In "Putin's Congo Roast," Gary Brecher explains the theory and practice of cannibalism as a military strategy during the current war in the Congo. Not appropriate reading if you have a queasy stomach.
Vladimir  Putin has jumped into the middle of the Dark Continent's darkest secrets. It  happened at a photo op in Moscow, after Blair and the Russians had hammered out  a deal to forgive more African debt...
Putin found a way to wipe the grin off Blair's face. He was getting noise about  Russia's "human rights record" in the Q&A photo op, and he's not  the kind of guy to put up with too much hassle from the press. That's not the  kind of thing they teach you in the KGB. He popped up with what the Brits are  calling "an astonishing outburst": "We all know that African  countries used to have a tradition of eating their own adversaries. We don't  have such a tradition or process or culture and I believe the comparison between  Africa and Russia is not quite just."
Whoo-hoo! You Russians have guts! Nobody west of the Volga would ever say  anything like that. Not in public, anyway. I wish I could see the footage of the  seconds after the "outburst," just to watch Blair's face. There he is,  Mister Smile, Mister Cool Britannia, now trying to be Mister Bob Geldof Bleeding  Heart, standing next to this crazy Russian who just called Africans cannibals.  Blair must've been tempted to do the old pulled-over-with-open-container  routine: "Hey, officer, I'm just hitching! I don't even KNOW this Russian  dude!"
The press invoked all the usual PC lies for their responses. It was interesting,  because nobody actually said Putin was wrong. Just "insensitive."  Somebody named Trevor-I mean, "Trevor"!-had a hissy fit and lisped,  "What a preposterous thing to say. Putin is at best insensitive and at  worst a downright racist."
Well, here's a news flash: Putin told the truth. Cannibalism is very common in  African war zones. Trevor should read the news from places like Congo more  carefully, like this story carried in the Economist a few weeks ago:
I'm going to skip over what happened to this poor Congolese woman who was grabbed by an opposing militia and get to Brecher's explanation of why cannibalism works as a tactic:
Cannibalism  always increases in wartime. And though hardly anybody knows it, Congo is the  site of the biggest war since 1945. Last time I reported on it the official  death toll was 2.5 million. Since then another half million Congoans have died.
And a few of those have been eaten. The Congo war is pure primitive warfare: no  battles, next to no combat, just massacres. Primitive warfare is one long  civilian hunt. Most people try to deal with that by vanishing into the jungle.  That's where they die-of malaria, or starvation, or an infected scratch,  snakebite-anything but combat. The current estimate is that less than 2% of the  deaths in this huge war have been from combat.
In wartime cannibalism is a weapon in itself, one of the most powerful of all.  Because primitive war is about terrorizing people. How do you drive those  enemy-tribe civvies into the jungle to die? You scare'em. So, what's the  scariest thing you could think of? Killing people? Nah. Most Central Africans  live hard, short lives. They're not scared of death, at least not as terrified  as first-worlders.
What they fear more than anything is being eaten. Being eaten is the biggest,  oldest fear in the world. Goes back to the days when it was us vs. the hyenas,  and the hyenas usually won. Why do you think Jaws made so much money? You're in  a million times more danger driving to Safeway than swimming in the ocean, but  you're not scared driving, and you are scared swimming. It's not because  Spielberg's such a genius, it's because that fear of being eaten is in our chimp  brains.   [More]
Spielberg came back and made even more money with "Jurassic Park," which isn't about much of anything besides getting eaten.
For the same reason, Matt Drudge gives enormous play to headlines about animals munching on people.
Putin's gaffe reminds of how back in the 1970s, Conrad's book Heart of Darkness was a huge collegiate fad, culminating in the fearlessly sophomoric "Apocalypse Now," but academics couldn't bring themselves to explain what Kurtz was doing that was so horrifying.
My published articles are archived at iSteve.com -- Steve Sailer
 
 
 
 Posts
Posts
 
 
 
 
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment