Arthur Jensen: You have meddled with the primal forces of nature, Mr. Beale, and I won't have it. You are an old man who thinks in terms of nations and peoples. There are no nations; there are no peoples. There are no Russians. There are no Arabs. There is no third world. There is no west. There is only one holistic system of systems; one vast interwoven, interacting, multivariate multinational dominion of dollars. Petrodollars, electrodollars, reichmarks, rubles, rin, pounds and shekels. It is the international system of currency that determines the totality of life on this planet. That is the natural order of things today. That is the atomic, subatomic and galactic structure of things today. It is the international system of currency that determines the totality of life on this planet. That is the natural order of things. You have meddled with the primal forces of nature, and you will atone! Am I getting through to you, Mr. Beale? You get up on your little twenty-one inch screen and howl about America and Democracy. There is no America. There is no democracy. There is only IBM and ITT and AT &T and Dupont, Dow, Union Carbide and Exxon. Those are the nations of the world today. What do you think the Russians talk about in their councils of state? Karl Marx? They pull out their linear programming charts, statistical decision theories, and minimax solutions and compute the price-cost probabilities of their transactions and investments just like we do. We no longer live in a world of nations and ideologies, Mr. Beale. The world is a college of corporations inexorably determined by the immutable by-laws of business. The world is a business, Mr. Beale! It has been since man crawled out of the slime. And our children will live to see that perfect world in which there is no war or famine, oppression or brutality. One vast and ecumenical holding company for whom all men will work to serve a common profit and in which all men will own a share of stock, all necessities provided, all anxieties tranquilized, all boredom amused. And I have chosen you to preach this evangel.
Beale: Why me?
Arthur Jensen: Because you're on television, dummy.
From Paddy Chayefsky's Network, 1976
Oh ... wrong Arthur Jensen, I guess.
12 comments:
Anonymous
said...
If you dressed Arthur Jensen in jeans and a business casual shirt, gave him one of those hands-free earpiece mics and coached him a bit on inclusive body language, he could make the same presentation today at a TED conference. Just put him in front of a slide show showing girls in Afghanistan going to school, kids in the tropics using laptops and vibrant urban youth using their hip-hop skills to design the next generation of satellites. It'd be great if he was gay and/or mocha-coloured but that's not a must.
O'Reilly stopped being a newsman some time ago. He like Howard likes to howl on TV. He even has his own "Sybil the Soothsayer" who reads facial expressions rather than palms or tea leaves.
in the game Deus Ex Human Revolution the main character's last name is Jensen, and his father's name (who is never seen) is called Arthur Jensen.
a central theme in the game is the morality debate that has ensued from the practice of individuals cybernetically enhancing themselves to be smarter, more atheletic, etc. the main character 'Jensen' is one of those cybernetically enhanced individuals. sort of reminded me of a debate about eugenics with the 'Arthur Jensen' name thrown in there.
Globalism-economic determinism. Can't you just see Niall Ferguson dancing ecstatically with Thomas P.M. Barnett while from her stool at the bar Camille Paglia scowls?
ITT is gone. IBM a shadow of itself. Kodak, gone, basically. Dow, a shadow. So too, US Steel. GM is a bailed out zombie. Chrsyler is owned by the Italians. And people sure are willing to kill each other, Syrians slaughtering Syrians. Meanwhile Catalonia and Scotland are pressing for independence.
The TED talks are the chattering of the transnational elites as their whole system falls apart. They rode a wave of change of stability, basically, enforced by the US-Soviet duopoly, and later the US as sole hyper-power keeping nationalism and sectarian slaughter in check. The only problem they had was being too successful -- believing their own bs. Hence Bush succeeded by Obama, war on the cheap, as the ME and other places spiral out of control. Japan is now tilting ultra-nationalist. The consequence of the end of the Pax Americana.
And TV? Just yesterday USA Today had the TV ratings for the previous week. Fascinating, not a show over 20 million viewers in prime viewing season. And the viewers themselves are all women. Shockingly some of the shows that get all this buzz (like Gossip Girl) get under a million viewers. The more TV screams the less people listen. Just like TED.
The most interesting thing about that scene was not how the names of the dominant corporations have changed, but how the predominate force in the world was actually international corporatism, and at that time it was considered to be a sinister, back-room revelation. Fast forward thirty years to the mostly cosmopolitanist US media, and watch how they not only accept this as a given (and a positive force) and will work to discredit anybody against our current "interconnectedness" as a wacky isolationist who should be ignored.
One of the biggest changes in the years since that scene was shot is the rise to predominance of women's tastes and preferences over pretty much everything. I think that's the key reason big corporations don't surround themselves with wood panelling, three piece suits and all that but rather make themselves seem fun, friendly, cheerful and non-threatening by dressing casual and using the word "awesome" a lot. Huge power players like Microsoft, Google and Apple have company brands that are more like toy companies. Yet they're still collecting mountains of data on us all and getting hardware built in Chinese factories that are nowhere near as fun as Willie Wonka's chocolate factory. Oh well, perception is reality.
"For the nations that mastered the world then they don't look so big now."
"IBM a shadow of itself."
IBM is the 9th largest company in the world by market cap, and has had an astonishingly long run of success, especially for a IT company. Exxon Mobil is the second largest company in the world by market cap, it will probably recapture #1 in a few years when Apple eventually deflates.
I always appreciate my readers' financial help. There are a few ways to support my work:
First: You can mail a non-tax deductible donation to:
Steve Sailer
P.O Box 4142
Valley Village, CA 91617-0142
Second: You can make a tax deductible contribution via VDARE by clicking here. (Paypal and credit cards accepted, including recurring "subscription" donations.) UPDATE: Don't try this at the moment.
Third: send money via the Paypal-like Google Wallet to myGmail address(that's isteveslrATgmail.com -- replace the AT with a @). (Non-tax deductible.)
Here's the Google Wallet FAQ. From it: "You will need to have (or sign up for) Google Wallet to send or receive money. If you have ever purchased anything on Google Play, then you most likely already have a Google Wallet. If you do not yet have a Google Wallet, don’t worry, the process is simple: go to wallet.google.com and follow the steps." You probably already have a Google ID and password, which Google Wallet uses, so signing up Wallet is pretty painless.
You can put money into your Google Wallet Balance from your bank account and send it with no service fee.
Or you can send money via credit card (Visa, MasterCard, AmEx, Discover) with the industry-standard 2.9% fee. (You don't need to put money into your Google Wallet Balance to do this.)
Google Wallet works from both a website and a smartphone app (Android and iPhone -- the Google Wallet app is currently available only in the U.S., but the Google Wallet website can be used in 160 countries).
Or, once you sign up with Google Wallet, you can simply send money via credit card, bank transfer, or Wallet Balance as an attachment from Google's free Gmail email service. Here'show to do it.
(Non-tax deductible.)
Fourth: if you have a Wells Fargo bank account, you can transfer money to me (with no fees) via Wells Fargo SurePay. Just tell WF SurePay to send the money to my ancient AOL email address steveslrATaol.com -- replace the AT with the usual @). (Non-tax deductible.)
Fifth: if you have a Chase bank account (or, theoretically,other bank accounts), you can transfer money to me (with no fees) via Chase QuickPay (FAQ). Just tell Chase QuickPay to send the money to my ancient AOL email address (steveslrATaol.com -- replace the AT with the usual @). If Chase asks for the name on my account, it's Steven Sailer with an n at the end of Steven. (Non-tax deductible.)
"Steve Sailer gives us the real Barack Obama, who turns out to be very, very different - and much more interesting - than the bland healer/uniter image stitched together out of whole cloth this past six years by Obama's packager, David Axelrod. Making heavy use of Obama's own writings, which he admires for their literary artistry, Sailer gives the deepest insights I have yet seen into Obama's lifelong obsession with 'race and inheritance,' and rounds off his brilliant character portrait with speculations on how Obama's personality might play out in the Presidency." - John Derbyshire Author, "Prime Obsession: Bernhard Riemann and the Greatest Unsolved Problem in Mathematics" Click on the image above to buy my book, a reader's guide to the new President's autobiography.
12 comments:
If you dressed Arthur Jensen in jeans and a business casual shirt, gave him one of those hands-free earpiece mics and coached him a bit on inclusive body language, he could make the same presentation today at a TED conference. Just put him in front of a slide show showing girls in Afghanistan going to school, kids in the tropics using laptops and vibrant urban youth using their hip-hop skills to design the next generation of satellites. It'd be great if he was gay and/or mocha-coloured but that's not a must.
That's funny, the idea that the TED talks of the 21st Century started out as parody in 1976.
Howard Beale has come to us now as Bill O'Reilly.
O'Reilly stopped being a newsman some time ago. He like Howard likes to howl on TV. He even has his own "Sybil the Soothsayer" who reads facial expressions rather than palms or tea leaves.
Phophetic guy that Chavefsky.
Albertosaurus
"IBM and ITT and AT &T and Dupont, Dow, Union Carbide and Exxon. Those are the nations of the world today."
For the nations that mastered the world then they don't look so big now.
in the game Deus Ex Human Revolution the main character's last name is Jensen, and his father's name (who is never seen) is called Arthur Jensen.
a central theme in the game is the morality debate that has ensued from the practice of individuals cybernetically enhancing themselves to be smarter, more atheletic, etc. the main character 'Jensen' is one of those cybernetically enhanced individuals. sort of reminded me of a debate about eugenics with the 'Arthur Jensen' name thrown in there.
Globalism-economic determinism. Can't you just see Niall Ferguson dancing ecstatically with Thomas P.M. Barnett while from her stool at the bar Camille Paglia scowls?
ITT is gone. IBM a shadow of itself. Kodak, gone, basically. Dow, a shadow. So too, US Steel. GM is a bailed out zombie. Chrsyler is owned by the Italians. And people sure are willing to kill each other, Syrians slaughtering Syrians. Meanwhile Catalonia and Scotland are pressing for independence.
The TED talks are the chattering of the transnational elites as their whole system falls apart. They rode a wave of change of stability, basically, enforced by the US-Soviet duopoly, and later the US as sole hyper-power keeping nationalism and sectarian slaughter in check. The only problem they had was being too successful -- believing their own bs. Hence Bush succeeded by Obama, war on the cheap, as the ME and other places spiral out of control. Japan is now tilting ultra-nationalist. The consequence of the end of the Pax Americana.
And TV? Just yesterday USA Today had the TV ratings for the previous week. Fascinating, not a show over 20 million viewers in prime viewing season. And the viewers themselves are all women. Shockingly some of the shows that get all this buzz (like Gossip Girl) get under a million viewers. The more TV screams the less people listen. Just like TED.
The most interesting thing about that scene was not how the names of the dominant corporations have changed, but how the predominate force in the world was actually international corporatism, and at that time it was considered to be a sinister, back-room revelation. Fast forward thirty years to the mostly cosmopolitanist US media, and watch how they not only accept this as a given (and a positive force) and will work to discredit anybody against our current "interconnectedness" as a wacky isolationist who should be ignored.
One of the biggest changes in the years since that scene was shot is the rise to predominance of women's tastes and preferences over pretty much everything. I think that's the key reason big corporations don't surround themselves with wood panelling, three piece suits and all that but rather make themselves seem fun, friendly, cheerful and non-threatening by dressing casual and using the word "awesome" a lot. Huge power players like Microsoft, Google and Apple have company brands that are more like toy companies. Yet they're still collecting mountains of data on us all and getting hardware built in Chinese factories that are nowhere near as fun as Willie Wonka's chocolate factory. Oh well, perception is reality.
I don't get it. Could somebody please explain this post for me and the other short bus riders?
No Wall Street?
Occupy Hollywood!
*cough*shekels*cough*
"For the nations that mastered the world then they don't look so big now."
"IBM a shadow of itself."
IBM is the 9th largest company in the world by market cap, and has had an astonishingly long run of success, especially for a IT company. Exxon Mobil is the second largest company in the world by market cap, it will probably recapture #1 in a few years when Apple eventually deflates.
Post a Comment