As Ben  Franklin pointed out in 1751, the social basis for the superior American way  of life -- what later became known as the American Dream of a vast middle class  of prosperous home owners -- has been based on high wages and cheap land, which  are due to America's enduring lack of labor relative to the abundance of  land.
This had the side effect of encouraging American inventiveness. Clever farm boys  who were good with their hands, such as Henry Ford, eventually made America the  world's industrial giant.
In recent years, though, it has become a journalistic cliché that cheap labor  is "good for the economy." The truth is that cheap labor discourages  inventiveness.
New  machines alter agriculture's future
By Dennis Pollock / The Fresno Bee
(Updated Sunday, October 1, 2006, 7:05 AM)
In a green bean field near Fowler, hundreds of metal fingers on a machine are  doing what 66-year-old Joe Santellano's fingers did decades ago when he  harvested beans in the San Jose area.
They're picking the beans and sending them into a box — their first stop  before being hauled to Sunnyside Packing in Selma.
Santellano and Todd Hirasuna, field representatives with Sunnyside, watch the  machine make its way through the field. It's the first time they have used it.
They sort through the harvested beans and wince at those that have snapped.
Broken and misshapen beans will be culled from what is sold to retailers.
A broken bean," Hirasuna says, picking one up. "That's a necessary  evil."
But most are in perfect condition.
Plagued by rising costs for labor and worker shortages, the packinghouse bought  the $28,500 harvester this year.
The irony: Bean harvesters have been in use for about 30 years elsewhere in  the United States. Simple geography — the proximity to a huge, low-cost labor  force in Mexico — virtually had kept them out of California fields until  now.  [Emphasis mine.]
Severe spot-labor shortages, crackdowns on illegal immigration and planned  increases in the minimum wage have opened California's doors to existing  machinery, fostered research and development to meet niche agricultural needs  and taken talk of orchard robots out of the realm of science fiction...
Growers shied from the expense in days past, Stich said.
"But now, there is a serious question of whether the labor will be  there," he said...
This year's raisin harvest is nearly 70% complete, and for the first time in  years, labor needs did not become an issue, said Glen Goto, who heads the Raisin  Bargaining Association. He cited two reasons: At least 40% of the crop is  mechanically harvested, and grape yields may be down as much as 30%...
Countries where low-cost labor is in short supply have been in the  machine-farming vanguard. Australians and Italians, for example, pioneered using  machines to prune grapevines, said Maxwell Norton, a University of California  farm adviser for Merced County...
Selma grower Bill Chandler said he saw pickers in apple orchards standing on  moveable platforms instead of ladders in Spain.
The practice could be spreading into California. For the second time this year,  a grower of pears used the platform technique in Lake County, where thousands of  tons of the fruit were left to rot this year because of a worker shortage.
Rachel Elkins, a UC farm adviser for Lake and Mendocino counties, said the  self-propelled platform, which rolls through the orchard on wheels, is being  evaluated by the Agricultural Ergonomic Research Center at UC Davis and others  for productivity, fruit quality, costs and other matters.
An advantage of the platform approach, Elkins said, is that it could broaden the  pool of workers, adding some who are unable or unwilling to wrestle with long  ladders in the orchards. Moreover, it may cut down on workers' compensation  claims.
In other words, fewer  injured workers.
Agricultural economist William Bailey points out in Farm  Week:
"American agriculture faces intense global competition. The effect of encouraging the continued use of inexpensive immigrant labor may have the unintended consequence of reducing the competitiveness of American agriculture."
This is especially true for the ultra-labor intensive farms of California, a state second only to Hawaii in cost of living in this country. To compete with overseas growers, it doesn't make much sense for California farms to follow a labor intensive strategy because the cost of living in California is so high.
My published articles are archived at iSteve.com -- Steve Sailer
 
 
 
 Posts
Posts
 
 
 
 
 
 
1 comment:
The greedy capitalist employers know when it's best to replace workers with machines.
The long-run benefit is achieved by taking advantage of whatever is cheapest and still does the job, keeping down the cost, letting competition determine when it's time to replace those workers with machines.
No need to artificially drive up wages = higher cost of production = higher prices. Lower prices are best for consumers, especially the poor, not artificially-high labor cost.
Post a Comment