Excerpts from my review in the upcoming American Conservative: (subscribe here):
With Tom  Cruise, the glass is always about five-eighths full. Sure, as an actor he's  memorable merely as the personification of youthful energy, and as a celebrity,  the Scientologist has turned into a pest as his once-bulletproof public  relations skills have broken down.
Yet, Cruise's movies are consistently better than they need to be. Since 2001,  he's made the artistically ambitious science fiction films "Vanilla  Sky" and "Minority  Report," the silly but magnificent-looking "Last  Samurai," and the limited but effective "Collateral" and  "War of the  Worlds." Only Russell Crowe's films have been consistently better, but  offscreen he seems too, uh, tired and emotional (as the Brit tabloids like to  say) to work as often as Cruise. Hollywood likes its leading men to set an  example for the whole film crew. "Superstars do not get where they are by  throwing temperamental fits, malingering on the set, or not following  directions," a talent agent explained to reporter Edward Jay Epstein...
Since 1983's "Risky Business," the boyish Cruise has epitomized the  shift in American preferences about the age of its heroes that began with the  replacement of the wise Dwight Eisenhower by the vigorous John F. Kennedy. Many  1930s actors, especially hard drinkers like Spencer Tracy and Clark Gable,  looked older than their years, while today's health-crazed male leads (with the  exception of that throwback, George Clooney) seem almost adolescent. (Cruise,  however, isn't quite Dorian Gray: like many 43-year-olds, his nose keeps  growing.)
Maybe you just need more energy to remain a star these days.
My published articles are archived at iSteve.com -- Steve Sailer
 
 
 
 Posts
Posts
 
 
 
 
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment