tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post7062164026182673126..comments2024-03-27T18:24:19.683-07:00Comments on Steve Sailer: iSteve: "Barack Obama is the kindest, bravest, warmest, most wonderful human being I've ever known in my life."Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger53125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-64589402887128017352008-10-06T21:02:00.000-07:002008-10-06T21:02:00.000-07:00Barack Obama and other high profile politicians ar...Barack Obama and other high profile politicians are attempting to limit the right to use on-demand, short-term financial assistance. A number of cities and towns are also attempting bans on the industry, with several more attempting to follow suit. American citizens from all across the nation are fighting the legislation hoping to have their voices heard to prevent the abolishment of the payday loan industry. Regardless of the hundreds of thousands of potential jobs lost, these politicians are encouraging the elimination of this matter generally for personal political gain.No Fax Payday Loans- Davidhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11958017480966673393noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-51636506340706159812008-02-15T12:50:00.000-08:002008-02-15T12:50:00.000-08:00"It’s because you know that the few short years of..."It’s because you know that the few short years of black governance have already produced a more criminal record than 45 years of Apartheid."<BR/><BR/>There were 342 years of Apartheid in South Africa, not 45, it just took a while for them to come it with a fancy name for it. And by the way; if Minto has blood on his hands for something he didn't do does that mean that white 'gun rights' advocates are responsible for the (white) moron who shot up NIU university as well?Truthhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17286755693955361308noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-4791199014683110082008-02-15T03:39:00.000-08:002008-02-15T03:39:00.000-08:00truth,You’re not serious and you certainly have no...truth,<BR/>You’re not serious and you certainly have no empathy so there is no point arguing. I'm going to close with this: <BR/><BR/>When John Minto, another insufferable Anti-Apartheid activist (which you seem to be as well) from New Zealand was told by a Boer who had recently lost relatives to black, state-organised farm murderers that he (Minto) has blood on his hands, the guy just hung up. <BR/><BR/>You people say many fantastic things about the evils of the past and Apartheid, but you never come with facts. It’s because you know that the few short years of black governance have already produced a more criminal record than 45 years of Apartheid. And that's with the ANC firmly entrenched (due to black masses) and without a Cold War. And you also know that states such as Angola and Congo are veritable cess-pools of violence, corruption and disease. And you also know why that is. But because it behoves you to bait whitey, and the Afrikaners have no political and military might anymore (thanks to your types), they are easy prey for your heartless arguments.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-34786025821451670132008-02-14T20:31:00.000-08:002008-02-14T20:31:00.000-08:00The majority of South Africans were living in Thir...<I>The majority of South Africans were living in Third World (or worse) status for years. The difference now is that some Afrikaners are in the same boat. That's unfortunate, but it seems like a lot of this could have been prevented had Afrikaners started preparing for majority rule decades ago. For example, what if you had developed a "talented tenth" black elite 20 or 30 years ago? Then you might have competent blacks today to work the utilities.<BR/><BR/>-fred</I><BR/><BR/>Why not develop a "talented tenth" of Palestinians in Israel?<BR/><BR/>How would you like it, fred, if Jews in Israel had to live like Palestinians in Gaza? <BR/><BR/>Tsk tsk. We're all getting tired of listening to the same old hypocritical cant from Jews.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-15320748054077148102008-02-14T18:26:00.000-08:002008-02-14T18:26:00.000-08:00"Truth said...The party line has said for years th..."Truth said...<BR/><BR/>The party line has said for years that there was a genocidal advance in which the hunter-gatherer San and the Herder Khoi peoples were systematically murdered over a period of a few hundred years. There is NO great evidence that this is true. No mass graves, handed down oral traditions or anything else."<BR/><BR/>And the Afrikaaners did not exterminate the Bantu they found at the cape either. None-the-less, after arriving, the Afrikaaners ended up running the land that the Bantu had held. Just as previously the Bantu ended up running the land previously held by the Khoi and San.<BR/><BR/>And your point was?<BR/><BR/>I'm not saying that whites can't be ba***rds. I'm just saying that they are ba***rds who are capable of running a modern country, whereas the empirical evidence suggests that blacks cannot.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-69136113485395571002008-02-14T15:12:00.000-08:002008-02-14T15:12:00.000-08:00I am not echoing any white nationalist anything\Bu...<I>I am not echoing any white nationalist anything</I>\<BR/><BR/>But you <I>are</I> echoing WN arguments. Every time you open your mouth to champion blacks and accuse whites, you make our argument for us.<BR/><BR/>I skipped the joke; I tired of your argument-via-just-so-stories some time back; I hope and expect I didn't miss anything.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-63759424222505707772008-02-14T10:26:00.000-08:002008-02-14T10:26:00.000-08:00"So perhaps apartheid was just karma opening a can..."So perhaps apartheid was just karma opening a can of whoop-ass on the Bantu, huh?"<BR/><BR/>Interesting that you should mention that Martin.<BR/><BR/>The truth is that there is a lot of disagreement over the Bantu expansion into East Africa. The party line has said for years that there was a genocidal advance in which the hunter-gatherer San and the Herder Khoi peoples were systematically murdered over a period of a few hundred years. There is NO great evidence that this is true. No mass graves, handed down oral traditions or anything else. <BR/><BR/>No while any clash of cultures is going to lead to some bloodshed, modern day anthropologists believe that the itinerant Khoi and San peoples simply moved away (for the most part) when the Bantu arrived. The Bantu were farmers and established property rights, so to speak. There was also a lot of interbreeding which is why most East Africans show mixed heritage genetic markers today.Truthhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17286755693955361308noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-30167050267807501762008-02-14T09:21:00.000-08:002008-02-14T09:21:00.000-08:00"African-Americans are probably the most racist pe..."African-Americans are probably the most racist people on this earth. How did the Bantu people spread through most of Africa? Probably the same way they tried in Rwanda."<BR/><BR/>Following your logic, I guess Germans and people of Germanic descent can be considered "the most racist people on earth." How did the Germanic tribes spread throughout Europe? Think of the Visigoths, Ostrogoths, Angles, Saxons, Franks, and Vandals. What ethnicity is primarily responsible for both World Wars? Again, I am simply applying your way of thinking.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-74112974089527577802008-02-13T19:57:00.000-08:002008-02-13T19:57:00.000-08:00"Charles Murray's data indicates that only 7% of a..."Charles Murray's data indicates that only 7% of all American blacks are born to mothers with IQs of 100 or greater...."<BR/><BR/>I too have read this depressing information by Murray. However, do not the prevailing IQ data generally show that black Americans have a mean IQ around 85? With a standard deviation of 15, would not that put approximately 16% of black Americans at or above IQ 100? Even our gracious host, Steve Sailer, has commented on this statistical fact. Of course, I recall that some researchers have stated that the black American standard deviation might be somewhat lower than 15.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-74681307581565770042008-02-13T18:42:00.000-08:002008-02-13T18:42:00.000-08:00"Truth said...I am not echoing any white nationali..."Truth said...<BR/><BR/>I am not echoing any white nationalist anything, what I am saying is quite simple actually. The land in South Africa, (as in The United States, New Zealand, the Caribbean, Australia, South America, and everywhere else that whites have immigrated) was originally owned by someone else."<BR/><BR/>And the land in South Africa that the Afrikaaners took from the Bantus, had been earlier taken by from the Khoikoi and San peoples by the Bantus.<BR/><BR/>So perhaps apartheid was just karma opening a can of whoop-ass on the Bantu, huh?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-6220924286598930762008-02-13T16:24:00.000-08:002008-02-13T16:24:00.000-08:00"but you're right of course - no surprise since yo..."but you're right of course - no surprise since you're echoing White Nationalist arguments (e.g., "blacks whine about racist white America, so we should ship them back to Africa where they'd be happy and free" (thus completing the circle and making full restitution for the evil of the transatlantic slave trade); "separation is good for everyone"; etc.)"<BR/><BR/>Svigor, please put the pipe down for just one second. I am not echoing any white nationalist anything, what I am saying is quite simple actually. The land in South Africa, (as in The United States, New Zealand, the Caribbean, Australia, South America, and everywhere else that whites have immigrated) was originally owned by someone else. There was a tribe living there that was usurped (extremely violently) by whites. Then, in their future magnanimity, a few hundred years after raping, stealing from and murdering the local population whites convince them that they are genetically predisposed to be, well, rapists, murderers, and thieves. <BR/><BR/>That is, what the Hindu's refer to as Karma. It's unfortunate, but that's the way it goes. Nations that were once established by the incredibly evil actions of whites are now governed by whites that consider these actions barbaric: When propagated by the original owners upon whites. It actually reminds me of a long yet very funny joke.<BR/><BR/>In the early sixties in Arizona, NASA in anticipation of the future lunar landing sends established a "space base" out on what was formerly indian territory. One day an old Indian and his son were riding their horses when they saw some white men doing strange things in a vehicle in funny-looking silver clothes.<BR/><BR/>The old man says something to his son which prompts the young man to approach a couple of white observers in suits.<BR/><BR/>"My father does not speak English" he said "but he would like to know what you are doing."<BR/><BR/>"Oh we're preparing to meet the man on the moon" said the CIA observer.<BR/><BR/>The young man translates to his father at which point the old man raises an eyebrow and says something again to be translated.<BR/><BR/>"My father would like to say something to the man on the moon" he says.<BR/><BR/>Seeing the opportunity for helpful PR, the CIA agent says "Wait, Wait, let me grab my tape recorder!" and runs to the car and back. <BR/><BR/>He then thrusts the tape recorder into the old man's face and says "go ahead sir."<BR/><BR/>The old man says something in Navajo, which makes his son bust out laughing, but when the men ask what he has said, he refuses to translate.<BR/><BR/>So they take the tape back into town, and play if for a local shopkeeper. The elderly woman again cracks up but refuses to translate.<BR/><BR/>The men receive the same treatment a few more times and are now dying to know what the old man has said to 'the man on the moon.' The figure out that the only way to find out will be to send the tape back to the CIA language lab at Langley.<BR/><BR/>As official CIA events go, it takes many weeks to get a response, but finally the agent received a very short telegram:<BR/><BR/>In response to the tape submitted from the Space Base in Arizona. The tape translates roughly to: "WATCH OUT FOR THESE A**HOLES, THEY'VE COME TO TAKE YOUR LAND!"Truthhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17286755693955361308noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-1308192796214702832008-02-13T15:31:00.000-08:002008-02-13T15:31:00.000-08:00Truth: Yes Lucius, this is America. You show me th...<B>Truth:</B> <I>Yes Lucius, this is America. You show me the scholarly dissertations produced by Ronald Regan, or either Bush and I will be gald to read them.</I><BR/><BR/>1950s:<BR/><BR/><B>Ronald Reagan in Hollywood: Movies and Politics</B><BR/>Cambridge University Press<BR/>$110.00<BR/>ISBN-10: 0521440807 <BR/>ISBN-13: 978-0521440806<BR/><A HREF="http://www.amazon.com/dp/0521440807/" REL="nofollow">http://www.amazon.com/dp/0521440807/</A><BR/><BR/>1960s:<BR/><BR/><B>The Education of Ronald Reagan: The General Electric Years and the Untold Story of his Conversion to Conservatism</B><BR/>Columbia University Press<BR/>$31.00<BR/>ISBN-10: 0231138601 <BR/>ISBN-13: 978-0231138604<BR/><A HREF="http://www.amazon.com/dp/0231138601/" REL="nofollow">http://www.amazon.com/dp/0231138601/</A><BR/><BR/>1970s:<BR/><BR/><B>Reagan, In His Own Hand: The Writings of Ronald Reagan That Reveal His Revolutionary Vision for America</B><BR/>Free Press<BR/>$30.00<BR/>ISBN-10: 074320123X<BR/>ISBN-13: 978-0743201230<BR/><A HREF="http://www.amazon.com/dp/074320123X/" REL="nofollow">http://www.amazon.com/dp/074320123X/</A>Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-76690524463934949042008-02-13T10:22:00.000-08:002008-02-13T10:22:00.000-08:00"Wer're bitching now because the Americans disarme..."Wer're bitching now because the Americans disarmed us without giving us a ticket back home. Before, when we had our own army, there was no bitching."<BR/><BR/>I think you lost me there, Sparky. It went right over my head.Truthhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17286755693955361308noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-88821528302525659342008-02-13T10:21:00.000-08:002008-02-13T10:21:00.000-08:00"Lucius, In France you have to write a serious int..."Lucius, In France you have to write a serious intellectual work to qualify as presidential material. But this is America."<BR/><BR/>Yes Lucius, this is America. You show me the scholarly dissertations produced by Ronald Regan, or either Bush and I will be gald to read them.Truthhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17286755693955361308noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-88188102281541242182008-02-13T08:58:00.000-08:002008-02-13T08:58:00.000-08:00Whenever I see these 'poor Afrikaners as prey for ...