tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post6723650799035484545..comments2024-03-27T18:24:19.683-07:00Comments on Steve Sailer: iSteve: House GOP plots stab in the backUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger55125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-23236623176447825062013-09-25T09:47:53.669-07:002013-09-25T09:47:53.669-07:00The strategy of the Republicans in the late 1960&#...The strategy of the Republicans in the late 1960's wasn't so much a Southern strategy but a sunbelt strategy. Paul Johnson mention the growing economic power of some of the southern states like North Carolina, Florida, Texas and sunbelt states like Arizona, Nevada and California in the 1960's. Whites had left the Midwest and Northeast to come to these states while blacks had left the south to the north making an economic gain in the sunbelt. Probably in 1970 California might have had the highest income in the US not the northeast states like it is today. In my opinion Ronald Reagan who like the growers instead of Ceser Chavez because Chavez was a leftist and Reagan was pro-business might caused the major turning point since he turned a blind eye to them bringing in illegal immigrants for farm work. Mexican immigration to Los Angeles seems to have tripled during the decade of the 1970's. La was about 12 percent Mexican in 1970 and about 28 percent Mexican and some Central American by 1980.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-91536555371781329802013-09-24T13:05:38.969-07:002013-09-24T13:05:38.969-07:00“We want to do immigration reform right,” - Roll b...“We want to do immigration reform right,” - Roll back the 1965 immigration law and secure the border in that case.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-19361876121504839892013-09-24T13:03:39.154-07:002013-09-24T13:03:39.154-07:00@Anonymous 9/23/13 1:01 pm,
"Barone...freque...@Anonymous 9/23/13 1:01 pm,<br /><br />"Barone...frequent guest on right-wing talk radio..."<br /><br />Michael Medved,neocon talking head,Loves Barone.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-89848130673689544402013-09-24T10:36:18.084-07:002013-09-24T10:36:18.084-07:00When you point out that the Koch brothers support ...When you point out that the Koch brothers support the gang of 7 bill you are called a liberal Troll. This is a problem with a lot of the Tea Party that opposes illegal immigration but supports anyone that is criticized by the left. The Koch brothers had a meeting about 3 months ago to support a legalization process. In fact, the brothers are so influential in the Republican Party that they invited Cruz, Perry and so forth to several secret meetings and they are about the 3rd richest people in the US.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-26408532057124098252013-09-24T08:56:35.970-07:002013-09-24T08:56:35.970-07:00"Off topic: Business Insider reports that a t..."Off topic: Business Insider reports that a transgendered girl (?) was homecoming queen in Los Angeles"<br /><br />oh, i bet the homecoming king just loved that.<br />9/23/13, 11:56 PM<br />Actually she was in a school in Huntington Beach, Huntington Beach is more libertarian than traditional conservative except with some white nationalists gangs. Huntington Beach voted against prop 8 but voted for McCain in 2008.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-71327393779039491562013-09-24T07:24:08.375-07:002013-09-24T07:24:08.375-07:00"The UK government have cancelled the next ce...<b>"The UK government have cancelled the next census, no prizes for guessing why."</b><br /><br />They haven't cancelled it (the next isn't until 2021), but they're discussing doing so and replacing it with an "annual survey." How in hell can you count the total population without an actual enumeration?<br /><br />The 2011 census found half-a-million more people living on that tiny island than estimates had projected. That Labour would want to hide the results of their immivasion policies is perfectly understandable. Why Tories would want to do so, unless they're on board with the Labour policies, is not.<br /><br />Frankly at this point I'm hopeful the House GOP will hold the line on amnesty. A more charitable interpretation of their actions is that they're running out the clock, talking about doing something 'sometime in the near future,' which is always a month or more away. Remember when it was going to happen in September?<br /><br />They've got budget fights and other matters ahead of them, and that takes up most of the rest of the year. Then we're in an election year, with primaries rapidly approaching. While the Senate might do so (as they did in 2006), the House, with 100% of members up for re-election, probably won't pass an amnesty in an even-numbered year.<br /><br />My bigger fear is that they'll try to pass something in the lame duck session, when several amnesty supporters (Landrieu, Pryor, Graham, etc.) may be winding up the last few days of their political careers. Why we haven't amended the Constitution to eliminate lame duck congressional sessions and lame duck pardons is beyond me.Matthewnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-65812749695151359212013-09-24T05:11:29.216-07:002013-09-24T05:11:29.216-07:00They could be busting illegals and their employers...<i>They could be busting illegals and their employers every day of the week, multiple busts per day all across the country, if they wanted to. If the cops heard someone was operating a meth lab in the area, and they knew that meth dealers always bought their supplies at Home Depot first thing in the morning, you can bet it wouldn't take them two years to get a bust out of it.</i><br /><br />The real key would be to simply change the rules and institute draconian, going-out-of-business type fines for employers of criminal infiltrators. That would dry up the swamp with the current level of enforcement. Businessmen generally don't play the bankruptcy lotto. Throw in a <i>viable</i> E-Verify and cut off bennies for criminal infiltrators and call it a day. The beauty is, criminal infiltrators would simply become unemployable and self-deport. No crybaby gaming from the media over deportations.<br /><br />There'd be <i>fewer</i> man-hours, <i>lower</i> costs, and far better results.<br /><br />P.S., I'd like to thank the Associated Press for the term, "criminal infiltrator." I was using "illegal infiltrator" like the Jewish politicians and press do in Israel, but the AP pointed out in their style guide that no one is illegal. They're right, the proper word is "criminal." Thanks AP!Svigornoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-13661806929437585872013-09-24T05:10:09.386-07:002013-09-24T05:10:09.386-07:00This is not "the Frankfurt School" (the ...<i>This is not "the Frankfurt School" (the explanation the late Andrew Breitbart offered) or the variant "the Jews" others offer but three critical factors.<br /><br />1. Modern technology alienates and destroys like acid ordinary feelings of nationalism and group unity, and does it on Whites who use it the most the most severely (Derbyshire noted that his daughters pals from coastal China also exhibit PC/multiculturalism).</i><br /><br />It's just hand-waving until you explain <i>how and why</i> technology alienates and destroys feelings of nationalism and group unity in the west, but seems to have no effect on Japanese nationalism and group unity, at least, not in the context of immigration.<br /><br />On it's face, this idea makes little sense. E.g., here:<br /><br /><a href="http://isteve.blogspot.com/2013/09/peter-turchin-explains-war-what-is-it.html" rel="nofollow">Peter Turchin explains War! What is it good for?</a><br /><br />Technology is what <i>helped make nationalism possible</i>.<br /><br /><i>2. Modern technology amplifies young and youngish women's desires to move leftward for status marker reasons and disdain their co-ethnic males as unworthy because they are generally status-equal.</i><br /><br />This makes no sense. Who's making the "other" status-superior? I know the Frankfurt School's got this one as the top of their totem, and the media has the Frankfurt School Cliff's Notes in lieu of company manuals, so it makes sense to <i>me</i>. But you've ruled that one out, so it doesn't fit your theory at all.<br /><br />This is just common sense; in high-tech societies, people from low-tech societies should be inherently L-O-W-E-R status, not higher.<br /><br /><i>3. Technology provides a huge apparent but not real "safety margin" and so society looks like it can take any shock or stress or when the reality is that it is more fragile. Hence no threat mass immigration.</i><br /><br />Nah. Media does that. The media (and by extension, the Frankfurt School) is the nervous system of nations, and it's controlled by a hostile elite. That's why they talk about meaningless crap all day and ignore, say, immivasion.<br /><br /><i>4. As you noted, Elites face no external threat from other elites forcing unity between masses and elites; instead their threat is internal and class-oriented hence "real enemy" is White middle class people.</i><br /><br />White "gentiles," yes.<br /><br />And, to tie it all together, P.S: the Frankfurt School was like 90%+ Jewish.<br /><br />In short, yes, the case that it's (partly*) the Jews and the Frankfurt School is well-made, and no, your case against the Jews + Frankfurt School theory isn't well-made, and no, your alternative explanation doesn't make any sense.<br /><br />(* necessary, but not sufficient, works for me)<br /><br />The irony is, nobody's forcing you to absolve the Frankfurt School and the Jews of <i>any and all</i> responsibility with your hare-brained explanations, thus dragging me into the discussion to punch your Hasbara full of holes. Which kinda makes ironic the fact that the only people you carry water for are the Frankfurt School and the Jews.<br /><br />P.P.S: I've figured out a way to save you time. Just condense all your arguments to "it's just the inevitable tides of history and society, nothing can be done." Because that's what all your stuff boils down to: "nothing can be done, it's inevitable, it's just the nature of the universe." It's the eternal refrain of the social malefactor.Svigornoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-74760677024981108562013-09-24T01:37:32.508-07:002013-09-24T01:37:32.508-07:00"The UK government have cancelled the next ce..."The UK government have cancelled the next census, no prizes for guessing why."<br />Unlike the US census, the British census is pretty useful for breaking down races and ethnicities. You got separate categories for White British, White Irish, White other, Asian (Pakistan), Asian (Bangladesh),Mixed race (W+African) Miexed race (Asian+ African (Caribbean) etc. Look it up inthe wikipedia.<br />I gather the first category, White (British) is dwindling faster than projected in the media. So they´d rather not make it public.<br /> <br /><br />BB753noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-77567838213904160442013-09-23T23:56:54.961-07:002013-09-23T23:56:54.961-07:00"Off topic: Business Insider reports that a t..."Off topic: Business Insider reports that a transgendered girl (?) was homecoming queen in Los Angeles"<br /><br />oh, i bet the homecoming king just loved that.jodynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-10656377178948273802013-09-23T23:25:27.529-07:002013-09-23T23:25:27.529-07:00Reagan and Bush Debate Illegal Immigration
ALEX KN...Reagan and Bush Debate Illegal Immigration<br />ALEX KNAPP · WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 7, 2011 · 12 COMMENTS<br />Via my colleague Doug’s Twitter Feed, this is unbelievable Outside the Beltway a video on George H Bush and Ronald Reagan supported legalization process back in 1980 during a debate. A young man asked you we be education the children of illegal immigrants in Houston in 1980. So, Ed Meese might have lied a little to save Reagan reputation.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-34370145600683609322013-09-23T22:27:55.764-07:002013-09-23T22:27:55.764-07:00Ben,
I didn't mean that illegals are only fou...Ben,<br /><br />I didn't mean that illegals are <em>only</em> found in the industries I mentioned; just that if the authorities want to enforce the law, those would be an easy place to start. As you say, construction could also be on that list. In my area, apparently most of the drywall work is done by illegals.<br /><br />Whatever the exact list, there's plenty of low-hanging fruit out there before they would need to go after anyone sneaky enough to require a 2-year sting.Cail Corishevhttp://cailcorishev.wordpress.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-57203462607226569772013-09-23T21:56:23.752-07:002013-09-23T21:56:23.752-07:00You think? Every public construction job in Texas ...You think? Every public construction job in Texas is done by illegals in plain sight of millions of motorists passing by every day, so it's a pretty damn safe bet that sociopaths in your neck of the woods also hire illegals to do jobs that the public doesn't know about.<br />Well, research on construction jobs in Texas shows about 60 percent of them are Hispanic. Maybe, not road construction but Houston is known to hire illegal immigrants on construction of high rises. Also, Texas is second to California in total number of illegal immigrants, something that Republican Texans don't want to be reminded.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-56891187701406892132013-09-23T21:36:38.027-07:002013-09-23T21:36:38.027-07:00Anonymous 10:49 wrote:
The GOP hasn't been an...Anonymous 10:49 wrote:<br /><br /><i>The GOP hasn't been an advocate of the interests of the American people since Teddy Roosevelt, if not earlier</i><br /><br />Harding. Coolidge. Lot of Republicans in the America First committee. Eisenhower.Noah172noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-75864976743199250312013-09-23T21:30:17.380-07:002013-09-23T21:30:17.380-07:00Black Death wrote:
Even the Republicans aren'...Black Death wrote:<br /><br /><i>Even the Republicans aren't stupid enough to pass a bill like this in an election year</i><br /><br />The Reagan amnesty was passed by Congress <i>less than a month before</i> the Congressional elections of that year (in which the Republicans got clobbered).<br /><br />Dubya Bush pushed his amnesty proposal in 2004, his reelection year, and 2006, a Congressional election. McCain talked about it in his presidential campaign.Noah172noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-56117100979333685452013-09-23T21:29:27.195-07:002013-09-23T21:29:27.195-07:00It's not complicated; if a place is slaughteri...<i>It's not complicated; if a place is slaughtering animals or milking cows or picking fruit and vegetables or assembling clothing on a large scale, it probably hires illegals. </i><br /><br />You think? Every public construction job in Texas is done by illegals in plain sight of millions of motorists passing by every day, so it's a pretty damn safe bet that sociopaths in your neck of the woods also hire illegals to do jobs that the public doesn't know about.ben tillmannoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-43859697643819409992013-09-23T21:14:06.836-07:002013-09-23T21:14:06.836-07:00I saw a chart of immigration and Mexicans were abo...<i>I saw a chart of immigration and Mexicans were about 3rd in 1970 but jumped to first by 1980 and this wasn't all the illegal immigration. </i><br /><br />It's worse than that. Most people were brought up to think of immigrants as mainly Germans, Italians and Irish. Those are, or were, the big three. In 400 years, from Jamestown in 1607 until today, about 7 million Germans, 5 million Italians and 4.5 million Irish immigrated here. That's about 17 million COMBINED over 400 years.<br /><br />In just the past 35 to 40 years, about 17 million Mexicans have come to the USA! Get that? As many Mexicans have come to the USA in just the past 40 years as ALL THE GERMANS, ITALIANS AND IRISH COMBINED OVER 400 YEARS.<br /><br />That's crazy especially when one considers that Mexico is a New World nation. To me that is the most frustrating part of current immigration. The vast majority of today's demographic changing immigration is from the New World. The New World is supposed to be where new nations flourish. <br /><br />If Latins have messed up their part of the New World so much in just two hundred years, do we really want them coming here in such huge numbers?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-34355392530032140992013-09-23T18:19:39.373-07:002013-09-23T18:19:39.373-07:00I saw a chart of immigration and Mexicans were abo...I saw a chart of immigration and Mexicans were about 3rd in 1970 but jumped to first by 1980 and this wasn't all the illegal immigration. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-79525805052227387802013-09-23T18:16:23.679-07:002013-09-23T18:16:23.679-07:00Oh, I dunno. Eisenhower was pretty sound on immigr...Oh, I dunno. Eisenhower was pretty sound on immigration, <br />I think.<br /> I think Ike is not like by the rank and file because marginal tax rates were high in the 1950's. Republicans like Reagan of course since he lowered those marginal tax rates even if he legalized millions while Ike booted them out is not like since marginal tax rates were high.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-51927741793134767462013-09-23T17:41:41.873-07:002013-09-23T17:41:41.873-07:00"The GOP hasn't been an advocate of the i..."The GOP hasn't been an advocate of the interests of the American people since Teddy Roosevelt, if not earlier."<br /><br />Oh, I dunno. Eisenhower was pretty sound on immigration, I think.Sgt. Joe Fridaynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-50962369760241550442013-09-23T17:33:24.646-07:002013-09-23T17:33:24.646-07:00Aye, laddie! Should have known it wasn't the ...Aye, laddie! Should have known it wasn't the Frankfurt School imposing Cultural Marxism, it was iPhoned schoolgirls themselves! <br /><br /> It just never gets auld, does it?<br /> Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-32825850442955041792013-09-23T16:51:50.465-07:002013-09-23T16:51:50.465-07:00(Reuters) - Hundreds of U.S. immigration agents ra...<em>(Reuters) - Hundreds of U.S. immigration agents raided the Koch Foods Inc. chicken plant in Fairfield, Ohio, and arrested more than 160 employees as part of a criminal operation against illegal immigrants, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) said on Tuesday.</em><br /><br />I don't want to downplay a good thing, but this is the equivalent of damning with faint praise. If it takes 300 agents and two years to nab 160 criminals who were operating in plain sight, someone's not trying very hard. <br /><br />It's not complicated; if a place is slaughtering animals or milking cows or picking fruit and vegetables or assembling clothing on a large scale, it probably hires illegals. <em>It's not rare.</em> Just ask around: I know that a hog farm 10 miles from my place hires illegals; a banker who worked with them told me so. In some industries, nearly everyone hires illegals; it's just the way it's done. Granted, the cops need <em>some</em> evidence to kick down the door, but when they <em>know</em> a crime is being committed, they usually don't have much trouble coming up with some.<br /><br />So drive around the neighborhood undercover in a construction truck in the early morning until you spot some mestizo-looking guys hanging around on a corner, offer them $100 bucks for the day, drive them several miles away, bust them, offer them $500 to snitch on the last place they worked, and go bust that. Or send some mestizo cops undercover to go hang out on the corner until they get hired, and go bust that place. <br /><br />They could be busting illegals and their employers every day of the week, multiple busts per day all across the country, if they wanted to. If the cops heard someone was operating a meth lab in the area, and they knew that meth dealers always bought their supplies at Home Depot first thing in the morning, you can bet it wouldn't take them two years to get a bust out of it.Cail Corishevhttp://cailcorishev.wordpress.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-2094018305910706892013-09-23T16:02:12.814-07:002013-09-23T16:02:12.814-07:00Meh. This comes from the insanely pro-Amnesty WAPO...Meh. This comes from the insanely pro-Amnesty WAPO. <br /><br />The mainstream media is often guilty of wishful thinking.<br /><br />I'm not saying ignore it. But I'm taking it with a grain of salt at this point. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-89805494003082873132013-09-23T15:36:17.519-07:002013-09-23T15:36:17.519-07:00Peter Turchin is at it again:
http://dienekes.blo...Peter Turchin is at it again:<br /><br />http://dienekes.blogspot.com/2013/09/simulating-three-thousand-years-of.htmlAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-55068355992017304902013-09-23T13:36:44.858-07:002013-09-23T13:36:44.858-07:00A nation built for immigrants... and people from h...A nation built for immigrants... and people from here can go f*** themselvesAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com