Not According to Gene Researchers: Study Shows Genetics Influences Choices in Friends, Mates" -- Lee Dye of ABC News explains J.P. Rushton's latest study;
- The  reason our friends seem a bit kooky, and our mates may seem strange compared to  ourselves, is that opposites attract. Right?
Nope. A large body of research suggests that we pick our friends, as well as our  mates, because underneath it all they are very much like us.
So if our friends are kooky, and our mates a bit strange, chances are we are  too.
And the latest study in this ongoing research takes it a little further. We can  blame it at least partly on our genes. People tend to like others who have the  same inheritable traits, so we often choose friends and mates who are  genetically similar to ourselves.
"People prefer their own kind," says J. Philippe Rushton, a  psychologist at the University of Western Ontario. "Extroverts favor  extroverts; traditionalists, traditionalists."
That may not jibe with your own experience, but Rushton notes that genes are not  the only players. We're not a bunch of robots that are being led around by genes  that even pick our friends. Other factors, according to the researchers, play a  significant role.
Rushton says our friends and our mates may also be a product of the "unique  environmental effects such as being in the right place at the right time."  You can't link up with an ideal mate if the two of you never meet.
Our genes, Rushton says, probably account for about a third of the reason why we  pick someone else as a friend or a mate.
"But that's still pretty strong," he says. "Let's say it's a  strong whisper from the genes."
Rushton, who has been researching this subject for 20 years, says clear patterns  emerged from a study of hundreds of identical and fraternal twins, as well as  their spouses and friends. It's no surprise that identical twins, who share 100  percent of the same genes, picked friends and mates who were very similar to  those picked by their twins.
But here's the twist. Fraternal twins, who share only 50 percent of their genes,  picked friends and spouses who are so much like themselves they could be their  brothers and sisters. And, Rushton says, so do the rest of us. "It's almost  as similar as siblings," he says. "Not quite, but almost."   [More]
When thinking about how  much genes drive behavior, it's often useful to think about how surprisingly  different siblings can be. Don't leading men Jeff Bridges and Dennis Quaid seem  more like they would be brothers to each other than to their own real brothers,  character actors Beau Bridges and Randy Quaid respectively?
So, it's not really that amazing that best friends and spouses are as much alike  as siblings, since siblings aren't anywhere near as similar as identical twins  are.
Of course, spouses need to be different on some dimensions, otherwise you  won't get much sexual attraction. Very few people are narcissists. (That's why  homosexual relationships tend to run out of steam faster than heterosexual  relationships.)
One model might be to distinguish between sexual/romantic attraction, which is  driven more by differences; and social attraction, which is driven by  similarities. The top advice columnists in the US, the identical twin sisters  Ann Landers and Dear Abby, recommended looking for somebody to marry who was  from a similar social background as you, but had a different personality.
Somewhat similarly, friends typically need a few differences for a particularly  good relationship so that they are complementary, with some synergy to their  pairing.
One of the most interesting things I've heard from twin expert Nancy Segal is  that identical twins seldom fall in love with the same person. Typically, they  approve of their twin's choice, but don't share the passion.
On the plus side of Ruston's genetic similarity theory, I've noticed quite a few  times that mentor-protégé pairs in business often look highly similar. For  example, Robert Redford helped launch Brad Pitt's career in A River Runs  Through It, in which director Redford had Pitt made up to look just like him  as a young man. Here's my review  of their second movie together, Spy Game, in which I discuss Rushton's  theory.
My published articles are archived at iSteve.com -- Steve Sailer
 
 
 
 Posts
Posts
 
 
 
 
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment