tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post526170798027591370..comments2024-03-27T18:24:19.683-07:00Comments on Steve Sailer: iSteve: More on Michael JacksonUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger48125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-55730614860386903662009-07-07T17:46:19.630-07:002009-07-07T17:46:19.630-07:00Who's to say if they are his kids or not? I do...Who's to say if they are his kids or not? I don't know who to believe(DebbieRowe, TMZ or US mag). If they aren't his biological kids, why did he not simply adopt? And why did he dump Debbie after he found out she was barren. It seems to me that having his own biological kids were important to him. Unless we have an actual DNA test, we'll never know.<br /><br />On why his kids look so white: Here is an image of Nayland Blake, a pretty famous artist. That's him on the left. His dad is the black guy on the right. His mom is white.<br />So, here is an example of someone who looks virtually white while still being biracial.<br />http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v81/nwbbear/ljphotos/meanddad.jpg<br /><br />If you look at all MJ's kids, they do have some resemblance to him. Look here for a closer inspection<br />http://justjared.buzznet.com/gallery/photoitemfull.php?yr=2009&mon=07&evt=paris-jackson&pic=paris-jackson-speech-michael-jackson-tribute-01.jpg<br /><br />Look at the nose and lips. And especially, the eyes.theDouchebadhttp://douchebag.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-73697174749952156072009-07-04T12:11:58.798-07:002009-07-04T12:11:58.798-07:00Hitler didn't believe in "Darwinian theor...<i>Hitler didn't believe in "Darwinian theory", at least he certainly didn't understand it. Darwin basically says the best adapted survive, Hitler wanted to believe the strongest survive. It's not at all the same thing.</i><br /><br />That's besides the point. I don't know to what extent Hitler understood Darwin. I do know that Pat Buchanan, in his column, attempted to discredit Darwinism by linking it with Hitler.<br /><br />I should also point out that Buchanan also linked Darwinism with Marx, which is interesting because Marxists, no matter what they *say*, certainly don't accept Darwinism as it applies to humanity. Interestingly Marx offered to write the forward in one of Darwin's books, but Darwin politely turned him down.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-56524530876740996562009-07-04T08:47:23.762-07:002009-07-04T08:47:23.762-07:00"In short, the verdict is: Michael Jordan was..."In short, the verdict is: Michael Jordan was a homosexual autohebephile. That is, turned on by prepubescent boys and by his own boyish body, which he altered through surgery to "remake himself, physically and behaviorally, into the boy he wanted"."<br /><br />That is one of the funniest typos ever. How about them Air Jackson shoes?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-70269218250005012152009-07-04T05:19:31.362-07:002009-07-04T05:19:31.362-07:00Because Hitler believed in Darwinian theory says n...<i>Because Hitler believed in Darwinian theory says nothing about its truth</i><br /><br />Hitler didn't believe in "Darwinian theory", at least he certainly didn't understand it. Darwin basically says the best adapted survive, Hitler wanted to believe the strongest survive. It's not at all the same thing.Peter Anoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-74354891813208769932009-07-03T16:33:51.364-07:002009-07-03T16:33:51.364-07:00Bailey writes his own psychiatric expertise:
htt...Bailey writes his own psychiatric expertise:<br /><br />http://tinyurl.com/nyyqcv<br /><br /><br />In short, the verdict is: Michael Jordan was a homosexual autohebephile. That is, turned on by prepubescent boys and by his own boyish body, which he altered through surgery to "remake himself, physically and behaviorally, into the boy he wanted".<br />Sounds twisted, but it fits the facts.Proofreadernoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-51624712410545700042009-07-03T16:21:34.934-07:002009-07-03T16:21:34.934-07:00P. S. - The only difference between Leni Riefensta...P. S. - The only difference between Leni Riefenstahl and, say, an ABC cameraman/director at, say, Obama's Colorado coronation is that Riefenstahl was a great artist while the network director is a dull hack.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-91230966075116955552009-07-03T16:15:50.172-07:002009-07-03T16:15:50.172-07:00Steve, you ought to see Ray Muller's Wonderful...Steve, you ought to see Ray Muller's Wonderful/Horrible Life: Leni Riefenstahl, http://www.netflix.com/Movie/The_Wonderful_Horrible_Life_of_Leni_Riefenstahl/17104419?trkid=190393.<br /><br />Her life and work were a bit more complicated than what you seem to see as straight propaganda. She was a remarkable woman and an artist who was used by Hitler and Goebbels. She paid a terrible price yet survived to almost 100 years. After spending time in Africa living with and photographing a tribe of great athletes she ended her days photographing as a diver well into her 90s.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-22100881891662919962009-07-03T05:20:15.239-07:002009-07-03T05:20:15.239-07:00Go ahead and keep telling yourself that Atheism an...Go ahead and keep telling yourself that Atheism and Conservatism go hand in hand. Oh yeah, I remember now, all of those essays by Burke, Kirk and Adams promulgating such.<br /><br />STUPID of me to have missed that.<br /><br />Last, how well has the banishment of Christianity worked out for those English working class blokes?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-90697141473911135502009-07-03T02:35:01.260-07:002009-07-03T02:35:01.260-07:00You're very much correct that it makes much mo...You're very much correct that it makes much more sense to play female-oriented music. I never thought about it before, but the strength and narrowness of genre preferences really is a big sex difference.<br /><br />testing99 may want entertainment to go for the male audience more, but at least in the case of live music it makes absolutely no economic sense as I explain here: http://www.corrupt.org/news/guy_music_vs_girl_musicMartin Regnenhttp://www.corrupt.orgnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-34802934595560905552009-07-02T22:33:20.333-07:002009-07-02T22:33:20.333-07:00(Yes, Im aware Rupert Murdoch's SUN isn't ...<i>(Yes, Im aware Rupert Murdoch's SUN isn't exactly the Book of Daniel). </i> <br /><br />This is a confusing analogy. <br /><br />The Book of Daniel was shown to be a forgery as early as the third century AD by Porphyry, a pagan philosopher.A Nonce Lilynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-77505875547896964592009-07-02T21:11:46.957-07:002009-07-02T21:11:46.957-07:00Whenever I read someone attacking Buchanan on iste...<i>Whenever I read someone attacking Buchanan on isteve they always spell his name wrong - as above. Evil Neocon used to make the same mistake.<br /><br />Is this a common affliction, or is it the same person doing the attacking, or is it some sort of neocon code?</i><br /><br />I am not a neocon and I am not "Evil Neocon." The unintentional misspelling is hardly relevant. Creationism is one of the most eminently stupid ideas ever conceived of and Buchanan's column is stupid. Because Hitler believed in Darwinian theory says nothing about its truth, btw. I'm sure Hitler believed the world was round too. Attempting to discredit ideas by attacking the messenger is generally a tactic of the left.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-9390743882665968802009-07-02T19:06:36.299-07:002009-07-02T19:06:36.299-07:00OT but I just read Pat Buchanon's latest colum...<i>OT but I just read Pat <b>Buchanon's</b> latest column. I didn't realize until now that he was a raving creationist. Stupidity like that undermines the rest of us on the right</i>.<br /><br />Whenever I read someone attacking Buchanan on isteve they always spell his name wrong - as above. Evil Neocon used to make the same mistake.<br /><br />Is this a common affliction, or is it the same person doing the attacking, or is it some sort of neocon code?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-33584745543218291492009-07-02T17:05:16.894-07:002009-07-02T17:05:16.894-07:00Steve --
You could not be more wrong. This is one...Steve --<br /><br />You could not be more wrong. This is one of my main pet peeves, the failure of entertainment media to even attempt to grab men.<br /><br />Take for example, the changing of NBC. In the 1980's, you had TV shows like Hunter, The A-Team, Miami Vice, and so on that appealed to a broad, mostly male audience.<br /><br />NOW, you have the head of NBC, Silverman (not ABC's Fred Silverman, someone else, no relation, out of Brit TV) saying he's happy not being #1 as long as his reality shows are cheap. Sitcoms skew 80% female, a big change from the 1970s and even 1980s. <br /><br />What's happened is that men have been chased off TV, which has transformed itself into a female-gay ghetto. Just tick off the mostly male (ESPN, USA, History, Discovery, Nat Geo, NFL Network) TV networks vs. the mostly female: everything else, and you can see how that works. Or look at the ads in these nets. It's rare I even see a male-oriented ad on TV now.<br /><br />Heck, go shopping sometime at the grocery store. Half the shoppers will be men (on weekends, accompanied by their kids). Decision making consumers yet the checkout stands are nothing but a gay-female ghetto of Cosmo and People. No Sports Illustrated, Maxim, etc.<br /><br />Look at Triumph's visit to Neverland on Youtube (shooting fish in a barrel) to see his fans, nearly all female. Which is itself odd. Yes there's about 3 million less White teens now compared to the 1980s and that probably makes a difference, but it's telling that no new acts have really surfaced making lots of money save the Disney tween girl express, and even they are getting crushed by the competition. Young guys don't seem to follow music, not compared to the 1980's or even early 1990s. <br /><br />I think you have to reject the fragmentation excuse because it does not literally add up: all most guys don't watch ANY TV save sports, there's fewer male oriented channels than female ones by orders of magnitude, and there's more female oriented performers than male ones. The male oriented acts that do seem to attract fans are mostly hyper-masculine rappers. Itself a powerful cultural signal.<br /><br />[Yes I am also Whiskey. Keeping the handle so those familiar can know my past posting history. Posted here before my blog.]testing99noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-77250153653988305672009-07-02T16:20:32.773-07:002009-07-02T16:20:32.773-07:00"...with sales of off the wall, thriller...&q..."...with sales of off the wall, thriller..."<br /><br />A rare example of correct usage of "of off".Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-26038422552071044552009-07-02T11:13:52.396-07:002009-07-02T11:13:52.396-07:00He wants good looking white kids...so he picks THI...He wants good looking white kids...so he picks THIS shmuck?? BTW Steve,I was looking at your picture by the Taki piece and,well,you seem a tad more plae...and your nose,seems a bit thinner...joshnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-53687480373387618962009-07-02T11:05:36.399-07:002009-07-02T11:05:36.399-07:00as said
"Um, non-whites may 'sharpen'...as said<br /><br />"Um, non-whites may 'sharpen' their noses and straighten their hair, but they don't usually bleach their skin white."<br /><br />They do it almost as usually as they sharpen their noses, I'd wager. <a href="http://sapnamagazine.com/2008/the-color-complex-is-the-fixation-really-fair/" rel="nofollow">Here</a>.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-59688829341716355532009-07-02T08:47:49.439-07:002009-07-02T08:47:49.439-07:00Steve, can you please insist that your commenters ...Steve, can you please insist that your commenters spell "vitiligo" right?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-75399067053490907392009-07-02T08:13:20.952-07:002009-07-02T08:13:20.952-07:00there is no way on earth he is the biological fath...there is no way on earth he is the biological father of those kids. it is extremely obvious that they are not related to the jacksons. they will grow up as the weirdest celebrity children of all time.<br /><br />in music news, michael jackson's death has caused his sales to spike. he moved about 500000 albums this week, with sales of off the wall, thriller, bad, and dangerous all near 100000 units.<br /><br />he should be number 1, number 2, number 3, and number 4 on the billboard 200 this week, except they don't put catalog albums on that chart, so i think jackson is getting screwed there.jodynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-7720564146772163652009-07-02T05:54:23.097-07:002009-07-02T05:54:23.097-07:00Castratos don't produce sperm.Castratos don't produce sperm.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-17938126068418453332009-07-02T05:52:15.080-07:002009-07-02T05:52:15.080-07:00Jackson has Vertigo??? Is that correct AS? Please ...Jackson has Vertigo??? Is that correct AS? Please post again. That just makes you dizzy and has nothing to do with skin color. <br /><br />Pat Buchanon can do no wrong imo.<br /><br />He named his son Blanket for God's sake- too weird for words. To see these network news anchors have to say that was disconcerting. <br /><br />It was his time to go- he's either burning in hell if he boofed those kids or getting the care he needs. RIP maybe.<br /><br />I've almost gotten in two fights with brothers after making derogatory comments in public about him. They wanted no dissent.<br /><br />Black fullback for Michigan State in the mid 90's had vitiligo- they called him batman bc it looked like a mask- rough going but he seemed ok with itmhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15560748812217517307noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-90628615264919274322009-07-02T03:22:48.108-07:002009-07-02T03:22:48.108-07:00Michael Jackson started this foundation, called He...Michael Jackson started this foundation, called <a href="http://www.healtheworldfoundation.net" rel="nofollow">Heal the World</a>, whose aim is "to improve the condition of all mankind."<br /><br />Isn't there some other group with this same mission? I can't quite put my finger on it, but I think there is one, and it's called Tika or Tiko or something like that. Anyways, I'm sure they're both doing a great job.Chris2noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-78742650012026314442009-07-02T01:41:07.502-07:002009-07-02T01:41:07.502-07:00***"OT - Anonymous 1. Typical Darwinian, no d...***"OT - Anonymous 1. Typical Darwinian, no discussion straight for the "stupidity" label. I'll let you in on a little secret, an Atheist (which I will go out a limb and assume that you purport to be one), by definition, can not be a Conservative. I assume you are equating "us on the right" to mean a Conservative."***<br /><br />1) Plenty of Christians have no problem with evolution. Your insinuation that "Darwinism" equals Atheism is a lie.<br /><br />2) Plenty of Atheists are Conservative. Your assertion that Atheists cannot be conservatives is a lie.<br /><br />3) The OP was quite correct: Pat Buchanan's column was abysmally stupid, riddled with factual errors, and frankly an embarrassment to anyone who knows anything about science and evolution. <br /><br />4) You don't know the OP's religious beliefs, and it is the height of arrogance and stupidity for you to claim that you KNOW what he believes simply because he doesn't believe in a literal interpretation of Genesis.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-60770636764670651162009-07-01T22:10:13.674-07:002009-07-01T22:10:13.674-07:00I agree with much of your analysis. Being skinny a...I agree with much of your analysis. Being skinny and pretty seemed to be his thing. Unfortunately there was no way he could grow old easily.<br /><br />He reminded me of Howard Hughes in some ways. The OCD, germ thing. The secrecy. <br /><br />He also reminded me of Elvis. You might be the King for a few years, but you won't be forever. Until you die and people remember you again.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-86967974409641274952009-07-01T21:54:55.959-07:002009-07-01T21:54:55.959-07:00Shawn: What is amazing to me is the the media neve...<b>Shawn:</b> <i>What is amazing to me is the the media never questioned him regarding is statements that his kids were biologically his. He said they they are a product of his sperm. Pretty crazy stuff considering that at least one of them used to have blond hair and they are all very light...</i> <br /><br /><b>Federal agents to join probe into Jackson's death</b> <br />By ANTHONY MCCARTNEY, AP Entertainment Writer<br />2009-07-01<br /><a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090702/ap_on_en_mu/us_michael_jackson" rel="nofollow">news.yahoo.com</a> <br /><br /><i>...Jackson's 7-year-old will, filed Wednesday in a Los Angeles court, gives his entire estate to a family trust and names his 79-year-old mother Katherine and his children as beneficiaries...<br /><br />Katherine Jackson was appointed their guardian, with entertainer Diana Ross, a longtime friend of Michael Jackson, named successor guardian if something happens to his mother...</i> <br /><br /><b>EXCLUSIVE: Dermatologist Is Father of Michael Jackson's Kids</b> <br />Tuesday June 30, 2009<br /><a href="http://www.usmagazine.com/news/michael-jackson-is-not-biological-dad-of-kids-2009306" rel="nofollow">usmagazine.com</a> <br /><br /><i>Though Michael Jackson was wed to Prince and Paris' mother, Debbie Rowe, their biological father is Arnold Klein, Jackson's L.A.-based dermatologist and Rowe's former boss, multiple sources confirm to the new issue of Us Weekly...</i> <br /><br /><b>Jackson/Rowe Not the Biological Parents</b> <br />by TMZ Staff<br />Posted Jun 30th 2009 12:00PM<br /><a href="http://www.tmz.com/2009/06/30/michael-jackson-debbie-rowe-surrogate-children-in-vitro/" rel="nofollow">tmz.com</a> <br /><br /><i>We've learned Michael Jackson was not the biological father of any of his children. And Debbie Rowe is not the biological mother of the two kids she bore for Michael. All three children were conceived in vitro -- outside the womb...</i> <br /><br /><b>'I'm better off dead. I'm done': Michael Jackson's fateful prediction just a week before his death</b> <br />By Ian Halperin<br />Last updated at 3:58 PM on 29th June 2009<br /><a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1196009/Im-better-dead-Im-How-Michael-Jackson-predicted-death-months-ago.html" rel="nofollow">dailymail.co.uk</a> <br /><br /><i>...He was also playing a truly dangerous game. It is clear to me that Michael was homosexual and that his taste was for young men...<br /><br />Other witnesses speak of strings of young men visiting his house at all hours, even in the period of his decline. Some stayed overnight...</i> <br /><br />So under what possible legal theory could Michael Jackson have any say in the disposition of these poor children?<br /><br />This stuff is beyond sick.<br /><br />Compare:<br /><br /><b>News agencies gagging 'gay' factor in boy's rape</b> <br />By Joe Kovacs<br />Posted: July 01, 2009 6:36 pm Eastern<br /><a href="http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.printable&pageId=102740" rel="nofollow">wnd.com</a> <br /><br /><i>...Frank Lombard, associate director of the Health Inequalities Program at the university's Center for Health Policy, was arrested last Wednesday in Raleigh, N.C., for attempting to induce someone to cross state lines to engage in sex with the child, who is black.<br /><br />The arrest affidavit goes into graphic detail of Lombard's alleged actions, including alleged performance of oral sex with the child in front of a webcam, and sodomizing the boy with his finger and tongue. It also prominently cites the fact that Lombard is a homosexual living with another "gay" man...</i>Lucius Vorenusnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-61548704538370774912009-07-01T21:51:29.248-07:002009-07-01T21:51:29.248-07:00Steve,
I believe the autopsy reported that Jacks...Steve,<br /><br /><br />I believe the autopsy reported that Jackson did indeed have vitigilio "scars" on his chest. http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/hermesfeed/2509846/Second-Michael-Jackson-autopsy-stuns-family.html<br />(Yes, Im aware Rupert Murdoch's SUN isn't exactly the Book of Daniel). <br /><br />If Jackson really did have vitiglio, he probably would have covered it up with clown-like make-up on his face. Ive seen some pictures of black men stricken with vitiglio, and must admit thats a sad dermatological condition. I hope science solves that one someday. MAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com