An excerpt from my article in the September 12th issue of The American Conservative (subscribe here):
Although  sportswriters like to present themselves as bluff, call-'em'-as-they-see-'em  regular guys, they are remarkably prone to form high tech lynch mobs when a  sports figure violates the reigning norms of political correctness. For example,  Fighting Irish football legend Paul  Hornung suggested in 2003 that to compete better with less academic  colleges, the University of Notre Dame should, in effect, offer black athletes  more affirmative action. A firestorm of journalistic indignation, though, cost  Hornung his radio job.
Yet, the National Collegiate Athletic Association's recent diktat that college  "mascots, nicknames or images deemed hostile or abusive in terms of race,  ethnicity, or national origin" be banned from NCAA tournaments (such as the  big money March Madness basketball tourney) was so laughable that many  sportswriters dared snipe at it in print.
For example, scribes pointed out that the NCAA's pronunciamento only applied to  18 colleges with American Indian team names, such as the Florida State  Seminoles. Yet, the council of the Florida Seminole tribe had given formal  permission to the university in return for scholarships, a Seminole museum on  campus, and other benefits.
Some columnists noted that proscribing the team name of the runner-up in the  2005 basketball tournament, the Fighting Illini, could cause problems since the  entire U. of Illinois's name stemmed from the tribe, not to mention the state  itself.
By this logic (such as it is), isn't the "U. of Indiana" inherently  offensive? And while I don't exactly know what a "Hoosier" is, it sure  sounds like it must be hostile or abusive to somebody…
More than  a few sportswriters observed that the most beloved nickname in college sports,  the Fighting Irish of Notre Dame (a university so popular that the NCAA had  contractually awarded it uniquely favorable treatment in football bowl game  bids), is a blatant ethnic stereotype. Indeed, Notre Dame's famed mascot is a  hostile and obviously alcohol-abusive leprechaun putting his dukes up.  Irish-American comedian George Carlin once observed that he had the feeling  Notre Dame had come close to naming its teams the "Drunken, Thick-Skulled,  Brawling, Short-D***** Irish." Still, ND's appellation is A-OK with the  NCAA.
Nonetheless, from the NCAA's institutional perspective, its ban on Indian team  names might actually turn out to be a rather clever bureaucratic ploy.
As Sports Illustrated's S.  L. Price noted: "Although Native American activists are virtually  united in opposition to the use of Indian nicknames and mascots, the Native  American population sees the issue far differently." A 2002 poll of 352  Native Americans found that 81 percent approved of college and high school  sports programs using Indian nicknames
Of course, the NCAA hardly cares what the average American Indian thinks. What  plagues the organization are the Native American activists, led by the National  Coalition on Racism in Sports and Media, which is a subsidiary of the old 1970s  radical organization, the American Indian Movement.
Although individual universities like Florida State can work out deals with  local tribal governments for naming rights, the NCAA is pestered by  free-floating ideologues like the NCRSM. I suspect the NCAA leadership thinks  it's double-crossing those annoying Indian activists, rendering them irrelevant  by abolishing the offending Indian nicknames. As Stalin might have said if he  was an NCAA functionary: "No mascot, no problem."    [Continued in the September 12th issue]
My published articles are archived at iSteve.com -- Steve Sailer
 
 
 
 Posts
Posts
 
 
 
 
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment