tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post6173603895440883162..comments2024-03-27T18:24:19.683-07:00Comments on Steve Sailer: iSteve: Peter Schaeffer: The history of immigration and assimilationUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger66125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-6522012065448735482014-02-06T12:21:27.715-08:002014-02-06T12:21:27.715-08:00"All Jews should be as emotionally resilient ..."All Jews should be as emotionally resilient as Reebok founder and CEO Paul Fireman"<br /><br /><br />Paul Fireman was not the founder of Reebok. He was merely the person who brought the Reebok brand to America.<br /><br />Reebok was founded in 1895 in Bolton, Greater Manchester, UK, by J.W. Foster<br /><br />http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reebok<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-84346011499839178612013-06-27T09:48:56.606-07:002013-06-27T09:48:56.606-07:00DVN said: So they (the Israelites) never wanted a...DVN said: So they (the Israelites) never wanted anything to do with that tribe (the Amalekites).<br /><br />Hunsdon clarified: Except exterminate them.Hunsdonnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-66356786114245072282013-06-27T00:04:45.490-07:002013-06-27T00:04:45.490-07:00Amalekite Golf and Cricket Club"
Wrong analo...<br />Amalekite Golf and Cricket Club"<br /><br />Wrong analogy , Amalekites were just an ahole predatory tribe in the wilderness. They had nothing the Jews were seduced by.So they never wanted anything to do with that tribe<br /><br />A more apt analogy would be the Babylonian Croquet Club or Egyptian Tennis Club<br /><br />Interestingly Greek and Romans never held in such awe by the Israelites as these more ancient but (relatively) less powerful peoples<br />Dr Van Nostrandnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-952312218957622272013-06-26T21:25:32.388-07:002013-06-26T21:25:32.388-07:00That's the nice thing about India there is not...<br />That's the nice thing about India there is nothing anyone wants to take credit for so instead people spend all their time lying about what caste they are."<br /><br />You continue to prove that you are a goddamn idiot.Dr Van Nostrandnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-46866704882594180582013-06-26T12:56:05.518-07:002013-06-26T12:56:05.518-07:00That's the nice thing about India there is not...That's the nice thing about India there is nothing anyone wants to take credit for so instead people spend all their time lying about what caste they are. Jason Wellsnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-11849845449161025002013-06-26T12:13:11.239-07:002013-06-26T12:13:11.239-07:00Without the '24 immigration act, America would...Without the '24 immigration act, America would have been much whiter, and as a result much less crime and other problems. In fact the '24 immigration act was the first attack on white America. WASPs betrayed other whites, and have continued to do so. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-16040834881847319512013-06-26T11:49:51.767-07:002013-06-26T11:49:51.767-07:00"The U.S. Jewish community debates the implic..."The U.S. Jewish community debates the implications of intermarriage, and some quarters are more hostile to it than others. Yet you write as if the most stridently hostile viewpoint is normative. That is inaccurate."<br /><br /><br />This issue is another good example of Jews attacking White people for something as a way of distracting attention from themselves.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-58081383866643653812013-06-26T09:56:32.326-07:002013-06-26T09:56:32.326-07:00American jobs<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8uMbpaFp3i4" rel="nofollow">American jobs</a>Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-16435500719672326282013-06-26T06:01:04.805-07:002013-06-26T06:01:04.805-07:00Aaron Gross: Do you know any Jews who are, in Phi...Aaron Gross: Do you know any Jews who are, in Phil Weiss' formulation, PEP? That is, progressive except for Palestine? Or are they all (forgive me) monolithic liberals?<br /><br />I can understand and, well, sympathize with the concept of a homeland under siege, and how that can cause otherwise deeply held political opinions, nay, political beliefs, to fall by the wayside.<br /><br />Do all of your Jewish acquaintances reject, say, the frothy-mouthed rantings of Jennifer Rubin against the Palestinians?Hunsdonnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-89344285735750233502013-06-26T05:58:18.836-07:002013-06-26T05:58:18.836-07:00A historical boogeyman does wonders for bostering ...<i> A historical boogeyman does wonders for bostering solidarity. </i><br /><br />True enough. But whites in America don't need a "historical" boogeyman. They have real ones, fully active today, robbing, raping, beating and murdering them. All the time. Yet this does nothing for white solidarity. Hell, whites won't even acknowledge they are a target because they are white. peterikenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-57467966457288930932013-06-26T03:26:20.283-07:002013-06-26T03:26:20.283-07:00t the end of chapter 15, he writes that Jews must ...t the end of chapter 15, he writes that Jews must answer for the "revolutionary cutthroats" in their ranks just as Russian Gentiles must repent "for the pogroms, for those merciless arsonist peasants, for...crazed revolutionary soldiers." It is not, he adds, a matter of answering "before other peoples, but to oneself, to one's consciousness, and before God. ..."<br /><br />actually that sounds very fair.Gentiles have done their share of self flagellation , a little introspection from Jews would go a long way towards cordial relationsDr Van Nostrandnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-76150754385246593222013-06-26T02:52:43.334-07:002013-06-26T02:52:43.334-07:00What were your ancestors doing 3500years ago?
Ans...What were your ancestors doing 3500years ago?<br /><br />Answer: building Stonehenge. It still looks good"<br /><br />Why are you assumingly a Nordic Anglo or Celt type taking credit for the achievements of the darker Iberian Neolithic peoples?Dr Van Nostrandnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-52705387785105135802013-06-26T02:02:05.226-07:002013-06-26T02:02:05.226-07:00"If you're still cursing King Haman each ...<br />"If you're still cursing King Haman each year on Purim for what he did to your tribe"<br /><br />If you still kept cursing the Barbary pirates,Ottoman Sultans and Mongols for what they did to your peoples like the Eastern Europeans did, you would have a stronger social and racial cohesion.<br /><br />A historical boogeyman does wonders for bostering solidarity.<br /><br />If werent for the presence of Turks a few miles away(Northern Cyprus), Greeks would be far more chaotic and quarrelsome than they are now.<br /><br />Ditto for Israelis and the wide Arab world.<br /><br />Chinese and Japanese. India and West and Central Asian Muslim states and so on<br /><br />Interestingly from the late 1800s till the First World War, it was Spain that loomed large as vicious predators. Wars in Phillipines,Cuba and Mexico left an indelible impression<br /><br />This latest Mestizo export courtesy the white Hispanic(no not THAT white Hispanic) mother country loving elites in Mexico is another battle in the Anglo Hispanic wars. <br /><br /><br />Who will rid me of this troublesome indio!Dr Van Nostrandnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-17423750631862201022013-06-25T23:09:54.725-07:002013-06-25T23:09:54.725-07:00"In retrospect, I wish America had been more ..."In retrospect, I wish America had been more open to Eastern European immigrants during the 20th century. The 1924 restriction was a bad idea in keeping them out. It would have meant more whites here and less population pressures in Europe, thus less economic pressures that might lead to war. " - America had the very same problems, so all you're doing is shifting Hitler to the west.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-43791298700293752442013-06-25T21:06:01.573-07:002013-06-25T21:06:01.573-07:00Hmm, I thought it was just that one kook mentionin...Hmm, I thought it was just that one kook mentioning the Purim thing, but other people jumped on it, too. So:<br /><br />1. Haman was not "King Haman," as everyone calls him here. He wasn't the king. Come on, get at least some clue about what you're talking about.<br /><br />2. Haman didn't exist, nor did any of the other characters. The Book of Esther was a fairy tale. Unlike the events in the Torah, I don't think even religious Jews are supposed to believe that it really happened. Unlike some other stories in the Bible, it's not a retelling of real events. Most Jews in America don't believe it really happened.<br /><br />3. Most Jewish Americans don't celebrate the massacre in the Book of Esther; they don't celebrate the drowning of the Egyptian soldiers in Exodus either. They're liberals. Purim is mostly just an excuse to wear costumes and get drunk.Aaron Grosshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07105500964362053569noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-44599909815392515832013-06-25T20:37:27.617-07:002013-06-25T20:37:27.617-07:00Just look at the IRS going after the Tea Party: Sh...<i>Just look at the IRS going after the Tea Party: Shulman, Lois Lerner, Steven Miller, etc. v. Middle America ...</i><br /><br />Yes, there's something about the ethnicity of those IRS executives.<br /><br />There's probably some parallel here to the U.S.S.R in the 1920's. <br /><br /><i>Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn<br />From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia<br /><br />Solzhenitsyn also published a two-volume work on the history of Russian-Jewish relations (Two Hundred Years Together 2001, 2002). This book stirred controversy and caused Solzhenitsyn to be accused of anti-Semitism.[56][57][58][59]<br />The book became a best-seller in Russia. Solzhenitsyn begins this work with a plea for "patient mutual comprehension" on the part of Russians and Russian Jews. The author writes that the book was conceived in the hope of promoting "mutually agreeable and fruitful pathways for the future development of Russian-Jewish relations".[60]<br /><br />There is sharp division on the allegation of anti-Semitism. From Solzhenitsyn's own essay "Repentance and Self-Limitation in the Life of Nations",[61]<b> he calls for Russians and Jews alike to take moral responsibility for the "renegades" from both communities who enthusiastically supported a Marxist dictatorship after the October Revolution. At the end of chapter 15, he writes that Jews must answer for the "revolutionary cutthroats" in their ranks just as Russian Gentiles must repent "for the pogroms, for those merciless arsonist peasants, for...crazed revolutionary soldiers."</b> It is not, he adds, a matter of answering "before other peoples, but to oneself, to one's consciousness, and before God. ... </i>David Davenporthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03315090179595817174noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-22608772569945768112013-06-25T20:19:54.730-07:002013-06-25T20:19:54.730-07:00The new position allows officiation even if the no...The new position allows officiation even if the non-Jewish spouse doesn't convert. Most Reform rabbis ask for a promise that the children will be raised Jewish, but there are a few who don't even demand that.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-51257222245929888972013-06-25T20:06:19.498-07:002013-06-25T20:06:19.498-07:00Elliot Abrams---all around neocon and good guy ins...Elliot Abrams---all around neocon and good guy insider!---thinks that Jews should <br /><a href="http://mondoweiss.net/2009/07/elliott-abrams-tried-to-shun-me-and-my-wife-he-failed.html" rel="nofollow">sit shiva</a> for those who marry out. (I.e., "mourn as dead.")Hunsdonnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-86520185851697916982013-06-25T20:06:16.231-07:002013-06-25T20:06:16.231-07:00The 1920's immigration restrictions were becau...The 1920's immigration restrictions were because of dire economic problems in the early 20's and serious problems with the immigrant themselves, examples:<br /><br />https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sacco_and_Vanzetti<br /><br />https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leon_Czolgosz<br /><br />https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al_Capone<br /><br />I these cases, many of the new immigrants sided with the criminals, making worse the ethnic tensions the mass immigration caused. <br /><br /><br /><br />Bertram Noonenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-44523416675911467462013-06-25T18:57:40.530-07:002013-06-25T18:57:40.530-07:00That may seem restrictive, but is a huge change co...<i>That may seem restrictive, but is a huge change compared even to 30 years ago when the official position of the Reform rabbinical assembly was to discourage any such officiation at all.</i><br /><br />Is that racial or religious? I'm pretty sure if the non-Jewish spouse converts there's no problem.Bob Loblawhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11081916786770290968noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-35407871093536260572013-06-25T17:04:19.387-07:002013-06-25T17:04:19.387-07:00Big Bill wrote:
Jewish resentment is not irration...Big Bill wrote:<br /><br /><i>Jewish resentment is not irrational. It prevents assimilation. That is its function. That is why they commemorate Hitler, Chmielewski and Haman in their liturgy. That is why they call Jewish mongrelizing with Americans "the Second Holocaust"</i><br /><br />Only the Orthodox consistently come close to the views and behavior you describe. Many Reform rabbis will now officiate at intermarriages under certain conditions. That may seem restrictive, but is a huge change compared even to 30 years ago when the official position of the Reform rabbinical assembly was to discourage any such officiation at all. The U.S. Jewish community debates the implications of intermarriage, and some quarters are more hostile to it than others. Yet you write as if the most stridently hostile viewpoint is normative. That is inaccurate.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-77024047094297595972013-06-25T13:53:00.627-07:002013-06-25T13:53:00.627-07:00" The first gentile they let in was Danny Tho..." The first gentile they let in was Danny Thomas (Lebanese), that just about says it all."<br /><br />From Wikipedia:<br /><br />At the time, Jack Benny quipped to Thomas that the least the club could have done was to admit a member who looked like a gentile.candid_observernoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-52215792842680290622013-06-25T13:19:46.946-07:002013-06-25T13:19:46.946-07:00Big Bill asked:
What were your ancestors doing 35...Big Bill asked:<br /><br />What were your ancestors doing 3500years ago?<br /><br />Answer: building Stonehenge. It still looks good.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-30309465845742778972013-06-25T12:36:16.141-07:002013-06-25T12:36:16.141-07:00"WASPs are nice, but ultimately naive and som..."WASPs are nice, but ultimately naive and somewhat weak, people."<br /><br />WASPs are (generally) nice and they are certainly naive. Weak? Tell it to America's enemies. Read the first hand accounts of soldiers who have fought America. With the notable exception of the Vietnamese, they weren't amused by the experience. <br /><br />Of course, the core of the American war machine has always been the Scotch-Irish who (to split hairs) are not WASPs. They have been ferocious fighters for our nation, long before 1776. <br /><br />Even putting war aside, American WASPs have demonstrated vast strength and character across every realm of human endeavor. <br /><br />My intent here is not to slight any other group, but simple to reject the 'WASPs as weak' thesis. Naive? Sure. Sorely lacking in the self-confidence that enabled them to build a great nation? Of late, yes. Weak? No.gwyatthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11612825096870341205noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-44942707501078964102013-06-25T12:12:52.966-07:002013-06-25T12:12:52.966-07:00I think that claiming country-club exclusionary pr...I think that claiming country-club exclusionary principles as the basis of Jewish outsider self-definition is a little far-fetched. It's more a confluence of a few other factors:<br /><br />1) Persecution of Jews in Europe in the pre-immigration age, as well as the Holocaust, leading to a more-or-less justifiable paranoia.<br /><br />2) The gradual alignment of Reform and Conservative Judaism, together the dominant stream of American Jewish practice in the 20th century, with liberal causes.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com