A reader writes:
I'm          currently in a Federal Criminal Law class [at famous law school A] . My          professors are 1) a current federal          prosecutor and 2) a federal judge.
   
      We spent several hours on the federal death penalty [FDP], and more than          half of that time was used to talk about the racial disparities in the          FDP. Blacks make up about 50% of FDP prosecutions, though I believe          (this wasn't mentioned in the class) that they tend to have a lower          proportion of actual death sentences than whites when measured against          prosecution rate (the Great White Defendant effect among juries, maybe?          In either case, it's a question for people more knowledgeable than me).
    
      Rather than focusing on things more properly in the ambit of a law          school course, such as the actual statutes or caselaw affecting the          subject, the class discussion meandered widely and vaguely over this          topic of race - about how "troubling" and          "disturbing" it all as, how it pointed to inherent inequities          in the justice system, etc. Notably, this went on and on without the          professor ever actually coming out and saying with finality something          like, "the system is racist."
    
      The discussion turned to the actual question of causal factors only near          the end. Which is in itself somewhat striking - the implication          throughout had been that no evidence of causation was needed: the fact          that the FDP results were racially disproportionate to population was          taken as res ipsa          loquitur ["the thing speaks for itself"] by everyone          there. Anyway, after reviewing many common theories of how racism might          have produced the skewed results, the professor tossed out the          observation that, "And there's one guy who says blacks just commit          more murders than anyone else. [laugh, shrug] Which I really just don't          buy, frankly." There were the perfunctory snorts of laughter from          most of the students as well.
According to the website of the federal Bureau of Justice Statistics "Blacks were 7 times more likely than whites to commit homicide in 2002." Blacks, who make up about 1/8th of the population, have committed about 52% of the homicides since 1976. Historian Roger Lane has demonstrated that the black-white murder gap has existed in Philadelphia all the way back through 1839.
Now,         as a natural coward when it comes to social situations like this, I         declined to mention anything as rude as the actual statistics. No matter         how definitively I showed that reality was starkly at odds with their         beliefs, I would have been a racist for saying so. I mean, really, why         would I know such a thing unless I was a closet KKK-er looking for         reasons to justify my obvious hatred of blacks?
   
      It was an amazing thing to watch nonetheless. Here you had an elite         educated cohort of individuals looking at an issue which will one day be         within their professional ken and for which there were readily available         and unambiguous statistics, and every one of them to the individual         person was studiously looking away.
Something else         that's characteristic is that this law school is located in an expensive         inner suburb of a city with a notoriously dangerous black ghetto. Most         of the law students in that class, when looking for housing, have         personally thought long and hard about the tradeoff between the cheap         rents available in the blacker parts of town versus the physical safety         of living in the high rent whiter parts of town. Yet, there is zero         connection in the minds of these high IQ people between their personal         lives and this issue.
   
      An awful lot of supposedly intellectual discourse in America is intended         not at all to discover the truth, but to demonstrate status and to         inculcate the proper status markers in young aspirants to the elite.         This lengthy session at a top law school serves to demonstrate to future         lawyers that the better sort of lawyer is too refined to mention the         bleeding obvious. Only crass, unrefined people use Occam's Razor when         thinking about social issues. Analogies to Victorian socialization of         the upwardly mobile to never mention anything having to do with sex are         obvious.
My published articles are archived at iSteve.com -- Steve Sailer
 
 
 
 Posts
Posts
 
 
 
 
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment