May 13, 2013

What would Beavis and Butt-Head say about the gay marriage tribe's totem poles?

There's been much discussion lately about surveillance and privacy in this electronic age. Is the Obama Administration spying on the Associated Press? Is the IRS out to get conservatives? Is Bloomberg snooping on Goldman Sachs?

Well, sure. Of course they are. 

Still, there are limits to the usefulness of spying because, while data is now cheap, data interpretation skills remain in scarce supply.

For example, consider yesterday's big feature article in the Washington Post about professional clam-diver Heather Purser, a strawberry-blonde Suquamish Indian, who convinced her tribe in 2011 to approve gay marriage. 

It's easily discoverable online that Heather has successfully been peddling this story, sometimes with Rebecca Platter, to major and minor media outlets for years. It's like a cross between a Greg Packer Man in the Street quote and a sketch from Portlandia -- the ones about the staff of the Women & Women First bookstore, combined with the performance artist spoofs.

All this is instantly available on Google, but nobody before ever got the joke. How can they? Gay marriage is serious.

Or then again, the Purser-Platter tale could even be a prank made up by two sniggering Beavis and Butt-headish adolescent sensibilities.

Consider, for example, the above photo from the feature "Same-Sex Marriage Brings Healing to Me—and My Tribe" in Yes! magazine (motto "Powerful Ideas, Practical Actions"). Look closely at the totem poles that Ms. Purser has chosen to pose between. Now think like Beavis and Butt-head:

What animals are carved on them?

And what exactly are those beavers about to do to each other?

That's the $69 Question.

Data interpretation!

Seriously, everybody is supposed to be into Big Data now for pattern recognition, but nobody is supposed to notice stereotypes. So, not much computes.

By the way, did I ever mention the Spring iSteve fundraising drive is still going on?

Thanks to everybody who has contributed so far. And for those who haven't gotten around to it:

First: you can make a non-tax deductible contribution to me by credit card via WePay by clicking here.

Second: you can make a tax deductible contribution to me via VDARE by clicking here.

Third: You can mail a non-tax deductible donation to:

Steve Sailer
P.O Box 4142
Valley Village, CA 91607-4142

32 comments:

  1. Notice too, on those totem-poles, that the small female figures are literally supporting the big dominating males.

    ReplyDelete
  2. "What would Beavis and Butt-Head say about these totem poles?"

    You said "pole"....uh-huh-huh-huh-huh...

    ReplyDelete
  3. What, they didn't have any garish plastic tee-pees for her to gaze from pensively?
    Data interpretation!
    That's funny; I think the breastplate weasels may even be--happy coincidence!--same sex!
    This is not data; this is a sign: somewhere weasels are about to screw themselves!

    ReplyDelete
  4. I don't think they are weasels.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Another question stories like this one (and the one about the 1/16th Indian social work professor) raise is why does the press settle for such diluted representatives of indigenous groups? Does the press not find real Indians interesting enough on their own to be worth writing about?

    ReplyDelete
  6. "Does the press not find real Indians interesting enough on their own to be worth writing about?"

    Purser and Platter aren't the sharpest tools in the drawer, but they know how to push all the right media buttons. That's a skill that isn't evenly distributed among all groups.

    Look at Greg Packer, the near fulltime Man on the Street in hundreds of newspaper quotes. He's a highway maintenance worker, a blue collar guy, a fat slob who likes to sit around shirtless in his lawn chair. There are a million guys like him, but very few of them anymore are Jewish like Packer, so Packer is the slob on the street who has figured out how to manipulate the media.

    ReplyDelete
  7. The poles in the front read "titty"!

    ReplyDelete
  8. Heh heh heh heh!

    ReplyDelete
  9. Another question stories like this one (and the one about the 1/16th Indian social work professor) raise is why does the press settle for such diluted representatives of indigenous groups?

    Because the press is made up of SWPL people (whiteR people), and whiter people do not really like minorities all that much. The big problem with minorities (for these folks) are that they're actual, you know, PEOPLE, and upon inspection rarely live up to the whiter person's idealized mental image of the Noble Savage.

    Which is why whiter people LOVE non-white white people, thus all the love for people who are 1/16th or less Indian.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Don't beavers have flat tails?

    ReplyDelete
  11. maybe good way to pale face to casinos.

    ReplyDelete
  12. beaver & butthole

    ReplyDelete
  13. Steve,
    This post and your comments are golden. Can't stop smiling at the naughtiness, yet insightful naughtiness. I can see this coming from Agnostic. A bit surprising, but in a good way.

    It must be the week. Like everything in the news has been a validation on steroids of so many istevey themes. Heady.

    On the Indian/white thing. I can't believe these people try and get away with this. There are millions of Southerners who are part Indian, but except for that redhead, nobody tries to use it for advantage... because it doesn't make them unique for starters.
    Being part Indian for a Southerner probably has about the same sort of significance as being part Neanderthal does for non-Africans.
    If you're ever in the deep South, you'll notice that for a people who are majority British with some German, they have precious few blondes or redheads. Kind of like France where nearly everyone is a brunette. I've always attributed that to their Indian heritage.
    Once you start to go further north and into the mountains (Kentucky, West Virginia), they start to look more British again. The Deep South's darkness, relatively, jumped out at me when I moved from the Florida Gulf Coast, which is more German.

    ReplyDelete
  14. It came to pass that I once supervised a team of programmers from the former Soviet Union.

    In order to ingratiate myself with these recent immigrants I gave a guy from Kiev an LP I had in my record collection of Paul Plishka singing Ukrainian folk songs. I also quoted to some others, from memory a poem in Russian by Pushkin.

    Alex - one of my less guarded coders - told me that first of all my accent was terrible and that anyway they were more interested in Beavis and Butthead.

    Albertosaurus

    ReplyDelete
  15. I think the funniest part is that she is a lesbian clam digger.

    ReplyDelete
  16. There must be two or three Steve Sailers. You're turning out heaps of stuff lately and it's all good. I'm plugging this and your other American Indian stuff and trying to keep up with you here:
    Squaws Gone Wild!

    ReplyDelete
  17. "I think the funniest part is that she is a lesbian clam digger."

    At least she aint a

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BS4BkkMRGsY

    ReplyDelete
  18. pre-Columbian gerbils?

    ReplyDelete
  19. Steve, very funny, but I think it has to do with this: http://queeringthechurch.com/2010/05/13/lesbian-lizards/. My sister has a lesbian friend and she has a tattoo like this. My vague recollection of her answer was along the lines of the web page mentioned.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Auntie Analogue5/14/13, 11:35 AM


    It's likely that the animals carved on the totem poles are Otters.

    We nasty nativists are not supposed to make sexist comments about The Otter!

    ReplyDelete
  21. Just went through the comments of the original thread, and yes, there are plenty of others who caught the pun as well.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Pretty sure those are actually otters, Steve. Beavers would be funny, but those tails are plain to see.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Very funny, Steve, but a lesbian friend of my sister has a tattoo like that and she told me it's related to this: http://queeringthechurch.com/2010/05/13/lesbian-lizards/

    ReplyDelete
  24. Well they're not beavers. They must be otters, which would make sense as the tribe is Northwestern and, I hasten to add, Wikipedia informs me otters are of the weasel family.

    ReplyDelete
  25. The Great Cornholio5/14/13, 1:41 PM

    A lesbian Indian? Will she have a teepee for my bunghole?

    ReplyDelete
  26. I bet she could get into a KKK meeting, easily passing for pure northwest European. But if they found out her sexual preference, she would have to flee, lickity split.

    ReplyDelete
  27. amerikwa
    where the deviants seek normality for status,
    and normals seek deviance for the same.

    ReplyDelete
  28. A lesbian Indian? Will she have a teepee for my bunghole?

    You win the Internet.

    ReplyDelete
  29. She looks like Lena Dunham aka Miss Piggy.

    ReplyDelete
  30. If you're ever in the deep South, you'll notice that for a people who are majority British with some German, they have precious few blondes or redheads.

    That is simply wrong.

    Is that supposed to be a joke? If so, I don't get it.

    ReplyDelete
  31. She grew up in her culture. If you dumb red necks bothered to actually read any of her actual writing you would see the dilemma growing up in two worlds has caused her. I don't know how to feel about homosexuals but when I read the story of this girl, well, it softened my heart. She has been through so much but nothing seems to stop her. Shame on all of you. What would Jesus say? He wouldn't welcome you into his kingdom with that hateful attitude I'll clue ya.

    ReplyDelete

Comments are moderated, at whim.