tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post6069626834238252082..comments2024-03-28T16:22:14.888-07:00Comments on Steve Sailer: iSteve: British government elects a new peopleUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger115125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-18090874671615861572009-10-29T08:29:16.787-07:002009-10-29T08:29:16.787-07:00> senior Labour figures were reluctant to discu...> senior Labour figures were reluctant to discuss the policy, fearing it would alienate its 'core working-class vote'. <<br /><br />Another reason to go BNP...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-8667815071796843432009-10-29T02:24:36.635-07:002009-10-29T02:24:36.635-07:00Jeff said...
"This story attests to the ...Jeff said...<br /><br /> "This story attests to the power and importance of the racism charge to the left.<br /><br /> Picture a group of Labour politicians itching to call Conservatives racists. How to do it?..."<br /><br />A light goes on! Thanks, Jeff.<br /><br />The original report more or less said that, but I needed it spelled out a bit more. What does the first part of "to rub the Right's nose in diversity and render their arguments out of date" mean, from the point of view of politically influential people seeing potential rewards in this game?<br /><br />Sometimes the simplest explanations are best.<br /><br />Not for the broad support for mass immigration. Katherine Betts is right on that, and always has been.<br /><br />But for what political activists were up to, and I know the type ... yep, dead on.<br /><br />Plus, they take pleasure in seeing their political opponents as prejudiced and thus socially inferior to them, and they take that fantasy as reality.<br /><br />(Think of the way Kerry and Edwards went after Dick Cheney's GAY! DAUGHTER!! on the assumption that this would hurt him with conservatives. This was based on a progressive fantasy about conservatives as easily manipulated and unforgiving gay-hating hicks that was so sweet to the progressive politicians that they took it for reality.)<br /><br />From this point of view, non-lefties <i>must</i> be racists whose feelings would be outraged by the sight of non-whites, and since those non-lefties are vile just by being non-leftie (and white) it's a source of pious self-satisfaction to good progressives to wound their feelings; which could be done by flooding the country with non-whites, till conservatives were all in a helpless rage, lost in a new country in which their traditions and arguments wouldn't apply.<br /><br />But for people who live for formulaic political attacks and their successful application, it's the prospect of goading conservatives into a reaction and then using the "RAAAAACISM!" charge that would seal the deal.David Bluehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01454705154817049520noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-69418489239036448452009-10-28T21:29:33.243-07:002009-10-28T21:29:33.243-07:00"If you turn Detroit into a gleaming city aga..."If you turn Detroit into a gleaming city again, that would do more to win converts to your side than all the blog posts in the world."<br /><br />LOL.. I thought whites have already done that at the country level 50 years ago. But let's say a bunch of whites really do turn Detroit around... how are they going to keep it white?<br /><br />What follows is just the usual:<br /><br />(a) First they will lose control of their financial institutions<br />(b) Then the media<br />(c) Then the politicians will be corrupted<br />(d) Then the children will be taught that whites are uniquely evil<br />(e) Then a mass wave of non-whites will relieve the white population of its new found Detroit privileges<br /><br />It really is a generic formula...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-89576907705403068842009-10-28T15:19:26.295-07:002009-10-28T15:19:26.295-07:00douchbag said...
"Name some things Germany ha...<i>douchbag said...<br />"Name some things Germany has done in the last 50 years or so?"</i><br /><br />Scanning tunneling microscope?<br /><br />Mössbauer effect?<br /><br />Giant magnetoresistance?<br /><br />Also, off the top of my head, the CD was invented jointly by Dutch (Philips) and Japanese (Sony).<br /><br />-leekAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-73034277716815619202009-10-28T13:01:44.338-07:002009-10-28T13:01:44.338-07:00Truther...
Once the Greeks were great at lots of ...Truther...<br /><br />Once the Greeks were great at lots of things, then Romans were great at lots of things. Chinese were once great at lots of things. For awhile Arabs were great at lots of things. Northern Europe was a late-comer but they surged ahead of everyone else. Britain was at forefront of much progress. Then came Germany and US. Few nations have sustained greatness over a long period--both in arts and movies. When was the last time Greeks made anything truly great in the arts? Where did the genius go? Will there be another Italian renaissance? Why was Japanese cinema great in the 50s and 60s but turn to crap since the 70s? Why was German cinema the best in the world the 20s but turn to crap with the rise of Nazis and never recover? I dunno, but I suspect much of the decline is internal. <br /><br />Eventually, there is a loss of cultural and/or economic hunger that once drove ambition and competition. Look at families. Men with ruthless ambition and bold vision build a fortune, but the kids and grandkids squander it in decadence and luxury. (I suspect one of the reasons why Wasps lost out to Jews is that Wasps either got TOO RESPECTABLE, TOO SHELTERED, OR TOO DECADENT. Respectable people don't wanna get down n dirty to win and prefer to lose with honor than win by locking horns. Sheltered rich also lack the guts and fervor to get into the grudge match ring. Decadent types are hopeless. Sure, they have trust funds and enjoy socialite privileges but they are holding onto than conquering new territory. Jews have attained grat wealth and privileges too, but there is an element in Jewish mindset and culture that is restless, anxious, paranoid, nomadic, cunning, subversive, etc. No matter how rich or successful a Jew becomes, he feels surrounded by goyim who wanna do him harm. He always feels like the underdog who might lose everything; this is the necessary fuel to gain more power, more wealth, and not lose out to stuffy respectability or decadence. The rich WASP gentile, in contrast, feels as though his position and priivlege are secure--even when much of his power and privilege slips away. Because WASPS once did have tremendous power and privilege--and dominance through money, politics, and numbers--, they see themselves as the permanent power elite(if only in the spiritual sense) whose main goal today is to be apologetic, guilt-ridden, and 'progressive'. Jews are all-powerful in Hollywood, but a goy like Robert Redford acts like an unjustly privileged wasp who must be nice and kind to the oppressed Jews, blacks, and Mexicans!! Jewish progressivism goes on the accusatory. Wasp progressivism is apologetic. Those with guilt and remorse are filled with doubt and paralysis. Jews act as the aggressive psycho-analyist of the wasps, the clients filled with doubt and shame--for their power and privilege. So, Jews don't lose the HUNGER even when they become powerful and rich.) <br /><br />Americans used to be much hungrier in the past. Eventually, too many people got used to the GOOD LIFE and MANNA FROM GOVERNMENT OR CORPORATE LARGESSE. Same thing happened to Japan. Japanese were hungry for food, success, power, and revenge-via-economics after WWII. By the late 1980s, the Japanese wanted easy money through speculation in stockmarket and real estaste. Kids got addicted to videogames and comic books. Japan's been going downhill ever since.Middletown Girlnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-71330238732078987592009-10-28T12:32:08.568-07:002009-10-28T12:32:08.568-07:00"Chindu"
ROTFLMAO
Let's think up s..."Chindu"<br /><br />ROTFLMAO<br /><br />Let's think up some other clever neologisms. <br /><br />Blewish Alliance: Black-Jewish Alliance. <br /><br />Funstreet: Partnership of Fundamentalist Christians and Wall Street money changers. <br /><br />Junglo, as in Jungle Anglo: basically white people into black or African culture--Marley, Rap, and Afropop. <br /><br />Gasp: Gay-Wasp dalliance. Lots of that in our PC culture. <br /><br />---<br /><br />By the way, the very fact that white guys lost so much power and prestige means there's something deficient about their society, culture, and values, no? And your simple-minded bitter but child-like fixation on some nostalgic arcadia is part of the problem. Dream all you want about some fantasy past where everyone white person was perfect, a genius, and had lots of dough(even Michael Moore said so). <br /><br />Once, the Greeks were geniuses at everything. But then, they did nothing remarkable for over a 1000 yrs. Well, looks like people all have ups and downs. <br />And, your scapegoating Chindus for all the problems is just another variation of Hitlerims, whose sole explanation of history was 'Aryans were great but then mixed with the darkies and met their doom'. Your chindu fixation is just a variation of this: white Aryan geniuses were overwhelmed by darkie chindu fakers and imitators. It used to be said by the Nazis that Jews could only imitate but could not CREATE anything. Now, chindus are the new Jews? <br /><br />Btw, I think most Hindus feel closer to Jews than to Chinese, so how about HinJews?Middletown Girlnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-9344810934366173422009-10-28T11:28:24.412-07:002009-10-28T11:28:24.412-07:00"No, the main reason why whites stay away fro..."No, the main reason why whites stay away from science and math is because it's considered 'geeky' and unglamorous in our stupid trashy culture. (I'll admit I stayed away from those fields for the same reason--plus the fact that I've no patience for long hrs of study and no aptitude for brainy stuff)."<br /><br />If you've no aptitude for brainy stuff, then YOUR reason for "staying away" from science and math, whether it's considered geeky or too many long hours of study or anything else, is irrelevant. Without the braininess, science and math would have kept YOU out.<br /><br />Smart White American kids are discouraged from math and science because they see that the Asian advantage, small as it is, at the top levels of achievement means it's virtually all Asians. The gas goes out of 'em, and they simply, reasonably, conclude they should apply their prodigious talents where the chances of actually making it to the top are greater.<br />Look at the makeup of the Nationals competitors for MathCOUNTS, for instance. Huge overrepresentation of Asians. MathCOUNTS is a middle-school enrichment program to encourage kids in math achievement, started by White engineers. The first winner, in the 1980s, was a White kid. Since? Not so much.<br />The kids of the H1B Asian professors have essentially commandeered the highest levels. A smart White kid in California, who is very, very close, will still get edged out and miss out on the fun trip that Nationals is. In middle school such a reality makes a very deep impression.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-51027094021127858662009-10-28T09:00:44.744-07:002009-10-28T09:00:44.744-07:00Ministers hoped to change the country radically an...Ministers hoped to change the country radically and 'rub the Right's nose in diversity'. But Mr Neather said senior Labour figures were reluctant to discuss the policy, fearing it would alienate its 'core working-class vote'. <br /><br /><br /><br /><br />NO SH_T !Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-40980853853925535082009-10-28T06:30:34.423-07:002009-10-28T06:30:34.423-07:00> it's obvious that
the subprime crisis is ...> it's obvious that<br />the subprime crisis is making neighborhoods whiter <<br /><br />I'm willing to bet it's doing so after having made those neighborhoods less white during the "up" phase.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-79177079714474430352009-10-28T03:14:15.090-07:002009-10-28T03:14:15.090-07:00Truth(er), there is a land that has an extremely n...Truth(er), there is a land that has an extremely negligible amount of Chinese and Hindus, and a whole lot of white people: It's called Europe. Where are all the major breakthroughs?<br /><br />What is your point?Truth(er)noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-43114585572919295152009-10-27T21:26:15.596-07:002009-10-27T21:26:15.596-07:00Truth(er), there is a land that has an extremely n...Truth(er), there is a land that has an extremely negligible amount of Chinese and Hindus, and a whole lot of white people: It's called Europe. Where are all the major breakthroughs?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-79383966828124990352009-10-27T20:23:06.036-07:002009-10-27T20:23:06.036-07:00The basic point that I am trying to make is that w...The basic point that I am trying to make is that when the science and engineering fields were dominated by Anglos and Europeans, you had, in the 20th century alone, revolutionary advances in sciences and technology, advances that were eventually seamlessly integrated into everyday life. These advances came along with "gradual improvements in existing technology" and "Nobel prizes."<br /><br />(Note: the American immigration experience is just a rhetorical device. The same argument applies to the rest of the Anglosphere and Europe.)<br /><br />Middletown girl claims that science is gradual improvements. That's partly true. What is also true is that the gradual improvements also come with the incredible life-altering discoveries. As of the last 40 years, when science and engineering is now a largely "Chindu" enterprise, we are seeing none of these life-altering discoveries. <br /><br />Oh sure...there are interesting papers and proposals in exotic fields like nanotechnology. But nothing approaching a working prototype. We have just a bunch of puzzles and Rubiks cubes. And in the long run, nobody cares if you can solve a Rubik's cube. <br /><br />It's also amazing how you dismiss the value of incentives in science and engineering. In the 40's, 50's and 60's, an engineer at Lockheed's "Skunkworks", or a professor of physics at Harvard had no problem earning enough money to raise his family in the comfortable middle class. Today, a physics post-doc makes $25,000 a year. How do yu raise a family on that? You can't. You could make more money as a manager at Wal-mart than a post-doc in physics. That's the problem.<br /><br />Also, keep in mind that I am talking about the subset of people capable of doing advanced science, engineering and math. These people have choices. If the choice is between $25,000 a year as a physicist or $180,000 a year as a quant on Wall Street or as a lawyer, what do you think most people will choose?<br /><br />Low-quality science is the result of regression toward the mean. The more Chindus enter the field, the more the population will represent the average that exists in their respective countries.<br /><br />I don;t hate Chindus. I think they belong in their own countries where they can be as "Chindu-ee" as they like.Truth(er)noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-81006234974853895202009-10-27T19:55:56.823-07:002009-10-27T19:55:56.823-07:00"Just like they cracked down on all the white..."Just like they cracked down on all the whites who gentrified half of Brooklyn?"<br /><br />Google "Whitopia". Some guy already blew the whistle on your ideaTruth(er)noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-53999890209030679082009-10-27T17:14:50.840-07:002009-10-27T17:14:50.840-07:00What would law enforcement have to do with it? Is ...<i>What would law enforcement have to do with it? Is it against the law to have a neighbourhood without diversity?</i> <br /><br /> <br /><br />Pretty much, yes. At least if the neighbourhood in question is white. The Obama JD is going after some neighbourhood near White Plains, NY for not being diverse (non-white) enough.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-52448638055668087542009-10-27T16:43:46.445-07:002009-10-27T16:43:46.445-07:00MIddletown Girl: I'll admit I stayed away fro...MIddletown Girl: <i>I'll admit I stayed away from those fields for the same reason--plus the fact that I've no patience for long hrs of study and no aptitude for brainy stuff.</i><br /><br />Ah c'mon, M-Girl. Informing yourself on this issue, instead of parroting the cheap-labor lobby press releases that pass for reporting these days, isn't rocket-science. All it takes is a moderate amount of time, patience, and smarts, and being more interested in knowing what you're talking about than hearing yourself talk.Rohan Sweenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-4579901960620133192009-10-27T16:41:28.663-07:002009-10-27T16:41:28.663-07:00"Just like they cracked down on all the white..."Just like they cracked down on all the whites who gentrified half of Brooklyn?"<br /><br />Tell me, was the gentrification of Brooklyn accomplished by a white supremacist conspiracy hatched in the darkest crevices of the internet and driven by hate and an insatiable hunger for "lebensraum?" If you really don't see the difference, try it and we'll find out. I know where I'd bet. I'd almost be tempted to write the New Yorker article blowing the lid off the whole thing myself.Lawful Neutralnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-44772481911339131252009-10-27T14:33:01.408-07:002009-10-27T14:33:01.408-07:00"But people of like races just seem to natura..."But people of like races just seem to naturally congregate together in neighbourhoods."<br /><br />Look at Mortgage Trends in the U.S. and it's obvious that<br />the subprime crisis is making neighborhoods whiter:<br />Market Share*:<br /><br />2006 <br />Black=8.7%<br />Hispanic Whites=12.1%<br />Asians=4.5%<br />White Non-Hispanics=62.7%<br /><br />2008<br />Black=6.3%<br />Hispanic Whites=8.5%<br />Asians=4.9%<br />White Non-Hispanics=69.1%<br /><br />Considering the Foreclosure crisis is disproportionately<br />impacting blacks and hispanics neighborhoods are definitely<br />becoming less diverse.<br /><br />*Source: The Federal Reserve HMDA Data Report:<br />See the PDF article:<br /><br />http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/bulletin/2009/default.htmAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-2576913977632249622009-10-27T13:21:21.227-07:002009-10-27T13:21:21.227-07:00Fred:
"If every white Christian in the Steve...<i> Fred: <br />"If every white Christian in the Steveosphere bought a house there, you could recolonize the city inside of a decade."<br /><br />That's clever, but not workable. If by some miracle enough of us internet loudmouths put our money where our mouth is to do this, the media, the courts, and law enforcement would come down on us with a righteous fury we could never withstand. </i><br /><br />-------------------------<br /><br />What would law enforcement have to do with it? Is it against the law to have a neighbourhood without diversity? Surely that couldn't be. Wouldn't that go against your constitution or something to have a law like that? I can see you would get in trouble if you refused to sell to certain races, though. <br /><br />But people of like races just seem to naturally congregate together in neighbourhoods. Around Vancouver the Chinese prefer the suburb of Richmond for some reason, while the folks from the Punjab like Surrey and south Vancouver. The Punjabi folk and other south Asians seem to like living in enormous houses with all their relatives. They build so-called "monster" houses that take up the whole lot practically. I don't know how they can stand living with extended family--it would drive me nuts. But it does help to explain why there is so much domestic violence in that culture.Melykinnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-66251468270780295492009-10-27T11:53:41.634-07:002009-10-27T11:53:41.634-07:00"The rest of your argument betrays a lack of ..."The rest of your argument betrays a lack of reading comprehension. My point is that the shift away from European representation in science and engineering toward Chinese/Indian representation in the same has a resulted in a radical lowering of the quality and quantity of scientific advances and scientific revolutions. But otherwise, where is the great revolution in the sciences ever since these Turd-Worlders took it over."<br /><br />Turd-Worlders? Hmmm. <br /><br />I don't know, but it seems like we're on the cusp of giant breakthroughs in computers, AI, biogenetics, medicine, nanotechnology, and much else. At any rate, modern discoveries or inventions are generally not the work of ONE man--white or non-white--but a collaborative effort of various peoples working together. I think you just don't like Hindus and Chinese. If all those Hindus and Chinese working at NASA or some research lab were white, you would not be complaining even if the level of achievement had been the same in the past 40 yrs. And, if Hindu or Chinese scientists began to make alarming discoveries, you would complain that that the 'dotheads and chinks' are taking over!!!!! You're not really talking about science but about racial solidarity, and that's fine--as long as you're honest about it. <br /><br />Anyway, great advances have been made in the past 40 yrs. Furthermore, lots of advances are improvements and refinement of knowledge we already have. True, the combustible engine was invented long ago, but are we to assume that the latest fuel-efficient engine from Honda(those damn 'Japs'!)that's many times more powerful is not a technological advancement--because white guys invented the first one long ago? Are to say that since the Wright Brothers invented the airplance 100 yrs ago, a jumbo jet is no proof of progress or advance since it's just another airplane?<br /><br />There are many Hindus and Chinese--and others--fine-tuning and improving technologies we have, and that's 99% of progress in science and technology... until someone stumbles upon another major breakthrough. But, the sciences are so specialized and complex nowadays that new inventions will be more collaborative than ever before. We still like the idea of the superstar scientist or theorist--because we like superhero myths--, but in fact, most new stuff will have been the work of many working together, sharing ideas, etc. <br /><br />And, it's too simplistic to say whites don't go into science or engineering because it doesn't pay as well as finance or etc. Most people who come out of business schools end up managing a corner drug store. Most accountants do okay, not great. A trained engineer or lab scientist makes more money. And then you have lots of white people who go into music, acting, screenwriting, journalism, etc though chance of success is very low and they end up waiting tables or working as office clerks. No, the main reason why whites stay away from science and math is because it's considered 'geeky' and unglamorous in our stupid trashy culture. (I'll admit I stayed away from those fields for the same reason--plus the fact that I've no patience for long hrs of study and no aptitude for brainy stuff). Also, there's less room for BS in science or math. Either you're good or you suck, either you know or you don't know. In other fields, there's more room for BS, charisma, cleverness, getting ahead with handshakes and smiles and connections. Of course, most whites who try to be Gordon Gekkos don't become Gordon Gekkos. They end up as a bunch of Dilberts. But, they prefer picking up a steady paycheck doing relatively easy work than taking on the hard 'geeky' work that requires many years of math and/or engineering.Middletown Girlnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-24281960074788626662009-10-27T10:57:58.605-07:002009-10-27T10:57:58.605-07:00Truth(er) mentioned various supposedly American in...Truth(er) mentioned various supposedly American innovations:<br /><br />1) Commercialization of the automobile.<br />2) Commercialization of the aircraft.<br />3) Radar<br />4) Rockets<br />5) Radio<br />6)Television<br />7) The Jet Engine<br />8) Computers<br />9) The Transistor<br />10) The Space Program<br />11) The Microwave Oven<br />12) DNA Discovery<br /><br />Well, quite a few of these are not American at all. Radar was British, and so, arguably, was radio (Marconi was a naturalized British subject, and if not regarded as British is Italian; and James Clark Maxwell was British). Television has several fathers, including John Logie Baird, a Scot, and the first regular TV broadcasting service started in Britain in 1936. The jet engine is another British invention, by Frank Whittle. The first computer is partly a matter of definition, but the Colossus of 1943 and the Manchester Mark 1 of 1948 both have strong claims and are both British, as does Konrad Zuse's machine of I think 1942 in Germany. The genetic code of DNA was unravelled in Britain by a Crick (British) and Watson (American) with help from some others.Graham Ashernoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-47949690586771255932009-10-27T10:03:22.122-07:002009-10-27T10:03:22.122-07:00Truth(er),
The "Turd-Worlders" may have...Truth(er),<br /><br />The "Turd-Worlders" may have retarded (returded?) scientific and technological progress, but I'm not so sure that we'd all be vacationing on Mars had science & engineering stayed European for the past few decades. This assumes too much and ignores all kinds of other possible factors. Other people like Ray Kurzweil that similarly make all kinds of assumptions claim that we'll reach the Singularity and achieve human immortality in 20 years.<br /><br />Also, people that make similar arguments to yours (i.e. the "Turd-Worlders" are ruining science) also seem to argue and even boast that despite the "Turd-World" influx, science is still dominated by Europeans/Euro-Ams, pointing to Nobel counts, top scientific figures, top science department composition etc. So presumably, science and especially top science is still dominated by Europeans/Euro-Ams, and those Euros/Eur-Ams pushed out are marginal cases that went into more highly paying professions such as law, finance, or something. But I'm not convinced that these marginal cases would've made an impact above and beyond the current science and technology.<br /><br />Frankly, I'm not sure what to believe. People much smarter than I am appear to arrive at different and contradictory positions on this issue.<br /><br />I do suspect though that the roughly 500 year period of tremendous European advancement from the late Renaissance to the mid-20th Century that we tend to extrapolate from and whose progress we tend to extend into the future is likely to have been a unique event in history, both in light of the "Turd-World" <i>and</i> Europeans, Nordics, European-Americans, etc.Paxsonnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-44374917153002673012009-10-27T09:44:55.610-07:002009-10-27T09:44:55.610-07:00You know, I can't tell when Fred is being seri...You know, I can't tell when Fred is being serious and when he is being facetious.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-74803146171444631512009-10-27T08:49:37.600-07:002009-10-27T08:49:37.600-07:00middletown girl said
> I make a distinction b...middletown girl said<br /><br />> I make a distinction between modernized Pakis who settled nicely into British society and contributed their share of hard work AND those Pakis who arrived later just to leech off welfare and maintain their barbaric customs. You condemn all, I condemn the bad apples. <<br /><br />This degenerating process is inevitable. It's an example of "reversion to the mean." Say the typical z has an IQ of 92. The first z immigrants are usually smarter people, more daring, more successful; they establish a beachhead (family or social, or both) in the adopted country. People rave about how great and hardworking and smart z's are! Then, the others follow: relatives, friends, friends of relatives, children. While the first immigrants were self-selected high-quality people (from a certain point of view), the quality tends to decline, particularly under "chain" immigration. With enough z's in the country, their IQ average is reestablished. This is why the more z's you have in an area, the more like zland it becomes. (You cannot escape from yourself.) The same holds true of a area filling up with Pakis. Can you simply forbid the "morons" from coming in? No: their burgeoning is an integral part of the process. You let a genius in, you have to let his wife in...and her brother...the brother has a son, so he comes in too...along with the parents and the other inlaws...and their people... After all, you don't want to be denounced by everyone as a cruel Hitlerite, do you.<br /><br />Imagine an American Indian, circa 1600, muttering "I sorta liked those first palefaces...but the ones coming in lately are bad apples..."Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-21351381177840932172009-10-27T06:34:42.847-07:002009-10-27T06:34:42.847-07:00The British government does not legal authority ov...<b>The British government does not legal authority over its asylum and immigration policy. We no longer have control over our defence and foreign policy either - the Afghan conflict is a legacy project. Today it all goes through EU.</b><br /><br />And Labour had no control over that, did they? They couldn't like, say, have held a referendum asking Brits if they wanted to surrender these rights, now could they? You know - like the referendum they promised to hold?<br /><br />If Britons no longer have control over their immigration policies then it's only because the powers that be, Labour and even many Conservatives, didn't want them to have that power. Both parties are toiling away night and day, in fact, to ensure that voters have no real choice about the matter - Tweedle Dum ad Tweedle Dee at your service.Marknoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-43916957717022807232009-10-27T03:04:39.566-07:002009-10-27T03:04:39.566-07:00Edward:
Pakistanis, Bangladeshis, Africans and Car...<i><br />Edward:<br />Pakistanis, Bangladeshis, Africans and Carribbeans are not citizens of EU countries.</i><br /><br />You need to understand they become EU residents after 5 years (example) when they can do all of the above. The British government does not legal authority over its asylum and immigration policy. We no longer have control over our defence and foreign policy either - the Afghan conflict is a legacy project. Today it all goes through EU.<br /><br />Please catch up soon.Edwardhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06642260769998827550noreply@blogger.com