A reader who was an inner city social worker comments:
Now I'm soooooo confused! As you point out, Charles Murray in his article "The Inequality Taboo," has "calculated that 60% of the babies born to black women who began participating in the National Longitudinal Study of Youth in 1979 were born to women with IQs below the black female average of 85.7. Only 7% were born to black women with IQs over 100."
But wait, weren't all those [low IQ, lower class] women having abortions? That's what genius economist Steven Levitt says in his super-brilliant book *Freakonomics,* where he tells us that abortion cut crime substantially because it kept hordes of little ghetto marauders from being born. Well, OK, Levitt doesn’t exactly put it that way, but we all know what he means (nudge, nudge, wink, wink).
If we are to believe Murray's figures, then it would seem that the black women who had abortions must actually have been the *brighter* ones -- whose children (had they been born), would statistically have been less likely to commit crimes than those born to lower-IQ women.
Could this mean that Levitt is, ahem, wrong?
That's what I told Levitt back in 1999: that the most likely explanation for why the serious violent crime rate show up among those born after abortion was legalized was that legalized abortion hollowed out the black middle class, while the black underclass just let s--- happen all the way to the maternity ward.
My published articles are archived at iSteve.com -- Steve Sailer
No comments:
Post a Comment