tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post862373651433582364..comments2024-03-15T20:52:26.967-07:00Comments on Steve Sailer: iSteve: Extended vs. nuclear family reunificationUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger15125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-30897132233089948382007-06-01T20:03:00.000-07:002007-06-01T20:03:00.000-07:00Pod means Podhoretz and, yes, the Pod People are o...<I>Pod means Podhoretz and, yes, the Pod People are of various religious and ethnic backgrounds. Now, as to who is providing the "intellectual firepower"</I><BR/><BR/>Intellectual firepower my @$$. I'm a pretty regular reader of The Corner, and I can't tell you the last time I recall JPodidiot ever contributing anything to the discussion. Here's there for one and only one reason - his last name. The man just sits there and bloviates.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-15302532844453039102007-06-01T12:49:00.000-07:002007-06-01T12:49:00.000-07:00Neoconservatism is an invasion of the Pod People!L...Neoconservatism is an invasion of the Pod People!<BR/><BR/><A HREF="http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/004455.html" REL="nofollow">Larry Auster discusses the neocon ideology behind Powerline blog.</A><BR/><BR/><A HREF="http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/004968.html" REL="nofollow">Auster discusses the neocon "quasi-Marxist" mindset.</A><BR/><BR/>Pod means Podhoretz and, yes, the Pod People are of various religious and ethnic backgrounds. Now, as to who is providing the "intellectual firepower", and who are the useful idiots? The reader can decide.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-47852597973329367382007-06-01T12:33:00.000-07:002007-06-01T12:33:00.000-07:00Dismissing criticism of neoconservatives as anti-S...Dismissing criticism of neoconservatives as anti-Semitism or anti-Jewish is nothing less than shameless.<BR/><BR/>And pulling out the Prop 187 myth is so very clever at a place like isteve.com.<BR/><BR/>Hard to tell if the posters above are fellow travelers or just useful idiots. But we can see the new history beginning to gel. Purges? What purges? <BR/><BR/>For neocons and their useful idiots history always begins anew! Especially if it means your magazine might come back through the office window tightly wrapped around a rock.<BR/><BR/>Here's a radical notion: it matters greatly what people have said and done in the past, especially when they have said and done it consistently and repeatedly.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-51082355806782740682007-06-01T12:23:00.000-07:002007-06-01T12:23:00.000-07:00What's wrong with that last sentence?Well, here is...<I><BR/>What's wrong with that last sentence?<BR/></I><BR/><BR/>Well, here is the last sentence on this site. (It is not the last one on the main site anymore, but it still makes no sense.)<BR/><BR/><I><BR/>In contrast, Obama's half-brother Mark, whom Obama cut off all contact with because he rejects Afrocentrism, with his physics degree from Stanford.<BR/></I><BR/><BR/>Remove the parenthetical sentence, and we get:<BR/><BR/><I><BR/>In contrast, Obama's half-brother Mark with his physics degree from Stanford.<BR/></I><BR/><BR/>If you are fine with that sentence, then I have to agree that the quality of education in the US has gone down considerably.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-55753452467821425132007-06-01T11:14:00.000-07:002007-06-01T11:14:00.000-07:00One thing struck me watching the Nicky Barnes harl...One thing struck me watching the Nicky Barnes harlem heroin episode of American Gangster (season 1's best episode): how a young Barrack must have viewed Malcolm X as a role model. Barrack's dabbling in drugs before finding a "clean path" and becoming an activist might have been a self-conscious effort to construct a pseudo out-of-the-ghetto background and, hopefully, be just like his idol, (the great unifier) X. Of course, Malcolm was the real timber, where Barrack would be merely the post-1980 self-constructed image of the timber.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-36805475068636615602007-06-01T04:39:00.000-07:002007-06-01T04:39:00.000-07:00Anon 10 pm -- your effort to root out neocons i.e....<I>Anon 10 pm -- your effort to root out neocons i.e. "jews" is wrong and foolish. </I><BR/><BR/>Agreed. When I look at websites which could be classified as "neocon" - i.e. pro-free market, pro-Israel, Republican-leaning - I note that they tend to be pretty strongly against illegal immigration and amnesty. This is in stark contrast to liberal and libertarian sites, which are alarmingly pro-open borders.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-83085811112511143112007-06-01T00:17:00.000-07:002007-06-01T00:17:00.000-07:00As for who lost California, it was lost when the R...<I>As for who lost California, it was lost when the Republican Establishment demonized Pete Wilson for supporting Prop 187</I><BR/><BR/>That myth has been disproved so many times it's almost pointless responding to it again.<BR/><BR/>California, by 1994, was already a liberal state. In 1992 - 2 years before Prop 187 - it voted overwhlemingly for Clinton, Boxer, and Feinstein, and it's congressional delegation was already overwhelmingly Democrat. <BR/>George HW Bush only barely own it in 1988, and then only thanks to Reagan.<BR/><BR/>Do the math: of the 23 members of Congress who are Hispanic, 20 are Democrats - a disparity that has existed for a very long time - long before the current debates about immigration.<BR/><BR/><I>WHY since it is so bad for African-Americans are so many of them just rolling over for Amnesty?</I><BR/><BR/>I don't think most blacks are for amnesty, though most black leaders are. And even if it were true, it would only go to show how difficult a time so many people have with connecting cause and effect.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-76248886064690595572007-06-01T00:09:00.000-07:002007-06-01T00:09:00.000-07:00I don't think it's fair to lambaste all the NR fol...I don't think it's fair to lambaste all the NR folks as "neocons." They have genuine editorial diversity, and clearly most of their writers are not "neocons."<BR/><BR/>Mark Steyn, Andrew Stuttaford, John O'Sullivan, David Frum, Mark Levin, Rich Lowry, The Derb - those are the names I can think of off the top of my head who are anti-open borders, to one degree or another.<BR/><BR/>I've been off the Bush bandwagon for quite some time, especially on immigration. I've always felt that conservatives were damaging conservatism by continuing to embrace Bush. But never, until now, have they actually done so. It's truly amazing how widespread the disgust is: <A HREF="http://www.opinionjournal.com/columnists/pnoonan/?id=110010148" REL="nofollow">Peggy Noonan</A> in the Wall Street Urinal; Laura Ingraham on her radio show; Mark Levin, David Frum, and Kathryn Lopez (a big Bush cheerleader) <A HREF="http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=Zjc3NzUwZjVkNmQ0YzdmNWUwODIwN2FhNDc5MDZmMjc=" REL="nofollow">over at NRO.</A><BR/><BR/>The disdain - for Bush and for other Republican sellouts, like Lindsey Graham - is large and spreading. At this point, given Graham's <A HREF="http://www.youtube.com/p.swf?video_id=5sEfrFoAIn4&eurl=&iurl=http%3A//img.youtube.com/vi/5sEfrFoAIn4/2.jpg&t=OEgsToPDskIhfj4bCVmK5YgbxBwTnoCc" REL="nofollow">ugly, hateful speech</A> to the folks at The Race (the last 20 seconds are the kicker), I have to doubt the man would survive a GOP challenge - which he <I>will</I> have.<BR/><BR/>These are the kinds of things that make for political realignment. Americans who favor border control are tired, angry, and fed up with being called "racist, nativist, xenpohobes, and bigots." PC and mulitculuralism are at death's doorstep.<BR/><BR/>And we all thought 9/11 was amazing...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-27406527639399968972007-05-31T23:09:00.000-07:002007-05-31T23:09:00.000-07:00Anon 10 pm -- your effort to root out neocons i.e....Anon 10 pm -- your effort to root out neocons i.e. "jews" is wrong and foolish. It was the traditional Republicans in the WSJ, the Bush Cabinet, and Republican Establishment that since 1986 supported illegal immigration (by not enforcing the borders) and repeated Amnesties.<BR/><BR/>As for who lost California, it was lost when the Republican Establishment demonized Pete Wilson for supporting Prop 187, while at the same time supporting the Clinton "peace dividend" that essentially destroyed the Southern California Aerospace and Defense industry. No Jews or Neocons in sight.<BR/><BR/>NR and Redstate oppose this Amnesty Bill and have been quite active. Do you want Cindy Sheehan-like political purity tests or any type of opposition to this awful bill? Take your choice.<BR/><BR/>Steve --<BR/><BR/>I think you are wrong on at least two counts on Obama. First, he has limited appeal to Whites. Certainly the media, but they are wildly unrepresentative of ordinary white voters, who by and large see the gargantuan hypocrisy of racial politics and feel zilch guilt themselves. <BR/><BR/>Obama's overt racial politics are a turn off to folks who see protected class minorities in the workplace occupying special positions. This applies to the cubicle farms as well as blue collar work. He's also glib, rich and the plaything of the media elite which is poison.<BR/><BR/>Don't confuse the Media Elite's fascination with him as being indicative of the larger population. Shrillary still leads with Dem voters, despite Nixonian levels of charisma and a horrible image of her by most men. So what does that say about Obama the Messiah?<BR/><BR/>And, with all due respect you are missing the big issue, the dog that didn't bark.<BR/><BR/>WHY since it is so bad for African-Americans are so many of them just rolling over for Amnesty? They must know they'll be economically cleansed out of many places, as they are in NYC, South Central LA, New Orleans, and elsewhere?<BR/><BR/>What this says to me is that the Black Community is so broken that it can't self-organize. It's essentially dead. In contrast, there is considerable effort among Conservatives to kill the Amnesty bill, including "Divorce" letters to the Republican Party, such stuff as 40% downturn in donations, burning/tearing up Registrations cards, etc. Not to mention the Minutemen, various other anti-illegal immigration groups.<BR/><BR/>Yet despite Blacks being hurt the most by illegal immigration, there is no action. Mayor Tony has his repeat of the May Day fiasco and the Black Community won't organize against him?<BR/><BR/>The total destruction of political and social life in the Black Community is the only answer I get.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-5118164992724794402007-05-31T22:15:00.000-07:002007-05-31T22:15:00.000-07:00And ain't it just fascinating that, if Obama wins,...<I>And ain't it just fascinating that, if Obama wins, we'll have two back-to-back presidents who are the smooth-talking sons of serial bigamists?</I><BR/><BR/>I meant, of course, to say "two back-to-back Democratic presidents."Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-52745297441837407182007-05-31T22:06:00.000-07:002007-05-31T22:06:00.000-07:00George HW Bush was a bigamist? Please explain. Al...George HW Bush was a bigamist? Please explain. <BR/><BR/>Also wtf is wrong woth SS's last sentence - makes sense to me. <BR/><BR/>A comment usually adds something to the discourse. Keep up the good work on Obama SS. DanAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-91306630071328583082007-05-31T22:00:00.000-07:002007-05-31T22:00:00.000-07:00If Mr Obama could flood this country with 100 mill...If Mr Obama could flood this country with 100 million foreigners he would do it in a heartbeat. Unless, of course, they were white. But, hey, the world is a tribal place... <BR/><BR/>...Steve, are we gonna see some excoriations of National Review staff? Here or at Vdare? Naming of names? A review of who said what and when on the National Question? A review of who fired whom? Who banished and exiled whom?<BR/><BR/>Maybe it's not the time for dissention. But those neocon snakes have been behind this immigration mischief the whole way. And now that it's dreadfully late in the game, all of the sudden NR is sounding the alarm. Does this not make you physically ill? After all that has gone on. After all of the unforgivable backstabbing and treason that has gone on.<BR/><BR/>Today NR is asking "Who Lost Texas?" What a sickening joke that is. When California was lost to the Left, the neocons didn't do anything but suppress the truthtellers. And they knew exactly what was happening. They nurtured the process. <BR/><BR/>These despicable neocons must not be allowed to paint themselves as giving a damn about the border. They are only jumping on the train now because of the upheaval and because they feel victory has been secured.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-85705980542369367732007-05-31T21:55:00.000-07:002007-05-31T21:55:00.000-07:00it's probably time to retire this topic for, oh, t...it's probably time to retire this topic for, oh, two months at least. no more obama posts until august.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-38519366900011319612007-05-31T21:11:00.000-07:002007-05-31T21:11:00.000-07:00If you have any doubt about the bias of the media,...If you have any doubt about the bias of the media, do two different Googles: make the first "Obama + bigamy." Make the second "Romney + polygamy." With the Obama search you get a few hundred hits. With the Romney search, you get over 200,000.<BR/><BR/>Romney's family hasn't had any polygamists since, at least, his great-grandfather. In Obama's case, it was his father who was the biganist.<BR/><BR/>And ain't it just fascinating that, if Obama wins, we'll have two back-to-back presidents who are the smooth-talking sons of serial bigamists?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-9025608666831935852007-05-31T17:48:00.000-07:002007-05-31T17:48:00.000-07:00I think you need to edit this article some more. T...I think you need to edit this article some more. That last sentence just leads nowhere and I have noticed other problems.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com