is my new article in the June 19th issue of The American Conservative (subscribe here). Here's an excerpt:
The  President's patent insincerity about controlling illegal immigration has  catalyzed the realization among a rapidly growing number of conservatives that  the Bush Administration's governing principles, such as they are, are at best  only superficially conservative. Their common denominator is a lack of what  Edmund Burke emphasized as a key conservative virtue: prudence.
The foreign, domestic, and economic policies of President Bush can be summarized  as:
- Invade the world
- Invite the world
- In hock to the world
As far as Grand Strategies go, this is not the most seamless. There are palpable  contradictions in combining pugnacity abroad with welcoming tens of millions of  foreign newcomers at home while borrowing hundreds of billions from overseas to  fund our budget and trade deficits.
How did the Bush Administration wind up with such clashing priorities?
The orgy of indebtedness with which the Administration is saddling future  generations of Americans is a byproduct of the President's politically motivated  profligacy. Increasing spending is popular among powerful interest groups. And  so is cutting taxes. Why not do both at once? Why pay today what you can put off  until tomorrow (or the next President's term)?
More mysterious remain the precise reasons behind the Administration's  conversion from its 2000 campaign promise of a "modest" foreign policy  that abstained from nation-building to its wildly ambitious neoconservative  ideology of 2003.
In contrast, Mr. Bush's desire to boost immigration has never been in doubt.
While the President contended in his speech that his terms as a border state  governor prove that he grasps the importance of enforcing illegal immigration  laws, never during his 12 years in office has he displayed much eagerness to  catch aliens.
For example, the "comprehensive immigration reform" of 1986 granted  amnesty to 2.7 million current illegal aliens combined with staunch employer  sanctions to eliminate the incentive for future illegal immigration.  Unfortunately, politically powerful employers soon began corrupting the  enforcement process. Still the nadir of negligence was not reached until this  Administration. In 2004, only three employers were fined.
In the placid months before 9/11, Bush's highest priority, after tax cuts, was  working out with Mexican president Vicente Fox an immigration deal -- although  what he asked Fox to sacrifice, if anything, was never made clear. The President  of Mexico wanted to dispose of his surplus uneducated poor and the President of  the United States wanted to acquire them, perhaps on the theory that global  dominance in the 21st Century goes to the country with the most manual laborers.
My published articles are archived at iSteve.com -- Steve Sailer
 
 
 
 Posts
Posts
 
 
 
 
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment