I wrote about the suspension of Australian professor Andrew Fraser earlier this week. Here's an interview with him conducted by Michael Duffy, whom I wrote about a month ago for his insight into the eugenic basis of Steven Levitt's abortions-cut-crime theory.
Michael  Duffy : Well there've been some amazing scenes in the past week or two at  Macquarie University in northwestern Sydney over a major free speech  controversy. The vice-chancellor, Di Yerbury, publicly apologised for comments  about immigration made by associate professor of law, Andrew Fraser. The  professor had a letter published in the local newspaper which was prompted by  the settlement of Sudanese refugees in the area.
Fraser regretted the steady erosion of what he calls Anglo-Australians'  distinctive national identity. Fraser works in the Department of Public Law, and  he wrote, 'Experience practically everywhere in the world tells us that an  expanding black population is a sure-fire recipe for increases in crime,  violence and a wide range of other social problems. Last week the university  tried to persuade Fraser to resign, and when he refused, they suspended him from  teaching.
We recorded the following interview just before the 2 o'clock class that Andrew  Fraser was about to go into, and as we go to air now, Andrew Fraser is holding  an informal class because he's been locked out of the classroom that he normally  uses-due to security concerns.
Andrew Fraser, welcome to Counterpoint. Let's run through the story from the  start. How did the university initially respond to your letter to the Parramatta  Sun ?
Andrew Fraser : Oh, their initial response was just make it clear that you're  not speaking on behalf of the university, and that's all they said.
Michael Duffy : Now, what's the exact law there, can you actually sign a letter  to a newspaper with your title at the university?
Andrew Fraser : Well, I just sent them an email with my signature attached to  it. I'd never even thought about it, personally, but then the reporter or the  letters editor at the Sun phoned me up and discovered obviously that I was an  academic, and that made him all the more interested in the letter.
Michael Duffy : I understand the vice-chancellor has apologised to  representatives of the Sudanese community for the fact that you signed the  letter like that. Are you saying that that was an accident?
Andrew Fraser : Partly an accident-but the fact is that because I'm an academic  and teach and research in areas such as American constitutional history and  Australian immigration law, I actually do know more about subjects like race,  racial differences and racial conflict than the ordinary citizen.
Michael Duffy : Okay, so that's an important point-you're actually speaking  within your area of expertise.
Andrew Fraser : Yes.
Michael Duffy : Di Yerbury also told the Sudanese people that the university as  a whole dissociates itself from your views. Does the vice-chancellor actually  have the power to do that-to dissociate an entire organisation from a particular  view?
Andrew Fraser : Well, I don't think the organisation per se has ever taken a  view on these subjects. I would be very surprised to learn when, where, and  indeed how they would take such a view...
Michael Duffy : Has anyone at the university criticised the factual content of  your claim regarding a link between an expanding black population and crime?
Andrew Fraser : No.
Michael Duffy : So why do you think they're so upset?
Andrew Fraser : Because-for example-the issue of sub-Saharan African IQs, which  are somewhere in the neighbourhood of 70 to 75-this is a fact that is well known  to psychologists but they prefer not to talk about it.
Michael Duffy : I understand that the IQ of Asian people on the same scale is  actually higher than that of Europeans.
Andrew  Fraser : Yes. Somewhere in the neighbourhood of 105, apparently.
Michael Duffy : Is this racism? Racism is attributing certain characteristics to  certain races, isn't it, so in a technical sense-not a moral sense-is what  you're saying racist?
Andrew Fraser : Well, I prefer to call it racial realism. It's just recognition  that races, or descent groups, if you prefer, are different across a whole range  of characteristics. Cognitive ability being one. But athletic ability being  another. If you want to think in those terms, black Africans clearly stand out  as being superior in many respects to white Europeans.
Michael Duffy : It's interesting, isn't it, that you're a university academic;  you spoke out on this subject that should be verifiable according to scientific  research, and yet the university has not tried to enter into that discussion-at  least, so far.
Andrew Fraser : Well, as the controversy broke, I provided Professor Loxton with  the text PDF files of the basic references involved.
Michael Duffy : Just to stick with the story of the university's response, for  the moment, we'll come back to your views later, perhaps-I understand that on 26  July, that's last week, you met with Tim Sprague, the university director of  human resources, who offered to buy out your contract. Did he say why he was  making that offer? I should just say that the university has said that he didn't  talk about the fact that it was affecting the university's capacity to attract  foreign students. What do you say to that?
Andrew Fraser : Well, in our initial telephone contact, he told me that the  university wanted to buy out my contract because they were suffering  reputational damage and loss of students as a consequence of the controversy.  The next day, when I spoke to him face to face, he told me essentially that the  university was a business, it had a business plan; that business plan was  oriented to attracting foreign students, and the controversy over my public  comments was impacting adversely on their attempt to get into that market...
Michael Duffy : And what was your decision? What did you decide?
Andrew Fraser : I decided not to because, essentially, while they were going to  buy out my contract financially, on the personal level they were refusing to  extend to me the status of honorary associate, you know, with email access and  so on that most retired academics who are still active in research and  scholarship customarily receive.
Michael Duffy : And they've declined to do that for you?
Andrew Fraser : Yes. So in effect what they were offering me was a dishonourable  discharge.
Michael Duffy : Andrew, let's talk briefly about your views, then. You've said  the white Australia policy should never have been discarded. What ill effects do  you think that that discarding has had on Australia, as of today?
Andrew Fraser : Well, as we can see in this controversy, I mean, it has bred  enormous-so far suppressed-ethnic conflict. As far as I can see there are a  great many ordinary white Australians who really do believe that they are losing  their country. And moreover feel fearful about making any sort of public  complaint about that loss. So it seems to me that is one of the major unreported  costs of a multiracial society.
Michael Duffy : That sense of loss, you're talking about.
Andrew Fraser : Yes. People often say multiculturalism is working well. But of  course the minute one raises any questions about it-for example the  antidiscrimination commissioner in New South Wales has been reported as saying  publicly my comments could lead to blood in the streets. Now, I mean, if  multiculturalism is so fragile a beast that the comments of an academic in a  local newspaper could bring the whole edifice crashing down, there's something  wrong here...
Michael Duffy : Getting back to the issue of crime, what would you say is the  evidence that the settlement of black people around Parramatta will lead to an  increase in crime in that area?
Andrew Fraser : Well, if you looked, as I said, to experience elsewhere, in the  United States, 90% of interracial crime in the United States is committed by  people of black African descent. Black African Americans are four to eight times  as likely to commit violent crime as white Americans. If you look at England the  same pattern emerges, the same pattern emerges elsewhere in continental Europe,  Canada. And if you look at Africa-South Africa for example, there are 30,000  murders per year in South Africa. And black Africa, sub-Saharan Africa, is  obviously notorious as a scene of violent crime, war-it's just a fact.
Michael Duffy : Had you always held these views about race?
Andrew Fraser : No. In fact, I mean, I was never very interested in race at all.  As we can see, most white Australians do not-or white Canadians-do not actually  like to think of themselves as members of a racial group. And I was fairly  typical in that. But over the last ten to fifteen years it has become plain to  me that members of other ethnic and religious groups are very interested in  their particular racial or ethnic identity, and had no hesitation whatever in  identifying themselves as members of particular ethno-cultural groups and  promoting the interests of those groups. So, in short, what's going on here is  everybody else is playing the game of identity politics, and white Australians  are willy-nilly being forced to play catch-up in that game...
Michael  Duffy : What do you think the university is so afraid of? Why are they making  such persistent efforts to respond to what you've done?
Andrew Fraser : Well, you know, this is a funny sort of question, because it  seems to me it says something about the distinctive ethnic character of white  Europeans. I think what's going on here is that what distinguishes white  Europeans from other ethnic groups is a kind of competitive altruism. We really  do feel as if we need to sacrifice our interests for the benefit of other  groups, and it makes us feel good when we do that. So to be anti-racist is to  prove one's moral superiority.
Michael Duffy : Do you think the Sudanese people around Parramatta would have  been offended or hurt by what you said?
Andrew Fraser : Well, they claimed to have been. I personally don't believe it.  I mean, I think really, once again, it's a stick to beat me and white Australia  over the head with. They are a group of people who, once again, have a clear  sense of their identity as Africans, and a clear desire to promote their  particular ethnic interests.
***
My published articles are archived at iSteve.com -- Steve Sailer
 
 
 
 Posts
Posts
 
 
 
 
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment