In response to my latest posting on the travails of Lonelyguys15million (here's my original item), a reader writes:
A          further comment on the dating problem for modern men. The fundamental          difficulty has been created by the over-zealous harassment laws adopted          by most American companies, forbidding employees from dating one          another.
    Women need to see men in action, being competent, reliable, and in          charge. The only place where they will see them this way is at work.          Thus Americans spend a very large amount of their time at work only to          have it ruled moot for dating purposes. Without these cues to          effectiveness and strength men are forced to compete where none of their          better qualities will come through, and women are thrown back on picking          up the most striking looking men in bars. When these then turn into          one-night stands it should come as a surprise to no-one, but apparently          it does, time and time again.
    It is true that feminists (along with lawyers) have created this barren          nightmare, because they have tried to pretend that when women find men          in authority attractive (i.e. in positions that reveal their          marriageable strengths) this means that the men are somehow abusing          their position. But they aren’t necessarily: they are simply          demonstrating those qualities that women most look for in a mate. Women          will gravitate to them—but the men are forced to ignore them if they          want to keep their jobs.
Another reader          writes about the decline of dances attended by all generations, which          were a big part of finding a spouse in, say, Pride and Prejudice          and Gone With the Wind. Nowadays, wedding receptions are just          about the only surviving examples.
    Another reader notes:
It wasn't  the electric guitar that killed off multigenerational socializing; it was the  explicit sexuality of the music. If you're getting the generations together for  the purposes of making a new one, you have to have plausible deniability that  that's what you're doing and you can't enflame the passions of the young men.  Otherwise lots of people are going to be too embarrassed to show and the ones  that do are going to end up jumping the gun out back.
I have been involved with some social groups centered around electronic dance  music, and while there are babies and young children present, there is a general  consensus to exclude the nubile and marriageable, because the adults don't want  to deal with the drama.
Making marriages happen used to be a huge part of what leisured women did;  preparing young women for the season in London, for example, was an enormous  undertaking and something that was generally understood as worth doing. Young  people at risk for heartbreak are a burden, and only a group that wants to  perpetuate itself will take on that burden.
I started my children playing traditional Irish music because it's inherently  valuable, but also I expect them to meet their wives in this context. Very few  people think like this. It's a pity.
My published articles are archived at iSteve.com -- Steve Sailer
 
 
 
 Posts
Posts
 
 
 
 
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment