http://www.iSteve.com/05JanA.htm#social.security.1
Bush's Social Security Plan: A reader writes:
-
If economic growth slows by half (in the midst of a global tech boom fuelled by Asian nerds unleashed from socialism)
-
If the stock market continues to grow faster than earnings
-
If the Bush upper income tax cuts are made permanent
-
If means test benefits cannot be introduced
-
If FICA taxes cannot be raised
-
If the the pension eligibility age is not moved out to take into account extended longevity (as life expectancy edges towards 80+)
-
If congress can be constrained from introducing loopholes for lobbyists and liquidators
-
And if Wall Street can be prevented from looting the greater fools overcharging fees or churning accounts
Then maybe, privatization of social security would look like a reasonable idea.
But why would one bet on so many ifs?
Considering what a superb job Bush did of thinking through every possible eventuality of the Iraq Attaq, he's obviously the man to upend Social Security. I know a lot of "conservative" pundits like Michael Barone are exulting that "conservatism" now means blindly backing radical gambles based on on one indifferently-informed man's hunches, but why is that conservative?
No comments:
Post a Comment