Informative readers have pointed out various websites that give clues about when currently high-priced on-patent drugs might be available as generics. For example, here's an FDA
site.
But it's not exactly user friendly, especially when you consider that a huge fraction of patients are not quite as sharp as they used to be. For example, here's what I get for Lipitor, the biggest revenue drug in the history of pharmaceuticals, which I've been getting generically for around a year:
Patent and Exclusivity Search Results from query on Appl No 020702 Product 001 in the OB_Rx list.
Patent Data
Appl No | Prod No | Patent No | Patent Expiration | Drug Substance Claim | Drug Product Claim | Patent Use Code | Delist Requested |
N020702 | 001 | 5686104 | Nov 11, 2014 | | Y | U - 213 | |
N020702 | 001 | 5686104*PED | May 11, 2015 | | | U - 213 | |
N020702 | 001 | 5969156 | Jul 8, 2016 | Y | | | |
N020702 | 001 | 5969156*PED | Jan 8, 2017 | | | | |
N020702 | 001 | 6126971 | Jan 19, 2013 | | Y | | |
N020702 | 001 | 6126971*PED | Jul 19, 2013 | | | | |
Exclusivity Data
There is no unexpired exclusivity for this product.
I'm pretty baffled by the rows of information, but it looks like the sentence at the end is pretty clear: "There is no unexpired exclusivity for this product."
But for products that are still on patent, it's not at all clear what's going on:
Patent Data
Appl No | Prod No | Patent No | Patent Expiration | Drug Substance Claim | Drug Product Claim | Patent Use Code | Delist Requested |
x | 003 | z*PED | Jul 16, 2012 | | | | |
x | 003 | q | Feb 14, 2014 | Y | Y | | |
x | 003 | e*PED | Aug 14, 2014 | | | | |
x | 003 | r | Aug 30, 2012 | | | U - 629 | |
x | 003 | y*PED | Mar 2, 2013 | | | | |
x | 003 | p*PED | Jul 16, 2012 | | | | |
Exclusivity Data
Appl No | Prod No | Exclusivity Code | Exclusivity Expiration |
x | 003 | M - 61 | Oct 10, 2015 |
|
x | 003 | PED | Apr 10, 2016 |
So , how much longer until a patient can get it generically?
This would seem like the kind of thing that
Cass Sunnstein, the Obama Administration's Nudgeocrat, could more profitably devote his time to doing than to his previous bright ideas like having the government battle on-line conspiracy theorizing by organizing a conspiracy to infiltrate conspiracy theorizers and plant more pro-government views. (The history of agent provocateurs raises severe questions about this approach.)
Cass, why don't you use your big brain to make it easy for an 80-year-old to figure out how long until his brand name medicine goes generic?
The other issues is that there is a lot of leeway in when things go generic because of anti-competition conspiracies between patent-holders and generic manufacturers. I'd like to see a scorecard where that gets spelled out in comprehensible detail. Make it easy to tote up just how much healthcare spending is boosted annually by anti-competitive agreements between patent holders and generic manufacturers. I wouldn't be surprised if the number is something like $100 billion annually. And yet, you almost never hear of it outside of investors' discussion groups.
4 comments:
How long until drug goes legal?
The economic consulting firm I worked for once handled a case about keeping generics off the market this way. We argued that while the manufacturer had no generic competitors, they gave away a lot more free samples, making consumers actually better off. This was before I joined, so I don't know the exact results, but I think the court bought it.
Mangan had an old post (now offline, with all of his old archives) called 'Don't Take Statins if you Need a Functioning Brain." Are you sure you need lipitor?
I'd poke through Paul Jaminet's writings on the subject and still see if you think you need it...
http://perfecthealthdiet.com/category/biomarkers/hdlldlcholesterol/
+1 on the stay clear of statins
Unless you've already had a heart-attack, their efficacy is completely unproven.
Do you have any risk factors besides total cholesterol count? To entertain a statin, you should also be exhibiting hypertension, small-dense LDL specifically _measured_ by a sub-fraction test, and a cardiac calcium deposit measurement. I'd also want to see some sort of lifestyle risk factor being exhibited: pear shape gut, heavy smoker/drinker,
And even with all those, I'd still try a year of dietary supplements of vitamin K2, D3, and EPA Omega-3, plus 0 wheat intake to see if that reversed the problem.
You come from a long line of long-lived men. Don't let some glorified car mechanic (AKA MD) sell you an Alzheimer's diagnosis 10 or 15 years from now.
But if you insist on the statin, be sure to supplement with CoQ10.
Good luck.
Post a Comment