-Saxons? Florida, Arizona, California, Texas, etc. These are not exactly Anglo-sounding, now are they? These territories originally belonged to Spain, and to Spaniards who lived there.</i><br /><br />...and who had previously conquered them from their previous owners. So, the only basis that legitimizes "Spanish" ownership prior to 1848 likewise legitimizes "Anglo" ownership after 1848.<br /><br />CennbeorcAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-51078891661977886262013-01-29T07:36:17.671-08:002013-01-29T07:36:17.671-08:00White people are pushing blacks out of NY and othe...White people are pushing blacks out of NY and other liberal areas like......DC.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-17348241722719964032013-01-29T06:51:22.846-08:002013-01-29T06:51:22.846-08:00If whites want to end immigration they would have ...<i> If whites want to end immigration they would have to adopt a concilliatory stance toward blacks at the same time as an adversarial stance toward hispanics. </i><br /><br />Yeah, white resistance to black demands has been oh so strong lo these many years.peterikenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-68935318129596179252013-01-29T06:47:21.214-08:002013-01-29T06:47:21.214-08:00No white people would never do anything sneaky to ...<i> No white people would never do anything sneaky to a minority group like give them small pox blankets. That would never happen. Oh snap. </i><br /><br />Because it didn't happen, dummy. It's yet another historical myth from the Zinn-ized "evil whitey" view of history.peterikenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-32514088131112310082013-01-29T05:05:43.199-08:002013-01-29T05:05:43.199-08:00UK DAILY MAIL: Rise of 'white flight': Bri...<i>UK DAILY MAIL: Rise of 'white flight': British families are 'self-segregating' as more Caucasians abandon urban areas for the countryside</i> <br /><br /><a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/immigration/9831912/I-feel-like-a-stranger-where-I-live.html" rel="nofollow"><b>UK TELEGRAPH: 'I feel like a stranger where I live'</b></a> <br /><br />* As new figures show 'white flight' from cities is rising, one Londoner writes a provocative personal piece about how immigration has drastically changed the borough where she has lived for 17 yearsAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-65627910182744159782013-01-28T23:36:59.542-08:002013-01-28T23:36:59.542-08:00Mr. Anon said...
[...]
The term "sub-saharan ...Mr. Anon said...<br />[...]<br />The term "sub-saharan Africa" is racist. In future, we should all use the term "african-american Africa".<br />____<br /><br />I thought that it only happened on TV but i had a brief chat with a chilean guy and as we were talking about brazilian black metal band made up of black guys, he refered to them as "african americans"! I found that kind of silly but he said that since I'm black he wanted to use a polite term or something like that lol.<br />ogunsironhttp://www.gmail.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-35937242101732092512013-01-28T22:20:05.920-08:002013-01-28T22:20:05.920-08:00No white people would never do anything sneaky to ...No white people would never do anything sneaky to a minority group like give them small pox blankets. That would never happen. Oh snap.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-17536927709214050902013-01-28T21:54:20.522-08:002013-01-28T21:54:20.522-08:00"Anonymous said...
If Latino immigration is ..."Anonymous said...<br /><br />If Latino immigration is a way to ethnically cleanse blacks, and Sailer readers aren't too fond of blacks, why are Sailer readers against Latino immigration?"<br /><br />The blacks don't go away - they just go somewhere else, leaving us with two unasssimillable populations. Plus, they increase the population of the country, which is already too high.Mr. Anonnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-74781731237160103002013-01-28T21:49:16.465-08:002013-01-28T21:49:16.465-08:00"Anonymous said...
The conspiracy to destroy..."Anonymous said...<br /><br />The conspiracy to destroy blacks by simply mentioning their continent of origin:<br /><br />http://abagond.wordpress.com/2013/01/14/sub-saharan-africa/"<br /><br />The term "sub-saharan Africa" is racist. In future, we should all use the term "african-american Africa".Mr. Anonnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-88325195369102224962013-01-28T21:43:57.441-08:002013-01-28T21:43:57.441-08:00"Matthew said...
""You want to tal..."Matthew said...<br /><br />""You want to talk about conquistadores, what about Anglo-Saxons? Florida, Arizona, California, Texas, etc. These are not exactly Anglo-sounding, now are they? These territories originally belonged to Spain, and to Spaniards who lived there.""<br /><br />And how did Spain come to acquire them? When the United States took the Southwest from Mexico it was almost completely unpopulated - as in about 170,000 people for half a million square miles of land, and many of those were English-speaking Americans."<br /><br />Those facts are, as Mr. Diaz calls them, inconvenient. Inconvenient for him, that is.Mr. Anonnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-60941115422207809922013-01-28T21:40:15.646-08:002013-01-28T21:40:15.646-08:00"Nick Diaz said...
You want to talk about co..."Nick Diaz said...<br /><br />You want to talk about conquistadores, what about Anglo-Saxons? Florida, Arizona, California, Texas, etc. These are not exactly Anglo-sounding, now are they? These territories originally belonged to Spain, and to Spaniards who lived there."<br /><br />They belonged to the indians before that. Spain stole it from them. So Mexican's claim is nothing more than that they were the first recipient of stolen property.<br /><br />"In fact, the 1924 Immigration Act tried to keep as many Southern European immigrants away from the U.S as possible on the grounds that they were BIOLOGICALLY undesirable and that too many of them would lead to the decay of the country."<br /><br />They were only thinking of people like you.Mr. Anonnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-51311630826347267002013-01-28T21:31:48.680-08:002013-01-28T21:31:48.680-08:00"If Latino immigration is a way to ethnically..."If Latino immigration is a way to ethnically cleanse blacks, ... why are Sailer readers against Latino immigration?"<br /><br />Blacks are Americans. They are part of this nation. We don't wish to "ethnically cleanse blacks" and we bear them no malice.<br /><br />We oppose all immigration that seeks upset the demographic balance of this country. We are effectively under invasion by foreign tribes.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com