Can anybody think of a movie that has had much impact in America made since the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989 that has depicted life under the Communists in Eastern Europe?
But in the mid 80's Joe Sedelmaier of the famous "Where's the Beef?" commercial created this one here that will always be one of my favorite images of Eastern Europe under communism.
Hi Steve, I don't think that any of these movies satisfy your question, however, here are a few movies that I ripped off from Films on Liberty and the State at Mises.org:
"Burnt By the Sun", "The Inner Circle", "The Promise", "Stalingrad", Sunshine, Underground
Some of these are not in English. Well, that was my best effort.
"Enemy at the Gates" with Jude Law and Ed Harris kinda qualifies.
This movie set in East Germany under Communism just came out, so it hasn't had much impact (yet), but Joe Morgenstern of the WSJ just gave it a rave review: Lives of Others
In my opinion, Enemy at the Gates portrayed the Nazis as more sympathetic than the Russians. On an individual level, Ed Harris' Nazi Colonel was the villian, but even he was depicted as not simply malevolent, while the Soviet state, represented primarily by Hoskins' Kruschev, is stupid, venal, incompetent and cruel.
"Sunshine" isn't bad as far as showing communism. It depicts the Soviet justice system as being more about stacking up tens of thousands of confessions/executions rather than finding real traitors/criminals and the perverting effect that this has on people.
It also has segments about Nazis, including the Holocause, as the main characters are a Jewish family.
How can there be a discussion of Eastern Europe under Communism and no mention of Hedwig and the Angry Inch?
Unlike other movies mentioned here, it did have (and continues to have) a passionate audience. It is routinely compared to "Rocky Horror" in terms of popularity. The demographic may skew DINKy in the upper age brackets, but there are lots of young 'uns there, too, which can hardly be said of "Enemy at the Gates".
I agree with dyork's IDing of the mid 80s Wendy's campaign, as well as several real-life East German "womens" Olympic athletes as fixing the general character of Eastern European communism in the American mind, forever.
There as that bit at the beginning of "The Spy Game" (Redord, Pitt), where the Pitt character is trying to help someone defect from Czechoslovakia (or was it E.Germany?). Does that count?
An old "Reason" article discussed this. Read it http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/939417/posts because the "a-ha" posts that follow are amusing for their ignorance. (Well, one poster seemed to know the real reason.)
"The Tunnel" (German language film) is a very good portrayal of the divided postwar Berlin. It does a good job of showing the grimness of life under Communism, and how rule of the rich gave way to despotism of the bureaucrat.
In America, where even welfare kids wear $200 sneakers and play PS2, people cannot fathom why Communism appealed to Russians one generation removed from a medieval lifestyle or (some) Germans living in the ruins of a modern industrial state ravaged by two nationalist wars.
But Americans certainly can understand the burdensome weight of bureaucracy on the lives of people who would otherwise be reasonably self-sufficient. "The Tunnel" conveys some of that.
Outside of your time span there is the 1970's movie "One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich" which made a big impact on me. It was not produced in Hollywood. The opening scene was wonderful; a slow flight over darkness in which a spot of light slowly resolves into lights on top of a barbed wire fence in the snow before dawn.
Also, there does not come to mind any movie ever describing everyday life (not involving the Holocaust) inside Germany during the war. I'd be interested to see such a movie. I would hope that it would show how dictators gain and maintain power.
There have been quite a few European films about life under communism, but I don't think any of them have made a splash in America. I recently saw the French "East-West", which was pretty good. I liked "Life of Others", too.
Hollywood has been reluctant to make films about the evils of communism. In previous decades, this may have been due to ideological reasons, but I doubt anyone in today's Hollywood is nostalgic for the Soviet Union.
I think if someone like Spielberg made a big movie about communist horrors, it would open the floodgates, and we'd see more movies like that because there are lots of mind-boggling stories to be told about "workers' paradises."
For example, the Kengir uprising (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kengir_uprising) is exactly the kind of unlikely story about valiant underdogs revolting against fascist authority that Hollywood loves -- and it's all true. It could make a great movie. If some struggling screenwriter is reading this, the Kengir story could be your ticket to fame and fortune!
I'll venture to guess, that in the English language, there have been no well-known movies since the fall of the Berlin Wall that have depicted life in Eastern Europe under communism.
I'll go further and guess there have been no well-known English language movies depicting life under communism anywhere in the world since that time. I cannot think of any movie since 1989 that depicts life in communist China, for example. The Last Emperor would be as close one gets to a depiction of communist China and that was released in 1987. Sadly, Team America's portrayal of Kim Jong-Il may be as close as we get to Hollywood examining Asian communism.
Excepting Vietnam movies (Hollywood loves Vietnam, though not as much as it loves the Nazis), a few spy thrillers, Rambo, and Dr. Strangelove, it would seem that the Cold War pretty much never happened for Hollywood.
I would prefer an accurate Hollywood movie about life in Maoist China even more than one about the Eastern bloc.
Even ignorant/liberal people are generally aware of the fact that life under Soviet-style communism was Very Bad Indeed. They just don't like to talk about it. But I'm amazed at the fact that that same group of people is almost completely clueless about what a hellhole Maoism created, and the fact that the body count was much higher.
Another burning hope of mine would be an honest, influential film about Castro and Che. Something like that would probably have the biggest effect in terms of turning people around.
Perhaps one reason we don't see a lot of "horrors-of-life-under-communism" movies is that we didn't win. Communism more or less petered out without a decisive battle fought against it. James Bond et al. were Cold War spy heroes - that much was dramatized, in abundance - but our side never engaged in direct battle with communism and won. Contrast the situation versus the Nazis. We crushed the evil Nazis. The Soviets - we allied with them, then things got tense for 50 years (spies sneaking about), we fought some dirty proxy wars against them and lost the most open of these (Vietnam), then poof! The only commies left are some banana republics like Cuba and a crony capitalist country not so dissimilar from our own (China).
So, there is no "Victorious Hero-Crushed Monster" frame from which to proceed with any kind of meaningful story. Just personal films about somebody's alcoholism, and somebody got arrested. Not enough to put butts in the theatre seats.
Americans dont pay much attention to foreign movies,ESPECIALLY if theyre serious. We like British movies the most,French to a lesser extent,some Japanese(which I like!:) )--and the occasional Irish/Scotch offering. Long,dreary movies about suffering and sadness and grain harvests are NOT gonna catch on here! To deal with the Communist stories for an American audience we need American movies--maybe Warren Beatty could produce a gulag archipelago thing! :0 Or,maybe not...
There was a HBO miniseries about Stalin several years ago. I never saw it, but I can't imagine it was very favorable (since these days even the lefest of leftists admits Stalin was a monster). The popularity of Nazi/Holocaust movies is attributable to two factors, in my opinion. Yes, one is the heavy Jewish presence in Hollywood, but I also think that anonymous 12:22 is on to something. We actually fought that the Nazis in open battle, so we can have movies that have Nazis as background characters while focusing on the people Americans are likely to really care about: other Americans. So we have two types of Nazi movies - Holocaust movies and war movies - and between them they take up quite a bit of the movie market.
Thw question is, of course, implicitly "anti-semitic". You are pointing out the specific ethnic concerns of the group that is dominant in Hollywood.
But the lack of a Gotterdammerung-like ending for the Soviet empire may be a big reason for the paucity of films about Soviet barbarity. If the Hungarians have produced anything worth seeing (post-89) about the 1956 revolt I'd like to see it-even without subtitles.
BTW, wasn't Goodbye Lenin a comedy? Among the many movies dealing with the Holocaust, I think there have been only one or two comedic films dealing directly or indirectly with the Nazi genocide.
I dont think movies have "big impacts" upon the populace as a whole these days due to the fragmentation of modern audiences. We are not "one big nation" like we were in 1970. The closest thing to a movie "everybody saw" in the past 15 years was "Titanic". I think smaller niche films will occupy more and more of Hollywood's product plans in the ensuing decades as we split ethnically and culturally into groups (Christians, Athiests, Muslims, Neo-Pagans, Envrionmentalists, Corporatists, Music lovers, Hip-Hoppers, Nerds, Sports fanatics, Aesthetics, adrenaline junkies, pleasure-worshippers, etc.)
I saw the HBO "Stalin" biopic. It reminded me of the positions of a lot of leftists who used to offer rhetorical support for communism: the system was ok, but it had been led by the wrong people. Stalin and Beria are shown as monsters while the intellectuals like Trotsky and Bukharin are treated much more sympathetically.
But it's a stretch to say that it had an impact.
Hollywood types have are too romantically invested in communism to ever show its ravages. Witness Selma Hayek's "Frida," in which communism is the only haven for art and freedom - but again, it's corrupted by baddies like Stalin, and Dionysian gluttons like Diego Rivera.
Although even a $200 million box office smash is seen in the theatres by only about 10% of the population, eventually a very large fraction will see it on DVD and TV.
Andy Vanja of Carolco is currently producing a movie about the infamous Hungarian-Soviet Olympic water polo match that happened shortly after the Hungarian revolt was put down. That should qualify.
"East-West" has a Russian screenwriter and some Russain actors,some dialogues are in Russian... I think I have seen it in Russian version if I am correct. So it is in my opinion rather Russian-French that purely French. Just a thought.
Steve, how about that movie - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moscow_Does_not_Believe_in_Tears ?
It was very popular in Soviet Union when it was made in 1979, it is a melodramatic one, but it surely depicts life in Soviet Union.
There were so many movie in Russia in 90s about different aspects of life in USSR that people are now sick of them. The problem that decause of language barrier most of them are not known to Western audience. And it is too bad. No movie ever produced in Hollywood could be considered to adequately depict life in Soviet Union. It is like expecting that a movie made in India or China in the 80s about life in USA in the 60s would be seriously accepted by an American public. :) You have to live in the country to know it, feel it, to be able to make a believable film.
None of the Hollywood movie about Russia/Soviet Union ever touched me the way some Russian/Soviet movies did, even though they were made with political constraints imposed on the movie-makers.
Some 90s Russian movies known abroad -
Burnt by the Sun ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burnt_by_the_Sun )
A few movies were made, but they did very poorly at the box office.
I look forward to seeing "the Lives of Others". It's getting good reviews. If it is as good as I've heard, it may be the first post-89 life-under-communism film that a lot of Americans see. It could have a huge impact.
It has a sexy female star, which should bring people in; but it's in German, which might scare people away. "Pan's Labyrinth" is in Spanish, has has brought in over $30 million in the U.S. already. Sure, some of the viewers must have been Hispanic, but most of the people at the theatre I attended looked pretty gringo.
"Letters from Iwo Jima" has brought in more than $11 million already, and it's in Japanese.
I suspect that "the Lives of Others" should bring in something in between, perhaps in the $20-30 million range.
Since 1989, no.
ReplyDeleteBut in the mid 80's Joe Sedelmaier of the famous "Where's the Beef?" commercial created this one here that will always be one of my favorite images of Eastern Europe under communism.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5CaMUfxVJVQ
Hi Steve,
ReplyDeleteI don't think that any of these movies satisfy your question, however, here are a few movies that I ripped off from Films on Liberty and the State at Mises.org:
"Burnt By the Sun",
"The Inner Circle",
"The Promise",
"Stalingrad",
Sunshine,
Underground
Some of these are not in English. Well, that was my best effort.
"Enemy at the Gates" with Jude Law and Ed Harris kinda qualifies.
Thanks. "Enemies at the Gate" was a big budget film with Bob Hoskins as Kruschev at Stalingrad, but it also had Nazis, and Hollywood loooooves Nazis!
ReplyDeleteSteve,
ReplyDeleteThis movie set in East Germany under Communism just came out, so it hasn't had much impact (yet), but Joe Morgenstern of the WSJ just gave it a rave review: Lives of Others
Dave
In my opinion, Enemy at the Gates portrayed the Nazis as more sympathetic than the Russians. On an individual level, Ed Harris' Nazi Colonel was the villian, but even he was depicted as not simply malevolent, while the Soviet state, represented primarily by Hoskins' Kruschev, is stupid, venal, incompetent and cruel.
ReplyDelete"Sunshine" isn't bad as far as showing communism. It depicts the Soviet justice system as being more about stacking up tens of thousands of confessions/executions rather than finding real traitors/criminals and the perverting effect that this has on people.
It also has segments about Nazis, including the Holocause, as the main characters are a Jewish family.
i was going to say enemy at the gates but you guys already got it.
ReplyDeleteit didn't make any impact though, because nobody saw it.
The Russia House
ReplyDeleteAlso with Connery, The Hunt for Red October.
ReplyDeleteThough production was likely quite far along by the time the Wall fell.
Yes, I can think of one. I'm not telling you, though.
ReplyDeleteHow can there be a discussion of Eastern Europe under Communism and no mention of Hedwig and the Angry Inch?
ReplyDeleteUnlike other movies mentioned here, it did have (and continues to have) a passionate audience. It is routinely compared to "Rocky Horror" in terms of popularity. The demographic may skew DINKy in the upper age brackets, but there are lots of young 'uns there, too, which can hardly be said of "Enemy at the Gates".
I agree with dyork's IDing of the mid 80s Wendy's campaign, as well as several real-life East German "womens" Olympic athletes as fixing the general character of Eastern European communism in the American mind, forever.
It was in 1988 (close), but Philip Kaufman's version of "The Unbearable Lightness of Being" turned a lot of people to the writings of Milan Kundera.
ReplyDeleteThere as that bit at the beginning of "The Spy Game" (Redord, Pitt), where the Pitt character is trying to help someone defect from Czechoslovakia (or was it E.Germany?). Does that count?
ReplyDeleteAn old "Reason" article discussed this. Read it http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/939417/posts because the "a-ha" posts that follow are amusing for their ignorance. (Well, one poster seemed to know the real reason.)
dougjnn, is that French film about a Russian emigre returning to the Soviet Union with his French wife only to be almost immediately disenchanted?
ReplyDeleteI don't recall the name. It certainly painted quite a bleak picture of life under the communists, though.
"The Tunnel" (German language film) is a very good portrayal of the divided postwar Berlin. It does a good job of showing the grimness of life under Communism, and how rule of the rich gave way to despotism of the bureaucrat.
ReplyDeleteIn America, where even welfare kids wear $200 sneakers and play PS2, people cannot fathom why Communism appealed to Russians one generation removed from a medieval lifestyle or (some) Germans living in the ruins of a modern industrial state ravaged by two nationalist wars.
But Americans certainly can understand the burdensome weight of bureaucracy on the lives of people who would otherwise be reasonably self-sufficient. "The Tunnel" conveys some of that.
Outside of your time span there is the 1970's movie "One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich" which made a big impact on me. It was not produced in Hollywood. The opening scene was wonderful; a slow flight over darkness in which a spot of light slowly resolves into lights on top of a barbed wire fence in the snow before dawn.
ReplyDeleteAlso, there does not come to mind any movie ever describing everyday life (not involving the Holocaust) inside Germany during the war. I'd be interested to see such a movie. I would hope that it would show how dictators gain and maintain power.
'Goodbye Lenin' is the only one which springs to mind.
ReplyDeleteThere have been quite a few European films about life under communism, but I don't think any of them have made a splash in America. I recently saw the French "East-West", which was pretty good. I liked "Life of Others", too.
ReplyDeleteHollywood has been reluctant to make films about the evils of communism. In previous decades, this may have been due to ideological reasons, but I doubt anyone in today's Hollywood is nostalgic for the Soviet Union.
I think if someone like Spielberg made a big movie about communist horrors, it would open the floodgates, and we'd see more movies like that because there are lots of mind-boggling stories to be told about "workers' paradises."
For example, the Kengir uprising (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kengir_uprising) is exactly the kind of unlikely story about valiant underdogs revolting against fascist authority that Hollywood loves -- and it's all true. It could make a great movie. If some struggling screenwriter is reading this, the Kengir story could be your ticket to fame and fortune!
I'll venture to guess, that in the English language, there have been no well-known movies since the fall of the Berlin Wall that have depicted life in Eastern Europe under communism.
ReplyDeleteI'll go further and guess there have been no well-known English language movies depicting life under communism anywhere in the world since that time. I cannot think of any movie since 1989 that depicts life in communist China, for example. The Last Emperor would be as close one gets to a depiction of communist China and that was released in 1987. Sadly, Team America's portrayal of Kim Jong-Il may be as close as we get to Hollywood examining Asian communism.
Excepting Vietnam movies (Hollywood loves Vietnam, though not as much as it loves the Nazis), a few spy thrillers, Rambo, and Dr. Strangelove, it would seem that the Cold War pretty much never happened for Hollywood.
Hollywood Jews are not interested in communism. Never happened.
ReplyDeleteI second the "Good bye, Lenin!" recommendation.
ReplyDeleteGood bye, Lenin! Trailer
"Hollywood Jews are not interested in communism. Never happened."
ReplyDeleteAny Rand was, that's why she wrote We The Living and tried (unsuccessfully) to get Cecil B. DeMille to produce it.
Dave
Rand was indeed. But surely you remember how warmly she was embraced by the Hollywood community.
ReplyDeleteI would prefer an accurate Hollywood movie about life in Maoist China even more than one about the Eastern bloc.
ReplyDeleteEven ignorant/liberal people are generally aware of the fact that life under Soviet-style communism was Very Bad Indeed. They just don't like to talk about it. But I'm amazed at the fact that that same group of people is almost completely clueless about what a hellhole Maoism created, and the fact that the body count was much higher.
Another burning hope of mine would be an honest, influential film about Castro and Che. Something like that would probably have the biggest effect in terms of turning people around.
You should give Speilburg a call.
ReplyDelete{ . I cannot think of any movie since 1989 that depicts life in communist China }
ReplyDeleteAt a stretch I suppose you could argue that 'Seven Years In Tibet' sort of counts.
Perhaps one reason we don't see a lot of "horrors-of-life-under-communism" movies is that we didn't win. Communism more or less petered out without a decisive battle fought against it. James Bond et al. were Cold War spy heroes - that much was dramatized, in abundance - but our side never engaged in direct battle with communism and won. Contrast the situation versus the Nazis. We crushed the evil Nazis. The Soviets - we allied with them, then things got tense for 50 years (spies sneaking about), we fought some dirty proxy wars against them and lost the most open of these (Vietnam), then poof! The only commies left are some banana republics like Cuba and a crony capitalist country not so dissimilar from our own (China).
ReplyDeleteSo, there is no "Victorious Hero-Crushed Monster" frame from which to proceed with any kind of meaningful story. Just personal films about somebody's alcoholism, and somebody got arrested. Not enough to put butts in the theatre seats.
Americans dont pay much attention to foreign movies,ESPECIALLY if theyre serious. We like British movies the most,French to a lesser extent,some Japanese(which I like!:) )--and the occasional Irish/Scotch offering. Long,dreary movies about suffering and sadness and grain harvests are NOT gonna catch on here! To deal with the Communist stories for an American audience we need American movies--maybe Warren Beatty could produce a gulag archipelago thing! :0 Or,maybe not...
ReplyDelete"Another burning hope of mine would be an honest, influential film about Castro and Che."
ReplyDeleteTry "Before Night Falls" directed by Julian Schnabel.
There was a HBO miniseries about Stalin several years ago. I never saw it, but I can't imagine it was very favorable (since these days even the lefest of leftists admits Stalin was a monster).
ReplyDeleteThe popularity of Nazi/Holocaust movies is attributable to two factors, in my opinion. Yes, one is the heavy Jewish presence in Hollywood, but I also think that anonymous 12:22 is on to something. We actually fought that the Nazis in open battle, so we can have movies that have Nazis as background characters while focusing on the people Americans are likely to really care about: other Americans. So we have two types of Nazi movies - Holocaust movies and war movies - and between them they take up quite a bit of the movie market.
Thanks, everybody, most helpful.
ReplyDeleteThw question is, of course, implicitly "anti-semitic". You are pointing out the specific ethnic concerns of the group that is dominant in Hollywood.
ReplyDeleteBut the lack of a Gotterdammerung-like ending for the Soviet empire may be a big reason for the paucity of films about Soviet barbarity. If the Hungarians have produced anything worth seeing (post-89) about the 1956 revolt I'd like to see it-even without subtitles.
BTW, wasn't Goodbye Lenin a comedy? Among the many movies dealing with the Holocaust, I think there have been only one or two comedic films dealing directly or indirectly with the Nazi genocide.
Steve,
ReplyDeleteI dont think movies have "big impacts" upon the populace as a whole these days due to the fragmentation of modern audiences. We are not "one big nation" like we were in 1970. The closest thing to a movie "everybody saw" in the past 15 years was "Titanic". I think smaller niche films will occupy more and more of Hollywood's product plans in the ensuing decades as we split ethnically and culturally into groups (Christians, Athiests, Muslims, Neo-Pagans, Envrionmentalists, Corporatists, Music lovers, Hip-Hoppers, Nerds, Sports fanatics, Aesthetics, adrenaline junkies, pleasure-worshippers, etc.)
I saw the HBO "Stalin" biopic. It reminded me of the positions of a lot of leftists who used to offer rhetorical support for communism: the system was ok, but it had been led by the wrong people. Stalin and Beria are shown as monsters while the intellectuals like Trotsky and Bukharin are treated much more sympathetically.
ReplyDeleteBut it's a stretch to say that it had an impact.
Hollywood types have are too romantically invested in communism to ever show its ravages. Witness Selma Hayek's "Frida," in which communism is the only haven for art and freedom - but again, it's corrupted by baddies like Stalin, and Dionysian gluttons like Diego Rivera.
Although even a $200 million box office smash is seen in the theatres by only about 10% of the population, eventually a very large fraction will see it on DVD and TV.
ReplyDeleteAndy Vanja of Carolco is currently producing a movie about the infamous Hungarian-Soviet Olympic water polo match that happened shortly after the Hungarian revolt was put down. That should qualify.
ReplyDelete"East-West" has a Russian screenwriter and some Russain actors,some dialogues are in Russian... I think I have seen it in Russian version if I am correct. So it is in my opinion rather Russian-French that purely French. Just a thought.
ReplyDeleteSteve, how about that movie - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moscow_Does_not_Believe_in_Tears ?
It was very popular in Soviet Union when it was made in 1979, it is a melodramatic one, but it surely depicts life in Soviet Union.
There were so many movie in Russia in 90s about different aspects of life in USSR that people are now sick of them. The problem that decause of language barrier most of them are not known to Western audience. And it is too bad. No movie ever produced in Hollywood could be considered to adequately depict life in Soviet Union. It is like expecting that a movie made in India or China in the 80s about life in USA in the 60s would be seriously accepted by an American public. :) You have to live in the country to know it, feel it, to be able to make a believable film.
None of the Hollywood movie about Russia/Soviet Union ever touched me the way some Russian/Soviet movies did, even though they were made with political constraints imposed on the movie-makers.
Some 90s Russian movies known abroad -
Burnt by the Sun ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burnt_by_the_Sun )
Kavkazskiy plennik http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prisoner_of_the_Mountains
John Tabin,
ReplyDeleteAdd The Red Violin to your Netflix queue, then.
Thanks for the recommendation. I'll have to check it out.
A few movies were made, but they did very poorly at the box office.
ReplyDeleteI look forward to seeing "the Lives of Others". It's getting good reviews. If it is as good as I've heard, it may be the first post-89 life-under-communism film that a lot of Americans see. It could have a huge impact.
It has a sexy female star, which should bring people in; but it's in German, which might scare people away. "Pan's Labyrinth" is in Spanish, has has brought in over $30 million in the U.S. already. Sure, some of the viewers must have been Hispanic, but most of the people at the theatre I attended looked pretty gringo.
"Letters from Iwo Jima" has brought in more than $11 million already, and it's in Japanese.
I suspect that "the Lives of Others" should bring in something in between, perhaps in the $20-30 million range.
~ Risto