The Washington Post reports
Blacks are  much more likely than whites to get lung cancer from smoking cigarettes,  according to a large study that provides significant new evidence in the debate  over whether race plays an important role in health.
The eight-year study of more than 183,000 people found that blacks and ethnic  Hawaiians are about 55 percent more likely than whites to develop lung cancer  from light to moderate smoking. Japanese Americans and Latinos are about 50  percent less likely than whites, the researchers found.
Although previous studies have indicated that smoking poses varying degrees of  risk to people from different racial and ethnic backgrounds, the size and  sophistication of the study, being published in today's issue of the New England  Journal of Medicine, make it the most convincing to date, the researchers said.
"We observed quite striking differences," said Christopher A. Haiman  of the University of Southern California, who led the study. "This suggests  there are racial and ethnic differences in the smoking-related risk of lung  cancer."
The study rekindles a long-running and emotional debate about whether race is  important in understanding why some people are more prone to certain diseases,  whether treatments should be tailored to racial and ethnic groups, and whether  biological differences help explain why racial minorities are so much more  likely than whites to get sick, respond less well to treatment and die younger.
Well, that should          be "some racial minorities:" the life expectancy of,          say, Japanese-American women is now approaching 90 years.
       
        Above one pack per day of cigarettes, however, the racial effect          disappears. If you smoke as much as Edward R. Murrow, you're likely to          wind up like him no matter who your ancestors were.
       
        Can't we do better than use "Hispanic" as a racial          category in medical studies? It's an ethnic category, so it doesn't          belong in a study looking at the impact of genes. The use of          "Hispanic" confuses doctors because in the East,          "Hispanic" typically means "part black" and in the          West, it means "part Indian." Would it be impossible to teach          medical researchers and doctors to use ancient but more accurate terms          like mulatto and mestizo? I realize those are currently considered          insensitive, but needless death is more insensitive.
An interesting sidelight is  that black kids don't smoke much at all these days. Black high school students  only smoke about half  as much as white high school students.
By the way, on a tangential note, here's an NYT article  on the large number of black football running backs who play chess as a hobby.  NFL stars Shaun Alexander and Priest Holmes promote chess for children. Quite a  few black men play chess. At my old company, the guys who played chess everyday  at lunch, half were black, whereas the male workforce was probably only 1/10th  black.
The first African-American grandmaster is Maurice  Ashley, who reached that rank in 1999.
My published articles are archived at iSteve.com -- Steve Sailer
 
 
 
 Posts
Posts
 
 
 
 
 
 
1 comment:
Nice observation, thanks.
Post a Comment