<I>Whenever I see these 'poor Afrikaners as prey for savages' posts I always wonder: Who forced the Dutch into Africa to begin with?</I><BR/><BR/>(yeah really, what where they thinking moving into a black neighborhood!)<BR/><BR/>You'd have been better off keeping mum (no need to reinforce the race-realist data on lack of empathy in blacks).<BR/><BR/>But you're right of course - no surprise since you're echoing White Nationalist arguments (e.g., "blacks whine about racist white America, so we should ship them back to Africa where they'd be happy and free" (thus completing the circle and making full restitution for the evil of the transatlantic slave trade); "separation is good for everyone"; etc.)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-2199841694748359262008-02-13T01:23:00.000-08:002008-02-13T01:23:00.000-08:00Kyle sed:"He's not a racist, he says, because when...Kyle sed:<BR/>"He's not a racist, he says, because when forced to choose among black candidates he actually voted for one."<BR/><BR/>Kyle, back then when I voted de Klerk was also running for Prez. So I was not "forced" to choose between black candidates, in fact I could also have abstained from voting. If my overarching reason would have been skin color, I guess I would have voted for that sellout. But instead I chose the black Chief who was not a MSM hype but actually had worked for his education and had some respect for whites. <BR/><BR/>The problem for your kind now becomes that the hard facts of black rule in Zimbabwe and South Africa are so disastrous that no amount of pro-black hyping and Apartheid guilt-tripping is going to hide that. And everybody knows the blacks took over those countries recently so that the connection between ethnic rule and competence is there in your face.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-50927934645397642792008-02-13T01:12:00.000-08:002008-02-13T01:12:00.000-08:00Truth sed:"Whenever I see these 'poor Afrikaners a...Truth sed:<BR/>"Whenever I see these 'poor Afrikaners as prey for savages' posts I always wonder: Who forced the Dutch into Africa to begin with?"<BR/><BR/>Wer're bitching now because the Americans disarmed us without giving us a ticket back home. Before, when we had our own army, there was no bitching.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-44502921025306360842008-02-13T00:57:00.000-08:002008-02-13T00:57:00.000-08:00Fred sed:"For example, what if you had developed a...Fred sed:<BR/>"For example, what if you had developed a "talented tenth" black elite 20 or 30 years ago? Then you might have competent blacks today to work the utilities. "<BR/><BR/>Fred, where do you think the current black middle class comes from? From the ANC? No, not really, they were far to busy cleaning out the massive government coffers left behind by the whites. The National Party started developing a black middle class from the 60's onwards. But it did not work because the black middle class switched over to the ANC the minute it saw more goodies there. In addition, blacks never study technical subjects, and when they do its to get into managerial posts. The technical work was always done by whites, and they have been forced out through AA.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-6564099168653187152008-02-12T22:53:00.000-08:002008-02-12T22:53:00.000-08:00Don't the people from HLR usually go on to become ...<I>Don't the people from HLR usually go on to become law professors & government bigwigs who have their names on all sorts of documents?</I><BR/><BR/>Obama's decision not to clerk after leaving Harvard was big enough news for me to get a lexis news hit for that in an LA paper (something else I came across last night).Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-66432947061231973262008-02-12T22:36:00.000-08:002008-02-12T22:36:00.000-08:00Lucius speculates that :one obvious candidate for ...Lucius speculates that :<BR/><BR/>one obvious candidate for an explanation <I>(that there is no record of Obama Sr or Obama Jr's academic production)</I> here is that both Obama Sr & Obama Jr were quota admissions as students [and/or quota hires as employees], and that neither of them was ever capable of writing any serious intellectual work.<BR/><BR/>Lucius, In France you have to write a serious intellectual work to qualify as presidential material. But this is America. Think, instead, of the meaning of Obama having benefited from the racial quota system. He may extend the system to cover everything in America. In Malaysia the system works. In other places it works less. Interesting times for America, as Steve commented.Jhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05676167615981895061noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-27182475552741283182008-02-12T22:28:00.000-08:002008-02-12T22:28:00.000-08:00"A post about how our host went looking for embarr...<I>"A post about how our host went looking for embarrassing published comments and couldn't find any."</I><BR/><BR/>Reread. <BR/><BR/>The argument is not that there are so few embarrassing comments in the paper trail but that there is very little in the paper trail to begin with when a paper trail can actually be found. <BR/><BR/>Face it. Obama is an empty suit, which a lot of people are more than happy to try on. The question is, after the election, will those people have buyer's remorse?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-56491747741034670942008-02-12T18:40:00.000-08:002008-02-12T18:40:00.000-08:00Obama as President would have impossible demands o...Obama as President would have impossible demands on him and would be a disaster because he would try and satisfy them.<BR/><BR/>Blacks would expect reparations, release of black criminals (the disparate sentencing issue), greatly expanded Affirmative Action, and a mostly Black cabinet.<BR/><BR/>That would incur the mother of all political fights, because other groups (Latinos, Asians, Whites, etc.) have competing interests. Obama NOW can be all things to all people but once he makes choices he WILL make enemies, or more likely he'll try and be "friends" with everyone end up paralyzed and weak.<BR/><BR/>Not to mention the fight with Iran. The American public clearly wants no more Iraqs -- costly occupations. "Negotiations" Carter-style while Iran goes nuclear is not going to fly either and might get Obama impeached. Obama is unlikely to order the policy that the Public (wrt Kosovo) has shown they're fine with -- massive bombing. Much less the likely effective means of stirring up nasty insurgencies in Iran as a leverage ("cool it with nukes and we'll back off the Azeris.")<BR/><BR/>As far as spending goes, massive deficits run up inflation and hurt the middle class. He's about on the par with McCain in economics and would likely dither about helplessly.<BR/><BR/>Jimmy Carter by all accounts was a fine nuclear engineer on his boat, but a disaster as President (because of dithering). Barack Obama by all accounts is a fine Chicago machine pol but likely a dithering Carter-disaster because he's shown no ability to make choices where someone in his backers loses.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-54743923355702884012008-02-12T17:22:00.000-08:002008-02-12T17:22:00.000-08:00Interesting comments, especially the eye-opener ab...Interesting comments, especially the eye-opener about the South African disaster.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-60799232499371813632008-02-12T16:58:00.000-08:002008-02-12T16:58:00.000-08:00Fred: it seems like a lot of this could have been ...<B>Fred:</B> <I>it seems like a lot of this could have been prevented had Afrikaners started preparing for majority rule decades ago. For example, what if you had developed a "talented tenth" black elite 20 or 30 years ago?</I><BR/><BR/>And what if it's the case that their IQs are so low that [on average] they are simply incapable of becoming a "talented elite"?<BR/><BR/>Charles Murray's data indicates that only 7% of all American blacks are born to mothers with IQs of 100 or greater [and that's with the advantage of all the miscegenation that's been going on lo these many years].<BR/><BR/>But Wonderlic scores place a person with an IQ of 100 at the low end of what you'd want in a truck driver.<BR/><BR/>BTW, this is what Black rule has done to Zimbabwe:<BR/><BR/><B>Zimbabwe's last white farmers face final push</B><BR/>October 2, 2007<BR/><A HREF="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/10/01/wzim101.xml" REL="nofollow">telegraph.co.uk</A><BR/><BR/><B>Zimbabwe runs out of bread</B><BR/>October 1 2007<BR/><A HREF="http://www.guardian.co.uk/zimbabwe/article/0,,2181086,00.html" REL="nofollow">guardian.co.uk</A><BR/><BR/>The Blacks in Zimbabwe are so stupid and so corrupt that they can't even figure out how to feed themselves.<BR/><BR/>All they had to do was simply continue using the methods & the infrastructure that the Caucasians left behind for them, but they couldn't even do that - i.e. they are so stupid [and corrupt] that they aren't even capable of mimicking or imitating the behavior of the Caucasians.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-68283628794494849092008-02-12T16:43:00.000-08:002008-02-12T16:43:00.000-08:00Wow. A post about how our host went looking for em...Wow. A post about how our host went looking for embarrassing published comments and couldn't find any. And then, right in the second comment, a fellow says he can comment on Obama's hypothetical administration because he knows about "black rule." He's not a racist, he says, because when forced to choose among black candidates he actually voted for one. Of course, he adds that South Africa's new (black) government wanted whites to hand over "their daughters." My, my, my.<BR/><BR/>You want embarrassing published remarks? This thread is the place to find them.<BR/><BR/>So having a black president means the blacksAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com