tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post7103957569335348874..comments2024-03-27T18:24:19.683-07:00Comments on Steve Sailer: iSteve: Starkey strikes backUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger108125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-68256461678825620632011-08-26T14:05:05.430-07:002011-08-26T14:05:05.430-07:00"Adult men do not respect "POWER". ..."Adult men do not respect "POWER". If and when you ever become a man you'll understand this."<br /><br />On a personal level, you are correct. That's why the whole "alpha-beta" male thing is bullshit. My sexuality responds to real men in charge of their actions like engineers or doctoral students in science while muscled thugs or grown men playing with balls, pretending it's a profession, don't even register as human males. Then again, my daddy is a real man.<br /><br />HOWEVER, interpersonal relationships are different from the relationship between a person and the state. The state MUST be able and willing to demonstrate power, meaning brute force. I live peacefully and follow the law expecting the state by whose laws I abide, to use brute force against those who break the law at my expense. I don't lack respect for, say, Romania, because it can't demonstrate power against Fiji by invading. I don't respect Romania because it lacks power over its own citizens and therefore fails to provide law and order for its own citizens. <br /><br />Oh, and you don't have to respect that thug with a knife you mentioned only as long as the state can successfully use brute force against him. Throughout my childhood, my father was the great provider of nurture and safety that stood between his family and chaos even though he was a physics nerd who'd never been in a fight. That is because he's a highly skilled specialist in a somewhat ordered system where he could call on another specialist, an armed representative of the local brute force to handle that huge drunk who was bothering his wife on her way from the market. Unfortunately, at that time, in that country, the organized provider of the law, able and willing to enforce it, was the mafia. Everyone respected it to some degree, at least, because the mafia kept the drunk thugs off the kids' slides and swings. Nobody respected the government because it was either unable or unwilling to exude enough brute force to get rid of neither the bothersome drunk thugs nor the mafia. <br />So you see, to create an environment where what you and I consider real manhood can flourish, an agreement to create a system which will provide law and order (and enforce them with brute force need be) is necessary.Mayanoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-15320510260371370292011-08-25T01:30:29.379-07:002011-08-25T01:30:29.379-07:00"I especially liked his call for a multiracia..."I especially liked his call for a multiracial English nationalism."<br /><br />What is wrong with with English English nationalism?ATBOTLnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-65148368996870850242011-08-24T15:32:02.738-07:002011-08-24T15:32:02.738-07:00"Cricket's ancientness is a part of its a...<i>"Cricket's ancientness is a part of its appeal - it stretches back into the middle ages and in the villages of England it is played today much as it was 500 and more years ago..."</i><br /><br />Yes, the continuity is a big part of its appeal. <br /><br /><i>"In England, it's one of the few institutions (perhaps even the only one) that the upper, middle and working classes partake in with equal enthusiasm."</i><br /><br />And the egalitarian aspect is another part of its appeal. <br /><br /><i>"It's long been a proxy for imperial politics, racial politics and geopolitics too - all of which will be of interest to most people here."</i><br /><br />Again, yes. All these are why it holds such sway over my imagination. Plus, I respect anything that's prompted such lovely poetry and so many interesting scenes in literature and film.Kylienoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-15364842649800955102011-08-24T14:44:52.491-07:002011-08-24T14:44:52.491-07:00Londoner:
"the England football team has a pe...Londoner:<br />"the England football team has a permanent minority of black players, but these are becoming noticeably lighter-skinned as time passes, and no other non-white ethnicities are ever represented (they don't play football)"<br /><br />The black (West Indian, Somali) and south Asian (Bangladeshi, Pakistani) kids were playing football on my street this evening when I came home from work. I often see groups of adult Tamils playing football down in Colliers Wood. The south-Asians do play football, they're just not very good at it.Simon in Londonnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-59638943508628349202011-08-24T14:28:34.237-07:002011-08-24T14:28:34.237-07:00Kylie - glad to hear it. Cricket's ancientness...Kylie - glad to hear it. Cricket's ancientness is a part of its appeal - it stretches back into the middle ages and in the villages of England it is played today much as it was 500 and more years ago. The USA has more of a cricketing tradition than most people realise too (down to the present day, when it seemingly has some kind of a foothold in LA's gangland, bizarre though that sounds). In England, it's one of the few institutions (perhaps even the only one) that the upper, middle and working classes partake in with equal enthusiasm. It's long been a proxy for imperial politics, racial politics and geopolitics too - all of which will be of interest to most people here.<br /><br />Robert Henderson is an interesting guy - a heretic on issues of national identity, sporting allegiance and immigrant equanimity who cause a storm in the 1990s by asking why the England team had so many foreigners in it (he also had an entertaining feud with Tony Blair). The offending article and other material is here: <br /><br />http://englandcalling.wordpress.com/2011/02/15/is-it-in-the-blood-and-the-hypocrisy-of-the-media/Londonernoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-8865482236351438102011-08-24T10:40:35.123-07:002011-08-24T10:40:35.123-07:00We are talking about POWERS THAT BE that want resp...<i>We are talking about POWERS THAT BE that want respect. For a POWER to command respect, there has to be an element of fear--physical, political, legal, physical, and/or moral.</i> <br /><br /> <br />What the fuck is a "POWER"? Are you a "POWER"? Do you command respect? <br /><br />I respect a lot of people who have no "POWER" to hurt me, Tom Tancredo, for instance. I respected Pope John Paul. I respect my Mom, and I respect Hungary. <br /><br />I don't respect you, because you're an idiot. I don't respect some street punk with a knife for the same reason. I don't respect the US government, regardless of how much "POWER" it can amass.<br /><br />Adult men do not respect "POWER". If and when you ever become a man you'll understand this.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-63588058406324165792011-08-24T10:33:18.131-07:002011-08-24T10:33:18.131-07:00Damn, anonymous at 1:24 AM, if you don't know ...Damn, anonymous at 1:24 AM, if you don't know how to post a hyper link, please <i>don't</i>.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-6069653156964276922011-08-24T09:28:26.232-07:002011-08-24T09:28:26.232-07:00"OT: the England cricket team has been doing ...<i>"OT: the England cricket team has been doing extremely well recently, and is now ranked #1 in the world. Unlike the mediocre England sides of the 1990s, which had numerous black and Asian players, it is exclusively white...I know that cricket is not the sport of choice of most iStevers, but I thought that this might be of interest."</i><br /><br />It is of interest, thanks.<br /><br />I love what I guess you'd call cricket's historical and cultural associations. Would you believe I've read the "cricket poetry" entry in Wikipedia? Thompson's "At Lords", Newbolt's "Vitai Lampada" speak to me of a tradition that many find laughable today but I continue to find laudable.Kylienoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-67331353692456764612011-08-24T09:06:51.894-07:002011-08-24T09:06:51.894-07:00"Ever since then I have regarded myself as En...<i>"Ever since then I have regarded myself as English and English only, and ceased to see myself as British in any sense other than a legal one (which I hope will also cease with the break-up of the United Kingdom)."</i><br /><br />Good for you, presuming, of course, that you are white. I entertain similar hopes for the unfortunately reunited States.<br /><br />In Liberia, one cannot hope to become a citizen (leaving aside the question of why any sane and civilized person would entertain such a hope) unless one is a Negro.<br /><br />Our elites, along with non-whites, want us to play by the set of rules they impose on us while they remain free to play by an entirely different set, funded of course by us.<br /><br />It's fundamentally unjust and unsustainable in the long run.Kylienoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-54183750482103878662011-08-24T05:28:54.620-07:002011-08-24T05:28:54.620-07:00Assuming that is true, is it a viable strategy ove...<i>Assuming that is true, is it a viable strategy over the long-term? I think not. It reminds me of the Jewish experiences in Poland and Spain -- works wonderfully for a while, but ends sadly.</i><br /><br />Once in a while a Jew will write a book that makes this point. A good one, which I recommend to you is Benjamin Ginsberg's <i>The Fatal Embrace: Jews and the State.</i> Does the principle of "gambler's ruin" apply to the cycle of Jewish booms and busts?ben tillmannoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-70164667139638827602011-08-24T05:20:41.313-07:002011-08-24T05:20:41.313-07:00"Rivers of bloods" sounds a bit ripe. Ma...<i>"Rivers of bloods" sounds a bit ripe. Maybe Powell should have something like flames of anarchy.</i><br /><br />It was a literary allusion.ben tillmannoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-6683505833973956622011-08-24T04:19:39.011-07:002011-08-24T04:19:39.011-07:00Well now, you don't see a two-page hyperlink j...Well now, you don't see a two-page hyperlink just everyday, now do you?Truthhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17286755693955361308noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-49017271555258517862011-08-24T01:24:44.182-07:002011-08-24T01:24:44.182-07:00Maybe this should be called the SNOOPY NIGHTMARE S...<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZUikER6TUoc" rel="nofollow">Maybe this should be called the SNOOPY NIGHTMARE SYNDROME. Remember 'What a Nightmare Charlie Brown' where Snoopy has a nightmare about being an Eskimo sled dog? Snoopy is a civlized dog because he lives in the human world. He reads, he writes, he ice skates, he celebrates Christmas, he cooks, etc. Snooper can be a civlized dog because he conforms to a world created and maintained by orderly humans. But one day, he bakes and eats too many pizzas and his stomachache leads to a nightmare where he finds himself in the Arctic with a bunch of Eskimo dogs or malamutes that are almost wolf-like. Snoopy's high-faultin ways are of no use here where might-is-right and muscle-is-bustle. With no protection from Charlie Brown and the civilized world, the only way Snoopy can cope is to become vicious himself. He even begins to howl like a wolf. Britain used to have poor people and social violence, but there was a very strong hand of order(sometimes brutally applied). And the lower orders feared, respected, and looked up to their social betters for instructions and as a model. But with breakdown of family, spread of trash pop culture, Negro-ization of society, and suppression of British pride and honor, the Chavs are turning into what the Snooper became in his nightmare.</a><br /><br /><a href="http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/savage_beagles_terrorize_east_end_FpN3hlz90Jee9rKgTI8VEN" rel="nofollow">The Snoopy cartoon is just fantasy, but here's a real-life story of beagles going feral and savage. In a way, the difference between whites and blacks is like between dogs and wolves. Same species but very different breeds. Like wolves, blacks are stronger, bigger, and more aggressiv(and harder to tame or civilize)than white folks. Whites are like German Shepherds and Collies, Asians are like smaller breeds. One difference in the analogy is that blacks are not smarter than whites though wolves are smarter than dogs(or most breeds of dogs). But even if wolves are smarter, their wild temperament makes it near impossible to guide their intelligence for constructive stuff like 'dog tricks'. Wolves are 'intellectually' capable of learning tricks but temperamently unsuited for such stuff, just like even smart blacks often get distracted by too much aggressive funky-jive stuff. Wolves and (even smart)blacks wanna whatever they feel like, which is usually to hunt and mark territory. <br />Anyway, with the introduction of the wolf-race into UK and breakdown of social order, the the dog-race(whites) are becoming feralized and recognizing the wolf-race as the alpha race. In the world of ferality, the bite is might.</a>Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-70970951693957592062011-08-24T00:07:50.089-07:002011-08-24T00:07:50.089-07:00"Rivers of bloods" sounds a bit ripe. Ma..."Rivers of bloods" sounds a bit ripe. Maybe Powell should have something like flames of anarchy.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-81949097662991331572011-08-23T23:10:53.031-07:002011-08-23T23:10:53.031-07:00Too little fear leads to contempt.
"I have ...Too little fear leads to contempt. <br /><br />"I have zero fear of Hungary, but I also have zero contempt for Hungary." <br /><br />"I have zero fear of my mom, but I also have zero contempt for my mom.<br />Your axioms are seriously flawed at best."<br /><br />Well, you can say the same thing about squirrels and earthworms. <br />But we aren't talking about just anything. <br /> <br />We are talking about POWERS THAT BE that want respect. For a POWER to command respect, there has to be an element of fear--physical, political, legal, physical, and/or moral. <br />Can you imagine anyone worshiping a powerless god? No, a god must be feared. But if a god is to be truly respected, it must also be admired(and seen as just). <br />Same goes for POWERS THAT BE.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-90997468467829229552011-08-23T22:12:12.172-07:002011-08-23T22:12:12.172-07:00As others have noted, English nationalism is a str...As others have noted, English nationalism is a strongly ethnic phenomenon.<br /><br />For years, decades even, we have been fed Britishness as a quasi-national identity - always defined by the elites in terms of meaningless abstractions such as "tolerance", "diversity", "fair play" etc, while Englishness has been maligned as the worst kind of racism or (preferably) not mentioned at all. But Blair's gang of reptilian bullies released the genie from the bottle in the 1990s by pandering in every conceivable way to Welsh, Scottish and Northern Irish interests while simultaneously trying to legislate England out of existence, not to mention replacing its people through mass immigration. In fact English identity - symbolised by the Cross of St George and the rejection of the Union Flag - had been resurgent since even before Blair came to power, but he inadvertently guaranteed that it would take hold. Ever since then I have regarded myself as English and English only, and ceased to see myself as British in any sense other than a legal one (which I hope will also cease with the break-up of the United Kingdom).<br /><br />For quite some time it's been fashionable and ok to be "Black British", "British Asian" etc - the nebulousness and meaninglessness of Britishness has facilitated these hyphenated identities - but the rise of Englishness and the rejection of Britishness by the English has effectively pulled the rug from under these identities - there is no such thing as "Black English" or "English Asian" and everybody knows it. These groups are welcome to feel as British as they like - but they must understand that the English no longer do.<br /><br />Presumably at some point the powers that be will attempt to re-imagine Englishness on our behalf as a rootless abstraction of identity rather than a viscerally ethnic one, but their preferred strategy for now is to deny, suppress and smear it - which of course only serves to make it more intractable. And all the while the hyphenated communities realise that the "British" with whom they share a nominal link are melting away like snow on a dyke and in their place are emerging the English, whose identity will not, cannot hyphenate.<br /><br />Sport does afford some measure of interracial unity, but it is limited. the England football team has a permanent minority of black players, but these are becoming noticeably lighter-skinned as time passes, and no other non-white ethnicities are ever represented (they don't play football). I sense that as blacks have abandoned cricket over the past twenty years, so they may now be abandoning football in favour of American sports/general non-sporting (sport is too white!) thuggishness. So that little (and superficial) common identity may also disappear. Ethnic retrenchment is coming, if it isn't already under way. It's still an unspeakable taboo, of course, but it won't stay so forever.<br /><br />So Starkey's dream of a multi-racial nationalism - if indeed he is serious about it and not merely trying to placate the multiculti mafia - seems pretty far-fetched to me. It doesn't and won't exist.Londonernoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-77613672865743958122011-08-23T19:15:31.417-07:002011-08-23T19:15:31.417-07:00Another example of the fine gentlemen coming into ...Another example of the fine gentlemen coming into the USA.<br /><br />LA Times reports:"A man who allegedly made threats to bomb a Los Angeles County social service office in El Monte because his benefits were terminated has been charged in connection with the incident, police said Tuesday.<br /><br />Jose Guillermo Zepeda Parra, 32, who lives in the Harbor City neighborhood of Los Angeles, is charged with calling the county Department of Public and Social Services on Aug. 12 and making the threats, the El Monte Police Department said.<br /><br />Parra, police said in a statement, "was upset because his benefits were terminated."..<br /><br />It is so SAD that this "UNDOCUMENTED 'Worker'" had his benefits cut. <br /><br />How will he pay for his neck tattoos?<br /><br /><br />http://tinyurl.com/3ppw743Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-6485723771414450842011-08-23T18:26:44.203-07:002011-08-23T18:26:44.203-07:00Too little fear leads to contempt.
I have zero f...<i>Too little fear leads to contempt.</i> <br /><br />I have zero fear of Hungary, but I also have zero contempt for Hungary. <br /><br />I have zero fear of my mom, but I also have zero contempt for my mom.<br /><br />Your axioms are seriously flawed at best.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-64119700380047040112011-08-23T16:48:09.919-07:002011-08-23T16:48:09.919-07:00We think liberal elites look down on us, but maybe...We think liberal elites look down on us, but maybe liberal elites are more obsessed about looking up enviously to people who have even more. So, a millionaire liberal feels oppressed by a 100 millionaire liberal who may feel oppressed by a billionaire liberal. Even if they are all liberal, there's bound to be lots of resentment, especially if they went to the same schools. Suppose among Harvard buddies, some guy ends up making 200,000 a year while another guy is making 10 million a year. Suppose one Harvard grad girl marries a well-to-do accountant while another marries a super millionaire computer company CEO. So, everyone feels oppressed, and even the rich don't see the world in terms of 'we rich vs the poor' but 'we poor rich vs the rich rich'. So, the elites feel more threatened by other elites than by the masses of blacks or mexicans. On the eve of the French Revolution, the vain aristocrats were more worked up about inter-aristocratic rivalries and triviaies than the fact than that people wanted to chop their heads off. <br /><br />In the past, when the rich and upper crust were rspected in UK, the under-elites may have felt resentment about the uber-elites, but the former identified with the latter. They wanted to be like their betters. Today, things are more schizo because under-elites, as in the past, wanna be like the uber-elites, but socio-morally they are supposed to identify with the masses and the oppressed poor. <br /><br />PS. On social reality vs personal reality. Consider TINKER TAILER SOLDIER SPY. The traitor knew the USSR was oppressive and evil. So, why did he become a Soviet agent? Because the loss of British power/glory to the upstart Americans was PERSONALLY traumatic and humiliating for him. It didn't matter US was a better nation than USSR. It only mattered that Americans had reduced UK to their poodle and worked to strip UK of its empire. <br /><br />I think we take things PERSONALLY too, on some level. Though many on the Right know Gaddafi is a scumsucker, some have rooted for him just to see him humiliate NATO that they've come to loathe.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-42459617783263307222011-08-23T16:47:48.146-07:002011-08-23T16:47:48.146-07:00"As an English person, part of the problem I ..."As an English person, part of the problem I would say, with migrations, is that English people, sadly, don't have much of a sense of history, and tend to think that culture is singing and dancing and having spicy food with a lot of ingredients per dish (rather than those being showy things that are more common at low latitudes), and so don't think they have a culture and basically assume everyone is like them except in ways flattering to the foreigners."<br /><br />We are living in the era of mass media and extreme gratification, and English culture--as rich, complex, and admirable as it is--, isn't conducive to winning over today's young people hooked onto culturgasms. To appreciate English culture, literature, and manners, one has to grow up in a certain hierarchy. Even critics of that hierarchy need to function within a hierarchy because satire is a form of art. It's not just grabbing the crotch and flipping the middle finger. I can't imagine kids today appreciating Swift or Orwell. <br /><br />When UK had been securely British, the 'bad guys' seemed to be mostly British: the lords, the upper crust, the rich, the politicians, the bigots, etc. <br />So, British reformers saw non-whites as powerless allies with whom to make common cause against the Establishment. <br />It's like in an all-white school where the bullies, bigshots, and jerks are mostly white, blacks might be perceived and idealized as 'fellow oppressed' and 'comrades' by white kids who feel dejected. John Hughes grew up in the rich white suburbs, and so his idea of GREAT EVIL was some spoiled white kid while he romanticized about blacks and white proles--the kind of people he never met in real life. <br />But with recent riots, some Brits are waking up the fact that blacks in UK are not merely political props or puppets or allies of their imagination; the immigrant community is indeed a time bomb threatening all of Britain. <br /><br />Regarding the British elites, we must keep in mind that people's resentments are often formed by personal reality than larger social reality. <br />For example, it may well be that most liberal Jews in America knew that blacks are a problematic people and that there were many admirable things about wasps. But as social climbers, more Jews were bound to compete with wasps than worry about black crime or craziness. So, for upwardly mobile liberal Jews, a wasp who wouldn't allow a Jew into a golf club or wouldn't allow his daughter to marry a Jew as a bigger reason for outrage and resentment than the fact of black crime(since most victims of black crime were not rich liberal Jews). People think ideologically but FEEL personally, and feelings oftentimes override ideas and knowledge of reality. <br />Since British elites live in their own cocooned world--and don't have to deal face-to-face with crime and other social problems--, their main emotional concern might be more about 'who has more than me' than 'who has less'. <br /><br />So, even though blacks and chavs are causing problems from below, as long as those troubles remain among the underclass(and affect ordinary schmoes), the vain elites are fixated on 'who has more than me'. And to the extent that they feel rebellious against 'those who have more', the under-elites(or petite elites or mini-elites) may 'spiritually' identify and feel united with the underclass against the uber-elites(as John Hughes the nerd in privileged white school did).Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-39847032056878481832011-08-23T14:10:04.938-07:002011-08-23T14:10:04.938-07:00As an English person, part of the problem I would ...As an English person, part of the problem I would say, with migrations, is that English people, sadly, don't have much of a sense of history, and tend to think that culture is singing and dancing and having spicy food with a lot of ingredients per dish (rather than those being showy things that are more common at low latitudes), and so don't think they have a culture and basically assume everyone is like them except in ways flattering to the foreigners.<br /><br />Plus England is a cosmopolitan place in many ways - the high musical, high art culture is pan-European and that is regarded as a common patrimony for the entire world, so there's no refuge there. And the way English people dress has been exported around the world, so English people can't hide a culture in a national dress either - there are no saris or qipaos because the country pioneered more modern forms of dress.<br /><br />Which all creates this idea that England is cultureless and needs culturebringers.<br /><br />Plus, for the Working Classes, it's a worse problem, they define their culture around manual labour and being good at that, and being tough and doughty and there's not much room for that these days - in addition to a kind of oppositionist Marxist response that is quite alien to most countries around the world (ex-Communist countries don't think in anything like the trenchant "We are Marx's proletariat!" way that the English Working Classes think, even if they don't necessarily even know who Marx was).Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-11445807696947752382011-08-23T12:09:16.775-07:002011-08-23T12:09:16.775-07:00>It reallt does seem if Irish, Welsh and for al...>It reallt does seem if Irish, Welsh and for all I know Scottish nationalism are really top down projects all along. Designed to reach certain ends, while being deniable all along.<<br /><br />Perhaps. But it's also true that the people of those isles have long been regarded as perfidious hypocrites.<br /><br />The only ethical principles an average Englishman, Irishman, or Scotsman adheres to consistently are these:<br /><br />1. Money = God;<br /><br />2. The other fellow should neither spend money nor have sex; and<br /><br />3. Anything that doesn't offend, directly or indirectly, against principles One or Two is permitted.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-80000296411083552402011-08-23T11:53:54.390-07:002011-08-23T11:53:54.390-07:00If non-whites in the past resisted white power bec...If non-whites in the past resisted white power because whites were too arrogant, contemptuous, and high-handed; non-whites today resist assimilation to white culture because whites are so wimpy, wussy, apologetic, self-loathing, and decadent. What passes for Western values today? Gay marriage? Worshiping a black guy as president of the most powerful nation in the world? And the sight of white people sucking up to Zionist powers-that-be in EU and US doesn't do much for respect for whites either. <br /><br />Too much fear leads to hate. In the past, there was too much fear of white imperialists by non-whites, which led to anti-white hate. <br /><br />Too little fear leads to contempt. Now, non-whites laugh at sappy whiteys. White elites seem to be apologizing all the time(and attacking white 'racists'), while worshiping Mandela, MLK, Oprah, and Obama. White masses seem to be shaking their asses to afro-jungle-thug music. HOw can anyone respect white people as a great people? <br /><br />Respect comes from a mix of fear and admiration. In post-war Japan, Americans make it clear who was boss, and so Japanese feared Americans. But Americans were also just and fair IF Japanese were willing to play ball. So, Japanese feared and admired Americans, and that led to respect. That was the golden age of wasp power. It is now gone. Wasps had been a triumphant people. Now they are a therapeutic people.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-8725321747923647322011-08-23T11:24:19.272-07:002011-08-23T11:24:19.272-07:00Anonymous:
"Jewish power is a very shadowy t...Anonymous:<br /><br />"Jewish power is a very shadowy thing, and Jewish neurosis reflects it. On the one hand, Jews are the most powerful people in the world; on the other hand, they are the most vulnerable among the great powers. Chinese have China, Russians have Russia, Japanese have Japan, Mexicans have Mexico, Canadians have Canada, Germans have Germany, etc. Jews have dinky little Israel, which really isn't much; Jewish power isn't firmly located in one sure/secure spot but spread out all over the world. It is these internationalist and globalist links that maintain, preserve, and expand Jewish power. Goy nationalism and firm borders, then, is the biggest threat to Jewish power, which explains why Jews are for 'free trade', 'open borders', UN and international organizations(which they control), media, etc against the forces of nationalism. In the West, manufacturing used to be conservative, with white employers hiring white employees. Now, many US manufacturers are cut off from their own people as they build factories in Mexico and China. <br />It is a form of Jewish imperialism, and we are all under its spell. Brits too."<br /><br />Assuming that is true, is it a viable strategy over the long-term? I think not. It reminds me of the Jewish experiences in Poland and Spain -- works wonderfully for a while, but ends sadly. The difference is that then the world was based on exploitation of the peasantry, and the Jews "exploited" that situation as tools of the ruling class. In a democratic polity the better strategy would be to support the peasantry and stand up for their interests. The common people - a la Lincoln's Gettysburg address -- could, and should, be their rock and salvation -- not competing gentile elites who harbor latent hostility.<br /><br />If I were in their shoes this is the way I would be thinking. But what do I know? I live in the sticks. [take note Abe Foxman! :) ]<br /><br />Which I hope they will comeLuke Leahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11290760894780619646noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-15328824493326979502011-08-23T10:50:18.642-07:002011-08-23T10:50:18.642-07:00OT: the England cricket team has been doing extrem...OT: the England cricket team has been doing extremely well recently, and is now ranked #1 in the world. Unlike the mediocre England sides of the 1990s, which had numerous black and Asian players, it is exclusively white. On last night's edition of Newsnight (the programme on which Starkey made his controversial comments), a "British Asian" was given substantial air time to argue that the England team must be "helped to become less white" (I quote verbatim). Because many Pakistanis, Indians and Bangladeshis in England are enthusiastic cricketers, he argued, the England team absolutely must reflect this. He ignored the fact that players called Khan, Patel, Shahzad, Panesar, Shah and Rashid have all either played for England in the last few years or are now on the fringes of the squad. There is in fact no shortage of reasonably good Asian cricketers in England, but the current team is all white (not to mention unusually blond) and that is clearly unacceptable to this particular ethnic partisan.<br /><br />The English presenter gingerly suggested that these "communities" usually owe their sporting and cultural allegiance to their country of origin rather than to England, something the British Asian cheerfully agreed with, but then argued that Asians should be AA'd into the England team anyway. There is apparently no urgent need to make the Indian or Pakistani teams "less brown", or the West Indies team "less black".<br /><br />I know that cricket is not the sport of choice of most iStevers, but I thought that this might be of interest. The only positive note was that, in my subjective opinion, the guy's language - "helped to become less white" - came across as egregiously malicious - it really jarred. This kind of talk would not have been too remarkable, say, ten years ago, but multiculturalism is not the force it once was and I sense it raises more hackles now. Hope so anyway.Londonernoreply@blogger.com