The exception that proves the rule

A reader writes:

I once watched a group of five or six "public intellectuals" here in Britain discussing this phrase on television. None of them came close to getting it right, but they were all full of pompous explanations of the errors of thought which had led our despised ancestors to come up with such an obviously erroneous "cliché".

I put it this way: an "exception" is only recognized as such when there is a general norm which it violates and thus "proves" in the sense of highlighting. No exception is recognized where there is no rule or norm. It is not "2+2=4" which is the sort of rule which is violated and thus recognized, but the sort of "rule" expressed by "Germans haven't much of a sense of humor", a rule which is hardly likely even to be formulated except in the sudden presence of the violating exception.

Similarly, you might not notice that Japanese people are generally not raging egomaniacs until you notice that Yoko Ono is an exception. By the way, according to David Letterman, one of the Top Ten Duties of the Emperor of Japan is "Make sure Yoko Ono's U.S. citizenship is kept up to date."

My published articles are archived at iSteve.com -- Steve Sailer