Senate passes Virtual Open Border bill 62-36:
SENATE          PASSES IMMIGRATION BILL
        By Charles Hurt
        THE WASHINGTON TIMES
       
        The Senate easily approved an immigration bill that allows 10 million          illegal aliens to become citizens, more than doubles the flow of legal          immigration each year and will cost U.S. taxpayers an estimated $54          billion over the next ten years.
       
        Even before the early-evening vote, the leaders of both parties are          hailing its passage as a historic success. The bill passed 62-36.
       
        "We've taken a bill, and we've made it better," said Majority          Leader Bill Frist, the only member of the GOP leadership in the Senate          to actually support the bill's final passage. "We've taken a bill          that the American people would have concluded was amnesty and by my          lights, we took the amnesty out while we put the security in."
       
        As they prepared to vote, senators on both sides of the aisle tearfully          congratulated one another and themselves for all their hard work in          producing the legislation. Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, Massachusetts          Democrat and leading proponent of the bill, called it "the most          far-reaching immigration reform in our history."
       
        Several Democrats facing re-election this year joined Republican          conservatives in opposing the first major overhaul of the nation's          immigration system in twenty years. They said that the Senate is flatly          ignoring clear public will and that the bill would have disastrous          consequences for decades to come.
       
        "We will never solve the problem of illegal immigration by          rewarding those who break our laws," Sen. Jim DeMint, South          Carolina Republican, said. "We must stop illegal immigration by          securing the border and creating a temporary worker program that does          not reward illegal behavior with a clear path to citizenship and voting          rights."
       
        Those who voted against the bill said it should have left out the          "amnesty" provisions and instead focused solely on securing          the border and enforcing the immigration laws that have been on the          books for decades.
       
        Sen. Rick Santorum of Pennsylvania, the No. 3 Republican in the Senate,          said the bill "puts the cart before the horse" because it          grants citizenship rights to illegals, grants full-blown amnesty to          employers and opens the borders to millions of new immigrants each year.
       
        "The horse here, that I've been hearing from my constituents, is we          need a border security bill first," said Mr. Santorum, who spends          much of his time campaigning for re-election this fall. "And we          need a program that makes sure that our country's borders are secure and          that they are not a threat either to our national security or economic          security.
       
        The bill also includes approval for 350 miles of new fencing along the          border, 500 miles of vehicle barriers and authorization of 3,000 new          border patrol agents this year.
       
        But conservatives in Congress like many voters are skeptical that the          federal government will make good on promises to secure the border and          enforce the laws. They suspect that immigration reform is headed for a          repeat of the 1986 reforms that granted amnesty to 3 million aliens and          promised to seal the border. But the laws were never enforced and three          million illegals were replaced with some 12 million.
       
        "The amnesty provisions and the fact that the enforcement          provisions will not kick in immediately mean to me that this will not          solve the illegal immigration problem," Sen. David Vitter,          Louisiana Republican, said today. "This will, in fact, make the          illegal immigration problem much bigger."
But do those 62 Senators even know what they voted for?
My published articles are archived at iSteve.com -- Steve Sailer
 
 
 
 Posts
Posts
 
 
 
 
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment