My published articles are archived at iSteve.com -- Steve Sailer
Second: You can make a tax deductible contribution via VDARE by clicking here. (Paypal and credit cards accepted, including recurring "subscription" donations.) UPDATE: Don't try this at the moment.
Third: send money via the Paypal-like Google Wallet to my Gmail address (that's isteveslrATgmail.com -- replace the AT with a @). (Non-tax deductible.)
Here's the Google Wallet FAQ. From it: "You will need to have (or sign up for) Google Wallet to send or receive money. If you have ever purchased anything on Google Play, then you most likely already have a Google Wallet. If you do not yet have a Google Wallet, don’t worry, the process is simple: go to wallet.google.com and follow the steps." You probably already have a Google ID and password, which Google Wallet uses, so signing up Wallet is pretty painless.
You can put money into your Google Wallet Balance from your bank account and send it with no service fee.
Or you can send money via credit card (Visa, MasterCard, AmEx, Discover) with the industry-standard 2.9% fee. (You don't need to put money into your Google Wallet Balance to do this.)
Google Wallet works from both a website and a smartphone app (Android and iPhone -- the Google Wallet app is currently available only in the U.S., but the Google Wallet website can be used in 160 countries).
Or, once you sign up with Google Wallet, you can simply send money via credit card, bank transfer, or Wallet Balance as an attachment from Google's free Gmail email service. Here's how to do it.
(Non-tax deductible.)
Fourth: if you have a Wells Fargo bank account, you can transfer money to me (with no fees) via Wells Fargo SurePay. Just tell WF SurePay to send the money to my ancient AOL email address steveslrATaol.com -- replace the AT with the usual @). (Non-tax deductible.)
Fifth: if you have a Chase bank account (or, theoretically,other bank accounts), you can transfer money to me (with no fees) via Chase QuickPay (FAQ). Just tell Chase QuickPay to send the money to my ancient AOL email address (steveslrATaol.com -- replace the AT with the usual @). If Chase asks for the name on my account, it's Steven Sailer with an n at the end of Steven. (Non-tax deductible.)
Posts
27 comments:
Like the saying goes:
Q: What is the golden rule?
A: He who has the gold makes the rules.
The only question is what if Slim buys more papers or even TV networks?
Has the Times ever editorialized against the 'war on drugs' (aside from the usual hand-wringing about sentence disparities between crack and powdered coke)? Some kid gets busted with a quarter ounce of weed and has to wear pink underwear in a tent for a couple of months -- and the Times is silent. An illegal immigrant ends up in Arpaio's jail -- because he's not supposed to be here -- and it's a disgrace.
I like the bit about Arpaio's America of "mob rule".
I searched in vain for any reference to a "mob" but came up short.
They are projecting their Kristallnacht phobia on all white gentiles again, I am afraid.
Yeah, they sure did duck the pink underwear angle when they hammered on the prison stripes.
If they got their knickers in a knot about Arpaio demeaning the macho Mexicans by dressing them in pink underwear, their homosexual readership would have had a seizure laughing their @ss off.
I can just imagine Michael Musto's comments in the Village Voice!
He who pays the piper, calls the tune.
This is true, and "Slim Times" is clever, but the NYT has been running these kinds of stories for ages. If we really want to get out of this mess we can't pretend it's *Mexicans* calling the tune - need to look at maybe, ahem, some other ethnic group.
Yeah, WASPy SWPL.
"If we really want to get out of this mess we can't pretend it's *Mexicans* calling the tune - need to look at maybe, ahem, some other ethnic group."
Hmm, let's see, Rove is of Norwegian background, Bush is a Yankee WASP "Brahmin" pretending to be a Texan and Teddy Kennedy is Irish.
So which white ethnic group is "calling the tune"?
testing99 said...
Yeah, WASPy SWPL.
Ah, like clockwork. You never disappoint, testy.
Why do I so strongly suspect that the grandparents of "Testing99/Evil Neocon" (and also the grandparents of all the Testing99/Evil Neocon clones) were absolutely fanatical public defenders of the innocence of the "murdered Rosenbergs"...
For all the endless talk of IQ-this and IQ-that, it seems pretty obvious to me that innate dishonesty and associated negative personality traits are heavily genetically-influenced and highly heritable.
I wouldn't be surprised if their heritability coefficient weren't considerably higher than that for IQ, and their micro- and macro- impact on social behavior patterns also much greater.
Maybe someone should ask Bernie Madoff whether he agrees with this analysis...
The only question is what if Slim buys more papers or even TV networks?
What, like Slim is moving the meter perceptibly on the issue? I know it sucks to lose our old nativist ally The New York Times. Slim should give a ton of money to La Raza, then maybe he could get them off the xenophobic bandwagon and move them into the pro-illegal column, too.
He's just pouring his money down a rathole.
Hmm, let's see, Rove is of Norwegian background, Bush is a Yankee WASP "Brahmin" pretending to be a Texan and Teddy Kennedy is Irish. So which white ethnic group is "calling the tune"?
Indeed. We don't need Jews to screw up the country - our own WASP elite would do quite well on its own.
Let's import Japan's elites.
Hmm, let's see, Rove is of Norwegian background, Bush is a Yankee WASP "Brahmin" pretending to be a Texan and Teddy Kennedy is Irish.
So which white ethnic group is "calling the tune"?
Uh... not the piper(s)? Isn't that the point?
Who essentially paid the various pipers you mention (via campaign contributions, media coverage, etc.)?
Seriously, "Slim Times", geez... did anyone have the balls to call it the "Sulzberger Times" less than a year ago?
Mexicans are an easy target. The ethnic group with real power is the ethnic group you can't criticize.
Yeah, WASPy SWPL.
:). Funny, nobody cares if we criticize WASPs. Hell, they don't even get to choose their own name.
That isn't quite accurate; criticism of WASPs isn't ignored, it's encouraged.
Now who can't we criticize...?
Russia rattles sabres in Obama’s direction
The double-act of Dmitry Medvedev and Vladimir Putin has come up with a series of security initiatives that seem designed to provoke, or at least irritate, the new administration in Washington. Without even waiting to hear how President Barack Obama intends to conduct his relations with Moscow – something that Joe Biden, his vice-president, may well address on Saturday at the annual Munich Security Conference – the Russian leaders have thrown down the gauntlet.
LoL. Didn't the Russians get the memo about the Messiah, Lord Hopenchange? Apparently they did, but they're not using the right Tranzlator.
They didn't even wait to have a "dialogue". Seems to me the Russians know fish when they smell it.
Not to put too fine a point on it, but Obama is the embodiment of America's spiritual decadence and its culture of appeasement. Why would Russians see him as anything else?
Its just amazing how obvious and quick the turnaround at the NYT was. At least this new Mexican mouthpiece now has an appropriate name: the Slim Times, ST.
"Why do I so strongly suspect that the grandparents of "Testing99/Evil Neocon" (and also the grandparents of all the Testing99/Evil Neocon clones) were absolutely fanatical public defenders of the innocence of the "murdered Rosenbergs"..."
testing99 claims to be of Scots-Irish desecent. He's also a big apologist for Gen Sherman. Sounds sketchy to me.
Another saying:
He who kill goose with gold egg no longer have much to sing about.
Nobody called it the Sulzberger times (except, I remember people doing that, but never mind), because really, do you think people would say "oh wow, the 'Sulzberger Times', he's really sticking his neck out by observing that the NYT is owned by a JEW, most people would never even suspect THAT. I mean there are so few Jews in New York City, and they are so completely powerless, that this comes as a true revelation".
A Mexican bailing out the NYT is more interesting. Maybe their editorial slant isn't really changed by Carlos Slim, but their continued EXISTENCE may depend on him, and he wants them to exist because their slant suits him, so calling it the Slim Times is quite appropriate.
"testing99 claims[!] to be of Scots-Irish desecent. He's also a big apologist for Gen Sherman. Sounds sketchy to me."
Ha, ha, ha!
Look, anyone who bothers reading just a few of "testing99's" massively long-winded comments quickly becomes aware that the good gentleman is an absolutely pathological liar about just about everything. But we're safe to assume he's nonetheless telling the truth about his own ethnicity.
And everyone knows that Americans of Scots-Irish ancestry regard themselves as "neocons," are totally obsessed with the ongoing Middle East Conflict and Muslims, are massively paranoid about the rising dangers of "anti-Semitism" in America and worldwide, and just love General Sherman's military methods during Civil War.
Poor "Testing99"---he's a little like one of all those stone-throwing bearded "non-women" in Monty Python's Life of Brian. Nope, no women to be seen there.
As I said, pathological dishonesty is pretty clearly a highly-heritable trait with strong genetic influence...
I am glad the times is coming out against these nativists. Now, its time to apply that to those nativists that want their state to remain:
a. an ethno religious idenity state
b. allow immigration of only one race
c. give special citizenship rights to that race.
I am sure editor ROSENTHAL is cooking something up right now.
>>>>Let's import Japan's elites.<<<<
That's like telling Finland's elites to immigrate to Kenya.
Damn those Ulster Scots anyway. They've got everyone thinking that "Scots-Irish" is synonomous with "Southerner". Even though the most famous TV show about the South was called "The Andy GRIFFITH Show", whose protagonist looked a perfect Welshman, like a lot of Southerners.
Not to mention all the actual Irish (from colonial times, not the 19th century wave), highland Scots, German Lutherans, French Huguenots, and of course plain old Englishmen. None of these were small, insignificant groups - you can find some sizeable area of one or more Southern states where each of these formed a preponderance of colonists. My guess is that this Scots-Irish thing is a fad propagated by people trying to pick out some kind of coherent heritage from the crazy morass that was (is) the American South..
Smash!
That`d be fine if white people would decide what their `race` is. It wasn`t that long ago that Hitler thought himself greater than the dirty Slavs of Eastern Europe. Right now a lot of people have jumped on the white pride bandwagon. If they ever succeed at their goal, I wonder how long it would be until they turned on each other once again.
From that James Webb article in Parade:
It is estimated that there are more than 27 million descendants of the Scots-Irish migration now living in the U.S. Because people from this culture also identify themselves as of Scottish, English or Irish descent, the actual number is probably much higher.
The press, Census Bureau or whoever has a way of splitting up the British ethnic as a way to shrink their numbers. I've often seen reports that the largest ethnic group in America is "German" (though it's now probably "Hispanic"). And yet Irish, Scottish, English and Welsh always get split out, not to mention the "Americans" whose lineage disappears into the ether and whose heritage is probably disproportionately British.
The irony is that at the time of their immigration all the "Scots," "Scots-Irish," "English," "Welsh," and "Irish" belonged to a single, fairly unified country, while Germans and Italians often did not, or else just barely.
Moreover, people with recent , generally non-British immigrants on one side of their family and distant, unknown, and often British ancestry on the other tend to identify with the portion of their ethnicity which they know. Besides, the anti-British media encourages them in the effort.
Post a Comment