http://www.iSteve.com/05JanA.htm#social.security.1
Bush's Social Security Plan: A reader writes:
-              If economic growth slows by half (in the midst of a global tech boom fuelled by Asian nerds unleashed from socialism) 
-              If the stock market continues to grow faster than earnings 
-              If the Bush upper income tax cuts are made permanent 
-              If means test benefits cannot be introduced 
-              If FICA taxes cannot be raised 
-              If the the pension eligibility age is not moved out to take into account extended longevity (as life expectancy edges towards 80+) 
-              If congress can be constrained from introducing loopholes for lobbyists and liquidators 
-              And if Wall Street can be prevented from looting the greater fools overcharging fees or churning accounts 
Then maybe, privatization of social security would look like a reasonable idea.
But         why would one bet on so many ifs?
       
Considering what a superb job Bush did of thinking through every possible eventuality of the Iraq Attaq, he's obviously the man to upend Social Security. I know a lot of "conservative" pundits like Michael Barone are exulting that "conservatism" now means blindly backing radical gambles based on on one indifferently-informed man's hunches, but why is that conservative?
 
 
 
 Posts
Posts
 
 
 
 
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment