Diamond's Collapse: A reader writes:
I         flipped through "Guns Germs and Steel" earlier today and         noticed that Diamond (correctly) refers to the Greenland settlement as a         "tiny marginal colony." Little could the Iceland-Greenlanders         have known that their tiny marginal colony in fact foretold the end of         civilization, according to the New and Improved Diamond.
       
        As an side, what is this fetish with deforestation? Diamond bases a book         on it, that African woman scored a Nobel Prize for planting trees, and a         coupe of weeks ago an (Asian-)Indian-British professor claimed in a         letter to the FinancialTimes editor that Western wealth was built on         deforestation.
       
        Geez. I have cut down a few trees and planted hundreds more but I have         neither a Nobel Prize nor much wealth to show for it. What am I doing         wrong?
Many         of the most beloved landscapes in the world, Tuscany, the Cotswolds, the         Loire Valley, and so forth, are largely deforested. People love trees,         but with the exception of specially adapted cultures like the Yanomamo         and the Andamanese, they don't much like forests, which most people find         dark and depressing. Actually, what humans really like are         grasslands at the edge of forests: that's what the typical American golf         course provides, and look how much money is spent on them.
       
        On the other hand, this is not to argue that the near total         deforestation of, say, Haiti was a good thing. Diamond has an         interesting chapter comparing the two halves of the island of         Hispaniola: basket case Haiti and mediocre but still viable Dominican         Republic. In the DR, the megalomaniacal dictator Trujillo         stole most of the forest land, which he then proceeded to exploit         cautiously in a rational manner, thus avoiding the tragedy of the         commons. (Surprisingly, Diamond even gets around to gingerly mentioning         the most obvious difference between the two countries, mentioning that         Trujillo encouraged European immigration. Indeed, Trujillo was the only         world leader to look forward to admitting large numbers of Jewish         refugees, asking for 100,000, although only 645 ever made it, but         that wasn't Trujillio's fault.)
 
 
 
 Posts
Posts
 
 
 
 
 
 
1 comment:
Rubbish.
Post a Comment