tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post8939256970974319859..comments2024-03-28T16:22:14.888-07:00Comments on Steve Sailer: iSteve: "This is weirdly fascinating."Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger142125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-21635795336454389382010-04-05T16:29:41.070-07:002010-04-05T16:29:41.070-07:00"I've shown, clearly, that Bob's clai..."I've shown, clearly, that Bob's claims are spurious."<br /><br />Clearly.Truthhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17286755693955361308noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-89731598602904973292010-04-05T14:50:28.541-07:002010-04-05T14:50:28.541-07:00By recognizing the enormity of Americas sins (Colo...<i>By recognizing the enormity of Americas sins (Colonization, Slavery, Vietnam, Segregation, Discrimination, bla bla bla), we make ourselves look like, well, what exactly? Nice guys?</i><br /><br />It doesn't make sense to me either.<br /><br />Svigor, have you ever made some big anti-Nazi statement to try to satisfy Fred and those guys? Just a thought.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-72260906240954038312010-04-05T14:23:55.879-07:002010-04-05T14:23:55.879-07:00I'm preparing a suit against the Mongols and t...I'm preparing a suit against the Mongols and the Saracens. If it weren't for the damage these groups did to Europe, we'd be on Mars by now.<br /><br />Clearly, modern Mongols and Saracens owe me a living via handout.Svigorhttp://majorityrights.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-28511283975549466712010-04-05T14:18:31.545-07:002010-04-05T14:18:31.545-07:00What are you smoking, Svigor?
Loved the hostile e...<i>What are you smoking, Svigor?</i><br /><br />Loved the hostile edit, too, where you trimmed off the rest of the sentence.Svigorhttp://majorityrights.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-38847758830760545642010-04-05T14:08:29.784-07:002010-04-05T14:08:29.784-07:00"Can you explain why the Pacific theater prac...<i>"Can you explain why the Pacific theater practically never happened as far as Hollywood is concerned"<br /><br />What are you smoking, Svigor? You don't think Hollywood made movies set in the Pacific during WWII? Seriously? Do you get TCM? You should watch it sometime.</i><br /><br />Compared to the European theater, it didn't. Pacific theater movies died out a long time ago.<br /><br /><i>"Call people Nazis and they blanch."<br /><br />Sorry you are troubled that people think Nazism was a bad thing.</i><br /><br />Now <b>there's</b> a comment free of disingenuousness! Ask for proportionality and you're the bad guy. Funny how that comment is precisely in line with the sort of thing I'm objecting to...Svigorhttp://majorityrights.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-22144327268282739902010-04-05T14:04:10.166-07:002010-04-05T14:04:10.166-07:00I also have the instructive case of Klaus vs. Bob....I also have the instructive case of Klaus vs. Bob.<br /><br />Klaus is a Polish immigrant. Bob has accused Klaus of breaking his leg, too. Bob thinks Klaus should support him via handout, too, and has brought a case against him.<br /><br />Klaus never had any ancestors in America, not in the courts, not in the legislature, not in the police, not in business (cruise ships or otherwise). Klaus never employed Bob or his ancestors, in fact, Klaus has never met Bob or his ancestors, at least not before Bob brought suit. The same is true for Klaus' ancestors.<br /><br />Yet, a court has ordered Klaus to pay Bob a living via handout. This clearly illustrates what Bob (and his powerful friends) are really up to.Svigorhttp://majorityrights.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-65381691915050811832010-04-05T14:02:49.813-07:002010-04-05T14:02:49.813-07:00Bob vs. Joe, part 3
"Or maybe con artists? B...Bob vs. Joe, part 3<br /><br /><i>"Or maybe con artists? Barring spectacular incompetence, who else but a con artist cultivates a limp for 3 generations?"<br /><br />[people in WV]</i><br /><br />Objection! This has nothing to do with Bob's claim that Joe owes him a living via handout.<br /><br /><i>[waistlines in Europe]</i><br /><br />Objection your honor! The plaintiff is changing the subject, which is, "is Bob's leg actually broken?" Bob's leg, and his father's leg, and his grandfather's leg, are/were all stronger than the legs of anyone back home in Bob's native land.<br /><br /><i>"In a cultural divorce, Bob and Joe simply agree to go their separate ways and all disputes and claims are null and void..."<br /><br />[Plaintiff claims Joe mistreated Bob, and that Bob & friends conspired to prevent Bob from returning to the motherland]</i><br /><br />The plaintiff's argument that Joe cannot culturally divorce Bob because of all the supposed mistreatment Bob has received at Joe's hands is not just absurd on its face, it's self-defeating. The plaintiff's argument that Joe cannot culturally divorce Bob because the whole world was conspiring against Bob is even more absurd.<br /><br />Joe doesn't run the court system, the legislatures, and the business ventures; Bob's friends do. Joe never ran any cruise ships. The police favor Bob, and Joe certainly never asked Bob for a cultural marriage.<br /><br />And the idea that Bob wanted to go back to the mother land is ludicrous, as he's had his entire life to buy tickets if that's what he wanted; he spent the money on rims, drugs, stereo equipment - enough to buy passage back to the homeland a thousand times over. The fact is, people offered to pay for his passage and set him up in the homeland (well they used to, but now they call that "racism"), but Bob knows perfectly well where the gravy train is. He figures his best chance is to sponge off of Joe forever. He knows all the legs back in the homeland are far more broken than his. He also knows that practically everyone back in the homeland is itching to be where he is.<br /><br />Bob simply has no claim on the sweat of Joe's brow. It's insulting to everyone (Joe, Bob, Joe's attorney, Bob's attorney) to claim otherwise, and a rank injustice toward Joe. I've shown, clearly, that Bob's claims are spurious.<br /><br />What's worse is that the plaintiff proposes that Joe's children should support Bob's children, and Joe's grandchildren should support Bob's grandchildren, and so on, and so forth, in perpetuity. I submit to the court that this intended malfeasance is evidence that the plaintiff is a malicious criminal and con artist, not a genuinely aggrieved party.Svigorhttp://majorityrights.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-2136119070221317582010-04-05T13:08:11.749-07:002010-04-05T13:08:11.749-07:00The spoils of war come from the vanquished, not fr...<i>The spoils of war come from the vanquished, not from allies.</i><br /><br />Have you heard? The Soviet Union is gone. Still waiting for those lawsuits...Svigorhttp://majorityrights.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-22720572886842431302010-04-05T13:04:22.290-07:002010-04-05T13:04:22.290-07:00By recognizing the enormity of the USSR of the ear...<i>By recognizing the enormity of the USSR of the early 1940s, we make ourselves look like fireside-brainwashed, New Deal-worshipping UN puppets.</i><br /><br />By recognizing the enormity of Americas sins (Colonization, Slavery, Vietnam, Segregation, Discrimination, bla bla bla), we make ourselves look like, well, what exactly? Nice guys?Svigorhttp://majorityrights.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-33517922156227440552010-04-04T11:08:35.907-07:002010-04-04T11:08:35.907-07:00"Can you explain why the Pacific theater prac...<i>"Can you explain why the Pacific theater practically never happened as far as Hollywood is concerned"</i><br /><br />What are you smoking, Svigor? You don't think Hollywood made movies set in the Pacific during WWII? Seriously? Do you get TCM? You should watch it sometime.<br /><br /><i>"So? American military personnel probably got a good look at Dresden, too. If the American military produced a significant number of the films in question, this might be persuasive."</i><br /><br />And they got a good look at Tokyo too, which was similarly fire-bombed (not to mention Hiroshima and Nagasaki, of course). Dwelling on those horrors would tarnish the Greatest Generation mythos though, as I already pointed out. But, Americans did at least see footage of Dresden, Tokyo, Hiroshima, and Nagasaki, because Americans were there to take that footage. The same wasn't true of Stalinist gulags. <br /><br /><i>"Call people Nazis and they blanch."</i><br /><br />Sorry you are troubled that people think Nazism was a bad thing.Frednoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-48828868195251566802010-04-04T01:05:37.916-07:002010-04-04T01:05:37.916-07:00As per the Russia-Germany thing; it is an Anglo wo...As per the Russia-Germany thing; it is an Anglo world, we play by Anglo rules, and the Anglo rulebook states as such:<br /><br />A king may murder as many people as he wants within his own borders, once he crosses one of those imaginary lines and starts murdering someone who speaks a different language, he is labeled a monster. It has worked that way roughly since the Magna Carta.Truthhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17286755693955361308noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-34724960828582078502010-04-04T01:02:45.855-07:002010-04-04T01:02:45.855-07:00"In a cultural divorce, Bob and Joe simply ag..."In a cultural divorce, Bob and Joe simply agree to go their separate ways and all disputes and claims are null and void..."<br /><br />The problem is that Joe runs the court systems, the legislatures, the and the business ventures, Joe ran the cruise ships that brought Bob here, Joe functions as the landlord, the policeman, and the clergy, and guess what, Joe asked Bob to marry him, Joe spiced up the marriage when it started to flag, and when Bob wanted to go back home and live with his parents, Joe owned of the vehicles but did not one to loan one to Bob, because, well, he loves Bob, always has, always will, and to death do them part.Truthhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17286755693955361308noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-86184254985608824452010-04-04T00:57:07.117-07:002010-04-04T00:57:07.117-07:00"Or maybe con artists? Barring spectacular in..."Or maybe con artists? Barring spectacular incompetence, who else but a con artist cultivates a limp for 3 generations?"<br /><br />Naturally brilliant, God-touched, blessed people in West Virginia and Kentucky have lived in shacks for 10 generations now, primarily because their ancestors passed that way of life down the line.<br /><br />"Objection your honor! The plaintiff is changing the subject, which is, "is Bob's leg actually broken?" Bob's leg, and his father's leg, and his grandfather's leg, are/were all stronger than the legs of anyone back home in Bob's native land."<br /><br />Yes, and Joe, his father and his grandfather all have wider waistlines than their relatives in Europe, because Bob and his line worked very hard in their factories, and did not earn what they should have. It's called symbiosis, my boy.<br /><br />"And on a side note, I submit that I welcome the chance to, should there be a separate case, discuss the laughable notion that Joe's success relative to his countrymen back in the Old Country is down to gimpy Bob and his gimpy ancestors"<br /><br />Why not, same white folks, and skin color is destiny, right?Truthhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17286755693955361308noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-21219417613414553932010-04-04T00:48:37.820-07:002010-04-04T00:48:37.820-07:00"Troof: there is no exchange at the link you ..."Troof: there is no exchange at the link you provide that even remotely resembles your parody."<br /><br />Taken directly from the post:<br /><br />"What's up with all the bashing of Near Eastern origin caucasians, anyway? Lebanese, Persians, and Armenians may be a bit on the clannish side (at least for the first generation or so) but are plenty sharp and their kids seem to do fine in school.<br /><br />Ah, here we go again, another post going on about how Protestant Germanics are so superior to all those Southern Europeans and Irish/Polish Catholic sorts. Bull.<br /><br />I agree with you. I guess the bashing derives from the fact that no small majority of the commentators on here are obsessed with extolling their WASP/Germanic roots, as if no other group of Caucasians (or Asians for that matter) has ever contributed anything to society.<br /><br />------ Dubious. If the touted northern European heritage is so important why does a NON Northern European white people like Jews consistently post better educational performances and higher IQ that the supposedly pace-setting "Nordic" whites?<br /><br />Oh please. Multiculti America is all about extolling the contributions of everybody BUT the WASP/Germanic populations that founded this country.<br /><br />Now Steve, if it resembled it any more closely, it wouldn't be a parody, it would be a copy.Truthhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17286755693955361308noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-57019080984832723812010-04-03T15:13:58.903-07:002010-04-03T15:13:58.903-07:00Komment Kontrol.Komment Kontrol.Svigorhttp://majorityrights.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-62693363557120325782010-04-03T08:23:45.190-07:002010-04-03T08:23:45.190-07:00Sexual attractiveness in and of itself outweighs I...<i>Sexual attractiveness in and of itself outweighs IQ in predicting success in mating, I think.</i><br /><br />Probably true, but that would be hard to measure. IQ is negatively related to drug addiction, short time horizons, getting into fights all the time ... things that reduce sexual attractiveness. Put another way, dim attractive people may beat smart plain people, but both pools are drowned by the huge quantity of dim ugly people.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-49282440489387351602010-04-02T19:45:16.986-07:002010-04-02T19:45:16.986-07:00Back to the topic at hand though, if you don't...<i>Back to the topic at hand though, if you don't think the footage of those piles of emaciated corpses, left behind by a genocidal regime that was driven by an ideology of scientific racism, sullied the brand of HBD/eugenics/race-realism? What do you think did?</i><br /><br />Svigor is a major critic of Jews. What he's saying is that, of the extensive menu of mass-murdering 20th Century socialists, Jews have narrowed the focus towards hating only the ones who killed Jews. Mao, Pol Pot, Ceaucescu, etc. get a pass.<br /><br />I don't consider Jews' roles in all of this to be surprising or offensive, but the "forget Stalin! hate Hitler!" meme may well be a testament to Jewish influence. I am not so sure myself, because it could also be attributed to sheepishness about criticizing GreatestGen attitudes and actions. We tend to remember our allies, even if they didn't by any stretch of the imagine deserve to be our allies. By recognizing the enormity of the USSR of the early 1940s, we make ourselves look like <b>fireside-brainwashed, New Deal-worshipping UN puppets</b>.<br /><br />Which we are, more or less.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-24290013587423994312010-04-02T14:33:01.999-07:002010-04-02T14:33:01.999-07:00I don't think commies in Russia, China, etc. w...<i>I don't think commies in Russia, China, etc. were known for "anti-race-realism"</i><br /><br />The Soviet Union officially opposed racism, discrimination, chauvinism, anti-Semitism, etc. Anti-Semitism was outlawed. What they were "known for" just goes back to who's got the bullhorn; the US and the Soviet Union called one another racist during the Cold War, trying to one-up one another in the anti-racist status game.<br /><br /><i>And there isn't just a shortage of gulag flicks, there is a shortage of flicks about the Eastern Front in World War II (I can think of one, "Enemy at the Gates"). That's because such a focus would both diminish and tarnish our national mythology about the "Greatest Generation". We'd have to remember that in WWII we were allied with one of history's worst mass murderers and that his troops and his people were more responsible for defeating Nazi Germany than we were.</i><br /><br />I see. The media undermines western traditions, values, and confidence at every turn, but when it comes to WWII, they're all waving the flag? Maybe "which flag?" is a good question.<br /><br />But, after WWII, Germany became one of our biggest allies, and the Soviet Union our main adversary. So, what were the patriotic filmmakers doing undermining our ally and ignoring, downplaying, or whitewashing our greatest enemy? <br /><br />Can you explain why the Pacific theater practically never happened as far as Hollywood is concerned, relative to the European?<br /><br /><i>Also, remember, re Nazi concentration camps versus Soviet gulags: American generals toured liberated concentration camps, and filmed the piles of emaciated corpses. They didn't tour and film any Siberian gulags, for obvious reasons.</i><br /><br />So? American military personnel probably got a good look at Dresden, too. If the American military produced a significant number of the films in question, this might be persuasive. Star Trek did its part in the "fight against racism and xenophobia," despite the fact no one's ever set foot on Alpha Centauri.<br /><br /><i>Back to the topic at hand though, if you don't think the footage of those piles of emaciated corpses, left behind by a genocidal regime that was driven by an ideology of scientific racism, sullied the brand of HBD/eugenics/race-realism? What do you think did?</i><br /><br />And we're back to whether a tree makes a sound if it falls in the forest and no one's around to hear it. The Soviet regime was driven by an ideology of scientific anti-racism, the infinite plasticity and interchangeability of man, etc., and left behind more than three times as many corpses as the Nazi regime.<br /><br />Do you really think Soviet anti-racism and modern American anti-racism are significantly different? They obviously come from the same source.<br /><br /><i>If it will cheer you up at all, I googled "Stalin is evil" and got almost 2 million hits. So the world is aware that he was evil.</i><br /><br />Yeah sure. But compare the thrust of politics in the west, and anti-communism doesn't even compare to anti-Nazism; compare the "guilt by association" games vis-a-vis Nazi values vs. Commie values. Call people Nazis and they blanch. Call people Commies and they laugh. Call people racists and they blanch; call them anti-racists and they preen.Svigorhttp://majorityrights.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-68244855260035455732010-04-02T13:42:21.355-07:002010-04-02T13:42:21.355-07:00Bob vs. Joe, part 2
"2) There's always t...Bob vs. Joe, part 2<br /><br /><i>"2) There's always the issue of whether Bob's leg is actually broken, what with it being stronger than any of Bob's brothers' (or cousins', or countrymen's), back in Africa."</i><br /><br /><i>Of course there's also the issue of, has Bob working in Joe's factory for so many years caused Joe's sales to be much higher than any of Joe's brohers' (or cousins, or countrymen's) back in France.</i><br /><br />Objection your honor! The plaintiff is changing the subject, which is, "is Bob's leg actually broken?" Bob's leg, and his father's leg, and his grandfather's leg, are/were all stronger than the legs of anyone back home in Bob's native land. These folks just have weak legs, it seems, made stronger, not weaker, by being near Joe's family. I move for dismissal.<br /><br />And for the record, Bob received all the compensation he was due for his labor when he cashed the paychecks Joe wrote him, irrespective of how well Joe's business has fared relative to that of his kin back in the Old Country. And on a side note, I submit that I welcome the chance to, should there be a separate case, discuss the laughable notion that Joe's success relative to his countrymen back in the Old Country is down to gimpy Bob and his gimpy ancestors; sans the handouts Joe's given Bob, Joe would be even further ahead of his kin back in the Old Country.<br /><br /><i>"3) Sounds like a case for societal divorce. Concomitant restitution (adjusted for prior payments & benefits) for partial injury might be reasonable, given divorce."</i><br /><br /><i>You are aware that in terms of divorce, the less powerful party generally gets to stay in the house, right?</i><br /><br />Nah, this is cultural divorce, totally different. In a cultural divorce, Bob and Joe simply agree to go their separate ways and all disputes and claims are null and void (you know, each has to make his way in the world on his own, like a man?); each party knows he's not due consideration for employment, handouts, compensation, or anything else.<br /><br /><i>"4) Each of our positions is (race-realist) heresy."<br /><br />Why?</i><br /><br />Lol. Never mind.<br /><br /><i>Yeah, but they didn't break Bob's leg in Boston, they just severely sprained his ankle.</i><br /><br />We've already dealt with the fact that Bob, his dad, and his grandad all have stronger legs than any of their countrymen back in Africa. His leg was broken (congenital defect, like all of his countrymen) back in Africa before he boarded the ship.<br /><br />Cheer up though - I think Bob may have a case against his cousin, Tom, the guy (with a broken leg) back in Africa who bopped him on the head and put him on a ship to the New World.Svigorhttp://majorityrights.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-70719296773476516412010-04-02T13:41:15.404-07:002010-04-02T13:41:15.404-07:00Bob vs. Joe, part 1
"1) Are we talking about...Bob vs. Joe, part 1<br /><br /><i>"1) Are we talking about Joe and Bob, or their great grandfathers? Sounds like two different cases to me."</i><br /><br /><i>We're talking about Bob and Joe's grandfathers, but folks around the way say that Bob's grandfather taught Bob's father how to walk, run, ride a bicycle and do everything that involves locomotion the only way he knew how...with a limp. Correspondingly Bob's father taught the same lessons to Bob, and now Bob, like Tim Tebow, has to learn how to do it all the right way as an adult.</i><br /><br />Wow, you really have no respect for Bob's family, do you?<br /><br />Sounds like Bob, his father, and his grandfather were spectacularly dysfunctional. Or maybe con artists? Barring spectacular dysfunction, who else but a con artist cultivates a limp for 3 generations? Think about all the pity parties at Bob's house; "yeah, the world was our oyster till Joe's great-grandfather made our great-grandpa's broken leg worse..."<br /><br />Your solution is that great grandpa Joe's descendants should pay to support great grandpa Bob's descendants, because Bob's whole family is dysfunctional, or con artists? Yeah, let's go in front of the judge with that one. Bob had better hope for a corrupt judge (maybe he's afraid of what Bob will do if he comes to the "wrong" decision, or maybe Bob has powerful friends), and a corrupt appeals judge, and so on... In fact, Bob better hope for a corrupt legal <b>system</b>, and hope it stays that way...Svigorhttp://majorityrights.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-74288661144758875762010-04-02T06:52:48.230-07:002010-04-02T06:52:48.230-07:00"John D said...
When NAM relative lack o..."John D said...<br /><br /> When NAM relative lack of success, or outright failure, and social pathologies are blamed on whites as the accepted reason for said failure, repeated ad nauseum, taught in schools, broadcast on networks, and regulated via laws as though it were true, then yes, HBD as the reason for said failure *does* need to be repeated, loudly and repeatedly until white people are no longer blamed for NAM failure."<br /><br />I quite agree. The current situation dictates that some people need to be offended.Mr. Anonnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-90854484608107160582010-04-02T06:05:51.449-07:002010-04-02T06:05:51.449-07:00The spoils of war come from the vanquished, not fr...The spoils of war come from the vanquished, not from allies. The amount of money made out of the Holocaust is whopping. No one cares about 30 million dead in Russia because there was no money to be made out it.<br /><br />More lucrative to sue the defeated parties silly. Heck, Jews even got their own nation out of it, though not many of them actually live there.<br /><br />Human rights abuses are probably more numerous in China than they were in Hussein's Iraq. But since the former is our financier and the latter was our "enemy," you will forever hear more about (non-existent) wood-chipper executions than you will hear about Asian slave labor. (And more about non-existent weapons of mass destruction than about Chinese nukes.)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-66938232150815196932010-04-02T00:54:34.684-07:002010-04-02T00:54:34.684-07:00Truth, you're right, that garbage is endless. ...Truth, you're right, that garbage is endless. At some point -- and it occurs very early on -- it moves <i>way</i> beyond understanding reality and becomes none too subtle ethnic one-upmanship . <br /><br />Take that uppity Canadian snot who bought a car off the Lebanese dealer. He sounds like a loser who has once been burned and is now determined to 'stand his ground' (like a good Anglo-Saxon!), so rather than answer the Lebanese's question, eg "On Friday you told me it'd be ready by <i>Monday</i>" and then see what the Lebanese had to throw at him, and put the Lebanese on the back foot, he stood his ground and got hung up on. Whatever 'point' he think he proved, he was still without car and now without explanation too. In short, an idiot.<br /><br />All that might be 'g' but what the IQ fetishists neglect is that there's a lot more to life than 'g', lawl.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-81482250268070636362010-04-01T22:47:26.571-07:002010-04-01T22:47:26.571-07:00"That's because such a focus would both d..."That's because such a focus would both diminish and tarnish our national mythology about the "Greatest Generation". We'd have to remember that in WWII we were allied with one of history's worst mass murderers and that his troops and his people were more responsible for defeating Nazi Germany than we were."<br /><br />That is an overstatement. We didn't know the truth about Stalin. You are correct about who did more to defeat Hitler, but the 'Greatest Generation' did its part, and they were most responsible for beating Japan.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9430835.post-71183337391823627302010-04-01T18:51:12.748-07:002010-04-01T18:51:12.748-07:00Svigor:
The movie you seem to be lookin for is: ...Svigor:<br /><br />The movie you seem to be lookin for is: "As Far as My Feet Can Carry Me". At least, I think that that is the name of it.<br /><br />It involves a German WWII soldier who becomes a prisoner in a Soviet mining camp in a Siberian location so cold and remote that the Russians don't even bother to put a fence around the camp.<br /><br />It is in German, with subtitles.For Svigornoreply@blogger.com